Is there a concentrated plan actively in place to reduce the human population on Planet Earth?

What a question to ask! However, according to a March 2016 paper by Kevin Galalae published in the journal Epidemiology: Open Access titled “Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population Growth” [1], Galalae sets out in his 16-page article what’s been going on and summarized in the paper’s Conclusion, in part:

All epidemics and pandemics of the past 30 years are fabrications of the UN system and its partners in crime at the national level for the purpose of lowering births below the magic line of replacement level fertility and, more recently, also for limiting life to an economically acceptable and environmentally sustainable age. [2]

Galalae goes on to conclude:

The strategy of depopulation has evolved and has been accelerated and amplified. Having exposed the covert chemical, biological, psychosocial and economic methods of population control, and having destroyed our governments’ cover of secrecy, we have shut down their ability to commit genocide by turning man against man through the misuse of the institutions of state, concealment of vital information, abuse of the rule of law, perversion of science, falsification of facts, misappropriation of public funds, and the debasement of executive powers. [2]

While THIS information below probably is the most disturbing of Galalae’s conclusions:

Vaccines now represent the newest battle line between the 1% and the 99% and between international and individual prerogatives. In the 21st century it is the needle not the bomb that causes death and disease at an unimaginable scale and at an unpredictable cost to the genetic endowment of mankind.

But although the weapon has changed the goal remains the same, to stop and reverse our numbers so that by the end of the 21st century everybody will live just as long, just as sterile, and just as sick.

The planet will be saved but mankind destroyed.

Why do I feel that Galalae’s above conclusions are most disturbing? The answer, I feel, is to be found in the fact that most people are proselytized enough to accept, and even believe, either due to political correctness, peer pressure ‘power’, or what’s rendered as ‘factual’ media information, that the deliberate injecting of neurotoxins, anti-fertility and sterility agents (polysorbate 80 is one), squalene, foreign DNA, mycoplasmas, and nanoparticles into infants, toddlers, and teens—in particular—the future of the human race, is called ‘preventive medical care’, which, ironically, is mandated by federal agencies and state laws! Hypothetically, ought it be called “eugenics by vaccination needles”?

The article explains how all Galalae discusses fits in with the “increased urgency to accomplish the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals” plus countless new pathogens that threaten humans. [3]

That prompts me to ask these questions:

• “Where do those new pathogens come from?”
• “Are they synthesized in government research labs like Fort Detrick, Maryland, and the infamous Plum Island off the coast of Long Island, New York?” Was Lyme disease invented on Plum Island? [11]
• “Are such ‘inventions’ designated to ‘protect’ us from terroristic assaults thereby making them seem innocuous?”
• “Who pays for them? Are taxpayers subsidizing our very own eugenics agenda?”
• “Are we unknowingly fulfilling the Georgia Guidestone’s New Age ‘first commandment’? [12]
• “Where are accountability requests and investigations by Congress, the media, religions and their clergy, and most of all, we who are impacted by the New World Order’s obviously sordid agenda?”

One of the graphics included in the Epidemiology: Open Access article is a global map depicting global health threats in 2016. [4]

Missing from the above map is the recently media-hyped Zika virus for which there’s now a fast-tracked vaccine in the works. Zika-blamed brain birth defects (microcephaly) realistically may be due more to, and result from, the chemical larvicide Pyriproxyfen [7] used for mosquito control in Brazil, since Zika has been tracked since the 1940s and ‘50s in Africa with no apparent brain anomalies being recorded—only minor flu-like symptoms [5]—until just recently—2015. What caused the Zika virus suddenly to become a teratogen, if that’s what they want to blame? Was it genetically modified at some point? Or, are toxic chemicals placed in Brazil’s water supplies to blame? [6]

According to Galalae’s article, what the New World Order folks probably want to effectuate and implement by using clandestine chemical birth control measures (vaccines) is what Bill Gates [8] so avidly endorses, i.e., using vaccines to reduce the population.

