Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/25/2016 4:02:56 PM

Giant holes found in Siberia could be signs of a ticking climate 'time bomb'



REUTERS/Vladimir Pushkarev/Russian Centre of Arctic Exploration


When a helicopter pilot spotted the first crater in summer 2014, everyone was baffled.

The 100-foot-wide hole appeared on the Yamal Peninsula seemingly out of nowhere, during a tense season of Russian military action in Ukraine and international sanctions.

And then more appeared. Lacking a better explanation, aliens and underground missiles were floated as possible theories, according The Washington Post.

But the truth is that the holes might come from a threat not even Mulder and Scully are equipped to handle: climate change.

Scientific American reports that Arctic zones are warming at a breakneck pace, and summer 2014 was warmer than average by an alarming 9 degrees Fahrenheit, according to anotherstory in Nature. As a result, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) think that permafrost, the permanently frozen ground that covers the tundra, is starting to thaw in these warmer temperatures.

So how does frozen methane blow a 100-foot-wide hole in the ground?

Given low-enough temperatures and high-enough pressure, methane and water can freeze together into what's called a "methane hydrate." Permafrost keeps everything bottled up, but when it thaws, so does the hydrate. Methane is released as a gas, building up pressure — until the ground explodes.

Scientists gained more evidence for this theory after an expedition to the bottom of the crater. It revealed that the air had an extraordinarily high concentration of methane.

siberia yamal crater pingo reutersVladimir Pushkarev/Reuters

It's not just explosions and melting permafrost that we should worry about, either. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) states that methane is a greenhouse gas that could have 25 times the impact of carbon dioxide over the next century.

A significant addition to methane emissions would likely have a disastrous impact on our already-troubling atmospheric warming, since it's 21 times better at trapping heat, according to Live Science.

Several outlets have even gone so far as to call this problem a "time bomb."

And it gets worse: One of the craters is just 6 miles from a natural-gas field. The Siberian Times reported that the combination of the two flammable materials in such close proximity is a huge safety concern for the area. At least two of the craters have since turned into lakes.

There may be an alternate explanation, though. Land can collapse without a burst of methane in something called a pingo, which forms when ice is trapped between layers of earth and distorts the top layer into a sort of mound. Thawing can make those mounds suddenly collapse.

Even if the craters are the result of collapsing pingos, they're still likely the result of climate change and still dangerous.

What's more, Slate reports, the same thing could happen in Alaska.

Whether pingo or exploding crater, it's clear that climate change is affecting the Arctic more rapidly than any other place on earth, but researchers are only beginning to grasp howunprecedented warming will effect northern ecosystems.

During his visit to Alaska in September 2015, US President Barack Obama echoed the common sentiment that the Arctic is "ground zero" for climate change.

These mysterious Siberian craters seem to be yet another warning sign that human-caused climate change is quickly spinning out of control, causing new and unpredictable changes along the way.

Read the original article on Tech Insider. Follow Tech Insider on Facebook and Twitter. Copyright 2016.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/25/2016 11:33:47 PM

NIGERIAN ARMY RESCUES MORE THAN 800 BOKO HARAM HOSTAGES

BY ON 3/25/16 AT 9:29 AM

A mother sits mourning the death of her husband after Boko Haram attacks at Dalori village in Borno State, northeastern Nigeria, January 31, 2016. Troops have freed more than 800 Boko Haram hostages.
STRINGER/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Nigerian forces have freed more than 800 hostages being held by the radical Islamist group Boko Haram in a number of villages in the country’s northeastern state of Borno, the military said on Thursday.

The military rescued 520 hostages from the village of Kusumma on Tuesday after clashes with Boko Haram and 309 hostages from 11 villages elsewhere in Borno state.

“The gallant troops cleared the remnants of the Boko Haram terrorists hibernating in Kala Balge general area,” army spokesman Sani Usman said in a statement released to AFP news agency. He added that 22 “terrorists” were killed in the operations and they had retrieved some of the group’s weapons and a motorcycle.

