Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/26/2017 5:10:44 PM

OPINION
MY HUSBAND IS STARVING IN AN ISRAELI JAIL—WE’LL BE REUNITED WHEN PALESTINE IS FREE

BY


Forty days ago, my husband, Marwan Barghouti, began a hunger strike from his cell in an Israeli prison—alongside over one thousand other Palestinian prisoners. The reason they are all putting their lives at risk is simple: they want to be treated humanely and with dignity. Considering that some of these prisoners are at risk of imminent death, we all wonder why the world has not intervened.

Marwan and I have been married for 32 years and during that time he has spent more time in prison than by my side. He has been struggling against the Israeli occupation of Palestine for more than 40 years. For 22 of those he was imprisoned, and for seven he was in exile after being deported by Israel. He was hunted for many months, and has survived two assassination attempts.

He was not present when each of our four children were born, or when they graduated from high school and university, or when three of them got married, or when our daughter had her two beautiful children, making him a grandfather. He has dedicated his life to the cause of freedom. In these 32 years of love and struggle, there have been many difficult days—far too many—but nothing like the last forty.

The demands that my husband and more than a thousand others are starving themselves for are basic rights. They are asking for an end to arbitrary punishments, such as being placed in solitary confinement, sometimes for years on end. They are asking for an end to torture and inhumane treatment and for better conditions when being transferred between prisons. They are asking for an end to administrative detention, a practice Israel uses to indefinitely detain thousands of Palestinians without charge or trial. Those who do get a trial for the most part stand in front of Israeli military courts with a conviction rate of 90 to 99.7 percent.

Marwan himself was tried in a civilian court in Tel Aviv for terrorism, a trialcharacterized by international observers as “political” and “unfair”, further discrediting the Israeli judicial system. No country recognized the verdict and around 130 countries, as well as the international and European parliaments, called for his release. In direct contradiction to the labels Israel tries to smear him with, Marwan has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize seven times, including by Nobel Laureates Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Adolfo Pérez Esquivel.

Since 1967, Israel has arrested an estimated 800,000 Palestinians, the equivalent of 40 percent of our male population in the occupied territory. In the eyes of the Israeli government, military and judiciary, the Palestinians are all guilty. They blame us for their continued military and colonial occupation. They want us to be guilty so they can play innocent.

The hunger-striking prisoners are asking that their right to family visits be respected. Israel forcibly transfers prisoners outside of the occupied territory — which in itself is a war crime — and uses that illegal act to justify placing restrictions on our right to visit. They require immediate family to obtain permits and often prevent many of us from seeing our imprisoned loved ones for years, if not indefinitely.

Extended family, including grandchildren, are prevented from visiting altogether. Prisoners also want access to public phones to talk to their family members, to simply hear their voices as they are denied the right to feel their touch. I myself have not touched Marwan in a decade and a half and I dream of being able to hug him for merely a second, especially in times such as these.

Israel says it respects international standards when it comes to how it treats our political prisoners. The International Committee of the Red Cross, the High Commissioner on Human Rights, and United Nations experts, and multiple states around the world utterly disagree. No further evidence is necessary for how Israel shows its “respect” but to look at its response to this hunger strike.


Israeli security officers walk next to a mural depicting jailed Fatah leader Marwan Barghuti at the Israeli Qalandiya checkpoint between Jerusalem and Ramallah, July 25, 2014.JAAFAR ASHTIYEH/AFP/GETTY

Since the strike began, Israel has retaliated against the Palestinian prisoners' peaceful protest in a variety of ways. They have placed several prisoners, including Marwan, in solitary confinement and have resorted to other inhumane treatment, including sleep deprivation, repeated cell raids, inhumane transfers to other prisons, denial of family visits, and for many, denial of legal visits. Instead of ending its violations of prisoners' rights and assaults upon their dignity, Israel has intensified them.

It has decided to try to break the hunger strike by force. Top Israeli officials have called for my husband’s execution, for the death of other prisoners, and for Israel to adopt the “Margaret Thatcher approach,” which led to the death of 10 Irish hunger strikers in 1981. Israel even passed a law in 2015 that allows for the force-feeding of hunger strikers, a law upheld by the Israeli High Court even though the U.N., human rights groups, and medical bodies worldwide state that force-feeding amounts to torture.

