State of the Nation

The List of Calamities in the USA Grows by the Year

• Nuclear Testing Sites In The Southwest*
• Love Canal Superfund Site
• Three Mile Island Nuclear Meltdown
• Hanford Nuclear Reservation
• Exxon Valdez Oil Spill
• Tennessee Coal Ash Spill
• 9/11 Destruction at Ground Zero
• BP Gulf Oil Spill
• Saint Louis Radioactive Waste Fire
• Oklahoma Fracking Earthquakes
• California Drought
• San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant Leak & Waste
• SoCal Natural Gas leak
• Flint, Michigan Water Crisis
• Sebring, Ohio Lead Contamination
• Gold King Mine Waste Water Spill
• Pacific Garbage Patch
• Geoengineering Via Chemtrails

*NUCLEAR WEAPON ‘TESTING’: Curse of the Post Modern Era

This partial list of manmade environmental disasters has two common denominators.

— Gross Corporate Negligence and Deliberate Government Misconduct —

All of these crimes against the people and the environment were as avoidable as they were the result of reckless corporate behavior and governmental complicity.

What’s really going on here?

First of all, are these environmental disasters LIHOPs of MIHOPs?

This is a critical question, which MUST be correctly answered.

These phrases were first used when the 9/11 truth movement attempted to understand what really happened on 9/11.

A LIHOP is a catastrophic event which was allowed to happen on purpose.
LIHOP = “Let It Happen On Purpose”

A MIHOP is a catastrophic event that was made to happen on purpose.
MIHOP = “Made It Happen On Purpose”

Now take a closer look at the list of disasters above.

If you’re not familiar with any of these, check them out on Wikipedia.

Look at the evolution of each of them.

Even those which appear to have happened as an accident, actually had periods of development over which the accident was set up as the Perfect Storm. In other words the confluence of circumstances, which greatly increased the chances of a disaster occurring, was practically nursed along by a combination of conspicuous corporate recklessness and overt government malfeasance.

The bottom line here is that each of the disasters noted above constitutes an historic failure of government that occurred in tandem with an egregious corporate crime-spree. On the face of it each of them was undoubtedly a LIHOP, especially those which transpired over years or decades. How could they possibly not be LIHOPs?

However, the much more disconcerting scenario is that many of them are now deemed by many investigative journalists and armchair researchers to actually be MIHOPs. In other word, they were surreptitiously planned out and fastidiously engineered over years, if not decades. Then, at a specifically selected times, these stunning events were triggered to manifest as a full-blown and shocking environmental catastrophe.

BP and Macondo evidence now shifting from LIHOP to MIHOP

True, it’s quite difficult for anyone to wrap their mind around the possibility that the aforementioned calamitous events were actually planned in advance and then implemented in a manner that they would appear to be innocent accidents. However, when the timing of each of these ongoing events is closely scrutinized, there emerges a clear pattern of deliberate distraction and diversion associated with each of them.

These overwhelming events are not only used to purposefully distract the American people, they are also used to traumatize a locale … or a city … or a state … or a region of the country. When utilized in the way, these manmade disasters are referred to as deliberate acts of environmental terrorism.

Environmental Terrorism

Everything points to the likelihood that environmental terrorism is the wave of the future. The world already knows that the War on Terror is nothing but a massive hoax perpetrated by the globalist cabal to scare the people of the world into a New World Order (NWO). In this fashion a One World Government (OWG) can be established in order to serve as the new protector of peoples everywhere.

Given the many revelations about how the US, UK, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Israel conspired to fabricate ISIS, brand ISIL as a phony caliphate and establish a fake Islamic State in the Middle East, terrorism is now losing its edge. The entire Greater Israel Project has been brilliantly exposed by Putin’s Russia for the imperialistic enterprise that it truly is. Hence, the manufactured terrorism which has been methodically executed throughout the Levant is now seen as the handiwork of the Western powers. Likewise, virtually every terrorist attack or other terror event which occur across the planet are also perpetrated by the same NWO cabal.

With the awakening of the mass consciousness to these grim realities, terrorism is no longer as efficacious as it once was. The world community of nations is now wise to the NWO scam. The nations are especially wary of giving up their sovereignty to a One World Government that would operate as a veritable Big Brother. They know that the OWG would transform the whole planetary civilization into an Orwellian world where “1984” meets the “Brave New World” and the “Lord of the Flies”.

Nonetheless, violent terrorism in its current form will see its final end now that the War on Terror has been laid bare as an Anglo-American conspiracy to dominate the world. The Anglo-American Axishas likewise been exposed as a political, military and economic construct designed to advance the NWO goals. The eastern half of the planetary civilization, especially the BRICS nations, has now so left the NWO reservation and will not bend to the dictates coming out of Washington and London.

This is why environmental terrorism has seen such a drastic uptick. Since 2010 the number and seriousness of environmental incidents have increased precipitously. The ensuing threats to public health have likewise increased around the globe. There’s not a week that goes by when a major catastrophe does not occur on a continent or in a country somewhere. Because the USA is being used as the poster child of environmental terrorism, many of these engineered events are talking place within the 50 states. California, in particular, is being used to advance this ever-intensifying type of terrorism.

The BP Gulf Oil Spill

The BP Gulf oil spill is a perfect example of how so many things went wrong that it is inconceivable that it was an accident. Albeit, it certainly appeared as one throughout the entire event. For many of us who worked closely on that spill, it was clear that there was something wrong with the whole narrative. BP lied every step of the way. The U.S. Federal Government obviously let them get away with it. Even the concerned state governments responded in a manner that defied rational explanation.

