3333-ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? | View Thread

…by Jonas E. Alexis

You certainly cannot make this stuff up. NATO allies are preparing to send at least 4,000 troops in Poland and the Baltic countries,[1] presumably to keep an eye on Russia. But according to Business Insider, a Zionist outlet which has been anti-Putin since the beginning to time, it is Russia that is being aggressive here![2]

Meanwhile, Stephen Blank of the American Foreign Policy Council has promiscuously declared in Newsweek that “Putin has made clear that Russia, under his rule, will not and cannot make credible commitments.”[3] A categorical lie.

Putin has made clear that the West needs to bring back practical reason in the political sphere. His reference to Satanism in the West is an implicit statement which basically says that the West has lost its moral ground. As he put it, “This is the path to degradation.”

Putin has also made clear that countries like America need to stop destroying one nation after another in the name of “democracy” and “freedom.” Iraq is virtually destroyed. Libya is virtually destroyed, and New World Order agents, as we have already seen, aspired to do the same thing in Syria. Putin has finally said, “Not on my watch.”

But Blank moves on to posit another categorical lie: NATO is acting in “self-defense”![4] Both the New York Post and U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter are basically saying the same thing.[5]

But one needn’t be an intellectual to realize that this statement is really dumb. As Pat Buchanan has brilliantly asked, “But how are Russian troops deploying inside Russia ‘provocative’, while US troops on Russia’s front porch are not?”

There is no rational answer to this question because NWO agents have already abandoned practical reason in the political realm and have yielded to essentially diabolical forces, which usually come in the form of “democracy” and “freedom.” As Jim W. Dean has pointed out, Buchanan has and will continue to make lots of enemies for saying things like that.

So, the ideological equation which the New World Order continues to impose upon us all simply cannot be balanced and is therefore false. Vladimir Putin again is not on the wrong side of the equation; NATO is. Putin is certainly having a blast over how NWO agents and Satanists are trying very hard not to be stupid, as he had in the past:

NATO’s expansionist ideology has been going on for some time,[6] and it is undeniable that they seek to create conflict with Russia.[7] NATO has recently been attempting to spread its wings in countries like Hungary and Slovakia.[8] It was reported that the United States pledged at least “$68mn NATO investment into Estonian military bases.”[9]

In response to NATO’s expansionist ideology, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said:

“NATO military infrastructure is inching closer and closer to Russia’s borders. But when Russia takes action to ensure its security, we are told that Russia is engaging in dangerous maneuvers near NATO borders. In fact, NATO borders are getting closer to Russia, not the opposite…NATO seeks expanding geopolitical space to encircle states that disagree with it.”[10]

What NATO is actually saying is that Russia is the true enemy, and terrorist states like Turkey are friends and allies. How else would the EU plan to “grant visa-free travel to Turkish citizens”?[11]

Thank God that people are waking up to practical reason, which is the force that drives virtually everything in this world, including serious science, history, mathematics, politics, etc.. This means that NWO agents are in trouble.

Human beings did not invent practical reason; it was there long before we even existed. The major difference between us and NWO agents is that we have submitted our appetite to practical reason, but they have submitted practical reason to their appetite. In that sense, NWO agents and Satanists live in an irrational world, in which good is evil and evil is good. In that sense, NWO agents and Satanists are following John Milton’s Satan as described in Paradise Lost.[12]

But we are the children of light. We will not and can never succumb to NWO’s deliberate lies and fabrications. We will never support their diabolical plan, which always promises “democracy” and “freedom” but always delivers something completely different. We are the children of practical reason. To use a metaphysical term, we are the children of Logos, and since Logos created us all, we will all do well to submit our passion to practical reason. This is actually true freedom.

[1] Julian E. Barnes and Anton Troianovski, “NATO Allies Preparing to Put Four Battalions at Eastern Border With Russia,” Wall Street Journal, April 29, 2016.

[2] “Russia keeps flying fighter jets aggressively close to US planes in Europe,”Business Insider, April 30, 2016.

[3] Stephen Blank, “Putin Threatens the West With NATO Ultimatum,” Newsweek, May 3, 2016.

[4] Ibid.

[5] “Why Russian planes are playing ‘chicken’ with US forces,” NY Post, May 2, 2016; Robert Burns and Josh Lederman, “Pentagon chief: US won’t be intimidated by Russia’s ‘nuclear saber-rattling,’” Associated Press, May 3, 2016.