The rescue came on the same day that the radical Islamists kidnapped 16 women, including two girls, from the northeastern state of Adamawa.

"We received reports of the kidnap of 14 women and two girls by gunmen believed to be Boko Haram insurgents near Sabon Garin Madagali village", Adamawa state police spokesman Othman Abubakar told AFP.

The group, which pledged allegiance to the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) and rebranded itself as the Islamic State West Africa Province in 2015, has killed thousands and displaced millions of Nigerians in a seven-year-long insurgencythat is attempting to create a radical Islamic state in northeastern Nigeria. The insurgency has also affected surrounding countries, drawing in Cameroon, Chad and Niger into the conflict.

Boko Haram’s elusive leader Abubakar Shekau on Thursday appeared in a new video, which could not be independently verified, for the first time since March 2015, when he made the ISIS pledge in an audio message.

The video, shared on social media and distributed on YouTube, shows Shekau holding an automatic weapon next to an ISIS flag. He appears to signal that it may be time for change at the top of the militant group’s leadership seven years after he took over from the group’s founder Mohammed Yusuf.

“This is my desire: that whoever sees this will hear nothing but greetings between me and you. Only Allah knows the rest, as you believed [and] as you submitted. For me the end has come,” he says in the poor-quality video.

(Newsweek)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+2
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/25/2016 11:47:49 PM

FARC Trafficking Humans, Drugs, Weapons - and Recruiting Panamanians As Sex Slaves in the Darien

Friday, November 04 2011 @ 01:16 PM EDT

Contributed by: Don Winner


#Panama - Following the arrest of an alleged "coyote" last week in the border area with Colombia in the Darien, in the sector of Alto Turia, the authorities suspect he was part of a group of the FARC that is responsible for recruiting women and children to be guerrillas, who subsequently become sex slaves. According to the investigations, the man who was arrested is Abel Pino Caicedo, who has a Panamanian cedula number E-86-053 as well as a Colombia cedula number 11-865-053, 45 years old, born in Bijao, Rio Sucio, in the Department of Chocó, Colombia. He is recognized as a person engaged in the smuggling of illegal aliens and undocumented foreigners, and when they enter Panama through the Darien they are stripped of their belongings. The other man who was arrested in the Darien is Luis Felipe Romaña, with Panamanian cedula number 8-7221, and who is associated with a group of Colombian FARC guerrillas. He is a resident in that town and he has been under police investigation since August 2011.

It was learned that both of these men could be involved as recruiters of people for the criminal organization. It is reported that these activities take place on the border between Panama and Colombia. The main victims of this armed group are single mothers, children who are school dropouts, or who are from broken homes and at risk. The FARC also facilitates the movement of illegal aliens for human trafficking through the border area between Panama and Colombia, specifically those from Asian and African countries, who are first introduced by the Caribbean side of Colombia and then they enter Panama through the thick jungles of the Darién. The FARC recruits and uses local children as informants to keep them abreast of the movements of the Colombian army and the Panamanian Border Service.

Similarly, the security sectors have evidence that some indigenous leaders in Panama as well as on the Colombian side, are collaborating with the FARC in the recruitment of women and children, and especially drug trafficking, using horses. They also emphasize that these indigenous leaders are accomplices of the FARC and especially those of the 57th FARC Front, according to reports obtained by La Critica. These suspects were captured last weekend during a shootout, according to the SENAFRONT. The last arrest was in the jungle, a few miles Matugantí, a town in the Darien, specifically in the camp that had been found days earlier by the Border Service, who for the second time were harassed by heavy weapon fire. A group of Special Forces went into the trails looking for more subversives. (Critica)

