Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/4/2016 1:48:51 PM

Muslim woman run down at protest




Warning: Video includes graphic content



A Muslim woman was purposely run over by a driver who plowed through a Belgian police checkpoint Saturday during a far-right protest in the Brussels suburb of Molenbeek.

In the stunning scene caught on video, the Audi A1 bypasses a checkpoint and barrels right into the woman while the vehicle’s passenger appears to capture images of the mayhem with his cellphone.

The woman is hoisted onto the hood of the vehicle before being thrown to the ground and clipped by the compact car as it speeds off.

She sustained head injuries and fractures in various part of her body, according to local reports.

More than 400 anti-immigration activists, wearing masks and shouting racist slogans, had descended upon the area Saturday.

Modal Trigger
Rescue workers give aid to a woman who was struck by a car that ran through a roadblock in the Brussels district of Molenbeek.Photo: Reuters

The immigrant-heavy neighborhood has been a target of protests after the suicide attacks on a Brussels airport and subway station last month that killed 32 people.

Two 20-year-old men, reeking of alcohol, later walked into a police station in order to turn themselves in for the violent hit-and-run, according to Belgian news outlet La Libre.

Police said the men were under the influence of alcohol and drugs, in possession of smoke bombs, and claimed they had no recollection of the incident.

Both men, who are from Molenbeek, were charged with armed rebellion and hit and run, the outlet said.

The injured woman was recovering in a hospital Sunday.

In recent weeks, police in Molenbeek have arrested hundreds of anti-Islam protesters, and a France-based far-right group staged a demonstration there again on Sunday.

Authorities in the Belgian capital, fearing violent disorders, banned all demonstrations after a group of right-wing hooligans congregated at the same square last Sunday.

Modal Trigger
Riot police secure a zone in the Molenbeek neighborhood in Brussels, Belgium, on April 2.Photo: AP

Molenbeek, dubbed the “jihadi capital of Europe,” is home to one of the largest Muslim communities in Brussels and has been a hotbed of radical Islamic sentiment.

Some in other countries have blamed Belgium’s underfunded security forces for not stemming the tide of extremism which has taken hold in the country.

The notorious area was home to some of the men who staged the Nov. 13 attacks in Paris that killed 130, which were also claimed by the Islamic State group.

Paris attack suspect Salah Abdeslam, who took part in the gun and bomb attacks in France, was captured in his Molenbeek hideout just four days before the Brussels bomb attacks.

Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel has admitted that “Almost every time (a terrorist attack occurs), there is a link with Molenbeek.”

With AP

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+2
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/4/2016 5:31:45 PM

US seizes thousands of Iranian weapons, including grenade launchers, in Arabian Sea



The crew of a U.S. Navy ship stopped a massive Iranian arms shipment dead in its tracks, seizing thousands of weapons, AK-47 rifles and rocket-propelled grenade launchers that likely were headed to Yemen, the Pentagon announced Monday.

The seizure, which unfolded in the Arabian Sea on March 28, was the third of its kind in recent weeks, military officials say. Iran has been supporting Houthi rebels in Yemen in their proxy war against a Saudi-led coalition backed by the United States. Like Iran, the Houthis are a Shia-led group.

The arms shipment appears to mark the latest provocative action from the defiant Islamic republic, which reported last month that it tested missiles marked with the phrase "Israel must be wiped out." And on Monday, the Iranian government warned the U.S. to butt out of trying to control its missile program. "The White House should know that defense capacities and missile power, specially at the present juncture where plots and threats are galore, is among the Iranian nation's red lines... and we don’t allow anyone to violate it," Deputy Chief of Staff Brig-Gen Maassoud Jazzayeri told state media.

On Friday, President Obama said Iran was obeying the "letter" of its landmark nuclear agreement with the West, but not the "spirit" of it.

The Navy said the shipment included 1,500 AK-47s, 200 rocket-propelled grenade launchers and 21 .50-caliber machine guns.

After the U.S. seized the weapons stash from the dhow, a traditional sailing vessel, the Navy let the crew go. A U.S. official told Fox News current rules do not allow western naval forces to seize the crew in addition to illicit cargo. "You have to find a country willing to prosecute," the official said.

A defense official reached by Fox News would not reveal the nationality of the dhow's crew.

Last month, Iran announced that it tested missiles marked with the phrase "Israel must be wiped out," in violation of a U.N. Security Council resolution tied to the recent nuclear deal. The resolution forbids Iran from working on its ballistic missile program for eight years and bans sales of its conventional weapons.

In January, Iran captured 10 U.S. Navy sailors in the Persian Gulf, on the same day President Obama delivered his State of the Union address. Iran released the sailors one day later.

