Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/15/2018 4:08:05 PM

HUNDREDS OF U.S. MARINES, IDF TROOPS TRAIN IN SOUTHERN ISRAEL

This year's Juniper Cobra drill is the largest that the Marine Corps and Navy have participated in in the last 6 years.

BY ANNA AHRONHEIM / MARCH 13, 2018 15:29



Hundreds of US Marines, IDF troops train in southern Israel (Anna Ahronheim)


Hundreds of Israeli soldiers and US Marines trained shoulder-to-shoulder Monday in southern Israel as part of Juniper Cobra 2018, drilling on close urban combat and tunnel warfare.

While the two-week joint Israeli/American military exercise drills on various scenarios adapted to Israel’s operational reality such as missile threats in various sectors simultaneously, the Marines have not directly participated in the missile drills that comprised the majority of Juniper Cobra.

Instead the 650 Marines trained with Israeli troops at the Tze’elim Army Base in several operational scenarios, including live fire and artillery drills, in order to enhance interoperability and cooperation between the two allies.

Juniper Cobra logo badge (credit: US Air Force Tech Sergeant Matthew Plew)

Calling the training with the Israelis “incredible,” Lt.-Col. Marcus Mainz, commanding officer, 2nd Battalion, 6th Marine Regiment, told reporters that this year’s Juniper Cobra is the largest that the US Marine Corps and Navy have participated in for six years.

“Both of our militaries have lots of experience, but that experience is different – from different places – and what we are able to do here is take our experiences from [the] last conflicts that we’ve been in and to share them,” he said, adding that this “allows us to increase the potency of both military forces.”

The instructors during the drills “teach the young soldiers and Marines how to see. They teach them what they saw – [whether] in the Gaza Strip or somewhere else on the battlefield like Afghanistan or Iraq,” Mainz continued, adding that “they teach them what to look for; what does the open door mean; what does the item on the ground mean to you? And [the soldiers] get to hear it from two perspectives.”


IDF troops drill alongside US Marines as part of Juniper Cobra 2018 (credit: Anna Ahronheim)

Mainz, who spent several years fighting in Iraq during Operation Iraqi Freedom, told The Jerusalem Post that the Israeli expertise differs from that of the Americans, especially in terms of tunnel warfare, which they haven’t encountered since the 1970s in Vietnam.

“Everyone has their expertise, so when we are here fighting in an urban environment, the IDF is as good as it gets inside this kind of environment, and we learn a lot from them [about] how to be effective,” Mainz said.

“In terms of tunnels, we have no experience there. It’s not something we’ve fought through, so the IDF teaches us that. What we teach them is that we get our big mechanized vehicles out and we teach the Israelis how to use them in an urban environment and be effective,” he added.

US and Israeli troops participate in the Juniper Cobra drill, March 2018 (credit: Anna Ahronheim)

Some 1,400 Marines deployed with the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit aboard the amphibious assault ship Iwo Jima are participating in Juniper Cobra 2018 along with 1,100 sailors and 2,000 IDF troops.

In addition to the thousands of Marines and the Iwo Jima, whose home port is the Naval Station Mayport in Jacksonville, Florida, the Americans have also deployed the USS Mount Whitney as well as their Patriot missile-defense system, Aegis ballistic missile-defense system, communication systems, 25 aircraft and three hovercraft.

It is the largest joint exercise with US military’s European Command this year.


(The Jerusalem Post)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/15/2018 4:54:26 PM

WHEN 'THE BIG ONE' STRIKES, NEW EARTHQUAKE WARNING SYSTEM COULD REDUCE DEATHS

BY


A collapsed four-story apartment building in San Francisco's Marina District on October 17, 1989, after an earthquake.
DAVID L. RYAN/GETTY


Updated | On September 8, 2017, sirens rang out across Mexico City. A minute later, the ground began trembling from a major earthquake off Mexico’s southern coast. The shake killed at least 60 people, but that minute may have saved a few lives.

That there was a siren at all is something the vulnerable the U.S. West Coast is unaccustomed to. “The way I know that an earthquake is happening,” says Robert-Michael de Groot, who lives near Los Angeles, “is I feel shaking.”

De Groot coordinates a program at the U.S. Geological Survey designed to change that. A plan to alert the Pacific region about an imminent earthquake could give people precious seconds they need to escape death. In this area, where a giant earthquake—aka “the Big One”—could strike anytime, such early notice is urgently needed. De Groot and his team at the USGS are locked in a race against the Big One, and at the moment the earthquake is in the lead.