[6] See for example Ian Traynor, “Ukraine crisis: Nato plans east European bases to counter Russia,” Guardian, August 27, 2014.

[7] “NATO Wants to Create Conflict in Baltics – Russian Ambassador to Sweden,”Sputnik News, June 21, 2015.

[8] “NATO to create new HQs in Hungary & Slovakia, boost response forces – Stoltenberg,” Russia Today, October 8, 2016.

[9] “US pledges $68mn NATO investment into Estonian military bases,” Russia Today, August 8, 2015.

[10] Quoted in “NATO to send 4,000 troops to border with Russia – report,” Russia Today, April 30, 2016.

[11] Pavitra Dwibhashyam, “EU to press ahead with plan to grant visa-free travel to Turkish citizens,” International Business Times, May 2, 2016.

Rania Al Abdullah is queen of Jordan.

In his novel “Blindness,” José Saramago asks us to imagine a world where one by one, people lose their sight. The epidemic triggers apocalyptic scenes of panic, cruelty, disorder and, eventually, the breakdown of society. It’s fiction, of course. After all, how could the whole world go blind?

That’s what I used to think.

After visiting the Kara Tepe camp in Lesbos, Greece, last week to meet a group of refugees and to support the life-saving work of the International Rescue Committee, I think truth could be stranger than fiction. In fact, I’m thinking about writing a sister novel to Saramago’s.

I’d call it “Deafness.” Because no one’s listening.

No one’s listening to the nearly 155,000 refugees who have risked their lives to reach Greece since the start of this year.

No one’s listening to Maha, the bright and articulate 24-year-old gynecologist trainee from Raqqa, Syria. For nearly four years, she defied the odds — conflict, threats, danger and deprivation — to study and work in a hospital. What kept her there, she told me, was that “the needs were so great, and doctors were in such short supply.” But, in March, finally, so scared that Daesh, also known as ISIS, would target her, she succumbed. She made the heart-rending decision to abandon her vocation and fled through 46 checkpoints guarded by all parties to this conflict — each one a frightening ordeal — to get to the Turkish border. If the fighters — on either side — found out she was a doctor, they likely wouldn’t let her leave, so she sewed her papers into the lining of her jacket to conceal them.

During parts of her trip, this talented young medic, just one year away from qualifying to be a gynecologist, crawled through mud to avoid being caught. “I never felt safe — not for a single minute,” she whispered. “I still don’t.”

“From death to death to death” is how she described the ordeal of those who finally reached the shores of Lesbos. “All we want is a new chance at life.”

No one’s listening to her mother, Sadaa, either. All she wants is to see her sons, who are in Germany. “I got as far as Macedonia,” she said, “but then I came back to get my daughter, and then the borders closed. Now, I’m here with her, my sons are in Germany and my husband is in Syria with his sick father. What do I do? Where do I go?”

And no one’s listening to Fatina, who, just one month ago lost her husband on a boat as they fled Turkey. Eighty refugees were forced at gunpoint onto a dinghy designed for 25. They were crammed in, literally, one on top of the other. Her husband, at the bottom of the pile at the front of the inflatable craft, drowned. The only thought that kept her going on the terrifying sea crossing was that they had escaped Syria and were on their way to start a new life with their four children: 18-month-old twins, a boy and a girl; and two daughters, 4 and 6.

In front of her children, she puts on a brave face. “God gives you power,” she said. But when her children aren’t looking, tears tumble down her cheeks. “I just don’t know what to do,” she sobbed, cradling her head in her hands.

Each and every story is harrowing. Exhaustion hangs, thickly, in the air. I wonder how much more these women can endure. Each and every story is different, but they are linked by the threads of helplessness, hopelessness and despair. These are women at their breaking point.

There’s only one thing worse than enduring brutal conflict, escaping your homeland, leaving behind everything you know, abandoning your dreams, risking your life, becoming destitute, being abused, fragmenting your family, watching your children suffer and losing loved ones, and it is this: arriving at a place you think is a haven only to be told you will likely be sent back. No one is sure when. No one is sure where. That is the definition of futility — and it’s cruel. Because no one chooses to be a refugee. Refugees are refugees because the alternative used to be death. Now, there’s a worse option: a living death. That is what I saw on Lesbos.