Last year, naval forces from Iran's Revolutionary Guard seized a Marshall Islands-flagged cargo ship and held it for weeks to settle a business dispute. Iranian vessels later surrounded a U.S.-flagged vessel but did not detain it.

Soon afterwards, U.S. warships escorted all U.S. and British flagged cargo ships and tankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz, a key Mideast oil passage.

In late December, Iran's military fired rockets near the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier, a move the U.S. called "unnecessarily provocative and unsafe."

Fox News' Lucas Tomlinson and The Associated Press contributed to this report.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+2
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/4/2016 6:04:17 PM

Iranian military official warns US: Stay away from Iran's red lines

Amid ballistics test, Iran officer says missiles designed to reach Israel

Analysis: What Iran's missile launches mean

Iranian deputy chief of staff says Islamic Republic will not curtail its missile program no matter what.




Iran warned the US on Monday that any attempt to encroach on the Islamic Republic's ballistic missile program would constitute the crossing of a "red line."

"The US calculations about the Islamic Republic and the Iranian nation are fully incorrect," Iranian Deputy Chief of Staff Brig-Gen Maassoud Jazzayeri was quoted by the Fars News Agency as saying.

"The White House should know that defense capacities and missile power, specially at the present juncture where plots and threats are galore, is among the Iranian nation's red lines and a backup for the country's national security and we don’t allow anyone to violate it," Jazzayeri said.

Jazzayeri accused US President Barack Obama of making vows and breaking them by saying removal of sanctions on Iran would be conditioned on the Islamic Republic halting its ballistic missile program.

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) test-fired two ballistic missiles last month that it said were designed to be able to hit Israel, defying a threat of new sanctions from the United States.

The launches followed the test-firing of several missiles as part of a major military exercise that the IRGC says is intended to "show Iran's deterrent power and... ability to confront any threat".

The IRGC fired two Qadr missiles from northern Iran which hit targets in the southeast of the country 1,400 kms (870 miles) away, Iranian agencies said. The nearest point in Iran is around 1,000 km from Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

"The reason we designed our missiles with a range of 2000 km is to be able to hit our enemy the Zionist regime from a safe distance," Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh was quoted as saying by the ISNA agency.

Three months ago, Washington imposed sanctions against businesses and individuals linked to Iran's missile program over a test of the medium-range Emad missile carried out in October 2015.

The IRGC, a powerful force that reports directly to the supreme leader, is deeply suspicious of the United States and its allies. It maintains dozens of short and medium-range ballistic missiles, the largest stock in the Middle East.

Washington fears those missiles could be used to carry a nuclear warhead at some point in the future, even after Iran implemented a nuclear deal with world powers in January that imposes strict limits and checks on its disputed nuclear program.

Iran's missile program is subject to UN Security Council resolution 2231 that calls on the Islamic Republic not to develop missiles designed to be capable of carrying nuclear warheads. Iran says its missiles are solely a conventional deterrent.

Reuters contributed to this report.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+2
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/5/2016 1:08:37 AM

ELECTION 2016

HILLARY: UNBORN BABIES HAVE NO RIGHTS


'Under our laws currently, that is not something that exists'



Hillary Clinton’s decision to bash Donald Trump for his answer to a hypothetical question on abortion boomeranged back on her during a “Meet the Press” interview Sunday.

The ‘Stop Hillary’ campaign is on fire! Join the surging response to this theme: ‘Clinton for prosecution, not president’

The presidential hopeful attacked Trump on Friday for saying “some” form of punishment should exist for women who obtained abortions in a world where Roe v. Wade were overturned and states outlawed the practice. NBC’s Chuck Todd used the issue to press Clinton on what rights an unborn baby has or should have.

“When, or if, does an unborn child have constitutional rights?” Todd asked.

“Well, under our laws currently, that is not something that exists. The unborn person doesn’t have constitutional rights,” Clinton responded. “Now, that doesn’t mean that we don’t do everything we possibly can, in the vast majority of instances to, you know, help a mother who is carrying a child and wants to make sure that child will be healthy, to have appropriate medical support. It doesn’t mean that you don’t do everything possible to try to fulfill your obligations. But it does include sacrificing the woman’s right to make decisions. And I think that’s an important distinction, that under Roe v. Wade we’ve had enshrined under our Constitution.”


The Democrat front-runner told Henry Blodget, Business Insider’s CEO and editor-in-chief, on Friday that Trump’s acknowledgement that the rule of law would exist in a world where Roe v. Wade was overturned was tantamount to wanting to deny women rights. She also used his statement as an indictment of the Republican Party.