Editor's Comment: Panama has always had a problem with the FARC in the jungles of the Darien. However in recent years the tactical and strategic realities on the ground have significantly changed. Now, the Colombian Army is in a much better position to pressure the FARC from their side of the border, meaning the 57th FARC Front is more likely to be spending time on the Panamanian side of the border. For years successive Panamanian governments have basically blown off the FARC (for the most part) in a sort of mutual agreement. If the FARC didn't screw around too much in Panama, then the Panamanian government won't go after then too hard. But now things have changed. The Panamanian National Border Service, together with the Special Forces units of the National Police, are spending more money and making more of an effort to go after the FARC in Panama. You can't catch them if you're not in the jungle trying, and in recent years Panama has been trying harder. Panama is also getting millions of dollars from the (gasp) United States, so they are now obligated to show some results. Catching those who recruit sex slaves, drugs on horseback, capturing human traffickers - all part of the same effort. Expect more news and information about the FARC in the Darien, not less, as the pressure is increased.

(panama-guide.com)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+2
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/26/2016 12:05:56 AM

Inside Fidel Castro’s double life as a drug kingpin





In a new tell-all book, Fidel Castro's former bodyguard, Juan Reinaldo Sanchez, exposes the drug dealing and deception of the former Cuban president.
Photo: Alex Quesada ; Getty Images


For 17 years, Juan Reinaldo Sanchez served as a bodyguard to Fidel Castro. But when he became disillusioned with the Cuban dictator’s hypocrisy and tried to retire in 1994, Castro had him thrown in prison. Sanchez made 10 attempts to escape the island, finally making it to Mexico by boat, then across the Texas border in 2008. Now he reveals all in his new book, “The Double Life of Fidel Castro.” In this excerpt, Sanchez explains how he lost faith in the revolution — and “El Jefe.”

The end of 1988. A day like any other was coming to a close in Havana. In a few minutes, my life would be overturned.


Fidel had spent his afternoon reading and working in his office when he stuck his head through the door to the anteroom, where I was, to warn me that Abrantes was about to arrive.

Gen. José Abrantes, in his 50s, had been minister of the interior since 1985 after having been, notably, the commander in chief’s head of security for 20 years. Utterly loyal, he was one of the people who saw El Jefe daily.

While they met, I went to sit in my office, where the closed-circuit TV screens monitoring the garage, the elevator and the corridors were found, as well as the cupboard housing the three locks that turned on the recording mikes hidden in a false ceiling in Fidel’s office.

A moment later, the Comandante came back, opened the door again, and gave me this instruction: “Sánchez, ¡no grabes!” (“Sánchez, don’t record!”)

The interview seemed to go on forever . . . one hour went by, then two. And so, as much out of curiosity as to kill the time, I put on the listening headphones and turned Key No. 1 to hear what was being said on the other side of the wall.

Disillusioned

Their conversation centered on a Cuban lanchero (someone who smuggles drugs by boat) living in the United States, apparently conducting business with the government.

And what business! Very simply, a huge drug-trafficking transaction was being carried out at the highest echelons of the state.

Abrantes asked for Fidel’s authorization to bring this trafficker temporarily to Cuba as he wanted to have a week’s vacation in his native land, accompanied by his parents, in Santa María del Mar — a beach situated about 12 miles east of Havana where the water is turquoise and the sand as fine as flour. For this trip, explained Abrantes, the lanchero would pay $75,000 — which, at a time of economic recession, wouldn’t go amiss . . . Fidel was all for it.

Modal Trigger
Juan Reinaldo SanchezPhoto: Alex Quesada

But he expressed a concern: How could they ensure that the parents of the lanchero would keep the secret and not go and blab everywhere that they had spent a week near Havana with their son, who was supposed to live in the United States?

The minister had the solution: All they had to do was make them believe their son was a Cuban intelligence officer who had infiltrated the United States and whose life would be gravely endangered if they did not keep his visit to Cuba absolutely secret. “Very well . . .” concluded Fidel, who gave his agreement.

It was as if the sky had fallen in on me.

I realized that the man for whom I had long sacrificed my life, the Líder whom I worshipped like a god and who counted more in my eyes than my own family, was caught up in cocaine trafficking to such an extent that he was directing illegal operations like a real godfather.