As they see their already-imprisoned loved ones under full-fledged assault by the occupying power, the families of prisoners on hunger strike have barely slept or eaten in forty days. They hear each day news of the deterioration of the health of dozens of prisoners and fear for their lives, wondering if among them there is their son, husband or brother. In a solidarity tent, a mother asks, “Does he have to die for me to hug him?” Another wonders, “Is dying their only way to freedom?”

Even then there is no guarantee, as Israel does not hesitate to detain corpses for years. As we mark 50 years of the occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, and almost 70 years since Israel’s mass expulsion of our people, known as the Nakba , I encourage the world to look inside Israel’s prisons if they seek to find the root of our struggle: the desire to live in freedom and dignity rather than in cages and humiliation. Those who want to be peacemakers must support the freedom of our prisoners and the freedom of our people.

Marwan told me 32 years ago, just before we got married, that so long as we are under occupation, he will dedicate his life to the struggle for freedom. He has kept his promise to the Palestinian people and that is why they trust him. But he also promised me that as soon as the occupation ends, we will be able to enjoy what every person seeks and deserves: a normal life.

Thirty-two years later, I still await that normal life as Marwan lies in solitary confinement, starving for freedom and dignity.

Fadwa Barghouti is the wife of imprisoned Palestinian leader and parliamentarian Marwan Barghouti. Convicted of involvement in five murders during the Second Palestinian Intifada, or uprising, he is currently serving five life-sentences in an Israeli prison.

(Newsweek)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/26/2017 5:27:58 PM



Gunmen Kill At Least 26 Coptic Christians in Egypt

May 26, 2017 at 7:43 am

The group was traveling in two buses and a truck through the province, which is home to a sizeable Christian minority, he said.

An interior ministry spokesman said the attack was carried out by unidentified gunmen in three four-wheel-drive vehicles.

Egypt’s president, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, called a meeting of security officials following the attack, the state news agency said.

The attack in Minya province came after church bombings in December and April claimed by the Islamic State group that killed dozens of Egypt’s Coptic Christians.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility for Friday’s attack, but IS had threatened more attacks against the Coptic population, who make up about 10 percent of Egypt’s population of 92 million.

About 70 have been killed in bomb attacks on churches in the cities of Cairo, Alexandria and Tanta since December.

The attacks prompted Sisi to declare a three-month state of emergency.

Muslim leaders condemned the killings. The grand imam of al-Azhar, Egypt’s 1,000-year-old centre of Islamic learning, said the attack, which came on the eve of Ramadan, was intended to destabilize the country.

“I call on Egyptians to unite in the face of this brutal terrorism,” Ahmed al-Tayeb said from Germany, where he was on a visit. The Grand Mufti of Egypt, Shawki Allam, condemned the perpetrators as traitors.

Egypt’s Copts are vocal supporters of Sisi, who has vowed to crush Islamist extremism and protect Christians.

But many Christians feel the state either does not take their plight seriously enough or cannot protect them against determined fanatics.

The government is fighting insurgents affiliated to Islamic State who have killed hundreds of police and soldiers in the Sinai peninsula, while also carrying out attacks elsewhere in the country.

By MEE and agencies / Republished with permission / Middle East Eye / Report a typo





"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/27/2017 9:35:57 AM

MORE THAN 700 OIL SPILLS IN NORTH DAKOTA REPORTED IN THE SAME MONTH
PIPELINE OPENS

May 24, 2017


Alex Pietrowski
Waking Times

There’s more reason to be concerned about the Dakota Access Pipeline than you may think. The distress expressed by water protesters at Standing Rock is not just for the sake of opposing big oil. There is a valid reason: the prevalence of oil spills in North Dakota.

To emphasize this possibility, let’s take a look at the number of oils pills in North Dakota recently reported by the North Dakota Department of Health. Chris Clarke at KCET, a non-profit community media organization, recaps the report:

In the year ending on May 1, 2017, according to the state’s Department of Health, the state’s oil and gas industry reported 745 involved oil spills — on average, a spill every 11 hours and 45 minutes.

Clearly, one can understand why so many have protested the Dakota Access Pipeline, which opens this month. This particular pipeline was built under the Missouri River, which is the primary water source for the Standing Rock Sioux tribe.

