Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/7/2013 10:01:41 PM

Senate Committee Passes Gun Trafficking Bill



ABC OTUS News - Senate Committee Passes Gun Trafficking Bill (ABC News)

A Senate panel passed the first piece of proposed gun legislation out of committee Thursday morning with an 11 to 7 vote in favor of a bill to stem weapons trafficking.

The bill, which is sponsored by committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., would make "straw" purchasing, which occurs when a buyer buys a gun on behalf of someone who cannot legally purchase one, illegal.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, was the lone Republican on the Judiciary Committee to vote in favor of the bill.

The committee is considering three additional measures today, including an assault weapons ban, abackground check bill and school safety legislation.

While the gun trafficking bill made it out of committee early in the morning, the assault weapons ban and background check bill may not.

Grassley, the ranking member of the committee, voiced his own unease with the bills. He argued that the assault weapons ban would not have prevented the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary and said that the background check bill could lead to a gun registry and higher confiscations.

On Wednesday, the background check bill hit a roadblock when Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., backed out of talks with Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. on the measure, according to reports.

Sens. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., and Joe Manchin, D-W.V., expressed their own concerns with the bill Wednesday, saying they could not support it in its current language but vowed to continue conversations on the issue.

"We are committed to continuing to work in a bipartisan effort with Senators Schumer, Coburn and others in order to find a commonsense solution for enhanced background checks, however, Senator Schumer's current proposal is one we cannot support as it stands today," Manchin and Kirk said in a joint statement. "Our goal is to pass a bill that will close loopholes in the current background check process in a way that does not burden law-abiding citizens. Any bill we support will guarantee that Americans' Second Amendment rights are clearly protected. We simply want to make sure firearms do not end up in the hands of convicted criminals or people who are deemed mentally unstable by court ruling.

"While the bill Senator Schumer introduced today doesn't meet this standard, we will continue to work with Senator Schumer, Senator Coburn and other colleagues to find a commonsense compromise," Kirk and Manchin said.

President Obama has pushed for stronger background checks as a part of his proposals to curb gun violence in the wake of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn. in December.

Also Read

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/7/2013 10:06:33 PM

Bin Laden son-in-law arrested in Jordan is brought to New York


Al-Qaeda spokesman Sulaiman Bu Ghaith speaks in an undated video message carried on Qatar's al-Jazeera television October 9, 2001 saying that the militant group believed in "terrorism against oppressors". [Osama bin Laden's] al-Qaeda group said on Tuesday that hijacked plane attacks on the United States would continue and that the "battle" would not end until America withdraws from Muslim lands. The station did not explain the origin of the statement but it appeared to be a video recording. Sulaiman Bu Ghaith had appeared with [bin Laden] on a recorded statement issued via Jazeera last Sunday. REUTERS

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A son-in-law of Osama bin Laden who served as al Qaeda's spokesman was arrested in Jordan and then brought to New York in an operation led by Jordanian authorities and the FBI, U.S. government sources said on Thursday.

The sources said Suleiman Abu Ghaith, a militant who appeared in videos representing al Qaeda after the September 11, attacks on New York and Washington in 2001, had initially been picked up in Turkey.

The Turkish government deported him to Jordan, said the sources, where local authorities and the FBI took custody of him. He had been brought to the United States in the last few days, a law enforcement source said.

Abu Ghaith is now being held in a detention facility in the New York City area and is expected to be charged and eventually brought to trial in federal court. The trial would most likely be in U.S. District Court in lower Manhattan, only blocks from the site of the World Trade Center, which was destroyed in the September 11 attacks, a law enforcement source said.

The Justice Department declined to comment and the FBI did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Initial public confirmation of Abu Ghaith's capture came from Representative Peter King, a senior Republican member of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee and former chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security.

"I commend our CIA and FBI, our allies in Jordan, and President (Barack) Obama for their capture of al-Qaeda spokesman Sulaiman Abu Ghaith. I trust he received a vigorous interrogation, and will face swift and certain justice," King said in a statement.

