Hi Gary,
Yes, even the research for the book has been poorly done and stretched into what I would call wishful thinking on the part of the author.
It's kind of like having a dream, then writing it down as a novel because it was so interesting during the dream.
Most dreams are only really interesting to the person having the dream.
However, in this case, it has become an international best-seller. Just as our language has gone downhill in a hurry in the past century, so the level of intelligence needed to amuse us has gone downhill, too, as is painfully evident in the success of this error-ridden manuscript.
It's interesting that I just read an article in Reader's Digest about an American woman who is hosting the Da Vinci Code tour in Paris, visiting various locations mentioned in the book. Her tour is immensely popular, but a big disappointment to most people who take it when they realize that even the "facts" about the settings are actually pure fiction.
I believe that unless your writing science fiction or other world fantasy, accurately depicting location is a key to making a book interesting and readable.
Thanks for your comments, Gary.
God bless,
Dave
|