Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/17/2013 9:44:55 PM

The Week

Obama's sinking ratings: 3 reasons the White House should worry

By Harold Maass | The Week7 hrs ago

A new poll shows that trust in the president is slipping

President Obama's poll numbers plunged over the last month, as the White House faced a backlash over several controversies, including revelations about the National Security Agency's phone and online data-mining programs. A CNN/ORC Internationalsurvey released Monday found that Obama's approval rating had dropped by eight percentage points to 45 percent, his lowest in 18 months.

The poll marked a first for Obama — one he won't relish — with half of respondents saying they didn't believe he was honest and trustworthy. Americans were split on the controversial NSA program that tracks phone logs, although they supported the agency's targeting of internet traffic linked to foreign terrorism suspects overseas.

SEE ALSO: The QT: Who Sarah Palin is palling around with, Florida's pest invasions, and more

The news was not all bad for the White House, but it gave the administration plenty of good reasons to be concerned about Obama's ability to pursue his agenda early in his second term. Here are three particularly troubling signs for Obama:

1. Obama's base is wavering
"The biggest concern for Obama and the Democrats," says Joe Gandelman at The Moderate Voice, "should be news that he has quickly lost a chunk of two pillars of his traditional support": Voters under age 30, and independents. "And this can't be good news for the Democrats heading into the mid-term elections," says Gandelman. "It also means Obama is likely to have an even harder time in Congress with the Republicans, who'll look at this and conclude that Obama is now politically on the ropes."

SEE ALSO: WATCH: Australia's army chief demonstrates how you address sex abuse

2. The trust problem could grow
"With a majority not finding the president trustworthy," says Rick Moran at American Thinker, "and the ObamaCare rollout making everyone antsy, expect the president's approval to continue to slide over the next few months." More than six in 10 Americans now believe the U.S. government is so big and powerful that it threatens our liberty. That does not bode well for the person at the top of that government. "It will be a summer of discontent in America with the target of people's angst being the president," says Moran.

3. GOP attacks are starting to stick
"Scandal Mania" appears to be what has torpedoed Obama's approval rating, notes Taylor Marsh at her blog. Not all of the Republican criticism of Obama and his administration is valid, of course, but now that the attacks are gaining traction that is not really what counts. "When there are cumulative news events that raise question about trust, it hardly matters that the Benghazi terrorist attack onslaught has been proven incorrect on the facts, or that the White House had nothing to do with the IRS snooping on conservatives groups."

SEE ALSO: Mad Men recap: 'The Quality of Mercy'

Obama's brand has been damaged by a contagion of news stories, not all fair but still having a cumulative effect, depicting a president who seems unrecognizable to many Americans compared to the person who came into office in 2008. [Taylor Marsh]

View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/18/2013 10:00:25 AM
The Week

'This country is worth dying for,' and other revelations from Edward Snowden's Q&A

By Keith Wagstaff | The Week – 20 hrs ago

The NSA leaker took to the internet to defend his actions and answer questions about the government's surveillance program

Ever since Edward Snowden revealed himself as the NSA leaker, reporters and critics have been busy trying to poke holes in his story. On Monday, Snowden attempted to clear things up with a live Q&A at The Guardian's website.

He answered questions about factual inconsistencies in his narrative, why he fled to Hong Kong, and what data NSA analysts have access to. A look at his most revealing answers given by Snowden during his hour-plus live-chat.

SEE ALSO: The QT: Who Sarah Palin is palling around with, Florida's pest invasions, and more

On his disputed salary
The original Guardian profile about Snowden implied that he made $200,000 while working as an employee of government contractor Booz Allen Hamilton. The massive consulting firm tried to distance itself from Snowden by firing him and saying that he was lying about his salary — which it put at $122,000.

Snowden defended himself on Monday, writing: "The statement I made about earnings was that $200,000 was my 'career high' salary. I had to take pay cuts in the course of pursuing specific work. Booz was not the most I've been paid."