Predicting an earthquake is, for now at least, impossible. Fault zones—crushed rock separating large pieces of the Earth’s crust that give rise to seismic events—have no consistent red flags that warn us of an impending disaster. And building a citywide siren system like those in Mexico and also Japan requires infrastructure, money and time that won’t be available to U.S. cities soon.

Instead, the USGS is focusing on ShakeAlert, which produces a much more targeted, digital siren. The program relies on the one warning sign we can count on: the earthquake itself. From its source, an earthquake sends waves of energy through the ground or ocean. These waves are what cause roads to crack and buildings to crumble. But radio waves move faster, which means a radio signal emitted from the source of an earthquake will reach a city seconds faster than the shakes. A warning carried by radio signal could give people a moment, however brief, to prepare.

ShakeAlert uses a network of sensors that pinpoint the exact location of any seismic activity as soon as it begins. Each one consists of a rubber tub buried underground containing sensors that pick up shaking. On top is an antenna that sends data to USGS computers that can then calculate about how much shaking the earthquake will cause once it reaches any given location.

The USGS estimates that alerting California, Oregon and Washington about an earthquake requires 1,675 sensors spread across the region. So far, 859 are operating. Cities are the priority, says de Groot, and California’s network should be about three-quarters completed by the end of the year.

A seismometer, the ground-motion detector part of a seismograph system.GARY S. CHAPMAN/GETTY

That’s slower than the USGS had hoped, given that installations began almost a decade ago. The project has lagged in part because it’s currently running on half its desired budget. Each sensor costs about $60,000. In order to address what Donald Trump called “higher priorities,” the president requested twice that the funding be canceled, in May 2017 and again in February. Congress restored part of the money for this year’s government budget but has yet to decide whether to continue that funding into next year.

Testing the worthiness of the system raises an odd conundrum: The best time to find out if ShakeAlert works is during an actual event. “It’s always nice to have a real earthquake,” de Groot says. “But not too big, right?”

His wish came true on January 4, when a magnitude 4.4 quake hit near Berkeley. The Bay Area light rail system, known as BART, wants to use the program to stop trains before an earthquake hits. On January 4, BART received a ShakeAlert indicating the intensity of the imminent shaking; however, the earthquake struck at just after 2:30 a.m., when no trains were on the rails. Still, says BART engineer Chung-Soo Doo, the agency successfully alerted construction workers before the shaking began.

If trains had been running, the transit system’s control center would have automatically slowed them down and informed human operators, so they could determine if the train needed stopping. “From a public safety standpoint,” says BART engineer Tracy Johnson, ShakeAlert seems like something the rail system can take advantage of “with very little downside.” The only risk, says Johnson, is false alarms. A similar program with the Los Angeles light rail system is in the early stages, and the USGS is also hoping utility companies, emergency responders, and education and health care services can use ShakeAlert.

Public access to ShakeAlert is unlikely for the foreseeable future because the technology required for such a widespread system doesn’t exist. While mass alerts for tornadoes and Amber Alerts for missing children have more time, the value of earthquake alerts expires in minutes. “There’s currently no way to get a message quickly enough from our system to the public, because none of our systems were built for speed,” says de Groot. “The beauty of a hurricane warning or a tornado warning is you have some time to do something about it.” Anyone who signs up to receive the alerts would need to know how best to respond within seconds.

No matter how much technology we have, says de Groot, it will always be largely based on guesswork. No earthquake drills or computer simulations can mimic the reality of the Big One. “Earthquakes,” he says, “are very complex organisms.”

Update: This article has been updated to reflect the version that will appear in the March 23 issue of the magazine.

(newsweek)



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/15/2018 5:15:19 PM



Experts Warn Pick of Mike Pompeo Increases Odds of US Attacking Iran

March 14, 2018 at 8:34 am

(COMMONDREAMS) — For all the reasons to be concerned about President Trump’s nomination of current CIA director Mike Pompeo to replace Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State, experts on Tuesday warn that an increase risk of a U.S.-initiated war with Iran should be at the top of the list.

In case you are wondering why Rex Tillerson had to be replaced with Mike Pompeo of all people: Iran.
Tillerson was too sane for a catastrophic and absolutely unnecessary Iran war.
Pompeo, on the other hand, has been waiting for this opportunity for decades.

