Hep-B (HBV) Vaccinations are Destroying Babies Lives
Hepatitis-B is a viral attack on the liver that is transmitted by usually promiscuous sex and shared hypodermic needles for illicit drug use. It's a bodily fluid thing, reportedly. So why is it foisted on helpless infants that cannot begin to exhibit those behaviors?
The Hep-B vaccination (HBV) is administered at or near birth and again at around two months to three months and again between six months and nine months of age. It's the beginning of a lengthy runway of hazardous vaccinations “recommended” by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and enforced by most pediatricians. [1]
Even if vaccinations worked safely, it would be prudent to screen expectant women for hepatitis-B to exclude unnecessary Hep-B vaccinations for newborns. Maybe it could make sense for a newborn whose mother tested positive for hepatitis-B. However, the real dangers of heavily vaccinating infants often with Hep-B vaccinations far outweigh the bogus benefits.
This is exerted from a 2001 letter to the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) by a PhD at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Erdem I. Cantekin:
“There is no scientific evidence to justify HBV vaccination before the age when those risk factors associated with the HBV transmission (sex, needles, etc.) become relevant. Recent risk-benefit analyses show HBV vaccination among children carries one of the largestunjustified risks and substantial financial costs, second only to the new controversial conjugate pneumococcal vaccine.” (Emphasis added) [2]
Hep-B Vaccinations Don't Really Work and They are Very Dangerous
There are examples of acute hepatitis-B among those who had been vaccinated. Those examples were from "high risk" adults, young and promiscuous, and some who were exposed to hepatitis-B in clinics and hospitals (iatrogenic exposure). [3]
The announced removal of mercury additives is a public relations distraction. Mercury based thimerosal has been replaced, if in fact it was actually removed, with aluminum hydroxide, which also creates serious adverse neurological effects. [4]
Besides, even vaccines without harmful preservative and booster (adjunct) toxic chemicals have demonstrated cascading biochemical sequences that lead to autoimmune diseases after repeated vaccinations. In other words, “greening” vaccines is not the solution.
An earlier TBYIL article covers a ground breaking Japanese research discovery with lab rats that are usually impervious to autoimmune diseases. It is “scientific”, not anecdotal, and the study report was peer reviewed to ensure it was performed according to scientific guidelines. Here's the link to that article (http://www.tbyil.com/Green_Vaccine_Dangers_Paul_Fassa.htm).
Ironically, there is evidence of almost immediate liver damage from HBV shots. Several animal studies with low dose Hep-B vaccines have been published since the 1990s. [5]
A recent study discovered gene mutations that led to liver cell death. This study noted that vaccine manufacturers don't test for gene mutations in their safety tests. All the studies were reported in peer reviewed journals. How does all this affect helpless infants undergoing the CDC's rigorous vaccination schedule beginning at or near birth with the Hep-B vaccination? [1]
Renowned neurosurgeon and author Dr. Russell Blaylock puts it this way: "Because the child's brain is undergoing a period of rapid growth from the third trimester of pregnancy until age 2 years, his or her brain is at considerable risk from this insane policy" [infant vaccinations]. [6]
The statistical evidence of rapidly rising autism and SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome) is overwhelming. Yet only five percent of adverse events get reported to the voluntary adverse event reporting system (AERS), making it easier for the CDC to claim low risk to benefit vaccine ratios. [7]
Even so, adverse effects and deaths from HBV vaccines greatly outnumbers the hepatitis-B infections and deaths among children between 10 and 14 years of age, considered the earliest age span for hepatitis-B from "high risk behavior", which included promiscuous sexual activity and shared syringe needles with drug use.
One would get a realistic adverse event statistic by multiplying what is reported by ten. Most directly affected adversely and parents of children affected adversely don't even know about AERS. Others, especially medical professionals, don't want to bother with the effort required. Many doctors prefer the cover of “plausible deniability” over admitting they administered a shot that destroyed a child's life. [7]
The CDC has steadily increased the "recommended” childhood vaccination schedule since the late-1970s, inserting the HBV shot in the 1990s. Autism has skyrocketed by almost 90 percent in three decades. Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) has also jumped dramatically within the USA, which is leading all other industrialized nations in that category.
Nevertheless, mainstream medicine constantly promotes vaccine safety and efficacy for HBV shots and all others. They continually dismiss those statistics as not scientific evidence for causality; while freely using epidemiological statistics, often manipulated, for their purposes.
Don't fall for their spin. Spare your child's future, someone's child you know, and yours the agony of constant suffering and medical care from adverse vaccine injury damage. If a pregnant woman doesn't have hepatitis-B, the HBV shouldn't even be considered.
Vaccinations are risky at any age, but they're the most risky when HBV vaccinations are scheduled, before a babies brain is fully formed.
Negative health results are highly probable later if not sooner according to actual research not publicly, or widely disclosed.
See also:
The hepatitis C study America never heard about - The Berkson Clinical Study