The Comandante, with his talent for dissimulation, went back to work as if nothing was amiss. One has to understand his logic. For him, drug trafficking was, above all, a weapon of revolutionary struggle more than a means of making money.

His reasoning was as follows: If the Yanks were stupid enough to use drugs that came from Colombia, not only was that not his problem — as long as it was not discovered, that is — but, in addition, it served his revolutionary objectives in the sense that it corrupted and destabilized American society. Icing on the cake: It was a means of bringing in cash to finance subversion.

And so, as cocaine trafficking increased in Latin America, the line between guerrilla war and trafficking drugs gradually blurred. What was true in Colombia was just as true in Cuba. For my part, I never managed to accept this twisted reasoning, in absolute contradiction to my revolutionary ethics.

Sham Trials

Juan Reinaldo Sanchez shakes Fidel Castro’s hand after the former Cuban president had won a medal.Photo: Juan Reinaldo Sanchez

In 1986, when economic aid from Moscow was starting to dry up, Castro founded the MC Department (for moneda covertible, or “covertible currency”), which traded in goods — illegal and legal — for hard currency from third parties, principally Panama.

The MC Department soon acquired another nickname, the “Marijuana and Cocaine Department.”

But the Americans became suspicious of Cuba’s drug dealing, and scandal loomed. Fidel decided to take action to nip any possible suspicion about him in the bud. He used the official daily paper, Granma, to inform its readers that an inquiry had been opened.

Among the arrested were the respected revolutionary general Arnaldo Ochoa and the minister I had overheard talking to Castro, José Abrantes.

The Machiavellian Fidel, while declaring himself “appalled” by what he pretended to have discovered, claimed that “the most honest imaginable political and judicial process” was under way.

Obviously, the reality was completely different. Comfortably installed in his brother Raúl’s office, Fidel Castro and Raúl followed the live proceedings of Causa No. 1 and Causa No. 2 on the closed-circuit TV screens. Both trials were filmed — which is why one can today see large sections of it on YouTube — and broadcast to every Cuban home, though not live: The government wanted to be able to censor anything that might prove embarrassing.

Fidel even had the means to alert the president of the court discreetly, via a warning light, whenever he thought a session should be interrupted.

And during breaks, the president of the court, the public prosecutor and the jury members would swarm out onto the fourth floor of the ministry to take their instructions from Fidel, who, as usual, organized and ordered everything, absolutely everything.

The Videotape

Modal Trigger
Fidel Castro (right) and Revolutionary Gen. Arnaldo OchoaPhoto: AP

At the end of these parodies of justice, Gen. Ochoa was condemned to death. José Abrantes received a sentence of 20 years of imprisonment.

After just two years of detention in 1991, he would suffer a fatal heart attack, despite his perfect state of health, in circumstances that were, to say the least, suspicious.

There followed the most painful episode of my career. Fidel had asked that the execution of Ochoa and the three other condemned men be filmed.

And so, two days later, on a Saturday, a chauffeur arrived at the residence, where I was, to deliver a brown envelope containing a ­Betamax cassette video. Castro’s wife, Dalia, told Fidel’s men they should watch it.

The video had no sound, which made the scenes we began to watch even more unreal. First, we saw vehicles arriving in a quarry at night, lit by projectors.

I have often been asked how Ochoa faced death. The answer is clear and unambiguous: with ­exceptional dignity.

As he got out of the car, he walked straight. When one of his torturers proposed to put a band over his eyes, he shook his head in sign of refusal. And when he was facing the firing squad, he looked death square in the face.

Despite the absence of sound, the whole excerpt shows his courage.

To his executioners, who could not be seen in the footage, he said something that one could not hear but which one could guess. His chest pushed out and his chin raised, he probably shouted something like, “Go on, you don’t frighten me!” An instant later, he crumpled from beneath the bullets of seven gunmen.

Castro made us watch it. That’s what the Comandante was capable of to keep his power: not just of killing but also of humiliating and reducing to nothing men who had served him devotedly.

