Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/16/2013 9:28:56 AM

‘Very Frightening’: Prominent Catholic Prof. Claims IRS Audited Her After Speaking Out Against Obama and Demanded to Know Who Was Paying Her


Editor's note -- We'll be discussing this story and all the day's news during our live BlazeCast at 1 pm ET...including your questions, comments & live chat:

  • >Noted professor and sociologist Dr. Anne Hendershottclaims IRS may have targeted her with a 2010 audit
IRS demanded to know which groups paid her and "what their politics were" Hendershott believes her articles critical of President Barack Obama's policies and George Soros' funding of liberal Catholic groups may have spawned the IRS audit Audit was emotionally and financially expensive and scared the professor into silence
-
Prominent Professor Dr. Ann Hendershott Claims Purported Politicial IRS Audit Silenced HerHendershott

Dr. Anne Hendershot (Photo Credit: Franciscan University)

In the midst of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) scandal, individuals and groups, alike, are continuing to come forward with ever-startling allegations. On Wednesday, Dr. Anne Hendershott, a devout Catholic and a noted sociologist, professor and author, exclusively told TheBlaze that she believes she may have been one of the IRS's targets.

According to Hendershott, the IRS audited her in 2010 and demanded to know who was paying her and "what their politics were."

It all started with a phone call she received at her home in May of that year -- a call during which Hendershott was told she would be audited. A letter that followed on May 19, 2010 solidified the IRS's request to meet her in person two months later in July. While IRS investigations are certainly not uncommon occurrences, the professor believes that the situation surrounding hers was more-than-curious.

"The IRS calls my house and says ... 'I just wanted to let you know that we're going to be auditing your business' and I said 'My businesses?' and he said, 'You know the expenses you take off for writing," the academic recalls.

Hendershott was surprised she was being audited on business grounds considering she does not operate an entrepreneurial endeavor in the traditional sense. In addition to her academic work, she told TheBlaze that she occasionally freelances for Catholic outlets and for the Wall Street Journal. But can this really be considered "business" activity?

"I don't make a lot of money from writing. In fact most years I don't show a profit," she told TheBlaze.

Hendershott said some of the outlets and organizations she has written for haven't paid her a cent.

But the circumstances surrounding the irregular nature of the experience don't end there. Hendershott noted it was particularly surprising that she, alone, was audited. Her husband, who brings in the vast majority of the family's income, was not included in the IRS's inquiry -- even though the Hendershotts always files jointly.

So when the agent explained that she would need to come alone and in person to discuss her "business" activity in July of 2010, the professor was perplexed.

"[The IRS agent] didn't even let me decide when it would be good for me ... He didn't want my husband to come," she said of the meeting, which was held at an IRS office in New Haven, Connecticut.

The process was a grueling one, including many questions that Hendershott felt were political in nature. Numerous records were requested before the in-person meeting, as well as during and after.

"Every question had to do with bank deposits we made. Every single question," she said. "What is this money? And I didn't know a lot of it. We had to go to our bank and get deposits back. We had to get records showing where the money came from."

While asking about the deposits, the agent wanted to know if the monies came from groups and, if so, what the organizations' politics were.

The mention of groups, Hendershott notes, is particularly interesting, as she had been writing for numerous Catholic outlets and organizations at the time. In addition to Catholic World Report and the Catholic Advocate, she also penned op-eds for the Wall Street Journal. Many of these writings were critical of President Barack Obama and his policies.

And the plot thickens. Among the organizations she targeted in her writings were progressive groups highly supportive of Democratic causes, including: Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, Catholics United, and Catholic Democrats.