"Propaganda statements in which Abu Ghaith and his late father-in-law, Osama bin Laden, praised the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 are alone enough to merit the most serious punishment."

U.S. sources indicated that, while a CIA role in the capture of Abu Ghaith could not be ruled out, the FBI took the lead role in the operation under the auspices of an interagency body known as the High-value Detainee Interrogation Group.

The group was created by Obama's administration after the president ordered the shutdown of a CIA program in which militant suspects were detained and held in a network of secret prisons, during the administration of President George W. Bush.

The suspects were sometimes subjected to controversial and physically coercive "enhanced interrogation techniques," and also were sometimes transferred without trial to third countries under a procedure known as "extraordinary rendition."

Records compiled by a United Nations sanctions committee show that Abu Ghaith was born in Kuwait in 1965, but that he left Kuwait for Pakistan in June 2001.

After the September 11 attacks, Abu Ghaith first surfaced as one of al Qaeda's main spokesmen. Later, U.S. officials believe he was part of a group of top al Qaeda figures that included one of bin Laden's sons, Saad, who allegedly traveled to Iran, where the Iranian government claimed they were being held "in custody."

The Long War Journal, a counterterrorism blog published by the conservative Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, reported in 2010 that Abu Ghaith had been released by Iranian authorities and supposedly had returned to Afghanistan.

(Editing by Warren Strobel and Christopher Wilson)

Article: Osama bin Laden’s hideout being turned into 50-acre amusement park

Article: U.S. didn't need rough interrogation to get bin Laden: Panetta

Article: Algerian terror attack latest case of Canadian jihadist involvement

Article: Zero Dark Thirty director defends showing torture


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/7/2013 10:08:23 PM

Drone Wars


Mar 7, 2013 8:52am
ap mq9 reaper drone ll 130222 wblog Drone Wars

Lt. Col. Leslie Pratt/US Air Force/AP Photo

By MICHAEL FALCONE (@michaelpfalcone)

NOTABLES

  • RAND MAKES A STAND: With a thin blanket of snow covering the capitol, the federal government shut down and John Brennan poised to be confirmed as CIA Director, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who has more than a little bit of libertarian running in his veins, engaged yesterday in the most traditional form of filibuster — talk. ABC’s Sunlen Miller and Z. Byron Wolf note that the point for Paul was to highlight the Obama administration’s view that its targeted killing program — the use of drones to bomb suspected terrorists in foreign lands — is Constitutional. His concern hit a new level Monday when his office released a letter from Attorney General Eric Holder explaining that the administration feels it has the ability, in the extremely unlikely situation, to kill Americans on U.S. soil to avert an imminent terror attack. http://abcn.ws/12uxwSW
  • THE FILIBUSTER IN 100 WORDS: “I’m not asking any questions about the president’s motives. I don’t question his motives. I, frankly, don’t think he will be killing people in restaurants tonight or in their house tonight,” Paul said yesterday afternoon about four-and-a-half hours into his speech. “But this is about the rule of law. It isn’t so much about him. It isn’t so much about John Brennan. It’s about having rules so that someday if we do have the misfortune of electing someone you do not trust, electing someone who might kill innocent people or who might kill people that they disagree with politically or they might kill people who they disagree with religiously or might kill people of another ethnic group, we’re protected.”
  • HOW IT STARTED: “I rise today to begin to filibuster John Brennan’s nomination for the CIA,” Sen. Paul declared at about 11:47 a.m. ET yesterday. “I will speak until I can no longer speak. I will speak as long as it takes, until the alarm is sounded from coast to coast that our constitution is important, that your rights to trial by jury are precious, that no American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first being charged with a crime, without first being found to be guilty by a court. That Americans could be killed in a cafe in San Francisco or in a restaurant in Houston or at their home in bowling green, Kentucky, is an abomination. It is something that should not and cannot be tolerated in our country.” WATCH: http://abcn.ws/12uxwSW
  • COMPARATIVE FILIBUSTERING: During the course of the nearly 13 hour marathon on the Senate floor, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Tex. quoted Shakespeare’s “Henry V,” Ronald Reagan and George C. Scott in the movie “Patton.” On the other hand, Sen. Marco Rubio quoted rapper Wiz Khalifa, Jay-Z and a few lines from “The Godfather” movies. (Specifically Michael Corleone’s warning to Fredo: “Don’t ever take sides with anyone against the family.”)
  • HOW IT ENDED: Paul finally yielded the floor at 12:39 a.m. this morning — just shy of 13 hours — to applause from his colleagues and a bit of a joke. “I would go for another 12 hours and try to break Strom Thurmond’s record, but I have learned there are limits and I have to go take care of one of those right now.” The Kentucky Republican said he hopes the White House will address this tomorrow and work to clarify they won’t target American citizens in the U.S.
  • WHAT HAPPENS NOW? Today the Senate resumes consideration of the nomination of John Brennan to be CIA Director.