In a reaction on Tuesday, the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), worried openly that Trump’s nomination of Pompeo “could have profound implications for the fate of the Iran nuclear deal and the prospect of a new war in the Middle East.”

Jon Rainwater, executive director of Peace Action, also expressed grave concerns. “By tapping Mike Pompeo to be Secretary of State,” said Rainwater, “Trump is handing over the reigns of U.S. diplomacy to one of the most hawkish members of his administration. For all of Tillerson’s flaws, he served as a check on Trump’s more hawkish positions. With Pompeo, Trump’s worst instincts on Iran and North Korea will be reinforced.”

In November of 2016, as CNBC notes, Pompeo warned that the Iranian government was “intent of destroying America,” characterized the nuclear deal forged by the Obama administration as “disastrous,” and said he was looking forward to “rolling back” the agreement.

At a time when Trump has repeatedly threatened to rip up or nullify the deal, Rainater lamented how Pompeo’s “extreme policy views threaten to gut U.S. diplomatic capacity further by making war the go-to option rather a last resort.”

Given that Pompeo has also suggested military strikes would be more effective than diplomacy when it comes to Iran, NIAC said there are “serious questions about his fitness to serve as America’s top diplomat.”

According to NIAC president Trita Parsi, Pompeo as head of the State Department is “a recipe for war.”

Reminder that only a day before was announced as CIA director, he tweeted that he was looking forward to “rolling back” what he called the “disastrous" nuclear deal with Iran.

“The firing of Tillerson and appointment of Pompeo furthers a dangerous trend in which Trump is increasingly surrounding himself with foreign policy hawks who fully support his erratic and belligerent foreign policy,” Parsi later added in a statement to Deutsche Welle. “Though Tillerson was not very effective, he nevertheless was an obstacle against Trump killing the nuclear deal with Iran. Pompeo, on the other hand, has been an ardent opponent of this multilateral agreement. The Iran nuclear deal is increasingly on life support as a result of this decision.”

In fact, Trump explicitly cited Pompeo’s thinking on Iran when he was asked by reporters on Tuesday morning about Tillerson’s ouster.

“We disagreed on things,” Trump said of the outgoing secretary of state. While Trump said he believes the Iran deal is “terrible,” he said Tillerson that it “was okay.”

“So we were not really thinking the same,” Trump added. “With Mike Pompeo, we have a very similar thought process. I think it’s going to go very well.”

For those concerned about Pompeo’s aggressive and hawkish positions, however, it’s not at all clear that the results will be anywhere near very well.

“Unfortunately,” NIAC warned in its response, “the net effect of Pompeo at State may not just be be the further isolation of America and erosion of our credibility on the world stage, it may result in a dramatic escalation of tensions in the Middle East and a war with Iran.”

By Jon Queally / Creative Commons / Common Dreams






"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/15/2018 5:35:37 PM
Where America’s future prisoners are born


Men who grew up in the poorest 10 percent of American families are 20 times as likely to be imprisoned by their early 30s than men from the richest 10 percent of families, according to a new Brookings Institution analysis of the drivers of incarceration.

“We estimate that almost one in ten boys born to families in the lowest income decile are incarcerated at age 30, and they make up about 27 percent of prisoners that age,” the study's authors, Adam Looney and Nicholas Turner, concluded.

By contrast, fewer than half of 1 percent of men from the richest 10 percent of families were imprisoned on any given day in their early 30s.

That stark relationship — between childhood family income and adult incarceration — underscores how much the environments children grow up in can shape their life trajectories.

To produce their analysis, Looney and Turner collected Internal Revenue Service tax returns for 2.9 million incarcerated individuals. For a subset of about 500,000 of those inmates, they were able to link incarcerated individuals to their parents’ income tax returns, providing snapshots of where the future inmates were born and how much money their families made at the time of their birth.

They found that income was a strong predictor of future incarceration: boys born into the bottom 10 percent of the income distribution (average family income of about $14,000) were about 20 times as likely to end up incarcerated as boys born into the top 10 percent (about $143,000).

While the incarceration rates for girls were much lower, the data showed a similarly sharp incarceration gradient running along the income spectrum.

They also found that children from single-parent families were about twice as likely to end up incarcerated as the children of married parents, regardless of family income.