Prominent Professor Dr. Ann Hendershott Claims Purported Politicial IRS Audit Silenced Her

Credit: AP

At the time, one of the founders of Catholics United, Chris Korzen, had become a target of her work, as she exposed, in her view, his true leftist agenda and some of the complicated theological stances the left-of-center organizations he associated with were taking. Plus, there were alleged financial ties with billionaire liberal George Soros. Here's just two paragraphs from an article she wrote in March 2010, just months before her meeting with IRS officials:

On its website, Catholics United describes itself as a 501(c) (4) non-profit organization--eligible to accept donations. But, Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good emerged in 2005 as a kind of sister organization to Catholics United. A 501(c) (3) organization, donors can claim a deduction against personal income tax when they donate money to Catholics in Alliance. Reviewing the 2007 IRS 990 forms for both Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and Catholics United raises some questions, because Chris Korzen is listed as having received $84,821 in compensation for 40 hours per week from Catholics in Alliance on the group's 990 Form--even though the Catholics United website claimed he was the director there during the same time period. [...]

Despite their inability to engage in extensive lobbying, Catholics in Alliance has been extremely successful in attracting large donors. Never a friend to the Catholic Church, George Soros, one of the earliest donors, contributed $50,000 to Catholics in Alliance in 2005 and another $100,000 in 2006 through his Open Society Institute. Likewise, Smith Bagley, a major Democratic donor and fundraiser, whose wife, Elizabeth Frawley Bagley, is Chairman of the Board of Catholics in Alliance, came close to matching Soros with grants from his family's Arca Foundation. With a long history of supporting progressive organizations like ACORN, the Gamaliel Foundation, People for the American Way, and Planned Parenthood, Arca contributed $50,000 to Catholics in Alliance in 2007 and another $75,000 in 2008.

Hendershott can't help but wonder if her writings against progressive groups played a role in her audit. It's obvious that before she was notified by the IRS she was commenting regularly about matters of faith and politics and, in particular, Obamacare. While she doesn't have proof that the IRS investigation was political in nature, she has strong suspicions that it was.

"I started writing articles like crazy saying these are fake Catholic groups," she said of the aforementioned organizations, noting that Korzen would often target her work and rail against her assertions.

Hendershott noted that the progressive leader once called into a radio show she appeared on to challenge her contention that he had accepted Soros money.

"I had the tax return in front of me and read off the amounts that Chris Korzen was getting paid from Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good -- a Soros supported fake Catholic group," she told TheBlaze, noting that, through Catholics in Alliance, he had received $85,000.

While Korzen denied this on the air, Hendershott read from the 990 form in an effort to prove he wasn't telling the truth. This, she believes, may have sparked -- or played a role -- in spawning the IRS audit.

"He was getting paid by one organization and working for another," the professor said of Korzen. "The IRS should have gone after them."

Her writings for the Catholic Advocate soon ceased because, Hendershott admits, the IRS audit silenced her. If her suspicions are true, this may have been its chilling intention.

"I haven't written for them since the audit, because I was so scared," she said (records show her last article for the organization was on July 10, 2010 -- the same month the IRS audit unfolded).

So far, she has only shared her story with friends and those close to her, but in light of the recent IRS scandal, she has decided to speak out.

"It was clear they didn't like me criticizing the people who helped pass Obamacare," she said of the audit," later adding, "The IRS is very frightening."

In addition to creating stress and fear, Hendershott said that the experience came at a great emotional and financial expense for the family, noting that even after the audit the government sought more information from her.

"It was like they just couldn't find what they wanted because they wanted more and more and more," she said.

Read more about the overarching IRS scandal here.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/16/2013 9:30:29 AM

Disgraced Cardinal to leave Scotland for penance-Vatican


Reuters/Reuters - Scottish Cardinal Keith Michael Patrick O'Brien kisses Pope John Paul II's hand during the consistory in Saint Peter's Square at the Vatican October 21, 2003. REUTERS/Alessandro Bianchi

By Philip Pullella

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - Disgraced Cardinal Keith O'Brien, who resigned as head of the Roman Catholic Church in Scotland after admitting to sexual misconduct, will leave his country for months of "prayer and penance", the Vatican said on Wednesday.

A brief Vatican statement did not say where O'Brien, once Britain's most senior Catholic cleric, was going, or spell out why he was quitting Scotland.

