Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
7/30/2016 11:34:56 AM

Iran’s 'dying' saltwater giant Lake Urmia turns blood-red (PHOTOS, VIDEO)

Edited time: 29 Jul, 2016 18:03


© earthobservatory.nasa.gov

A drought of epic proportions at Lake Urmia has brought the Iranian UNESCO site to the brink of disappearing off the face of the Earth, and is turning its once blue waters blood-red.

While once Urmia spanned an area five times larger than Hong Kong, its volume has decreased dramatically since 1972.


A study by hydrology experts at the University of California in 2014 painted the picture of a dying natural resource, highlighting how desiccation, or drying, had reduced the 5,000 sq km (1,930 sq mile) lake by almost 90 percent.

Its catastrophic demise has been compared to the loss of the Aral Sea, where poor irrigation and farming practices contributed to it drying up almost completely.






Massive salt content in the Urmia’s dwindling waters has now given it a deathly tinge, turning it a dramatic blood-red color.

Scientists working with NASA’s Earth Observatory have explained that as water levels drop during the hot summer months, microscopic algae and bacteria become more apparent, causing the unusual hue.

The color phenomenon has occurred a number of times before but is becoming increasingly common. Satellite monitoring of the site has revealed that the latest reddening occurred between April and July of this year.

Mohammad Tourian, of the University of Stuttgart, has been observing Urmia’s gradual disappearance. He indicated that alarming depletion of the lake at 1.03 cubic kilometers per year has allowed algae known as Dunaliella salina to take hold.


© earthobservatory.nasa.gov


“Previous research suggests that Dunaliella salina [algae] is responsible for reddening of Lake Urmia,”
Tourian said.

“In the marine environment, Dunaliella salina appears green; however, in conditions of high salinity and light intensity, the microalgae turns red due to the production of carotenoids in the cells.”

In 2014, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani announced funding of $5 billion to save the former popular tourist location.

However, there are fears that the damage done is beyond repair.

“The results from satellite imagery revealed a loss of water extent at an average rate of 220 sq km per year, which indicates that the lake has lost about 70 percent of its surface area over the last 14 years,” said Tourian.


(RT)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
7/30/2016 5:00:14 PM

Brazilian drug lord turns jail cell into luxury suite

Hugo OlazarJuly 29, 2016

View of Brazilian drug trafficker Jarvis Chimenes Pavao's cell at Tacumbu prison in Asuncion on July 28, 2016 (AFP Photo/Norberto Duarte)

Asuncion (AFP) - Paraguayan authorities got a surprise when they raided a Brazilian drug lord's jail cell... and found a three-room luxury suite complete with library, kitchen, conference room and plasma TV.

Jarvis Chimenes Pavao, considered one of South America's most dangerous drug traffickers, had been serving an eight-year sentence for money laundering at the Tacumbu prison in the Paraguayan capital, Asuncion.

But little did anyone on the outside know what kind of lifestyle that really meant -- until a powerful bomb was discovered inside the prison.

Chimenes Pavao, who was due for release next year but facing extradition back to Brazil on drug charges, had allegedly planned to use the plastic explosives to blow a hole in the prison walls and escape.

But his plan backfired when police poured into the prison to investigate and discovered his pimped out cell.

The "VIP cell," as it was known to prisoners, had three rooms with en suite bathroom, a kitchen and conference room, air conditioning, stylishly tiled walls, plush furniture and a library complete with a DVD collection to watch on the big-screen plasma TV, AFP reporters saw during a visit.

The DVDs included the full collection of "Pablo Escobar," a TV series on the feared Colombian kingpin who was killed in 1993, a hero of Chimenes Pavao's.

- Friends in high places -

The raid, which took place Tuesday night, has already shaken up the Paraguayan penal system.

Chimenes Pavao's lawyer, Laura Acasuso, told reporters the corruption that enabled her client to turn his cell into a luxury suite reached all the way to the top.

"Six or seven justice ministers and six or seven prison directors" took bribes from Chimenes Pavao, she said.