Once you hear their stories, you can’t un-hear them. So, maybe it’s not that the world can’t hear. Maybe it’s that it won’t hear. Maybe it’s not an epidemic of deafness, but of selective hearing — we hear only what we want to hear and shield ourselves from what we don’t want to confront.

Because if the world listened to the stories — in Greece, Lebanon, Jordan (the kingdom estimates that there are 1.3 million Syrians now living there) and beyond — more people would feel compelled to act. And small acts of kindness would give way to bigger and bolder ones — which would give way to humane policies to help refugees.

But, first, we all must listen. To the sighs and the screams and the stifled sobs. To the exhausted exhalations and the broken voices. To the prayers and the wretched memories. To the whispered pleas: “All we want is a new chance at life.”

They’re telling us a story — a nonfiction story. Let’s dignify them by listening, and by supporting them in practical and lasting ways.

(The Washington Post)

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 5/6/2016 10:56:06 AM
	Monsanto loses... Ted Cruz OUT! Wednesday, May 04, 2016 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger (NaturalNews) Ted Cruz, the Republican presidential candidate who characterized opposition to genetically engineered crops as "anti-science zealotry" has thrown in the towel. He's out! And like most Natural News readers, we are happy that a pro-Monsanto candidate has left the race (although we did really like Cruz's knowledge of the law and the Constitution). Ted Cruz positioned his campaign as an "outsider," but he was fueled by insider money and insider interests all along. Ultimately, he got "out-outsided" by the ultimate outsider, Donald Trump. "From the start, Cruz had premised his candidacy on the idea that 2016 would be an election driven by resentment toward the established GOP order. It was a strategy that looked prescient as Cruz steadily rose in the polls throughout 2015 and broke into the top tier in Iowa in early 2016," reports Politico. "But what Cruz did not expect is that he would be outmatched in outsider anger by Trump." Cruz's exit leaves Trump almost certain to win the Republican nomination, causing Natural News readers and fans to turn their focus to the Democrat side of this race, where the "Bride of Frankenfood" Hillary Clinton is literally stealing the race from Bernie Sanders, an outspoken proponent of GMO labeling and a strong voice for countering the monopolies of corporations like Monsanto. Nearly all Natural News readers are either Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders fans. Nobody wants Hillary Clinton in office... not even most Democrats. Let's get Bernie into position and sweep Hillary out of the way for good! Bernie Sanders pulled out an amazing victory in Indiana today, thrusting the Democrat establishment into total disarray. "I know that the Clinton campaign thinks this campaign is over. They're wrong," Sanders said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press from New Albany, Indiana. "Maybe it's over for the insiders and the party establishment but the voters today in Indiana had a different idea." (SOURCE) If Hillary Clinton continues to steal the rigged nomination, this race will end up pitting Clinton, a Monsanto operative, against Trump, a courageous anti-establishment candidate who can't be bought off by Monsanto money. Let us all hope that the influencers on the left can upset Clinton and get Bernie into position for the nomination. If that happens, Monsanto will have lost both parties and we might end up with an opportunity for ending the corporate agriculture monopolies that are devastating our farmers, poisoning our crops and contaminating our food supply with cancer-causing glyphosate herbicide. Once Trump secures the nomination on the Republican side, Natural News reporters are going to attempt to determine Trump's position on GMOs, Monsanto and glyphosate. He hasn't detailed his views on such topics yet, but we do know that he's already pro organic food, so there's hope for a rational position that opposes the mass poisoning of the food supply by the agriculture giants (and the EPA which actively and deliberately conspires with Monsanto to poison the American people with cancer chemicals). Stay tuned to Natural News for more updates on all this. NOTE: We don't cover pure politics on Natural News anymore, but we do cover candidates' positions on GMOs, vaccines, fluoride, complementary medicine and similar issues of great interest to our readers. Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/053884_Ted_Cruz_Monsanto_Donald_Trump.html#ixzz47s66fR99
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+2