But it will be hoping the announcement draws a line under an affair that has added to a sense of crisis in the Catholic Church as it continues to deal with separate scandals over sexual abuse of children by priests.

The cardinal resigned as archbishop of St. Andrews and Edinburgh on February 25 after three priests and one former priest in Scotland complained about incidents of sexual misconduct dating back to the 1980s.

O'Brien initially rejected the allegations published in a British newspaper and said he was seeking legal advice. But he later apologized for the misconduct.

The Vatican said on Wednesday his departure had been decided "in agreement with the Holy Father," stopping short of saying if Pope Francis had ordered O'Brien to go.

O'Brien would leave Scotland for "several months for the purpose of spiritual renewal, prayer and penance," the Vatican added.

He would be leaving for the same reasons that he decided not to participate in the conclave that elected Pope Francis on March 13, the statement said, without going into further detail.

At the time, O'Brien said he had ruled himself out of the conclave to avoid focusing media attention on himself.

Earlier this month Scottish media reported that Catholic leaders in Scotland had asked the Vatican to take action against O'Brien because his continued presence there would cause further scandal.

When he apologized for unspecified acts of sexual misconduct with adults, O'Brien said he had "fallen below the standards expected of me as a priest, archbishop and cardinal".

He also promised he would play no further part in the public life of the church in Scotland.

"Any decision regarding future arrangements for His Eminence shall be agreed with the Holy See," the Vatican added.

O'Brien's temporary exile, self-imposed or not, makes him the most prominent Churchman to withdraw for "penance" since 2006, when Pope Benedict ordered Father Marcial Maciel, founder of the Legionaries of Christ order of priests, to retire to a life of "prayer and penitence".

Maciel had for years contested accusations that he had abused seminarians and young men but Benedict forced him out when a Vatican investigation concluded the allegations were true.

Maciel died in 2008 and a year later the Legionaries were forced to admit that he had led a double life. Apart from having abused seminarians, Maciel secretly fathered children with at least two women, used drugs, and misused donations.

(Reporting by Philip Pullella; Editing by Andrew Heavens)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/16/2013 9:40:53 AM

Palestinians mark their 1948 displacement


Palestinians commemorate Nakba Day as one refugee remembers being forced out of his home. Lindsey Parietti reports.

A masked Palestinian throws back a tear gas canister during clashes after a rally marking the Nakba Day outside the West Bank town of Hebron, Wednesday , May 15, 2013. Palestinians annually mark the "nakba," or "catastrophe" the term they use to describe their defeat and displacement in the war that followed Israel's founding in 1948. (AP Photo/Nasser Shiyoukhi)
People hold torches as Palestinians hold a rally to commemorate the 1948 creation of the Israeli state, known in Arabic as "Nakba Day," or "Day of the Catastrophe" in the West Bank town of Bethlehem, Tuesday, May 14, 2013. (AP Photo/Majdi Mohammed)
An Israeli border policeman fires a tear gas grenade during a Palestinian rally to commemorate the 1948 creation of the Israeli state known in Arabic as "Nakba Day", or "Day of the Catastrophe" outside the West Bank town of Bethlehem, Tuesday, May 14, 2013. (AP Photo/Nasser Shiyoukhi)

RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) — Tens of thousands of Palestiniansmarked the 65th anniversary of their mass displacement during the war over Israel's 1948 creation, marching in the streets and in some parts of the West Bank clashing with Israeli security forces.

Every May 15, Palestinians hold rallies to commemorate the "nakba," or "catastrophe" — the term they use to describe the displacement, when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled or were driven from their homes during the fighting. The dispute over the fate of those Palestinians and their descendants, now numbering several million people, remains at the core of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

The United Nations General Assembly approved a partition of British-ruled Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states in 1947. In May 1948 Israel declared independence.

Israel views the Palestinians' return as demographic suicide and expects the displaced and their descendants to be taken in by a future Palestinian state. But intermittent Israeli-Palestinian attempts to agree on the terms of such a state have so far failed.