Justice Minister Carla Bacigalupo was sacked almost as soon as the scandal broke. Her replacement, Ever Martinez, vowed a crackdown.

"We're going to demolish Chimenes Pavao's cell and take measures against the prison directors who allowed this inmate to enjoy these privileges," he said.

Chimenes Pavao has now been transferred to a cell in a police special operations unit.

Among the 3,500 inmates at Tacumbu -- double its capacity -- many already say they miss him.

"I don't know what's going to become of us without him," said a fellow prisoner, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

He said Chimenes Pavao was a generous benefactor who paid for a football pitch and chapel at the prison, as well as employing bodyguards among the inmates.

"He was the most loved man in this prison," said another inmate, Antonio Gonzalez.

- 'Not a saint' -

Like at many prisons across Latin America, most inmates at Tacumbu eat only irregularly and sleep on cardboard boxes or directly on the floor. Riots are common.

"It's miserable," said Josieux, another prisoner from Brazil. "Two inmates died of hunger and cold" in June, he said.

Things were different for Chimenes Pavao, who was arrested on the Brazil-Paraguay border -- a hotbed of smuggling -- and is accused of ordering the killing of business tycoon Jorge Rafaat in the same region last month.

To be transferred to the pavilion where he was held, inmates had to pay $5,000, plus weekly rent of $600, a former inmate, Osvaldo Arias, said in a TV interview.

In return, they were allowed to use cell phones, the internet and receive visitors anytime, he said.

"He never said he was a saint," said Chimenes Pavao's lawyer.

"But he was completing his sentence and helping out with the money he earns legally through his companies," which employ 1,200 people, she said.

She said her client paid for lodgings for prison directors, toilets for the guards, the renovation of the prison library and the cooks' salaries.


(Yahoo News)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
7/30/2016 5:29:24 PM

We’re confused: Six Flags didn’t let this girl back in to the park because she was wearing a…t-shirt

July 29, 2016


A few weeks ago, 22-year-old Bina Ramesh was celebrating her birthday in what should have been a fun-filled, relaxed afternoon at Six Flags (located in Jackson, NJ). But instead of fun, she was served a major dose of sexism. Why? Because the security team didn’t like her t-shirt.

giphy-19
giphy-19

“I was re-entering the park with my friends after I was already admitted earlier that day,” Ramesh told Seventeen. “I had forgotten something in the car. Going back in, I had to go through the metal detectors again, which had lights that picked up the neon light blue bralette I was wearing under my T-shirt.”

Security guards decided her shirt, which was literally a regular gray t-shirt any of us can be found lounging around in, was “inappropriate” and “against park rules.”


Luckily, a friend was willing to swap shirts with her. Of course they didn’t mind the shirt on his body, but on hers, it was inappropriate. Cue major eye roll.

When Ramesh posted about the awful incident (I mean seriously, it was her BIRTHDAY) to Facebook, people immediately rallied around her. The post has over 300 “likes” and 88 shares to date. What happened was *so* obviously messed up. “I’m so glad that people felt as angry as my friends are I about the situation,” she said. “But this double standard needs to change.”

As I was entering Six Flags I was stopped by security because my top was considered inappropriate for the park's...

Posted by Bina Ramesh on Sunday, July 10, 2016

We couldn’t agree more. It’s bad enough that dress codes prove time and time again that no matter how young we are, women’s bodies are viewed as sexual objects. Talk about a major step backwards. Shout out to Bina Ramesh for refusing to stand down in the face of sexism. We’re with you, Bina.



(Yahoo News)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
7/30/2016 5:47:55 PM

Trump, Clinton spar for national security upper hand

July 30, 2016

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump walks off after speaking during a campaign rally at Wings Over the Rockies Air and Space Museum, Friday, July 29, 2016, in Denver. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

WASHINGTON (AP) — In their struggle for the upper hand on national security, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are emphasizing strikingly different themes - he as the bold and cunningly unpredictable strongman who will eliminate terrorism; she as the calm, conventional commander in chief who will manage all manner of crises.

