Hi:
==========================================
Linda, do I have to worry about either of these syndication things right now? If not, I'll put my fingers in my ears and go 'lalalalala' while you and Winston are talking about it, lol.
==========================================
You can put your fingers in your ears. lol
Personally, I think RSS and syndication has potential - but will be more so when some of the garbage has died out.
I compare it to the dot-bomb era compared to today. In the beginning, everyone thought they could slap anything online and make millions. Then companies started falling hard.
For a while, companies didn't take the internet seriously. After all, look at all those big companies with deep pockets - if they didn't make it, no one can, right? (wrong)
After a while, people began to realize that the Internet does offer us an unparalleled way to communicate with potential customers - but we still need sound business practices to make a go of it. Registering a dot-com and throwing money at it without a sound plan doesn't work.
We discovered it's not about the money. It's about the know how. Surprise, surprise.
Same thing with RSS. People think everything needs an RSS feed -- and as a result, there's a lot of garbage in the blogosphere right now. There's a lot of software that posts to blogs. There's a lot of blog spam.
Every marketer out there thinks they "neeeeed" to get their sales pitches out by RSS. They fall all over CMS systems (content management) because -- drumroll -- they have RSS feeds build in. Heck, man, RSS is the way to bypass email filters, dontcha know?
Of course, they don't realize that not all CMS systems are even search engine compatible - but they'll figure that out eventually, too.
But, over time, RSS will evolve, get sane and get power... just like marketing online did.
So - you can plug your ears for now. I'm still voting for good content that people actually want to come back for. At least for now.
: )
Linda
|