SEE ALSO: Mad Men recap: 'The Quality of Mercy'

On why he chose to abscond to Hong Kong
Plenty of people have questioned Snowden's decision to flee to Hong Kong — a city that, despite its relative autonomy from Beijing, still is under the sovereignty of the Chinese government, which isn't exactly known for respecting its citizens' privacy.

Why not flee to Iceland, a country Snowden mentioned as a possible safe haven?

SEE ALSO: WATCH: Australia's army chief demonstrates how you address sex abuse

There was a distinct possibility I would be interdicted en route, so I had to travel with no advance booking to a country with the cultural and legal framework to allow me to work without being immediately detained. Hong Kong provided that. Iceland could be pushed harder, quicker, before the public could have a chance to make their feelings known, and I would not put that past the current U.S. administration. [The Guardian]

Others have also wondered whether Snowden's destination was a sign that he was giving secrets to the Chinese government. Snowden adamantly denied that accusation:

This is a predictable smear that I anticipated before going public, as the U.S. media has a knee-jerk "RED CHINA!" reaction to anything involving HK or the PRC, and is intended to distract from the issue of U.S. government misconduct. Ask yourself: if I were a Chinese spy, why wouldn't I have flown directly into Beijing? I could be living in a palace petting a phoenix by now. [The Guardian]

On whether the NSA has 'direct access' to the servers of major internet companies
Internet companies, including Google, Apple, and Microsoft, vehemently denied Snowden's claims that the NSA had direct access to their servers.

SEE ALSO: How typeface influences the way we read and think

On Monday, Snowden stuck by what he had said, claiming that "their denials went through several revisions as it become more and more clear they were misleading and included identical, specific language across companies."

As for what exactly he meant by "direct access," Snowden replied that if the NSA had access to raw communications databases, "they can enter and get results for anything they want. Phone number, email, user id, cell phone handset id (IMEI), and so on - it's all the same. The restrictions against this are policy based, not technically based, and can change at any time."

SEE ALSO: WATCH: Miss Utah spectacularly flubs her Miss USA question

On the NSA allegedly hacking Hong Kong computers
In an interview with the South China Morning Post, Snowden claimed that the NSA was conducting secret attacks on the computers of Hong Kong civilians, an action he called "ethically dubious." He was asked to justify his revealing of information about how the United States gathers foreign intelligence:

Congress hasn't declared war on the countries - the majority of them are our allies - but without asking for public permission, NSA is running network operations against them that affect millions of innocent people. And for what? So we can have secret access to a computer in a country we're not even fighting? So we can potentially reveal a potential terrorist with the potential to kill fewer Americans than our own Police? No, the public needs to know the kinds of things a government does in its name, or the "consent of the governed" is meaningless. [The Guardian]

On facing criticism from politicians
"Being called a traitor by Dick Cheney is the highest honor you can give an American, and the more panicked talk we hear from people like him ... the better off we all are," Snowden wrote. "If they had taught a class on how to be the kind of citizen Dick Cheney worries about, I would have finished high school."

SEE ALSO: 10 secrets of the Vatican exposed

On the danger he feels he faces
Snowden seemed convinced his life was in danger. "All I can say right now is the U.S. Government is not going to be able to cover this up by jailing or murdering me," he wrote. "Truth is coming, and it cannot be stopped."

When asked what he would tell other people who were in a position to leak information on the "intelligence apparatus of the USA," Snowden answered: "This country is worth dying for."

SEE ALSO: The last word: He said he was leaving. She ignored him.

Read the entire Q&A session at The Guardian.

View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/18/2013 10:02:39 AM

Hamas urges former ally Hezbollah to leave Syria


Associated Press/Bilal Hussein - Injured Hezbollah fighters listen to a speech by Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah on a screen via a video link during a rally to mark "wounded resistant's day," in the southern suburb of Beirut, Lebanon, Friday, June 14, 2013. Nasrallah said his group will continue to fight in Syria “wherever needed,” and said he has made a “calculated” decision to defend Syria and is ready to bear all consequences. (AP Photo/Bilal Hussein)

RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) — The Palestinian militant group Hamas on Monday urged Lebanon'sHezbollah militia to withdraw its fighters from Syria and accused it of stoking sectarian tensions, leveling unprecedented public criticism against a former ally.