Across the West Bank on Wednesday, sirens wailed at noon for 65 seconds to commemorate the 65 years since the "nakba." Thousands marched in Ramallah from the grave of the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat to the city center. Many wore black in a sign of mourning, holding Palestinian flags and large keys symbolizing the homes they left behind.

"The right of return will not die," chanted the protesters. Schools closed at midday and parents brought their children to the demonstration.

In Ramallah, 38-year-old Manwal Awad brought her 11-year-old twins to the protest. "Every year I bring them with me to inherit the story of our nakba, and to keep the dream of return," she said.

Rallies were elsewhere in the West Bank as well, and in several places demonstrators throwing rocks clashed with Israeli security forces, who responded with tear gas, Israel's military said. Near the volatile city of Hebron, a fire bomb hit at an Israeli military vehicle, causing it to overturn and injuring four soldiers, the military said.

In east Jerusalem, Israeli police used water cannon and officers on horseback to disperse an "illegal march," police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said. Nineteen protesters were arrested for throwing rocks and bottles at police that injured three police officers, he said.

Seven other Palestinians suspected of attacking several Jews as they walked to the Western Wall in the Old City were also arrested, he said.

In Gaza, around a thousand people marched to the U.N. headquarters in Gaza City, where the demonstrators chanted: "We shall return. We will never give up or compromise over our land."

Militants in Gaza, which has been under the control of the militant Hamas group since 2007, fired a rocket into southern Israel that exploded in an open field causing no injuries, Israel's military said.

In a televised speech on Tuesday night, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said the Palestinian cause earned international acceptance last year with the United Nations' de facto recognition of aPalestinian state in east Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

"We won the support of the world," Abbas said, adding that Israel's policies toward the Palestinians are "condemned internationally."

Last year, Abbas created a stir when he told Israeli media that he himself has no wish to live in Safed, the city of his birth, in northern Israel.

Although widely condemned by Palestinians, Abbas' remarks were seen as a reflection of a decades-old understanding among Palestinian officials that likely only a limited number of refugees would ever be able to return to their original homes in Israel as part of a compromise that would result in a future peace agreement.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has been trying to renew Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, which collapsed four years ago over the issue of Jewish settlements. Palestinians insist they will not resume talks unless the construction of settlements in territories they want for their future state ends first. Israel says negotiations should resume without preconditions and that settlements will be resolved through talks along with the other issues.

In efforts to jump-start the talks, Kerry has managed to persuade Arab leaders to reissue their 2002 peace proposal with new incentives, including a suggestion that final borders between Israel and a future Palestine could be modified from the 1967 lines through agreed land swaps.

The 2002 initiative, which at the time was endorsed by the Arab League and the 57-member Organization of Islamic Cooperation, offered Israel normalized relations in exchange for a full withdrawal from territories captured in 1967. However, it was overshadowed by Israeli-Palestinian fighting and was greeted with skepticism by Israel.

Israel has been mostly quiet on the proposal so far.

On Wednesday, the Palestinian statistics bureau in the West Bank issued a statement saying the number of Palestinians today has reached 11.5 million. Of those, 4.4 million live in the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza; 1.4 million in Israel while the remainder live in the diaspora.

___

Associated Press writer Ibrahim Barzak contributed to this report from the Gaza Strip.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/16/2013 9:44:11 AM

The melting of Mount Everest: By the numbers

Rising temperatures and declining snowfall are taking a heavy toll on Himalayan glaciers

The authors of a new environmental study warn that the glaciers surrounding Mount Everest, the highest peak in the world, arereceding at an alarming rate as temperatures rise and snowfall decreases. The team, led by researcher Sudeep Thakuri of Italy'sUniversity of Milan, used satellite imagery and topographic maps to piece together the glacial history of Everest and the surrounding 713-square-mile Sagarmatha National Park. Here's a look at the report the scientist compiled, by the numbers:

13
Percentage that the glaciers in the Everest region have shrunk in the last 50 years

SEE MORE: WATCH: A time-lapse video of the eclipsed sun and moon

590
Feet Everest's snowline has climbed, as lower parts of the mountain's frozen cap melt

437
Yards (400 meters) the average glacier around Everest has receded since 1962

SEE MORE: Larry Page's vocal cord paralysis: What does it mean for Google?