Terrorism is Trump's national security touchstone, and the Islamic State group is his target. He promises to wipe it out, and quickly.

Clinton accuses him of fearmongering and of denigrating the U.S. military as gutted and worn out. She presents herself as the anti-Trump.

"America's strength doesn't come from lashing out," she said in accepting the Democratic nomination Thursday. "Strength relies on smarts, judgment, cool resolve, and the precise and strategic application of power." By implication, Trump is cast as bombastic, scattershot, impulsive and fanciful.

National security has emerged as a key focus of the campaign — more the candidates' temperaments than their plans

Trump says he is best suited because he would be a dealmaker and deliberately unpredictable, thus making it more difficult for adversaries to counter his military or diplomatic moves. Clinton pitches her steadiness and depth of experience from eight years in the Senate and four years as President Barack Obama's secretary of state.

Each has zeroed in on what many consider the most worrisome issues: terrorism and an assertive Russia. The next president, however, will face a wider range of problems, to include ending the war in Afghanistan, managing the nuclear ambitions of Iran and North Korea, coping with a rising China and ending a cycle of bloody instability in Iraq and Syria. There also are challenges in cyberwarfare, nuclear weapons and the modernization of the U.S. military.

Trump calls his approach "America first," meaning alliances and coalitions would not pass muster with him unless they produced a net benefit to the U.S. He drew rebukes from much of the national security establishment when he suggested in a recent newspaper interview that as president he might not defend certain NATO member countries against outside attack if they were falling short of the alliance's defense spending targets. He also has been accused of being too easy on Vladimir Putin, the Russian president whom Trump has openly admired.

Clinton sees international partnerships as essential tools for using American influence and lessening the chances of war. That is an approach rooted in a U.S. tradition of bipartisan support for institutions such as NATO, whose value and future Trump says should not be taken for granted.

Trump has tried to keep his focus on fear. In his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention he decried "war and destruction." He said the long-volatile and often violent Middle East is now "worse than it has ever been before," suggesting Americans are increasingly at risk.

He mocks Clinton's experience as a member of Obama's war Cabinet, labeling her legacy at the State Department as "death, destruction, terrorism and weakness."

She questions Trump's reliability. "He loses his cool at the slightest provocation," she said in her acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention. "Imagine him in the Oval Office facing a real crisis. A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man we can trust with nuclear weapons."

The commander in chief's responsibility in the nuclear arena is not traditionally a hot-button issue on the campaign trail. But it has arisen more regularly this time, mainly because the Democrats see Trump as vulnerable to voter doubts about whether he could be trusted to use nuclear restraint. He raised eyebrows during a Republican primary debate when he seemed unaware of the nuclear "triad," the bombers, submarines and long-range missiles that have comprised the three basic pieces of the American nuclear arsenal for more than 50 years.

Through her supporters, including retired military officers, Clinton has pushed back on Trump's claim that he alone has the right formula for keeping America secure.

"She, as no other, knows how to use all instruments of American power, not just the military, to keep us all safe and free," John Allen, the retired Marine general and former presidential envoy to the international coalition aligned against the Islamic State, told the Democratic National Convention.

Allen presented a counterpoint to Trump's top military supporter, retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. In his address to the Republican National Convention, Flynn doubled down on Trump's portrayal of Clinton as unqualified to be president. He blamed her for "bumbling indecisiveness, willful ignorance and total incompetence."


(Yahoo News)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
7/30/2016 6:06:26 PM

I’VE CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT BLACK LIVES MATTER

On the rare occasions when I'm stopped by the police, I'm a bit nervous about it. If I were black, I would have good reason to be terrified.



This article first appeared on the Independent Institute site.

My initial reaction to the Black Lives Matter movement, like many old white guys, was that All Lives Matter. But recent events have changed my thinking on this.

My old thinking: Racial discrimination is a reality, but race is just one of many personal characteristics on which people discriminate. Good-looking people tend to be favored over ugly people. Tall people tend to be favored over short people. People with British accents tend to be favored over people with Southern accents.