Recent Oil Spills in North Dakota

It goes without argument that oil pipelines are less secure than the companies building them want us to believe. Furthermore, because spill detection technology is somewhat lacking, many of the 745 leaks in North Dakota last year resulted in substantial contamination.

For example, in December 2016, nearly 530,000 gallons of oil leaked from the Belle Fourche Pipeline in Billings County. The leak contaminated private land, US Forest Service grazing land, and Ash Coulee Creek. This was just 2.5 hours from Standing Rock.

Furthermore, what’s somewhat horrifying is how True Companies, which owns the Belle Fourche Pipeline, found out about the leak. A landowner notified them when he stumbled upon the leak. Did we mention that spill detection technology is lacking? Clearly, an important disconnect exists.

Last 15 Years Weren’t Any Different

The leak in December 2016 is not an isolated incident. True Companies reported ten oil spills since 2011. In 2015, the company’s Poplar Pipeline leaked about 30,000 gallons of crude oil into the Yellowstone River. This prompted a town to shut down drinking water service to 6,000 of its residents.

Rather than dismissing these two examples as isolated incidents, consider the following. The New York Timesreports that between 2006 and 2014, more than 1,300 oil pipeline spills occurred in North Dakota. In 2006, over one million gallons leaked out into the county of McKenzie. The same county experienced a leak in 2014 with another 1,008,000 gallons of oil spilling into the environment.

Consequently, it is clear why protesters and landowners are concerned about the structural integrity of oil pipes. Oil leak examples presented in this article are not unique. Oil spills in North Dakota are actually quite common. What’s to make us believe that the Dakota Access Pipeline will not follow this alarming trend?


About the Author

Alex Pietrowski is an artist and writer concerned with preserving good health and the basic freedom to enjoy a healthy lifestyle. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and Offgrid Outpost, a provider ofstorable food and emergency kits. Alex is an avid student of Yoga and life.

This article (More than 700 Oil Spills in North Dakota Reported in the Same Month Pipeline Opens) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alex Pietrowski and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

(
wakingtimes.com)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/27/2017 10:27:54 AM



Dear UK: Your Government Already Let the Terrorists Win — but Not How You Think

(ANTIMEDIA Op-Ed) In the aftermath of the gruesome Manchester bombing, which killed 22 people Monday evening, the British government rushed to the rescue, deploying soldiers into the streets of the U.K. in the name of guaranteeing security.

But as the country’s government purports to protect its citizens, it has already proven its incompetence many times over — and it let the terrorists win long before this week. According to areport published Thursday by the Telegraph, British authorities had the suicide bomber, Abed Salman Abedi, in their grasp five times before he blew himself up at a concert Monday evening.

Sources suggest that authorities were informed of the danger posed by Abedi on at least five separate occasions in the five years prior to the attack on Monday night,” the outlet reported, also adding that“authorities were also aware that Abedi’s father was linked to a well-known militant Islamist group in Libya, which is proscribed in Britain. Abedi also had links to several British-based jihadis with Isil connections.”

People who knew Abedi had called the government’s anti-terrorism hotline to report concerns about his radicalism.

They had been worried that ‘he was supporting terrorism’ and had expressed the view that ‘being a suicide bomber was ok,’ a source told the BBC,” as noted by the Telegraph. Further, a community leader “said that Abedi was reported two years ago ‘because he thought he was involved in extremism and terrorism.’”

Despite all the clear signs Abedi posed a threat, the British government failed to prevent him from planning and executing the attack (this is also a common theme with U.S. intelligence agencies, which have shrugged off legitimate threats only to have suspects go on to commit attacks). This is the same government now claiming to hold British citizens’ safety in the highest regard.

The U.K. government’s failures are even more glaring considering the British government has one of the most extensive surveillance systems in the world. The country has one surveillance camera for every eleven people. It has sweeping mass spying capabilities. Last year, Parliament passed the Investigatory Powers Act, a sweeping anti-privacy bill that, as the Guardian reported, “legalise[d] a whole range of tools for snooping and hacking by the security services unmatched by any other country in western Europe or even the US.”

After its passage, whistleblower Edward Snowden remarked that “The UK has just legalised the most extreme surveillance in the history of western democracy. It goes further than many autocracies.”