1.08
Degrees Fahrenheit (0.6 Celsius) the average annual temperature has risen in the Everest region since 1992

3.9
Decrease, in inches, in annual precipitation during the pre-monsoon and winter months

SEE MORE: Is Obama a hands-off president?

43
Percentage decrease in the size of the region's smallest glaciers — less than a square kilometer, or about 247 acres — since the 1960s

17
Percentage increase in areas where the ice and snow are melting faster than they can be replaced, revealing rocks and other debris that had been hidden for ages

SEE MORE: Is it time to lower the DUI threshold?

1.5 billion
People who depend on the melting glaciers for their water supply. "The Himalayan glaciers and ice caps are considered a water tower for Asia since they store and supply water downstream during the dry season," said Thakuri, who presented the findings at a conference in Cancun this week. "Downstream populations are dependent on the melt water for agriculture, drinking, and power production."

29,029
Height, in feet, of Everest, which is known to some as the "roof of the world"

SEE MORE: Today in business: 5 things you need to know

0
Days each year when temperatures rise above freezing at or near Everest's peak. That means the climb to Everest is unlikely to get any easier any time soon.

Sources: Los Angeles Times, Nature World News, UPI

SEE MORE: How do fortune cookie messages get written?

View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/16/2013 9:54:35 AM

Joe Scarborough Is Outraged the White House Followed His Advice on Leaks


Joe Scarborough Is Outraged the White House Followed His Advice on Leaks

If there is one clear lesson to the story over the Department of Justice seeking the phone records of Associated Press reporters, it's that no one should ever take the advice of Joe Scarborough. The MSNBC host is in high dudgeon because people who might leak confidential info to reporters will clam up because they fear afederal investigation into leaks that he called called for last summer.

RELATED: A Few Moustache Recommendations for Joe Scarborough

RELATED: The White House Wants to Stay Out of the AP Phone Records Story

Speaking this morning to David Axelrod, the former Obama campaign manager who is now on the MSNBC payroll, Scarborough was in prosecutorial mode: "Answer my question: Will sources, confidential sources inside the federal government be intimidated because of what this administration, according to The New York Times, has been doing from the very beginning?" he demanded. Of course, it was a complete reversal of his position last July, when Mitt Romney was calling for a federal investigation into who was leaking the national security info that he thought was damaging his campaign. Speaking to Axelrod on July 25, Scarborough boomed: "Can the president assure America that his White House will batten down the hatches and stop the release of this classified information that is disturbing not only to men and women in the military, but disturbing to millions of Americans?" Here's that clip:

RELATED: The Justice Department Secretly Seized AP Phone Records — on a Terror Leak?


RELATED: The Early Reviews of Jay Carney's First Day

This morning Axelrod pointed out the contradiction between the two shows ("I appeared with you, and you challenged me with the same tone, actually, on these leaks") which received a sneer from Scarborough ("Don't shift this to me!"). This is not, of course, the first time that Scarborough has found himself defending his feelings against facts. He thought Nate Silver's statistical predictions of the 2012 election was "a joke" and he's vouched for his gut feelings about fiscal policy over the expertise of a Nobel Prize-winning economist like Paul Krugman.