Everyone should be treated as an individual and not judged based on personal characteristics over which they have no control. That doesn’t always happen, but a free society does not force people to deal with others except on terms that are mutually agreeable.

If someone discriminates based on race or any other characteristic, those discriminated against must deal with this as best they can. People can’t be forced to drop their biases.

My new thinking: When those who hold racial biases also hold government-issued firearms and are given a mandate to go after the bad guys, this is life-threatening to those who the people with the guns and the mandate are biased against. Everyone who is reading this is well aware of the number of video recordings of white cops killing black victims who posed no immediate threat to anyone.

07_30_Black_Lives_01
Police prepare for a violent confrontation as people gather on Interstate 94 to protest the fatal shooting of Philando Castile by Minneapolis area police during a traffic stop, in St. Paul, Minnesota, on July 9. Randall Holcombe writes, "On the rare occasions when I’m stopped by the police, I’m a bit nervous about it. If I were black, I would have good reason to be terrified."
ADAM BETTCHER/REUTERS

On the rare occasions when I’m stopped by the police, I’m a bit nervous about it. If I were black, I would have good reason to be terrified.

I place some of the blame for the current situation on the war on drugs, and some on the way police are trained.

As for the war on drugs, any victimless crime requires that law enforcement actively search for violators, because those violating the law are trying to keep their activities hidden, and nobody has an incentive to report the activity.

Victims of robberies or muggings report those crimes to the police and want the police to help them. Buyers and sellers of drugs want to hide what they are doing from the police, who then have to come up with various pretenses to try to detect drug activity.

It creates an adversarial relationship between police and citizens. All citizens. Because the police don’t know whether you’re a drug dealer or a drug user, everyone’s privacy is subject to violation and everyone is a suspect.

But if police suspect that some races are more likely to be involved in drug activity than others (even if it is true), those people are subject to more invasive policing, and the relationship between those people and the police is even more adversarial.

As for the way police are trained, I have a minimal amount of firearms training, most of it from law enforcement personnel, and my views are partly based on that training. I admit up front my training is minimal and welcome anyone to provide more information and set me straight if I’m wrong. Two things have bothered me about the training I’ve received.

First, there was an emphasis on using a firearm to get a “bad guy.” That’s the term that was used over and over again. I’ll agree that muggers, home invaders and carjackers are bad guys.

Because of the law enforcement background of the people who ran the courses I took, I assume that they are trained using the same language. Their job is to get the bad guy. This type of training creates an adversarial mindset among law enforcement personnel, in contrast to “the policeman is your friend” type of propaganda we’ve heard.

When the police stop someone for questioning, the officer’s mindset isn’t, “I’m your friend,” it is, “There is a good chance this is a bad guy. That’s why I’m questioning him.” Combine that with a racial bias, and it’s bad for blacks.

Second, I’ve done some scenario training, also run by law enforcement personnel, and the heavy emphasis in the training I had was on shooting quickly to neutralize the threat. Something bad was always happening in those scenarios. It was never a mistake to draw and shoot quickly. The mistake was to fail to recognize the threat until the “bad guy” had the upper hand.

Think about the recent police shootings in this context. Police are trained that they are going after bad guys, and they are trained to react quickly to neutralize any perceived threat. Those police were just doing what they have been trained to do.

The war on drugs combined with the nature of police training makes police view themselves in an adversarial relationship with citizens. Combine this with the increasing militarization of the police, and the police start to look more like an occupying force rather than the protector of our rights.

The situation is unfortunate for everyone, but when a group of people find themselves more suspect just because of their race, it’s especially bad for them. Sure, all lives matter. But black lives are the ones most threatened by the ever more adversarial police state.

Randall G. Holcombe is research fellow at the Independent Institute and DeVoe Moore professor of economics at Florida State University. This article was reprinted with permission of the publisher. © Copyright 2016, Independent Institute, 100 Swan Way, Oakland, California 94621-1428; http://www.independent.org;info@independent.org

(Newsweek)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1