The Hamas statement came as the region's Sunni and Shiite Muslims are lining up on opposite sides of Syria's civil war. Most of those trying to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad are Sunnis, as are their regional backers. Assad and key members of his regime are Alawites, followers of an offshoot of Shiite Islam, and he is being supported by Shiite Iran, also the main backer of Hezbollah.

Last month, Hezbollah sharply raised its profile in the fighting in Syria, playing a key role in the Assad regime's capture of the strategic rebel-held town of Qusair. Many Sunni hard-liners have taken Hezbollah's intervention as a declaration of war by Shiites, and some have urged Sunnis to fight alongside the rebels.

Hamas, a Sunni movement, on Monday criticized Hezbollah over its growing role in the Syria conflict. In a statement, Hamas called on Hezbollah to "withdraw its forces from Syria and keep its weapons directed at the Zionist enemy (Israel)." Hamas also said that sending forces to Syria "contributed to the sectarian polarization in the region."

Hamas and Hezbollah used to be part of the self-proclaimed Iranian and Syrian-led "axis of resistance" against Israel. Hamas leaders in exile were based in Syria, and both Hamas and Hezbollah received funds and weapons from Iran.

Hamas leaders left Syria last year to protest Assad's crackdown on fellow Sunnis. Since then, Hamas has drifted away from Iran and moved closer to the region's Sunni camp led by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, though it has not formally cut ties with Tehran.

Hamas and Hezbollah played important roles in Iran's attempt to set up heavily armed proxies on opposite sides of Israel — Hamas in the Gaza Strip and Hezbollah in southern Lebanon.

For years, Hamas and Hezbollah enjoyed close ties.

Two decades ago, when Israel deported hundreds of Islamic militants from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip to south Lebanon for a year, leaders of Hamas had a chance to meet face-to-face with Hezbollah leaders. The office of the Hamas representative in Lebanon is located in a heavily guarded Hezbollah stronghold in southern Beirut. Hamas officials have said Hezbollah has shared its military experience with their group.

Two Hamas officials in Gaza said Monday's statement is a result of growing outrage within Hamas over Hezbollah's involvement in Syria. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they did not want to pre-empt the movement's top leaders who have been meeting in Cairo since Sunday.

On Saturday, the Hamas representative in Lebanon, Ali Barakeh, met with a member of the Hezbollah political bureau, Hassan Hubballah.

Hezbollah said in a statement that the two discussed "the existential challenges facing the Muslim and Arab world today, particularly the war on Syria," but it did not elaborate.

____

Associated Press writer Zeina Karam in Beirut contributed reporting.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/18/2013 10:05:04 AM

Rowhani's 'path of moderation' also shows limits


Associated Press/Ebrahim Noroozi - Iranian newly elected President Hasan Rowhani, listens during a press conference, in Tehran, Iran, Monday, June 17, 2013. Rowhani showcases his reformist image by promising a "path of moderation," the easing of nuclear tensions and steps to narrow the huge divide with the United States. He also make clear where he won’t go, saying he opposes any halt to uranium enrichment, at the heart of the nuclear standoff. (AP Photo/Ebrahim Noroozi)

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iran's newly elected president showcased his reform-leaning image Monday by promising a "path of moderation" that includes greater openness on Tehran's nuclear program and overtures to Washington. He also made clear where he draws the line: No halt to uranium enrichment and no direct U.S. dialogue without a pledge to stay out of Iranian affairs.

Hasan Rowhani's first post-victory news conference was a study in what may make his presidency tick.

Rowhani may be hailed as a force for change, but he also appears to carry a deep and self-protective streak of pragmatism. He knows he can only push his views on outreach and detente as far as allowed by the country's real powers, the ruling clerics and their military protectors, the Revolutionary Guard.