THE ROUNDTABLE

ABC’s RICK KLEIN: Sen. Rand Paul did the improbable with his marathon filibuster: He got the Senate, which likes to call itself the world’s greatest deliberative body, to actually deliberate. Not in the Hollywood sense of a speech dramatically convincing lawmakers to change their minds. Maybe (probably?) not in actually changing policy, not with John Brennan still looking like he’s on track for confirmation, and the administration’s drone policies untouched. But Paul found a way to break through the modern media wackiness by talking and not stopping for a long while. In the process, he didn’t do what most “filibusters” these days usually do – stop something from happening. Instead, he started a conversation, about anti-terrorism policies and civil liberties. Surely that’s worth munching on Milky Ways for.

ABC’s Z. BYRON WOLF: John Brennan is still likely to be CIA director. But Rand Paul’s filibuster worked if you consider his audience was the GOP. When Mitch McConnell agreed to join in it put the establishment Kentucky leader on the same page as the improbably Tea Party senator. This does not mean that McConnell suddenly holds Paul’s views on drones and targeted killing and the war on terror. And it is not clear if there will be enough votes to block Brennan if Democrats try to end debate tomorrow. But it does indicate that Paul’s effort pierced through and establishment Republicans now joining with Paul may be feeling some heat on this from the Tea Party conservatives. (McConnell is up for reelection, don’t forget). McConnell’s support also upends the conventional party alignments in the war on terror since 2001. They have been increasingly strained during President Obama’s presidency and escalation of the drone war and with the election of so many Republicans who never served under the last administration. But imagine if George W. Bush’s Attorney General had, like Eric Holder, argued the government could kill a U.S. Senator in the U.S. You can easily envision a mirror image political argument with Democrats and Rand Paul mounting a filibuster.

ABC’s TOM SHINE: Picture it: 26 people on bikes with a direct, simple message: “Ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.” Organized by Newtown resident Monte Frank, a group called Team 26 will bike past Sandy Hook Elementary on Sunday with a police escort and then head to Washington, D.C. Baltimore Sun reporter Dan Rodricks reports that on the way they will stop in a small town in New Jersey to visit a parent of a victim of Virginia Tech, then go to Baltimore for a meeting with the mayor before heading to the nation’s capitol on Tuesday. New York epidemiologist Megan Cea is joining the ride and Rodricks said she wrote this on her Facebook page: “I ride because I refuse to live in a world where the right to own an assault weapon trumps the rights of all Americans to go to the movies, walk through their neighborhoods, and send their children to school without fear they will never return home.” This morning the Senate Judiciary Committee starts, what is expected to be many days of heated debate and numerous votes on several gun bills.