This bill legalized spying powers the government had already been using, largely in tandem with the United States government’s surveillance apparatus. Lawmakers passed the bill without making any substantial concessions to privacy advocates, thanks in part to widespread fears of terror attacks.

Upon the Investigatory Powers Act’s passage, Jim Killock, executive director of Open Rights Group, said:

The UK now has a surveillance law that is more suited to a dictatorship than a democracy. The state has unprecedented powers to monitor and analyse UK citizens’ communications regardless of whether we are suspected of any criminal activity.”

And still, the government failed to stop Abedi. As Ron Paul’s Liberty Report observed after the Manchester bombing, “All individuals in the UK gave up their liberty for security, and as Ben Franklin warned, they ended up with neither.

Prime Minister Theresa May, who advocated the passage of the bill when she was Home Secretary, has made grandiose statements about the barbarism of the terror attack but has taken no responsibility for her government’s failure to adequately use the invasive, rights-violating tools at its disposal to ‘do its job.’

Instead, May is implying that further U.K. and N.A.T.O. intervention in Syria is a solution to preventing more attacks on British soil. Unsurprisingly, absent from her condemnations of the terror attack were any acknowledgments that the U.K. has armed and empowered the oppressive Saudi Arabian regime, which exports radical Islam and almost certainly funds ISIS, the terror group increasingly implicated in Monday’s carnage.

Her advocacy of further intervention is indisputably the worst possible course of action considering Abedi’s sister, Jomana Abedi, disclosed to the Wall Street Journal that Abedi was specifically resentful toward Western airstrikes in Syria. “I think he saw children – Muslim children – dying everywhere, and wanted revenge,” she said. If she’s correct, he can be added to the growing list of terrorists who have cited Western intervention in the Middle East as the main driver in their radicalization. The Orlando shooter, Boston bombers, and Charlie Hebdo shooters all decried Western wars in the region.

Further, the British government also participated in the 2011 ousting of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, where Abedi visited just weeks prior to inflicting the attack. Libya became a hotbed of terrorist activity after Western governments ousted Middle Eastern the dictator from power and to this day hosts a broad range of terror groups from ISIS to al-Qaeda. The West has also spent vast resources arming al-Qaeda-affiliated groups, further bolstering the proliferation of terrorism.

Regardless, it’s safe to say that no matter one’s perspective on why Abedi committed the attack, the evidence suggests the British government has failed in its responsibility to protect its citizenry. As it attempts to seize even more power and encroach even further on individuals’ civil liberties, it appears more of the same tactics will only encourage further attacks.

Opinion / Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/27/2017 10:48:17 AM
May 26, 2017


Update 12:55 p.m.: The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights now reports that over 100 civilians were killed Thursday in a pair of airstrikes in eastern Syria, up from earlier reports of 35 dead in a single airstrike. "There were two rounds of strikes: one Thursday night and the second after midnight, targeting buildings housing families of [Islamic State] fighters," said the Syrian Observatory's Rami Abdel Rahman. Our original post appears below.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reports that the U.S.-led coalition fighting the Islamic State in the Middle East killed at least 35 civilians in airstrikes in eastern Syria on Thursday, the same day the U.S. Central Command admitted to accidentally killing at least 105 Iraqi civilians in Mosul in a March targeting of two snipers.

The eastern Syrian town targeted Thursday is held by ISIS. "Among the dead are at least 26 relatives of [ISIS] fighters, many of them women and children, including Syrians and Moroccans," the head of the Syrian Observatory, Rami Abdel Rahman,told France 24. "The other nine are Syrian civilians and include five children."

Monitors aren't sure how many civilians have been killed by the U.S.-led coalition, but Airwars, a London-based group of researchers and journalists, puts the number at 366 in Iraq and Syria in April alone. The group "said it had seen civilian fatalities surge since U.S. President Donald Trump came to power and gave greater leeway to battlefield commanders," France 24 writes.

The Syrian Observatory, also based in Britain, estimates 225 civilians were killed in coalition strikes between April 23 and May 23. Before the Thursday report, the United States military had claimed 352 civilians had been "unintentionally" killed since 2014.

"Our condolences go out to all those that were affected," Major General Joe Martin said in a statement following Thursday's report on the Mosul bombing. "The coalition takes every feasible measure to protect civilians from harm." Jeva Lange


(THE WEEK)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1