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 5/6/2016 11:05:54 AM
	CDC discloses that flu vaccinations fail 50 percent of the time Thursday, May 05, 2016 by: Isabelle Z. (NaturalNews) We've all heard the horror stories of people suffering injury and even death from the flu shot. Now, to add insult to injury, the CDC has admitted that the flu shot does not prevent the flu in most cases. A statement taken directly from the CDC's website reads: "While vaccine effectiveness can vary, recent studies show vaccine reduces the risk of flu illness by about 50% to 60% among the overall population during seasons when most circulating flu viruses are like the vaccine viruses." There is a lot of disturbing information packed into that sentence. First of all, vaccines only reduce the risk of flu illness by 50 to 60 percent in the overall population? What about those who need it most: the immune-compromised and the elderly? Also note how they say this statistic is relevant "during seasons when most circulating flu viruses are like the vaccine viruses." How can you be sure when they are injecting you that the strains chosen are the ones that will actually be circulating in your area that year? How are those who make the vaccines even sure? It's a gamble at best; do you want to gamble with your health? Too many factors at play The CDC website goes on to outline the factors that influence how well the vaccine works. In an interesting typo, the subheading says: "What are factors that influenza how well the vaccine works?" – not exactly the best way to inspire confidence in the validity of anything they say. They state: "During years when the flu vaccine is not well matched to circulating viruses, it's possible that no benefit from flu vaccination may be observed." Is this really worth the substantial risks the vaccine brings? They also warn that the flu vaccine works best on "healthy adults and older children," who also happen to be the groups of people best equipped to fight the illness on their own and therefore least in need of such a vaccine in the first place. Meanwhile, vaccines are reportedly less effective in the elderly. Just one sentence is devoted to this vital fact, and it is followed by a six-point bulleted list arguing why the elderly should get the shot anyway. With so many factors at play, even those who are not opposed to shooting their bodies up with chemicals in theory have got to be asking themselves just why a vaccine with such a poor track record is repeatedly pushed on the American public. At the end of the page, long after most people have stopped reading, the CDC outlines how people can protect themselves against the flu besides by getting vaccinated. Not surprisingly, their first suggestion is antiviral prescription drugs as a second line of defense. It's almost as if Big Pharma wrote this page themselves. They go on to suggest covering your mouth when you cough and washing your hands frequently. Why is no one mentioning natural alternatives? Why don't they mention that green tea supplements reduced people's risk of getting the flu by 75 percent in clinical trial involving nearly 200 healthcare workers, which is a far better result than the flu vaccine gets? In addition, green tea brings a host of other health benefits with it, rather than miserable side effects like the vaccine. Of course, this statistic is no surprise to those who understand and practice natural health. Vitamin C found naturally in limes and kiwis, vitamin D from the sun, and probiotics won't make doctors and pharmaceutical companies rich, but they do have the power to reduce your flu risk, and their efficacy is not dependent on the ability of a group of people you don't know to predict which strains of flu are going to be prevalent next year. Given such an appalling failure rate, why are people being pushed to get this vaccine? Even more alarmingly, a CDC analysis of the effectiveness of the flu vaccine over the past decade showed that the seasonal flu shot is less than 50 percent effective more than half the time! In spite of this, government health officials recommend that all children and adults get the flu shot yearly starting at six months of age, and some healthcare workers who opt not to get the shot actually risk losing their jobs. Among the many questions this raises is why are healthcare workers, who are presumably well-informed about such matters, willing to lose their jobs to avoid this ineffective shot? Check out the Natural Medicine, Healing & Wellness Summit to learn more about protecting your health without risky, ineffective vaccines! Sources include: HealthImpactNews.com CDC.gov NaturalNews.com Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/053909_CDC_flu_shots_vaccine_ineffectiveness.html#ixzz47s9CnG15
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+2