2016 LIKE IT’S TODAY: A new Quinnipiac University poll of registered voters finds thatHillary Clinton would defeat three potential Republican presidential candidates if the 2016 presidential election were held today, with New Jersey Gov. Christopher Christie second in a field of three Democrats and three Republicans … Vice President Joseph Biden and New York’s Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo would not fare nearly as well, the independent Quinnipiac University poll finds. Former First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State Clinton wins easily against any of the Republicans, topping Christie 45 – 37 percent; leading Rubio 50 – 34 percent and besting Ryan 50 – 38 percent.”More from the poll: http://bit.ly/ZcRY6G

IN THE NOTE’S INBOX

WHY WE’RE RAISING MONEY TO SUPPORT OBAMA AGENDA,” a CNN Op-Ed by former Obama campaign manager Jim Messina, the chairman of Organizing for Action.“There has been some confusion about what Organizing for Action is and is not. Organizing for Action is an issue advocacy group, not an electoral one. We’ll mobilize to support the president’s agenda, but we won’t do so on behalf of political candidates. The president has always believed that special interests have undue influence over the policymaking process, and the mission of this organization is to rebalance the power structure.While Organizing for Action is a nonprofit social welfare organization that faces a lower disclosure threshold than a political campaign, we believe in being open and transparent. That’s why every donor who gives $250 or more to this organization will be disclosed on the website with the exact amount they give on a quarterly basis. We have decided not to accept contributions from corporations, federal lobbyists or foreign donors.” http://bit.ly/WVH1IF

BUZZ

WHITE HOUSE LUNCH BREAK: A senior administration official tells ABC News Chief White House Correspondent Jonathan Karl that President Obama has invited Wisconsin Congressman and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan to lunch today at the White House. Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, will also be at the lunch. Obama delivers remarks and signs the Violence Against Women Act at the Interior Department this afternoon. He will be joined by advocates and members of Congress, as well as Vice President Joe Biden.

NORTH KOREA’S LATEST NUKE THREAT. An Associated Press bulletin from Seoul, South Korea reports: “North Korea is vowing a pre-emptive nuclear strike against the United States. The harsh rhetoric Thursday comes hours ahead of a vote by U.N. diplomats on whether to level new sanctions against Pyongyang for its recent nuclear test. An unidentified spokesman for Pyongyang’s Foreign Ministry said the North will exercise its right for ‘pre-emptive nuclear strikes on the headquarters of the aggressors’ because Washington is pushing to start a nuclear war against the North.”

WHITE HOUSE RESPONSE: On “Good Morning America” this morning ABC’s Jonathan Karl read a quote from White House Press Secretary Jay Carney: “Provocative rhetoric and actions won’t bring North Korea closer to an end to sanctions, only compliance with its international obligations under the UN Security Council resolutions will.” WATCH: http://abcn.ws/XUOe9z

OBAMA, GOP SENATORS BREAK BREAD. President Obama and Republican senators had a “good exchange of ideas” last night during their roughly two-hour-long dinner at the posh Jefferson Hotel, just blocks from the White House, a senior administration official told ABC’s Mary Bruce and Alexandra Dukakis. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., gave the meeting a thumbs up as he exited the hotel, saying it was “just fine,” “great” and “wonderful.” McCain told reporters gathered across the street that it was a “very enjoyable evening,” but declined to discuss specifics. Obama invited 12 GOP senators to break bread as part of a larger effort to jump start budget negotiations and try to cut a deal with rank-and-file Republicans. “The president greatly enjoyed the dinner,” the administration official said. But did they make any progress? “We’ll see,” Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., told reporters. Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., described it as a “good, constructive conversation.” http://abcn.ws/12vxU3A

WHO DINED? Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn.; Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H.; Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.; Sen. Dan Coats, R-Ind.; Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.; Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C.; Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb.; Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa.; Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis.; Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D.; and Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga.

WHO PAID? The extremely rare meeting has also fostered a new point of contention: Who picked up the tab? According to the White House, President Obama paid for the meal out of his own pocket. Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., however, claimed the bill was split.