Many of Rowhani's statements reflected these boundaries, which could later expand or contract depending on how much the theocracy wants to endorse his agenda.

When he appealed to treat "old wounds" with the U.S., he also echoed the ruling clerics' position that no breakthroughs can occur as long as Washington is seen as trying to undermine their hold on power. Rowhani's urging for greater "nuclear transparency" as a path to roll back sanctions was also punctuated by a hard-liner stance: No chance to stop the uranium enrichment labs at the heart of the stalemate with the West and its allies.

Rowhani spoke eloquently about a "new era" on the international stage but avoided direct mention of the sweeping crackdowns at home since the disputed re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejadin 2009.

At the end of the news conference, a spectator — whose identity was not immediately known — yelled out for the release of opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi, who has been under house arrest for more than two years. Rowhani smiled but made no comment.

"You can make any kind of promises you want," said Merhzad Boroujerdi, director of the Middle East Studies program at Syracuse University. "At the end of the day, it's the ruling clerics that decide whether they go anywhere."

There is no doubt, however, that the overall tone of Rowhani's remarks resonates well in the West. The White House and others have already signaled cautious hope that Rowhani's presence could open new possibilities on diplomacy and efforts to break the impasse over Tehran's disputed nuclear program after four failed negotiating rounds since last year.

Even so, the Obama administration won't welcome Rowhani's election with any new nuclear offer.

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the U.S. is open to new nuclear talks with Iran. But Washington and its international partners first want a response to an offer of sanctions relief for Iranian nuclear concessions they presented in April.

"The ball is in Iran's court," Psaki said Monday in Washington.

If nothing else at the Tehran news conference, the contrast was vivid with Ahmadinejad and his hectoring style.

"We are on a path of moderation. ... We have to enhance mutual trust between Iran and other countries," Rowhani told journalists. "We have to build trust."

Rowhani appeared to borrow phrases from another cleric-president, reformist Mohammad Khatami, who preceded Ahmadinejad and opened a range of social and political freedoms that have been largely swept aside in the lockdown atmosphere of recent years.

"The basis of politics is constructive interaction with the world," said Rowhani, wearing a white turban and surrounded by violet flowers — the signature color of his campaign. "Circumstances have changed in the world by this election. ... The new atmosphere will definitely be turned into a new opportunity."

Many questions remain, though. Rowhani sidestepped the issue of Iran's close alliance with Syrian President Bashar Assad, saying only that the efforts to end the civil war and restore stability rest with the "Syrian people."

In Paris, Israel's defense minister, Moshe Yaalon, underscored worries among some Israeli officials that their Western allies could hope for Rowhani-inspired breakthroughs while Iran continues "to make progress in their military nuclear project."

Although the 64-year-old Rowhani cannot directly set key policies, he might be able to use the strength of his landslide victory and his influential connections, including with former PresidentAkbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, to shape opinions. Rowhani served as Iran's first nuclear envoy from 2003-2005 during a period of intense deal-making with Europeans.

Rowhani's aides have said he proposed an accord in 2005 with then-French President Jacques Chirac to allow uranium enrichment in exchange for the highest level of monitoring by the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog agency. The deal did not gain support from other countries such as Britain and the U.S.

In an interview last year with the Iranian magazine Mehr Nameh, Rowhani said he also received a U.S. proposal in 2004, carried by the head of the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency at the time, Mohamed ElBaradei, for direct dialogue on nuclear and other issues. Rowhani said he passed along the offer to the ruling clerics and "the decision was that we should not negotiate with the U.S."

Rowhani has not given any clear details on his advice for the current talks, which face pressure from factions in the Israel and the U.S. urging greater consideration of military options.

But Rowhani appears to favor the general contours of the reported French-backed deal for greater openness as the way to ease Western sanctions over Iran's nuclear efforts. The sanctions have slashed oil revenue and contributed to a spike in inflation. "If sanctions have any benefits, they will only benefit Israel," he said at the news conference.