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 5/6/2016 11:17:38 AM
	Queen Rania: The Syrian refugees I met are experiencing something worse than death Queen Rania of Jordan (center,)meets with refugees during her visit to Kara Tepe camp on the Greek island of Lesbos, on April 25. (Associated Press) By Rania Al Abdullah May 5 at 7:20 PM Rania Al Abdullah is queen of Jordan. In his novel “Blindness,” José Saramago asks us to imagine a world where one by one, people lose their sight. The epidemic triggers apocalyptic scenes of panic, cruelty, disorder and, eventually, the breakdown of society. It’s fiction, of course. After all, how could the whole world go blind? That’s what I used to think. After visiting the Kara Tepe camp in Lesbos, Greece, last week to meet a group of refugees and to support the life-saving work of the International Rescue Committee, I think truth could be stranger than fiction. In fact, I’m thinking about writing a sister novel to Saramago’s. I’d call it “Deafness.” Because no one’s listening. No one’s listening to the nearly 155,000 refugees who have risked their lives to reach Greece since the start of this year. No one’s listening to Maha, the bright and articulate 24-year-old gynecologist trainee from Raqqa, Syria. For nearly four years, she defied the odds — conflict, threats, danger and deprivation — to study and work in a hospital. What kept her there, she told me, was that “the needs were so great, and doctors were in such short supply.” But, in March, finally, so scared that Daesh, also known as ISIS, would target her, she succumbed. She made the heart-rending decision to abandon her vocation and fled through 46 checkpoints guarded by all parties to this conflict — each one a frightening ordeal — to get to the Turkish border. If the fighters — on either side — found out she was a doctor, they likely wouldn’t let her leave, so she sewed her papers into the lining of her jacket to conceal them. During parts of her trip, this talented young medic, just one year away from qualifying to be a gynecologist, crawled through mud to avoid being caught. “I never felt safe — not for a single minute,” she whispered. “I still don’t.” “From death to death to death” is how she described the ordeal of those who finally reached the shores of Lesbos. “All we want is a new chance at life.” No one’s listening to her mother, Sadaa, either. All she wants is to see her sons, who are in Germany. “I got as far as Macedonia,” she said, “but then I came back to get my daughter, and then the borders closed. Now, I’m here with her, my sons are in Germany and my husband is in Syria with his sick father. What do I do? Where do I go?” And no one’s listening to Fatina, who, just one month ago lost her husband on a boat as they fled Turkey. Eighty refugees were forced at gunpoint onto a dinghy designed for 25. They were crammed in, literally, one on top of the other. Her husband, at the bottom of the pile at the front of the inflatable craft, drowned. The only thought that kept her going on the terrifying sea crossing was that they had escaped Syria and were on their way to start a new life with their four children: 18-month-old twins, a boy and a girl; and two daughters, 4 and 6. In front of her children, she puts on a brave face. “God gives you power,” she said. But when her children aren’t looking, tears tumble down her cheeks. “I just don’t know what to do,” she sobbed, cradling her head in her hands. Each and every story is harrowing. Exhaustion hangs, thickly, in the air. I wonder how much more these women can endure. Each and every story is different, but they are linked by the threads of helplessness, hopelessness and despair. These are women at their breaking point. There’s only one thing worse than enduring brutal conflict, escaping your homeland, leaving behind everything you know, abandoning your dreams, risking your life, becoming destitute, being abused, fragmenting your family, watching your children suffer and losing loved ones, and it is this: arriving at a place you think is a haven only to be told you will likely be sent back. No one is sure when. No one is sure where. That is the definition of futility — and it’s cruel. Because no one chooses to be a refugee. Refugees are refugees because the alternative used to be death. Now, there’s a worse option: a living death. That is what I saw on Lesbos. Once you hear their stories, you can’t un-hear them. So, maybe it’s not that the world can’t hear. Maybe it’s that it won’t hear. Maybe it’s not an epidemic of deafness, but of selective hearing — we hear only what we want to hear and shield ourselves from what we don’t want to confront. Because if the world listened to the stories — in Greece, Lebanon, Jordan (the kingdom estimates that there are 1.3 million Syrians now living there) and beyond — more people would feel compelled to act. And small acts of kindness would give way to bigger and bolder ones — which would give way to humane policies to help refugees. But, first, we all must listen. To the sighs and the screams and the stifled sobs. To the exhausted exhalations and the broken voices. To the prayers and the wretched memories. To the whispered pleas: “All we want is a new chance at life.” They’re telling us a story — a nonfiction story. Let’s dignify them by listening, and by supporting them in practical and lasting ways. (The Washington Post)
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+2

Menu

Forums

Vladimir Putin: New World Order Agents and Satanists Make Me Laugh

…by Jonas E. Alexis

Monsanto loses... Ted Cruz OUT!

Let's get Bernie into position and sweep Hillary out of the way for good!

Too many factors at play

Why is no one mentioning natural alternatives?

Given such an appalling failure rate, why are people being pushed to get this vaccine?

Praying for Palmyra: Russian maestro leads orchestra in ruins of ancient city