His Brother’s Keeper

Modal Trigger
Fidel and Raúl CastroPhoto: AP

After Ochoa’s death, Raúl Castro plunged into the worst bout of alcoholism of his life. He had taken part in the assassination of his friend.

He turned to vodka, which had long been his favorite drink.

There was doubtless another factor involved: having watched the elimination of his counterpart, Abrantes, Raúl could logically fear that he, too, would be hounded from his position of defense minister.

The government No. 2 was dead drunk so often that the ministers and the generals could not have failed to miss it. The ­Comandante decided to go and lecture his younger brother.

I heard Fidel admonishing his brother, launching into a long, moralistic tirade.

“How can you descend so low? You’re giving the worst possible example to your family and your escort,” began the Comandante. “If what’s worrying you is that what happened to Abrantes will happen to you, let me tell you that Abrantes no es mi hermano [is not my brother]! You and I have been united since we were children, for better and for worse. So, no, you are not going to experience Abrantes’ fate, unless . . . you persist with this deplorable behavior.

“Listen, I’m talking to you as a brother. Swear to me that you will come out of this lamentable state and I promise you nothing will happen to you.”

Sure enough, shortly afterward, Fidel spoke out in praise of Raúl, applauding his integrity and his devotion to the Revolution. Raúl, for his part, carried on drinking vodka, but in far more reasonable quantities.

From “The Double Life of Fidel Castro: My 17 Years as Personal Bodyguard to El Lider Maximo” by Juan Reinaldo Sanchez with Axel Gyldén.

Copyright © 2015 by the author and reprinted by permission of St. Martin’s Press, LLC.


(New York Post)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/26/2016 12:25:39 AM

Stirring Up Mass Panic Is Donald Trump’s Only Hope for Winning the White House

By


Donald Trump. Photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images


Most weeks, New York Magazine writer-at-large Frank Rich speaks with contributor Alex Carp about the biggest stories in politics and culture. This week: the terror attacks in Brussels, the GOP quest to unite around an anti-Trump, and a farewell to Margaret Sullivan, the New York Times public editor.

In the wake of the terror attack in Brussels this week, NBC's Matt Lauer and Savannah Guthrie caught some criticism for practically suggesting to Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton that torture might be necessary. How much do such responses of high-profile journalists contribute to creating fear and panic in the U.S.?
Fear has brought out the worst in America throughout its modern history. We tirelessly recall that FDR told America it had nothing to fear but fear itself at his first inaugural address in 1933, but often omit the part that he signed an order to incarcerate Japanese-Americans in internment campslater in his presidency. So many calamities in modern American history have been prompted by fear, it’s impossible to list them all, from the Red Scare of the McCarthy era to the failure of the Reagan administration to address the AIDS crisis to the misbegotten, 9/11-generated Iraq War, which helped create the Islamic State that has rained down blood on Paris, San Bernardino, and Brussels in less than five months.

The missteps of morning talk-show hosts are, truly, the least of our problems right now — and in general I think we should worry less about the ginning up of panic by television news (or other journalistic platforms) and keep our focus on the fearmongering politicians who are running for president in an election year. Trump does not need prompting from Lauer and Guthrie to talk about torture as a panacea for terrorism. His fear-driven solutions for dealing with ISIS — more torture, sealing our borders, reducing support of NATO — are as ineffectual as they are incoherent. Cruz’s plan to have wholesale policing of American Muslim communities is nothing if not a propaganda gift to the Islamic State, inviting more terrorism. And John Kasich’s proposal in the aftermath of Brussels: President Obama should cut short his trip to Cuba. That’ll show 'em!