RELATED: Top Tweets: Bye Bye Rahmie Edition

The investigation into national security leaks should be easier to understand, because it involves no math. The investigation that lead to the subpoenas of the AP reporters is the very same investigation that was begun last summer after a few news cycles of campaign coverage were dedicated to the Romney campaign's accuations that the White House was leaking information that made it look tough on terrorism, including the AP's report that the CIA had foiled an underwear bomber in Yemen. After it's publication there were calls for investigations from Dianne Feinstein and the Romney campaign to track down the people who leaked the CIA information to the AP. "It betrays our national interest. It compromises our men and women in the field. And it demands a full and prompt investigation by a special counsel, with explanation and consequence," Romney said at the time. Scarborough joined the chorus, grilling Axelrod last July, "So what's gone wrong? What's happened? Why is it leaking out of the White House and how can we stop it?" and seemed mollified after Axelrod said they would be scaring the dickens out of anyone who might consider giving an AP reporter a scoop: "Joe, there's an investigation going -- well, you stop it by sending strong signals. Strong signals have been sent."

The White House is now coming under fire for the the Justice Department's subpoenaing of the Associated Press's phone records that's drawing a strong reaction from members of the press and calls for heads to roll from Politico's anonymous sources. (And from John Boehner, too.) The investigation is (allegedly) looking into the possible whistleblower who handed over national security information for a story that came out last summer about Al Qaeda terrorists unknowingly handing a sophisticated underwear bomb over to the CIA. The very same story that prompted Joe Scarborough to call for an investigation into the course of the leaks. And the very same story he was yelling at David Axelrod about Wednesday morning on Morning Joe.

Scarborough pressed Axelrod about the potential "chilling" of whistle-blowing sources over the Department of Justice's investigation into the AP. He was worried that whistle blowers may be hesitant to come forward with confidential information in the future. "I appeared with you, and you challenged me with the same tone, actually, on these leaks and said, 'When is the president going to send a strong signal to people that leaking classified information won’t be tolerated?'" Axelrod pointed out. "'When is is he going to make people accountable for these leaks?' [...] They’ve apparently interviewed 550 people and went to court and got a subpoena to do what they did. In order to do what you and others said should be done." Scarborough did not take kindly to Axelrod's memory of events, no sir:

“I’ve heard the president’s defenders try to say this, and I congratulate you guys for going off into a room and calling each other and coming up with this bogus argument — but never did I suggest that 100 AP reporters have all of their phone records seized, their private cell phone records seized, their home phone numbers seized. So please save that for somebody else that’s going to buy into that. Don’t shift this to me! Answer my question: Will sources, confidential sources inside the federal government be intimidated because of what this administration, according to The New York Times, has been doing from the very beginning?”

Axelrod conceded that it could have an impact on whistleblowers, but that the investigation was started "because many people, you included, said there shouldn’t be these leaks" of national security information.

This is all true. Scarborough suggested that some "middle ground" should exist between an investigation that would keep deter leaks but not involve an "overly broad" reach into the AP's phone records. But then, Scarborough, a former lawyer is in about as good a position as anyone to know that prosecutors aren't known for their gentle demeanors. As Axelrod added, "The fact is, that everyone in the summer was clambering for an investigation to do exactly what you now say you’re concerned about, which is chilling people who would leak."

So does Axelrod have a point? Yeah. The investigation into the AP's story probably wouldn't have been launched and carried out so aggressively if it wasn't for the airtime, columns and news segments Romney, Feinstein, Scarborough and any number of cable news pundits crowed so loudly about how their needed to be an investigation.

Scarborough isn't as dumb as Jon Stewart thinks he is. But this episode shows how he's not paid to think through his arguments much farther than the next segment, so in calling for a federal investigation into leaks he need not consider how federal prosecutors investigate leakers. The function of cable news is to be as outraged as possible over the headline of the day. Do it as long as you possibly can and wildly make suggestions about what should be done to improve the country — then move on. There's another segment, another thing to be outraged over, and more suggestions to be made. Are your suggestions good ideas? Who cares!

In retrospect, it's almost impossible to comprehend how one story could be so much of a headache for one administration. But that's the way cable news is now. They have to be angry about the press getting the story, about how they got the story, and about how the press may never get the story again. They never think about how they're the ones who caused both scandals in the first place.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!