The graphic below illustrates that between 2010 and 2050, the smallest demographic is expected to fall between ages 0 to 64, which probably can be accomplished by the more vaccines they can pump into infants, children, and teens, in my opinion, and as Mr. Gates offers with his population control equation in his TED talk. The older folks are those who have not received all the vaccines that the last two generations have been mandated to receive under the guise of ‘herd immunity’ and school attendance regulations, I offer. Can the projected demographics below also be the compelling reason for all the “catch-up” vaccines adults and senior citizens now are being mandated to get [13]?

Percentage change in the world’s population by age: 2010-2050. [9]

Galalae’s paper presents some intriguing facts insofar as it states:

Under the pretext of curbing the spread of the polio virus from one country to another the WHO gave itself a plausible reason to intensify eradication activities, in other words to mass vaccinate entire populations in places where the total fertility rate is not under control.

The countries targeted are all high fertility nations and hotspots of poverty, conflict or environmental degradation: Afghanistan (TFR 5), Cameroon (TFR 4.7), Equatorial Guinea (TFR 5), Ethiopia (4.6), Israel (3.1), Nigeria (5.7), Pakistan (3.7), Somalia (6.6) and the Syrian Arab Republic (3) [25].

On pages 7 and 8 of his thought-provoking article, Galalae presents charts estimating projected declining fertility rates for those countries. However, it should be noted he points out that Brazil’s national fertility rate “is safely below replacement level,” while

Brazil’s regional differences are significant. The northeast, which has the poorest and the brownest (62.5%) people in the country, [where the larvicide was sprayed into water supplies] also has significantly higher fertility rates than the rest of the country, approximately 2.4 children per woman compared to only 1.6 in the south where the population is 75% white. [10] [CJF emphasis]

Canadian activist and author Kevin Mugur Galalae has engaged in several hunger strikes over the years to bring awareness and influence consciousness on various issues—successfully, too. In April 2016 he’s been ‘camped out’ at the Vatican in Rome, Italy, to bring awareness to the human depopulation agenda. You can hear courageous Kevin interviewed on day 14 of his 2016 hunger strike on The Rickie Allen Show.

References:

[1] Galalae K (2016) Turning Nature against Man: The Role of Pandemics, Vaccines and Genetics in the UN’s Plan to Halt Population Growth. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 6: 232. doi:10.4172/2161-1165.1000232
[2] Ibid. Pg. 15
[3] Ibid. Pg. 1
[4] Ibid. Pg. 2
[5] http://www.vox.com/2016/1/28/10861094/microcephaly-zika-virus-birth-defect-pregnancy
[6] https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/02/10/bang-not-zika-brazilianargentine-doctors-say-pesticides/
[7] http://www.gmwatch.org/news/latest-news/16706-argentine-and-brazilian-doctors-name-larvicide-as-potential-cause-of-microcephaly
[8] https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6WQtRI7A064#t=4
[9] See [1], Pg. 6
[10] See [1], Pg. 14
[11] http://www.cbsnews.com/news/plumbing-the-mysteries-of-plum-island/
[12] http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.com/guidestones.html
[13] http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-schedule-easy-read.pdf

(activistpost.com)

By Alex Pietrowski

Big Brother is watching you and he wants you to believe that if you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear.

This is a lie, of course, and as we move deeper into the era of State-sponsored technological surveillance, we see more evidence that the loss of privacy and confidence in interpersonal communications is transforming the individual into a compliant, self-policing ward of the State.

In one of the first empirical scientific studies to provide concrete evidence of the ‘chilling effects’ that government surveillance has on Internet users, Oxford University professor Jon Penney looked at Wikipedia search data and traffic patterns before and after the 2013 revelations by Edward Snowden regarding widespread NSA surveillance of the Internet. The results demonstrated an immediate trend towards self-censorship, as traffic and searches for terms like ‘Al Qaeda,’ ‘car bomb,’ and ‘Taliban’ showed nearly instant and mentionable decline.