“What’s important here is that all the Republicans agree with him,” Clinton said. “They all want to see women’s rights eroded and for abortion to become illegal again. That’s why so many state Republican governors and legislators are defunding Planned Parenthood and shutting down clinics that not only provide a safe abortion, but HIV testing, cancer screenings, and so much else.”

The former secretary of state’s comments come almost one year after she said America’s “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”

Clinton made the remarks while speaking at the sixth annual Women in the World Summit, WND reported April 24, 2015.

“Look at what Hillary said [about abortion] as a moral and ethical statement,” reader Tim Bones of the conservative website Hotair said Sunday. “She dismisses the personhood of an infant in the womb until the baby is born alive. Anything goes until birth, sort of like Red China’s forced abortions one child policy. If she can ignore the little babies, she can be just as dismissive about your rights as a citizen if she wants to.”

“Apparently a clump of cells can become a ‘child’ before being born, but only if its mother magically makes it so by wanting it,” added reader Denise Weisbrodt.

Read the tested and proven strategies to defeat the abortion cartel, in “Abortion Free: Your Manual for Building a Pro-Life America One Community at a Time.”

The conservative website noted that Clinton’s comments may hinge on one’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which states:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Writer Jazz Shaw went on to say, “it obviously gets a bit fuzzy is where the amendment goes on to say that the state shall not deprive ‘any person’ of life, liberty or property.”


NBC’S Chuck Todd asks Hillary Clinton about the rights of unborn children on “Meet The Press,” Sunday, April 3, 2016 (Photo: NBC screenshot)



Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/hillary-unborn-babies-have-no-rights/#x50f4w8m7e4rWhhm.99


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+2
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/5/2016 1:22:38 AM

Trump on Abortion: ‘The Laws Are Set and I Think We Have to Leave It That Way’

By on


Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump told CBS News this week following controversy over his remarks about abortion that “at this moment, the laws are set, and I think we have to leave it that way.”

Trump was interviewed on Friday for “Face the Nation” with John Dickerson, which is set to air on Sunday.

“What would you do to further restrict women’s access to abortion as president?” Dickerson asked.

“Well, look, I know where you’re going, and I just want to say, a question was asked to me and it was asked in a very hypothetical [way]. It said illegal,'” Trump said. “I’ve been told by some people that was an older line answer and that was an answer that was given on a, you know, basis of an older line from years ago on a very conservative basis.”

Trump was referring to an interview earlier this week with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, in which he was asked if he believed abortion should be criminalized.

“Do you believe in punishment for abortion—yes or no—as a principle?” Matthews inquired.

“The answer is there has to be some form of punishment,” Trump replied.

“For the woman?” Matthews asked.

“Yeah, there has to be some form,” Trump stated.

“Ten cents, 10 years, what?” Matthews inquired in seeking to obtain specifics.

“That I don’t know,” Trump said.

Trump’s remarks received both support and opposition, with some applauding the idea and others denouncing it. He later released a statement of clarification, advising that he doesn’t believe the mother should be punished; only the abortionist.

Dickerson’s question was a follow-up to those remarks.

“I was asked hypothetically,” Trump told Dickerson. “The laws are set now on abortion and that’s the way they’re going to remain until they’re changed.”

“You had told Bloomberg in January that you believe abortion should be banned in some pregnancies,” Dickerson replied. “Where would you like to see a ban…?”

“Well first of all, I would’ve preferred states’ rights,” he added. “I think it would’ve been better if it were up to the states. But right now, the laws are set. And that’s the way the laws are.”

“But do you have a feeling on how they should change?” Dickerson asked. “There are a lot of laws you wan to change. You’ve talked about them—everything from libel to abortion. Anything you’d want to change on abortion?”

“At this moment, the laws are set. And I think we have to leave it that way,” Trump replied.

“Do you think it’s murder—abortion?” Dickerson then inquired.

“I have my opinions on it, but I’d rather not comment on it,” Trump replied.

“You said you were very pro-life,” Dickerson stated. “Pro-life means that abortion is murder.”

“I mean, I do have my opinions on it,” Trump replied. “I just don’t think it’s an appropriate forum.”

“But you don’t disagree with that proposition, that it’s murder?” Dickerson asked.

“No, I don’t disagree with it,” Trump said.

Following the release of footage from the interview and subsequent reports that Trump had seemingly walked back his remarks even further, his campaign released a statement asserting that what Trump really meant was that abortion laws need to stay the same until he is elected.

“Mr. Trump gave an accurate account of the law as it is today and made clear it must stay that way now—until he is president,” spokesperson Hope Hicks told reporters. “Then he will change the law through his judicial appointments and allow the states to protect the unborn.”

“There is nothing new or different here,” she contended.

(christiannews.net)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+2


facebook
Like us on Facebook!