He outlined "step by step" measures to reassure the West about Iran's nuclear ambitions. The West suspects that Iran is seeking a nuclear weapon. Iranian leaders, including Rowhani, insist Iran seeks reactors only for energy and medical applications.

Enriched uranium is used as fuel for energy and research reactors but it can be further boosted to make a nuclear warhead.

"The first step will be showing greater transparency. We are ready to show greater transparency and make clear that the Islamic Republic of Iran's actions are totally within international frameworks," he said. "The second step is promoting mutual confidence. We'll take measures in both fields. The first goal is that no new sanctions are imposed. Then, that the (existing) sanctions are reduced."

Rowhani, though, reaffirmed the positions that have contributed to the logjam in talks so far: Iran's insistence that Washington "should recognize all of Iran's rights, including the nuclear rights."

He further added that any hope for one-on-one dialogue with the U.S. depends on the improbable starting point already set out by the ruling clerics. "The Americans need to specify that they will never intervene in Iran's internal affairs," Rowhani said.

"It's not easy," he said. "There is an old wound. This wound could be treated through prudence. We will not seek increasing tensions. Wisdom requires that the two nations and the two governments look to the future."

On Syria, he said the ultimate responsibility to resolve the more than two-year-old civil war should be in the hands of the "Syrian people."

"We are opposed to foreign intervention," he said. "We hope peace and tranquility will return to Syria through cooperation with countries of the region and world."

Rowhani formally takes office in August. In the meantime, it appears Ahmadinejad's political foes could be plotting a payback, underscoring the often cutthroat nature of internal Iranian affairs.

Iran's official news agency said a criminal court summoned Ahmadinejad over a lawsuit filed by the country's parliament speaker and others.

The report gave no further details, but Ahmadinejad and the speaker, Ali Larijani, have waged political feuds for years. The court has set a November date for Ahmadinejad's appearance, it said.

___

Murphy reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Bradley Klapper in Washington contributed to this report.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/18/2013 10:07:15 AM

Palestinian statehood at 'dead end': Israeli minister


Reuters/Reuters - Naftali Bennett, smiles during a Jewish Home party meeting, at the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, in Jerusalem March 4, 2013. REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - A far-right member of the Israeli government said on Monday the idea of establishing a Palestinian state in the West Bank had reached a "dead end".

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu distanced himself from the comments, but the Palestinian chief negotiator said they were "part of Israel's plan to destroy any possibility for a Palestinian state."

Industry and Trade Minister Naftali Bennett, a leader of Jewish settlers living in occupied territory, has long opposed a Palestinian state, and his latest remarks underscored deep divisions over the issue inside Netanyahu's coalition.

"The idea that a Palestinian state will be formed in the land of Israel has come to a dead end," Bennett told a settlers' conference.

"Never in the annals of Israel have so many people expended so much energy on something so futile," said Bennett, who heads the ultranationalist Jewish Home party.

Efforts by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to revive Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, which collapsed in 2010 in a dispute over settlement expansion in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, have shown little sign of progress.

Israel captured those areas, along with the Gaza Strip, in a 1967 Middle East war.

When asked by Reuters about the comments, Netanyahu said: "Foreign policy is shaped by the prime minister and my view is clear. I will seek a negotiated settlement where you'd have a demilitarized Palestinian state that recognizes the Jewish state."

Palestinians have resisted Netanyahu's call for such recognition, fearing it would be tantamount to waiving any right of return for Palestinian refugees.

Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat said Bennett's remarks were, along with policies such as settlement expansion and demolishing Palestinian homes, part of a strategy to destroy any possibility for a future state.

He urged Western leaders to "hold Israel accountable for destroying the prospects of justice and peace."

Divisions in the Israeli cabinet over Palestinian statehood could cause the coalition to unravel should U.S. peace efforts gain speed.

The leader of the main opposition Labour Party has already pledged to support Netanyahu to offset any defections by hardliners if he clinches a deal with the Palestinians.

(Reporting by Jeffrey Heller; Editing by Robin Pomeroy)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!