Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/1/2017 4:26:28 PM

Britain furious, Trump unapologetic as fallout swells from anti-Muslim videos


British politicians criticized President Trump’s recent retweets of anti-Muslim videos. Some called for the cancellation of Trump’s upcoming state visit

The British revolt against President Trump swelled Thursday with Parliament members openly deriding him and Britain’s prime minister standing by her denunciations of Trump’s retweets of a fringe group’s anti-Muslim videos.

Prime Minister Theresa May blasted Trump for crossing a line by posting the inflammatory videos on his Twitter page Wednesday — and then warning May to essentially mind her own business and focus on Islamist terrorism instead of him.

But officials were careful to note that ties with the United States are stronger than the current flare-up with the White House.

“It’s increasingly clear that any official visit from President Trump to Britain would not be welcomed,” tweeted London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, the first Muslim to hold the office. Khan has repeatedly called for Britain to withdraw an invitation for Trump to visit — and his stance appeared to gain backing amid the outrage against the president.

In a sign of the disruptive wake unleashed by Trump, British Home Secretary Amber Rudd had to remind Parliament and the public that Britain’s relationship with the United States was bigger than one president — and that important trade, security and intelligence sharing are ongoing.



The Trump tweets were widely seen in Britain as the kind of exchange he might have had with a hostile power, not the United States’ closest ally and certainly not one facing Islamist terrorist attacks at home while fighting alongside the United States against the Islamic State in Syria and elsewhere.

British officials were shocked at the personal nature of the tweet against May and the suggestion that Trump was boasting — even gloating — that the United States has been relatively free of terrorist attacks while Britain has suffered a string of deadly assaults.

“@Theresa_May, don’t focus on me, focus on the destructive Radical Islamic Terrorism that is taking place within the United Kingdom,” Trump tweeted late Wednesday. “We are doing just fine!”

Trump was responding to statements from 10 Downing Street that the president was “wrong” to retweet three anti-Muslim videos from the far-right group Britain First, which describes itself as a defender against growing Islamic influence in Britain.

Trump later deleted and reposted the tweet aimed at May — because he had gotten the social media address of the prime minister wrong — suggesting to many British officials that the president was operating alone, without consultation or support from White House advisers.

May on Thursday reiterated her stance that Trump was “wrong” to share the anti-Muslim tweets.

But at a news conference in Jordan, she repeatedly deflected questions about Trump’s tweet that criticized her. Instead, she spoke about what’s called the special relationship between Britain and the United States, saying it was “an enduring relationship because it is in both our national interests for that relation to be there.”

Asked whether she would fire someone from her senior leadership team if they retweeted the same account Trump did, she said: “I have absolute confidence that my cabinet ministers would not be retweeting material from Britain First.”

Trump has a history of jumping on Twitter and causing headaches for British officials. But this was the first time that he publicly took aim at the British prime minister.

Sajid Javid, Britain’s communities secretary, tweeted that Trump “endorsed the views of a vile, hate-filled racist organisation that hates me and people like me. He is wrong and I refuse to let it go and say nothing.”

Trump once tweeted that Nigel Farage, the former leader of the anti-immigrant U.K. Independence Party, would be a “great” choice as British ambassador to the United States. He also attacked Khan, London’s mayor, following a terrorist attack at London Bridge.

Trump’s latest missives prompted an urgent debate in Parliament on Thursday, where politicians across the political divide lined up to condemn the president’s tweets. In remarks rarely uttered about a U.S. president in the House of Commons, some parliamentarians mocked Trump as “stupid.”

Stephen Doughty, a Labour Party lawmaker, told Parliament: “By sharing it, he is either a racist, incompetent or unthinking — or all three.”

He also added that “I love America,” that his great-grandfather was an American soldier and that he has traveled extensively in the United States. “It is a country and people of extraordinary generosity, courage, kindness and humanity — but this president represents none of those things.”

“We have been clear — President Donald Trump was wrong to retweet videos posted by far-right group Britain First,” Rudd said.

But she also urged lawmakers to consider the bigger value of the deep ties with the United States.

Justine Greening, Britain’s education secretary, tried to walk a similar tightrope.