The changes were statistically significant enough to indicate that many people automatically alter their own behavior upon realizing that a punitive authoritarian organization is monitoring them for legitimate or perceived wrongdoings.

If people are spooked or deterred from learning about important policy matters like terrorism and national security, this is a real threat to proper democratic debate. – Jon Penney

In 2013, the organization Pen America conducted a survey of writers in the United States showing that many were already self-censoring themselves in an increasingly oppressive atmosphere of government surveillance. The fear of being caught up in a dragnet of legal and financial problems was sufficient enough for many to change their tone and content, even though no direct physical threat existed.

The results of this survey—the beginning of a broader investigation into the harms of surveillance—substantiate PEN’s concerns: writers are not only overwhelmingly worried about government surveillance, but are engaging in self-censorship as a result.[Source]

Commenting on the effects of authoritarian governments which heavily surveil their citizens, Pen America also notes that, “historically, from writers and intellectuals in the Soviet Bloc, and contemporaneously from writers, thinkers, and artists in China, Iran, and elsewhere—aggressive surveillance regimes limit discourse and distort the flow of information and ideas.” This is without question the intended aim of such programs.

That study also included data which indicated how people curtail their online behavior and interactions with other people out of fear of being persecuted by the nanny state:

Smaller percentages of those surveyed described already changing their day-to-day behavior: 28 percent said they had “curtailed or avoided activities on social media,” with another 12 percent saying they had seriously considered doing it; similar percentages said they had steered clear of certain topics in phone calls or email (24 percent had done so; 9 percent had seriously considered it). [Source]

Furthermore, in a 2015 study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) examining how awareness of government surveillance affected people’s use of Google, the world’s most widely used Internet search engine, researchers concluded that, “users were less likely to search using search terms that they believed might get them in trouble with the US government.”

In general, people’s behavior also changes in ways more favorable to an authoritarian government when surveillance both online and in the real world is as ubiquitous as it already is in American society. The State draws power from a compliant, acquiescent, and self-policing public, and when mass surveillance is applied to the citizenry, with the predictable result of creating a more submissive and conformist citizenry.

This idea was effectively brought to life in George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel, 1984, where the primary surveillance device of the individual was the telescreen, a digital device located in every home that could receive and transmit audio and video, giving individuals zero privacy in their own homes. The beauty of omnipotent surveillance such as this was that the government did not even have to actually be monitoring an individual, because the simple fact that they could be listening and watching was enough to frighten a person into voluntary compliance and self-censorship.

There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You have to live – did live, from habit that became instinct – in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized. – George Orwell, 1984

This principle is coming to fruition in our modern world in the form of the internet and social media. Couple this with the creation and publication of government watch lists of all flavors, where people can be arbitrarily restricted from travel, or worse, and we are marching headlong into a brave new world where freedom is tightly constricted not by law, but by a creeping ambiguous fear of what may happen to us if we step out of line. We are creating a society where people may have legally protected free speech, but they dare not use it.

There is a reason governments, corporations, and multiple other entities of authority crave surveillance. It’s precisely because the possibility of being monitored radically changes individual and collective behavior. Specifically, that possibility breeds fear and fosters collective conformity. That’s always been intuitively clear. Now, there is mounting empirical evidence proving it. – Glen Greenwald

Alex Pietrowski is an artist and writer concerned with preserving good health and the basic freedom to enjoy a healthy lifestyle. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com and Offgrid Outpost, a provider of storable food and emergency kits. Alex is an avid student of Yoga and life.

Like Waking Times on Facebook. Follow Waking Times on Twitter.

This article (This is What Government Sponsored Mass Surveillance is Doing to Your Mind) was originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alex Pietrowski and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

~~ Help Waking Times to raise the vibration by sharing this article with friends and family…

(activistpost.com)