You will notice that none of the Republican candidates — nor Clinton, who called for steady leadership and one of her typical bullet-point lists of more or less existing American policies — proposes ground troops in the Middle East. You’ll notice that Thomas Friedman and Roger Cohen, both of whom offered thoughtful critiques of Obama policy in this morning’s Times, had no real solutions of their own, unless Friedman’s pitch for American support to the developing democracies of Tunisia and Kurdistan counts as one. (As goes Tunisia, so might Syria? This seems like magical thinking.) I certainly don’t have a solution either, but I do get why Obama is doing everything he can to tamp down fear, even at the price of being criticized for passivity, weakness, etc. Policy based on fear prompts even rational politicians like Clinton to sign on to debacles like Iraq, and politics based on fear can only increase the odds of a self-professed strongman like Trump gaining power.

Ted Cruz's big win in Utah last night, as well as Jeb Bush's endorsement of him, suggest that the GOP nomination still isn't quite Trump's for the taking. Did yesterday provide any additional hope for voters hoping to avoid a Trump nomination?
Mormons really do not like Trump, and if America (Mormon population about 1.7 percent) were Utah (Mormon population 58 percent), he’d be done. Meanwhile, back in the real world, nothing has happened to slow Trump’s path to the nomination. The GOP is still in the same place, and it’s not going to change: Either Trump is going to have a majority of delegates by the time the party convenes in Cleveland, or he’s going to have a plurality, in which case all hell is going to break loose as the anti-Trump forces attempt to secure the nomination for a candidate with fewer delegates than Trump or possibly a “compromise choice” (e.g., Paul Ryan) who arrives at the convention with no delegates at all. Any American planning to take a vacation the week of July 18 may want to reconsider: This is going to be binge-watchable must-see TV, and you will never get to the beach.

As for Jeb Bush’s endorsement: Surely if we’ve learned anything from this political cycle it’s that endorsements from the GOP “Establishment” mean nothing. If they did, Jeb would still be in the race, for no one in the Republican field had collected more of them. And once again, we have an illustration of the timidity that helped crater the Bush candidacy. Bush is finally — finally — putting distance between himself and his brother George, who said “I just don’t like the guy” when speaking of Cruz to a room of donors back in October. We can look forward to more bold stands from Jeb now that he’s back in private life, but it’s past time when any of them would merit an exclamation point.

Margaret Sullivan, the Times' public editor, leaves her post next month, on the heels of what is probably her biggest success: a rewriting of the Times' anonymous-sourcing policy. What should the newspaper's next public editor learn from Sullivan's tenure?
The job of public editor really gained traction after the paper’s own fear-induced calamity in the wake of 9/11. The Times’ inability to apply serious journalistic scrutiny to the Bush administration’s case for the war in Iraq — an institutional failure that did not just involve credulous and ideological reporters like Judith Miller but editors in the chain of command to the top of the masthead — required serious self-examination and reform if the paper was going to regain the trust of its readers and even many in its own newsroom. The first public editor, Daniel Okrent, played a significant role in pushing for such reform and asking the hard questions that the paper had failed to ask itself in the run-up to the war.

Since then, public editors have come and gone with far less impact. But that was not the case with Sullivan. She has been fearless and provocative, and, as her tenure nears its end, she has scored a major achievement in getting the Times to reform its use of anonymous sources. Earlier on she got the paper to drop its odious willingness (shared by other journalism outlets) to give some of those quoted in its news columns the right to “approve” their quotes after the fact. She got Michael Hayden, the former head of the NSA and the CIA, to say on the record that the Times story on warrantless government surveillance, held back by the paper for 13 months at the urging of the Bush administration, in fact did not endanger American national security. Sullivan also took on the Times’ failings in dealing with poverty, sexism, and even its lack of racial diversity in its staff of culture critics, often prompting change.

One hopes the next public editor will learn from Sullivan’s tenure that nothing should be off-limits; a strong critic, advocating for both the readers and the highest standards, makes the paper better and its often-opaque practices more transparent. She is going to be a tough act to follow. Meanwhile, the Times’ loss is going to be another gain for Martin Baron’s ever-more-competitive Washington Post. Sullivan is launching a free-ranging media column there that is likely to be a must-read throughout this election year and beyond.

(daily/intelligencer)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!