KIDS TELL WASHINGTON: ‘THE WHITE HOUSE IS OUR HOUSE! PLEASE LET US VISIT!’ Hundreds of school kids who have dreamed of visiting the White House on their spring break are now dealing with disappointment. Their plans have been dashed, notes ABC’s Devin Dwyer. Less than 24 hours after the Obama administration canceled all White House tours indefinitely, parents and children from across the country have been speaking out about their frustration with Washington’s sequester. Their message to lawmakers? “The White House is our house! Please let us visit!” chanted a group of a dozen 6th graders from Waverly, Iowa, on a call with ABC News’ Jonathan Karl. The group from St. Paul’s Lutheran School, just outside Cedar Falls, received the news of their canceled tour from Rep. Bruce Bailey’s office earlier today. They are headed for Washington a week from Friday, after months of fundraising and building excitement. That sentiment was shared by kids, parents and would-be chaperones all across the country in interviews with ABC News.http://abcn.ws/13HrJJv

THE MOST CONVOLUTED SEQUESTER CONTROVERSY KNOWN TO MAN? In perhaps the most convoluted back-and-forth yet regarding whether the Obama administration has overstated the effects of automatic spending cuts, the Department of Agriculture says an employee’s email has been misinterpreted and taken out of context by congressional Republicans and news reporters. The story began with a leaked email which seemed to indicate USDA had told one of its workers to make the sequester cuts as painful as promised, dismissing his request for leeway to spread the cuts out and avoid furloughing his employees. Republican Reps. Tim Griffith and Kristi Noem reportedly circulated the email, which came from a USDA field worker named Charlie Brown, who works for the Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service (APHIS) in Raleigh, N.C. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack was asked about it Monday before the House Agriculture Committee. USDA released a statement that “Several reports yesterday misrepresented a USDA effort to explain the impacts of budget cuts to an employee in USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)” and explaining the saga in detail. An agency official told USDA’s side of the story in a conversation with ABC News’ Chris Good on Wednesday. An official said that USDA not only granted the requested spending leeway, it had already planned to avoid the furloughs. Read more: http://abcn.ws/14vk9xh

FIVE QUESTIONS FOR FORMER ROMNEY ADVISER STUART STEVENS. This week we asked Mitt Romney 2012 campaign senior adviser Stuart Stevens to answer five questions about the recent presidential campaign, Twitter and what lies ahead for him. Here’s an excerpt of the questions and answers, courtesy of ABC’s Ben Bell. ABC: “Regarding this past presidential election, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich wrote that you are ’indifferent to the facts’ and have ‘no sense of responsibility for a presidential campaign’ that you ‘dominated.’ He also criticized Mitt Romney’s endorsement of ‘self-deportation’ as a way to deal with illegal immigrants in the United States. What is your response to Gingrich and was it a mistake for Mitt Romney to embrace “self-deportation?”STUART STEVENS: ”I have nothing but respect for Speaker Gingrich and his views on any subject. As for taking responsibility, I have said repeatedly that I take full responsibility for any campaign mistakes or missteps. The subject of immigration was debated in the primary and there is nothing to be gained revisiting these discussions. “Self-deportation” was a description of voluntary actions in contrast to forced federal deportation. I would leave it to those who are protesting the president’s escalation of federal deportations to decide if they are happy with the status quo of forced deportation and if they believe the president’s policies are working.” Read the full Q&A:http://abcn.ws/Zdmg9q

HOUSE PASSES SIX-MONTH STOPGAP BILL TO FUND GOVERNMENT. The House voted yesterday to pass the continuing resolution and fund the federal government through the end of the fiscal year, making a shutdown later this month doubtful, reports ABC’s John Parkinson. The continuing resolution, known around Washington as a CR, is subject to sequestration levels in its entirety, setting the top-line overall rate of spending at $982 billion, down from $1.043 trillion the previous fiscal year. The vote on the CR passed 267-151 with mostly Republican votes, although once it became clear the bill would pass 53 Democrats decided to join the majority. Fourteen Republicans and 151 Democrats opposed the bill. http://abcn.ws/13FWCxA

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/8/2013 12:37:11 AM

Neglected prisoner gets $15.5 million after serving 22 months in solitary

Stephen Slevin spent 22 months in solitary confinement in a New Mexico jail. During that time, his mental health deteriorated, fungus grew on his skin, and he was forced to pull his own tooth after being denied access to a dentist. A recent settlement with Dona Ana County resulted in Slevin receiving $15.5 million.