Children of poor families are thus heavily overrepresented in the prison population. Among the cohort of prisoners age 28 to 34 the authors examined, the bottom 5 percent of families, by income, produced about 30 percent of the inmates. The bottom 20 percent of households produced nearly half the inmates, while the bottom 50 percent of families accounted for over 82 percent of inmates.

Incorporating family structure into the analysis, the study found that “boys from single-parent families in the bottom 10 percent of the income distribution — a group that makes up only 3.7 percent of the overall population” — accounted for 20 percent of all prisoners in 2012. Conversely, boys with married parents who grew up in the top 50 percent of households accounted for 46 percent of all boys but only 14 percent of men in prison.

The data also allowed Looney and Turner to map out prisoners’ places of birth. That map, below, indicates that prisoners are “disproportionately likely to have grown up in socially isolated and segregated neighborhoods with high rates of child poverty and in predominantly African American or American Indian neighborhoods.”

In a number of Zip codes, future incarceration rates topped 10 percent. For instance, 1 in 7 children (male and female) born in North Nashville, Tenn., between 1980 and 1986 could expect to end up incarcerated on any given day in their early 30s, the highest rate in the nation among high-population Zip codes.

“The neighborhoods with high incarceration rates are predominantly black, or are otherwise nonwhite, have child poverty rates that are two to three times the national average, and have male unemployment rates substantially higher than the rest of the country,” Looney and Turner found.

“Poor African American and Native American boys living in segregated communities of concentrated poverty are highly unlikely to experience anything but unemployment or incarceration or both,” wrote the Brookings Institution’s Camille Busette in an accompanying commentary. “If we add to this the fact that police disproportionally kill African American and Native American men, it is clear that the level of exclusion faced by these men is staggering.”

Other research has shown that one way out of the cycle of poverty, violence and incarceration is to get out — literally. A 2015 study by Raj Chetty and colleagues found that “moving to a lower-poverty neighborhood significantly improves college attendance rates and earnings for children who were young (below age 13) when their families moved.”

But moving is disruptive and expensive, and families whose children stand to gain the most from moving to a new neighborhood are, almost by definition, the ones least able to afford such a move.


(The Washington Post)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/15/2018 6:19:10 PM



Gina Haspel Oversaw Brutal Torture at CIA Black Site, Then Destroyed the Evidence

March 14, 2018 at 9:47 am

(SP) President Donald Trump nominated CIA Deputy Director Gina Haspel to succeed Mike Pompeo as director of the agency. Haspel was briefly in charge of a black site prison and helped destroy evidence to cover up torture.

The possible promotion is but another consequence of the failure and refusal among President Barack Obama’s administration and the political establishment to meaningfully hold officials accountable for torture.

Trump made the announcement as part of a tweet that indicated CIA Director Mike Pompeo was nominated to replace Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, and Tillerson was effectively fired.

Haspel would not only be the first woman to run the CIA. She would also be the first woman, who helped agency officials conceal evidence of torture and abuse against detainees in the “war on terrorism,” to serve as a CIA director.

The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), which represents survivors of the CIA rendition and torture program, reacted, “During [President George W. Bush’s] administration, Gina Haspel oversaw the torture of Abu Zubaydah and others at a CIA black site in Thailand, where he was waterboarded 83 times. She was then instrumental in the destruction of the tapes of those interrogations, which were evidence of torture.”

“She is unfit to lead the CIA. Gina Haspel should be prosecuted, not promoted,” CCR added.

Republican Senator John McCain, who is chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, did not signal opposition to Haspel but stated, “The torture of detainees in U.S. custody during the last decade was one of the darkest chapters in American history. Ms. Haspel needs to explain the nature and extent of her involvement in the CIA’s interrogation program during the confirmation process.

“I know the Senate will do its job in examining Ms. Haspel’s record as well as her beliefs about torture and her approach to current law,” McCain suggested.

Democratic Senator Ron Wyden, a member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, opposed the nomination.

“Ms. Haspel’s background makes her unsuitable to serve as CIA director,” Wyden asserted. “Her nomination must include total transparency about this background, which I called for more than a year ago when she was appointed deputy director. If Ms. Haspel seeks to serve at the highest levels of U.S. intelligence, the government can no longer cover up disturbing facts from her past.”