“This is a president that behaves unlike any other in the nature of the tweets he puts out. I don’t believe that should be able to undermine an overall important relationship with our country,” she told the BBC.

Vince Cable, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, was one of many to call on May to cancel the state visit offered to Trump.

“She must end humiliating dependence of #Brexit Britain on goodwill of evil racist. Cancel visit,” Cable tweeted.


(The Washington Post)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/1/2017 5:20:13 PM
Why North Korea’s latest ballistic missile test is worrisome


North Korea’s state-run television broadcasted footage on Nov. 30 of Kim Jong Un monitoring the launch of its "breakthrough" Hwasong-15 missile.

In this occasional series, we will bring you up to speed on the biggest national security stories of the week.

On Wednesday, North Korea launched an intercontinental ballistic missile that may be capable of reaching the U.S. mainland. The regime is calling it the Hwasong-15, which translates to “Mars” in Korean. North Korea’s state media marked the launch by showing video images of the missile blasting off, as a newscaster proclaimed that it could carry a “super large heavy warhead.”

The missile flew 10 times higher than the International Space Station and 500 miles higher than previous missile tests of its kind. It was in the air for about 50 minutes, flying eight minutes longer than previous tests before crashing into the Sea of Japan. Analysts say that its range was more than enough to reach the United States if the missile traveled on a flatter trajectory. In general, experts agreed that the launch was a significant step forward in North Korea’s missile development.

After the launch, President Trump called China’s President Xi Jinping and vowed to impose more sanctions on Pyongyang. Yet North Korea has defied all previous rounds of sanctions, conducting 20 missile tests this year alone. On Thursday, Trump criticized the Chinese envoy to North Korea as having “no impact on Little Rocket Man” and vowed to “take care of it.” Trump has previously threatened that North Korea will be met with “fire and fury like the world has never seen.” However, North Korea experts say that any military option would result in massive casualties.

What do we know about the launch?

The test was conducted just before 3 a.m. local time on a cold night just outside the capital, an unusual time since nighttime launches are rare. Previous tests have typically occurred between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. Shea Cotton, a research associate at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, said North Korea has favored mid-mornings because “they have a full day of sun to try and collect the pieces” if something goes wrong. However, no one knows for sure how North Korea makes its decisions. Analysts say another possibility could be that North Korea wanted to show how unpredictable it can be to rattle its neighbors.

What’s new about the Hwasong-15?

North Korea released photos of the ballistic missile a day after its launch. The Washington Post’s Anna Fifield did a complete breakdown of the missile, but here are the basics:

– North Korea claims the transporter erector launcher — the vehicle used to move the missile — has one more axle than the previous version. Analysts believe they are modified Chinese trucks.

– The nose cone is much blunter than on previous versions, indicating that the missile was designed to slow as it flies and protect the warhead as it comes back down.

– The missiles likely carried a small payload, allowing it to fly farther. If outfitted with a more standard payload, the missile would “barely reach Seattle.”

– There were likely two additional engines that gave the missile a higher altitude.

– North Korean analysts were surprised to see more advanced steering of the missile via gimbaling. “This is a sort of maneuvering which is pretty fancy. You lose the least thrust that way,” said Scott LaFoy, an imagery analyst for NK News.

What can the U.S. do about this?

The boost phase for an intercontinental ballistic missiles is about three to five minutes, allowing it to climb quickly. Missile defense systems are particularly vulnerable to its speed and the ability to travel long distances. An ICBM has a minimum range of 3,400 miles, but experts estimate that the Hwasong-15 had a maximum range of 8,100 miles. North Korea’s capital and Washington, D.C., are about 6,800 miles apart.

The United States has several options, but the main deterrent is the ground-based midcourse defense program. Trump has previously claimed that the system can knock out an ICBM “97 percent of the time” — but that’s not the case. In testing the system, the Pentagon concluded that it has only limited defense capabilities. Before it shot down a mock ICBM over the Pacific, the system failed seven times in 17 tests. It uses a five-foot-long “kill vehicle” to shoot down an incoming warhead.

The head of the U.S. Missile Defense Agency said the Pacific test proved that the system worked effectively under a “realistic” test. However, some experts have questioned the statement and pointed out that they are performed in a controlled environment.