Initially, Slevin was awarded $22 million by a jury, but Dona Ana County appealed. The two parties reached an agreement this week. According to NBC News, Slevin's attorney, Matt Coyte, said his client's "mental health has been severely compromised from the time he was in that facility. That continues to be the same. No amount of money will bring back what they took away from him. But it’s nice to be able to get him some money so he can improve where he is in life and move on."

During his 22 months in solitary confinement, Slevin developed bedsores and lost 50 pounds. The ordeal began in 2005 when he was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence and stealing a car, which he says he borrowed from a friend. Slevin was never brought before a judge nor was he officially convicted of any crime. He said he wrote letters, begging for help with his depression. The before and after photos show the effect the 22 months of neglect had.

"Why they did what they did, I'll never know," Slevin told KOB4-TV. "Walking by me, watching me deteriorate day after day after day, and they did nothing at all to get me help."

Slevin's attorney said his client was battling depression at the time of his arrest. His health woes continue. He was recently diagnosed with lung cancer. He also suffers from post traumatic stress disorder due to his time in jail.

Jess Williams, Dona Ana County's public information director, told NBC News that the jail is making an effort to improve the way it treats prisoners with mental illness.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/8/2013 12:39:27 AM

Abduction illustrates UN vulnerability in Syria


Associated Press/Ariel Schalit - Smoke rises following an explosion in the Syrian village of Jamlah in the southern province of Daraa, Syria, seen from the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights ,Thursday, March 7, 2013. Clashes between Syrian troops and rebel fighters flared on Thursday near an area where armed fighters linked to the opposition abducted 21 U.N. peacekeepers a day earlier. The peacekeepers are part of a force that monitors a cease-fire between Israeli and Syrian troops in the Golan Heights. Israel captured part of the territory in the 1967 Mideast war, and while the area has been peaceful for decades, Israeli officials have grown increasingly jittery as the Syrian civil war moves closer to its borders. (AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)

BEIRUT (AP) — New video Thursday of U.N. peacekeepers held captive by Syrian rebels illustrates the sudden vulnerability of a U.N. force that had patrolled a cease-fire line between Israel andSyria without incident for nearly four decades.

The abduction of the Filipino troops — soft targets in Syria's civil war — also sent a worrisome signal to Israel about the lawlessness it fears along the shared frontier if Syrian President Bashar Assad is ousted.

The 21 peacekeepers were seized Wednesday near the Syrian village of Jamlah, just a mile from the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights, a plateau Israel captured from Syria in 1967.

Negotiations were under way Thursday for the release of the men, who said in videos posted online that they were being treated well.

"To our family, we hope to see you soon and we are OK here," said a peacekeeper shown in one video. He was one of three troops dressed in camouflage and blue bullet-proof vests emblazoned with the words U.N. and Philippines.

However, a rebel spokesman seemed to suggest the hostages were also serving as human shields. If the U.N. troops are released and leave the area, the regime could kill "as many as 1,000 people," said the spokesman, who spoke via Skype and did not give his name for fear of reprisals.

The peacekeepers' abduction highlights the growing risks to U.N. staff in Syria's escalating conflict.

Fighting has spread across the country, claiming more than 70,000 lives and displacing nearly 4 million of Syria's 22 million people. There is no sign of a breakthrough for either side, though rebels have scored some recent gains on the battlefield and in the diplomatic arena.

U.N. diplomats and officials said Thursday that the capture of the peacekeepers will almost certainly lead to a re-examination of security for the U.N. force and its patrols in the field.

The U.N. monitoring mission, known as UNDOF, was set up in 1974, seven years after Israel captured the Golan and a year after it managed to push back Syrian troops trying to recapture the territory in another regional war.