Back in February 2017, Wyden and Democratic Senator Martin Heinrich urged Pompeo to declassify certain information on Haspel so Americans were not kept in the dark when it came to her past. They contended classifying information about her violated an executive order prohibition against concealing “violations of law” or to “prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency.”

Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein, who has served on the Senate intelligence committee and played an instrumental role in producing the study on the CIA’s torture program, was restrained in her statement on the nomination.

“I look forward to speaking again with Gina Haspel about the role she would play and how she would run the CIA,” Feinstein stated. “It’s no secret I’ve had concerns in the past with her connection to the CIA torture program and have spent time with her discussing this. To the best of my knowledge, she has been a good deputy director and I look forward to the opportunity to speak with her again.”

Feinstein apparently has no problem with Pompeo and the CIA concealing key information about her role in the torture program so she can continue to enjoy prestigious promotions in government.

Jerrold Nadler, a Democratic Representative from New York who serves on the House Judiciary Committee, unequivocally opposed the nomination.

“The Senate owes it to the American people to take a hard look at Deputy Director Haspel, whose career at the CIA coincides with some of the darkest moments in recent American history. She oversaw a ‘black site’ prison in Thailand. She approved interrogation techniques that were clearly unlawful at the time and ordered the destruction of evidence of those practices.”

Nadler added, “Torture is not only abhorrent, torture is a crime. The Senate already—rightly—denied Deputy Director Haspel a post as head of the clandestine service because of the role she played in the Bush Administration’s ‘enhanced interrogation’ program. The Senate should not confirm Deputy Director Haspel to lead the CIA.”

In 2002, Haspel briefly operated the CIA’s secret prison in Thailand. The chief of the base was given “final decision-making authority” to determine whether “enhanced interrogation” techniques against Abu Zubaydah were halted.

According to the torture report, “Over a two-and-a-half-hour period, Abu Zubaydah coughed, vomited, and had ‘involuntary spasms of the torso and extremities’ during waterboarding.”

The CIA employed a combination of torture techniques against Zubaydah that included “walling, attention grasps, slapping, facial hold, stress positions, cramped confinement, white noise, and sleep deprivation.” They used varying combinations “24 hours a day” for 17 straight days in August 2002. He was waterboarded 2-4 times a day, “with multiple iterations of the watering cycle during each application.”

As Zubaydah personally described, “They shackle me completely, even my head; I can’t do anything. Like this, and they put one cloth in my mouth and they put water, water, water.” Right before he is about to die, the board was stood up. He made heavy breathing noises. He told them, “If you want to kill me, kill me.”

Zubaydah was apparently mistaken for a top al-Qaida leader. An agency interrogator even apologized, “Sorry, we made a big mistake.” But to this day, he remains in indefinite detention at Guantanamo Bay.

Haspel engaged in a conspiracy with the National Clandestine Service chief, Jose Rodriguez, to ensure torture videotapes of Zubaydah never saw the light of day.

In Rodriguez’s memoir, “Hard Measures,” he recounted how Haspel, his chief of staff, helped him destroy the evidence.

“My chief of staff drafted a cable approving the action that we had been trying to accomplish for so long,” Rodriguez wrote. “The cable left nothing to chance. It even told them how to get rid of the tapes. They were to use an industrial-strength shredder to do the deed.

“On Tuesday, November 8, after scrutinizing the cable on my computer for a while, I thought about the decision. I was not depriving anyone of information about what was done or what was said. I was just getting rid of some ugly visuals that could put the lives of my people at risk. I took a deep breath of weary satisfaction and hit Send.”

Though Rodriguez confessed to a crime in his memoir, he was never prosecuted.

The destruction of videotapes of Nashiri and Zubaydah’s waterboarding sessions had a huge influence on the Senate intelligence committee and fueled the decision to produce a study that would clearly document the brutality of the CIA torture program and the efforts of officials, like Rodriguez and Haspel, to lie to Americans about what was done in their name.

Up until her appointment as deputy CIA director, establishment media outlets protected her identity and withheld her name from coverage of the torture program. (In fact, Rodriguez did not use her name in his 2012 book. She is only referred to as “my chief of staff.”)

It is well-known that she was part of the destruction of torture tapes, but as for what other deeds she committed while working for the CIA, the agency has withheld crucial information from the public.

With no accountability for torture, it will forever be easy for career officials like Haspel to pursue leadership positions at the CIA.

Kevin Gosztola / Republished with permission / Shadow Proof





"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!