(The Washington Post)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/2/2017 9:33:38 AM
Seismograph

BOOM! Mysterious blasts rattling the skies are on the increase around the world - UPDATE at least 64 documented events (VIDEO)

A sound graph from the U.S. Geological Survey's Lakeview Retreat near Centreville, Alabama, shows a loud boom heard over Alabama at about 1:39 p.m. CST on Nov. 14, 2017.
© USGS
A sound graph from the U.S. Geological Survey's Lakeview Retreat near Centreville, Alabama, shows a loud boom heard over Alabama at about 1:39 p.m. CST on Nov. 14, 2017.
Was it a supersonic aircraft? A meteor? A ground explosion? The end of the world as we know it?

Those are the questions experts and non-experts around the world are asking themselves in recent weeks as curiously loud mystery BOOMS have not only been hear around the world, but felt - shaking buildings and rattling nerves from Alabama to Michigan, Idaho to California, Russia to Denmark.

The Alabama boom last Tuesday at 1:39 CST was heard and felt through 11 counties, but an earthquake event has been ruled out.

The day after Alabamans were shaken by that incident, something similar occurred in Idaho. No explanation has been forthcoming from law enforcement officials there.

Then, last Saturday, much the same thing was reported in Michigan, according to various local newscast. Still no explanation.

WXYZ in Detroit said the reports came in from the towns of Wyandotte, Ecorse, Lincoln Park and many others. Wyandotte Police said the loud boom did not originate in their city. Ecorse Police also said their officers heard and felt it inside their police station, but they were not able to pinpoint the source of the sound, saying it did not happen in Ecorse.

Southern New Jersey had baffled residents on Oct. 25 who called 9-1-1 centers. It was also heard and felt in the Philadelphia area. An earthquake was ruled out. There was speculation about a sonic boom from military aircraft flying out of the Naval Air Station near the Patuxent River in eastern Maryland. But a public affairs officer from the base said there were no aircraft flying in the area that morning. There is also speculation about an inversion, which happens when a layer of warmer air sits over a layer of cooler air, magnifying the sound of an aircraft miles away.


Comment: This sounds like a lame attempt to explain an event which was clearly unusual for those whom experienced it.


The same day - a world away - residents in Sydney, Australia's inner west and outer southern suburbs were awakened to extremely loud explosion sounds, leaving some fearing for their lives.

According to news reports, savage bomb-like booms echoed across the city and as far as 30 miles to the south. Powerful cracking sounds shook homes and buildings and were joined by bursts of blinding white light, likened to the flash of a speed camera. The sounds have been attributed to a lightning storm. But some aren't buying it ... because there was no lightning seen.

Similar reports in the last week were reported in Russia, Denmark, Florida, Louisiana and Texas.


Comment: To add just a few of the other 'mysterious booms' recorded in the last month or so: 16th November: Mysterious boom heard in Idaho Panhandle


On Nov. 8, there were reports in Tennessee.

On Nov. 4, in Bend, Oregon.

On Nov. 3, in Minnesota.

On Nov. 2, in San Diego.


So, what's going on?

Conspiracy theorists are jumping in with chatter about an alien invasion.

Others are talking about secret military experiments.

Numerous websites are cropping up to chronicle the events and exchange information.

But no one is coming up with official explanations for most of the events.

The experts are as baffled as the residents experiencing the disconcerting sounds and earthquake-like shocks that accompany them.


Comment: The loud booms and shaking happening all over the world is probably associated with the incredible increase of fireballs and meteors: Retired Georgia professor says meteor may have caused unexplained boom that shook Athens

And these are not the only strange sounds in the sky being recorded:For more information check out Pierre Lescaudron and Laura Knight-Jadczyk's book: Earth Changes and the Human Cosmic Connection

And for documentary evidence on the up-tick of other bizarre happenings on our planet, watch SOTT's monthly Earth Changes video report.
UPDATE: 64 mysterious booms heard all over the world this year. Why?

And the mainstream 'experts' provide an explanation but the public who actually witnessed the event just aren't buying it:

Comment: Also See: Witches, Comets and Planetary Cataclysms


(sott.net)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/2/2017 9:55:03 AM
Robots could replace nearly a third of the U.S. workforce by 2030



Over the next 13 years, the rising tide of automation will force as many as 70 million workers in the United States to find another way to make money, a new study from the global consultancy McKinsey predicts.