For nearly four decades, the U.N. monitors helped enforce a stable truce between Israel and Syria, making it one of the most successful U.N. missions in the world, said Timor Goksel, a Beirut-based former senior U.N. official in the region.

The force has an office in Damascus and staffs observation posts along the armistice line.

Goksel, who works for the Al-Monitor news website, said the observers are "soft targets" in Syria's increasingly brutal civil war. Up to now they were "never challenged by anybody in Syria," he added.

The monitors' success may have been linked to a decision by Assad and his father and predecessor,Hafez Assad, to comply with the armistice deal, including limits on military hardware allowed near the cease-fire line.

Moshe Maoz, an Israeli expert on Syria, said the U.N. mission's success was largely due to the Assads' decision to abide by the truce.

"When you are dealing with an army that follows orders, it is one thing," Maoz said. "Now you have different groups. They do not recognize international law and have no respect for any law or international morals. They are terrorist groups that know no bounds."

An Israeli official said that if UNDOF were to halt operations, it would be a "bad thing for peace." He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the diplomatically sensitive issue with the media.

Israel has said it's trying to keep out of the Syria conflict, but is watching the disintegration of the country with growing concern.

In recent months, Syrian mortars overshooting their target have repeatedly hit the Israeli-controlled Golan. In Israel's most direct involvement so far, Israeli warplanes struck inside Syria in January, according to U.S. officials who said the target was a convoy carrying anti-aircraft weapons bound for Hezbollah, a Lebanese militia allied with Assad and Iran.

The U.N. peacekeepers' four-vehicle convoy was intercepted Wednesday by rebels from a group calling itself the Martyrs of the Yarmouk Brigades. The convoy was stopped on the outskirts of Jamlah, about a mile from the armistice line.

Rebels said 10 people have died in regime shelling of Jamlah and nearby villages in recent days. Fighting continued Thursday, according to activists.

The rebels and Syrian opposition officials have sent conflicting messages about the peacekeepers' release.

Immediately after their seizure, one of the rebels said the U.N. troops would be held until regime forces leave Jamlah.

On Thursday, however, a spokesman for the captors expressed concern about more regime attacks on the area if the hostages are freed, suggesting release was not imminent.

A member of Syria's political opposition in exile, Khaled Saleh, said the rebels would deliver the U.N. troops to safety in Jordan as soon as the regime halts airstrikes in the area and a transfer is deemed safe.

In two amateur videos posted Thursday, men who appeared to be captive U.N. troops made similar statements, though it was not clear to what extent they had been coerced to do so.

"We, the U.N. personnel here, are safe, and the Free Syrian Army are treating us good," one of three peacekeepers shown in the video said in halting English. "We cannot go home because the government of (President Bashar) Assad do not stop the bombing."

In another video, six men, presumably peacekeepers, are shown. One man, who identifies himself as a captain, says the U.N. force encountered bombings and artillery, and civilians in the area "helped us for our safety."

The videos appear in line with AP reporting of the incident.

The U.N. Security Council, which has demanded the peacekeepers' immediate and unconditional release, scheduled a closed meeting Friday with U.N. peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous.

"As far as we know they are safe," Ladsous told a group of reporters Thursday. "But of course we demand the immediate freedom and the ability for UNDOF to carry out its mandate in the area of the Golan."

In Washington, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland called the men's continued detention "absolutely unacceptable."

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, an activist group, said negotiations were under way between the rebels, the Arab League and U.N. officials on handing over the peacekeepers. As part of the negotiations, the rebels were demanding that the regime withdraw from the area, end shelling attacks and allow refugees to return, the Observatory said.

Meanwhile, Nuland said Assad's forces have bombarded opposition-held neighborhoods in the central city of Homs over the last 24 hours and cited reports that regime forces were amassed outside of the city "for what looks to be an all-out assault on rebel holdouts."

___

Associated Press writers Bassem Mroue in Beirut, Aron Heller in Jerusalem, Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations and Bradley S. Klapper in Washington contributed to this report.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0