That means nearly a third of the American workforce could face the need to pick up new skills or enter different fields in the near future, said the report's co-author, Michael Chui, a partner at the McKinsey Global Institute who studies business and economics.

“We believe that everyone will need to do retraining over time,” he said.

By 2030, the researchers estimated, the demand for office support workers in the U.S. will drop by 20 percent. That includes secretaries, paralegals and anyone in charge of administrative tasks.

During the same period, the need for people doing “predictable physical work” — construction equipment installation and repair, card dealing, security guarding, dishwashing and food preparation, for example — will fall by 30 percent.

Other advanced economies, such as Germany and Japan, will see at least a third of their workforce similarly disrupted, the report concludes.

China's share will be smaller (12 percent), since more employers there will still find it cheaper to employ humans.

Machines can increasingly perform tasks that people have long handled. They scan Tylenol and lip balm at the drugstore. They build pickup trucks. They take your grilled cheese order at Panera.

Technology could replace up to 375 million employees worldwide by 2030, the McKinsey authors estimate.

The jobs most at risk involve repetitive tasks. About half the duties workers handle globally could be automated, according to the report, though less than 5 percent of occupations could be entirely taken over by computers.

Caretakers, psychologists, artists, writers — anyone who relies on empathy or creativity at work — can expect to have the most job security as automation continues to spread, said Jason Hong, a computer science professor at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh.

“Artificial intelligence is now taking over even white collar jobs,” he said, “but those that require lots of human touch and communication won’t be easily automated.”

Still, the McKinsey researchers foresee “substantial workplace transformations” across the globe, which they think calls for more public investment in job training centers and education.

“The shift could be on a scale not seen since the transition of the labor force out of agriculture in the early 1900s in the United States and Europe, and more recently in China,” the authors wrote.

A May survey from the Pew Research Center revealed anxiety among bosses. About a third of business leaders and technology watchers in a group of roughly 1,400 expressed “no confidence” that the country’s education system and job training programs will evolve quickly enough to meet the next decade’s labor demands.

But the McKinsey study, an eight-month endeavor, offers hope.

Susan Lund, a labor economist at the firm, said automation will open more jobs — workers who create robots, workers that run computers, occupations we can’t yet imagine — and ultimately boost U.S. productivity and general well-being, as long as the workforce can adequately adjust to a new climate.

Earlier this month, she pointed out, Stanford University researchers found that a machine could better diagnose pneumonia than radiologists.

“This is how our children could end up with a better standard of living than we have,” Lund said. “We want to be able to transition our workforce so that the people displaced can get new jobs and we can capture the benefits without the downside.”


(The Washington Post)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/2/2017 10:13:18 AM
Network

Sudanese president looks to Putin for protection against US Empire

putin sudanese president
© Kremlin Press Office/Handout
Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) and President of Sudan Omar Al-Bashir shake hands as they pose for a photo during their meeting in Sochi, Russia on 23 November 2017
As the Sudanese President returned home from his trip to Sochi to meet Russian leader Vladimir Putin, the world's media overwhelmingly seized on his plea that Moscow should provide protection to Sudan against the aggressive actions of the United States of America.

Other news outlets quoted Al-Bashir's veiled invitation to the Russians to establish a military base on Sudanese territory near the Red Sea; a political and diplomatic move that has emboldened Russia and put the rest of the region on alert. For what emerged from the presidential discussions were startling, to say the least, and has provoked a plethora of positive and negative reaction.

Al-Bashir's comments began by the statement that the visit to Russia had long been dreamt about and that Sudan was primarily opposed to the US interference in the domestic affairs of Arab countries, in particular US intervention in Iraq.

Al-Bashir blamed the US for the problems being faced in the region and said the Darfur and South Sudan problems take their roots in US policy that split Sudan into two parts and made a bad situation worse. He went on to welcome Russian intervention in Syria which he said would be lost without Moscow's assistance and he also welcomed Russian assistance to reequip the Sudanese armed forces. Lastly, he said in his official closing remarks:
Sudan may become Russia's key to Africa. We have great relations with all African nations and we are ready to help. We are also interested in developing relations with BRICS.
On social media #Sudan saw no shortage of condemnation of Al-Bashir and his comments. Social media guru, Greta van Susteren told her 1.5 million followers in response to a photograph of the two leaders shaking hands: "Putin welcoming mass killer #Sudan Pres #Bashir - he should be arresting him."

However, Sudanese diplomatic circles expressed a quiet satisfaction that the US was meted out a taste of its own medicine and a feeling was that Al-Bashir's stance was the sign of a "bold and courageous" politics.

Further examination of the drivers behind Al-Bashir's decision to paint the United States as a carnivorous predator threatening the region and responsible for the partition of Sudan, reveals the sense of injustice that Al-Bashir is said to feel and is reported to have been holding back for some time.

First, Al-Bashir and the Sudanese government appear to be angry that despite the US decision to lift 20-year old economic sanctionslast month; in practice the flow of hard currency is not actually being permitted. This week Sudan has had to put in place emergency measures to stop the effective devaluation of its currency. After falling to an all-time low of around 27 pounds to the dollar on the informal "black" market, it strengthened at the beginning of this week to about 24 pounds in anticipation of the new measures.

One diplomat, who wished to remain anonymous, told MEMO: "We thought after the lifting of sanctions we would be on a level playing field, but whilst in principle the economic sanctions have been lifted; in practise, very little has changed!"

Second, according to a journalist and political commentator close to the ruling party, Abbas Mohammed, Al-Bashir wanted to send a strong message to the United States and the Gulf countries that Sudan's foreign relations policy was entirely a matter for Khartoum. "He wanted to show that he's still in charge despite being side-lined in the negotiations to lift sanctions. He wanted to show that Sudan's foreign policy could not be dictated by the United States, the Gulf nations or any other country for that matter," he said.

Observers have not failed to notice that Al-Bashir used US Thanksgiving Day to launch a stinging attack on Washington. Unconfirmed reports suggest the US has told Khartoum that no further concessions including the removal from the state sponsor terror list would come from the US while Al-Bashir remains in power.

A few weeks ago, comments made by Al-Bashir were widely reported as indicating that he would be stepping down at the end of his turn and would support Mohammed Tahir Ayala, the governor of Gezira. However, political commentators have been quick to point out that Al-Bashir's comments were made in the context of the ongoing dispute between the Governor and the State's legislative assembly. The message was a signal to parliamentarians of his strong support for the Governor's position over and above the position taken by lawmakers.

Commentators say the statement was not intended to signal that he would be stepping down from power. In fact, just days later the governor of Gezira himself said that if the president chose to run again, Al-Bashir had his support. Confirmation of Al-Bashir's intention to run was further evidenced by the Information Minister's Ahmed Osman Bilal statement in which he said: "A constitution is not like the Holy Qur'an, it can be amended at any time."

His reference was to the 2005 constitution which only allows the President to serve two terms; but any hope that 71-year-old Al-Bashir will be out of the picture soon is by no means certain. The noises coming from his party and supporters suggest that Al-Bashir is being strongly encouraged to stay put as head of the National Congress Party. A diplomat told MEMO: "The country is still technically at war and therefore needs a strong army man to be in control, a return to rule by a civilian president would not be in Sudan's interest."

The visit to Sochi is being strongly seen as Al-Bashir's hard ball tactics to demonstrate a willingness to join the Russian BRICS block against the rest of the world, if Sudan is not given what it needs by the US Western alliance. The current listing on the state sponsor of terror may be the US leverage over Sudan to force it to continue to comply with the wishes of Washington, but Al-Bashir's Russia pronouncements appear clearly to be a calculated attempt to play the two sides against each other and force one side or the other to provide Sudan with the assistance it needs.

Nevertheless, there are concerns that the US may not play ball and might continue to impede Sudan from the debt relief and the investment opportunities it so badly needs. While support for Russia and Bashar Al-Assad will alienate the Arab world and politically marginalise Sudan. Al-Bashir may have therefore made the wrong diplomatic move but it is clear he has given all stake holders in Sudan's future some serious food for thought.


(sott.net)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!