A Special Report on the BP Gulf Oil Spill: The Gulf of Mexico is Dying

The BP Gulf Oil Spill Info Blackout And Data Lockdown

The Gulf of Mexico Is Still Dying: A Special Update On The BP Gulf Oil Spill

A close examination of this epic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) reveals a complex conspiracy between the U.S. Federal Government and BP that goes back to the first Bush Administration. As follows:

When George W. Bush and Tony Blair were negotiating their deal to commit an international war crime against Iraq, they had to come to terms, and quickly. The end result of their cattle-swapping was an extraordinary concession on the part of GWB in order to secure cover from the Brits to illegally invade a sovereign nation (for their oil), as though the Blair Administration could offer legitimacy for anything.

The final deal gave BP an extremely generous and enormous stake in oil leases all over offshore America, especially in the Gulf of Mexico in those areas with the most proven oil reserves. BP also received extraordinary concessions to do drilling and exploration in high-compression prospects, as well as the green light to drill at depths that the industry geologists knew were completely unsafe (i.e. the technology and equipment were simply insufficient to deal with the many likely contingencies).
(Source: THE BP GULF OIL SPILL: A Matter Of National Security?)

What’s the point?

The whole BP Gulf oil spill saga was orchestrated from beginning to end. The dramatic burning and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon in the Macondo Prospect and subsequent gushing well were permitted to happen and so capture the attention of the entire world. Who was not glued to their TV while the GOM oil volcano gushed hydrocarbon effluent into the Gulf for 87 straight days?

The real point here is that there appears to be a deliberate agenda of outright environmental destruction at work. In other words the BP spill was a classic MIHOP operation. It was conceived in the very bowels of the NWO capitals of the world and executed by those corporate and state entities which were chosen to do the dirty work. Fouling the Gulf of Mexico with massive amounts of hydrocarbon effluent and highly toxic dispersants like Corexit was the real goal, not the result of a mishap.

Geoengineering and the “Report From Iron Mountain”

Only by correctly understanding the “Report From Iron Mountain” can the strategy for deliberate environmental destruction across the planet be properly understood. The new bogeyman of the future is not the jihadi terrorist, it will be the threats to Earth’s environment. Anything that puts the viability of the biosphere in jeopardy will be considered the ultimate enemy of the human race, as it should be.

Report from Iron Mountain: How War Will Be Replaced By Environmental Destruction To Traumatize Humanity

Except that BIG bogey men like Global Warming are actually geoengineered into place … … … all over the planet 24/7. In fact, chemical geoengineering is the now single biggest threat to the global village as it radically alters weather pattern and climate trends the world over. Truly, the greatest manmade environmental catastrophe humanity has ever faced is the global climate change chaos that now assails every continent. This ongoing calamity is also responsible for causing the most pervasive public health disaster ever experienced by this tract of humanity.

CHEMTRAIL SYNDROME: A Global Pandemic Of Epic Proportions

Only by comprehending the true intent behind Agenda 21 and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development will the researcher come to appreciate the ultimate objectives of the U.N. blueprint for the formation of a One World Government. Both of these longstanding endeavors seek to exert complete control over every sovereign nation. The IPCC was in fact created in order to promote theirGlobal Climate Change narrative in every nook and cranny on Planet Earth. To a great extent this gimmick has thus far worked, although many are now aware that the climate change has been manufactured by the global chemical engineering programs in tandem with space-based HAARP stations.

OPERATION INDIGO SKYFOLD: The Most Secret Covert Black Operation In World History

At the end of the day manmade climate change, not from anthropogenic CO2 generation, but rather that caused by geoengineering will be known as the worst manmade environmental catastrophe in human history. Yes, it is that pervasive, profound and perpetual in its damage to the biosphere. What’s worse is that very few know about it. Only because of this lack of awareness is the NWO cabal able to poison the skies of the world with virtual impunity … until now!

MORE>>

[See also: The Deliberate Trashing of Planet Earth by Zen Gardner]

Nobel Peace Prize Winner, US President Barack Obama has apparently decided to end his presidency with a war – by sending troops to the Middle East and unleashing new hostilities there. – Here is the real proof of the high standing of the Peace Prize Winner. Or is it possible that the Nobel Committee awarded this title to the US President “under a corrupt scheme”?

Here are the facts. The United States and Turkey are ready for a military resolution of the conflict in Syria in the event that the political negotiation process fails. This was directly and clearly said by Vice President Joseph Biden during his recent visit to Ankara. However, it did not go without demagoguery that has become a characteristic of the representatives of the present-day American establishment. Before that, J. Biden expatiated a lot on some kind of political settlement. However, in the event that it is not possible for some reason (although, the American did not say what the reason was), they will have to resort to a military resolution, said the politician after a meeting with Turkish Prime Minister, Ahmet Davutoglu.

Politicians do not rule out that J. Biden’s statement is aimed at pushing, or rather to urging the government of Syria to be more compliant at the upcoming Geneva talks with the so-called moderate opposition. It is the issue of who should be called moderate opposition and who should be called terrorists and bandits that has stirred up the principal debate. Most probably, both politicians have decided on their preferences and coordinated the provision of large-scale military aid to Sunni groups, in other words, to the terrorists who sought to remove the legitimately elected President Bashar al-Assad from his post.

At the same time, US Secretary of Defence, Ashton Carter, announced at the economic forum in Davos that America “would send troops” to Iraq to help local forces in the their struggle against the extremist group of the “Islamic State” (IG). This will be achieved using the 101st Airborne Division of the Second Separate Brigade. The military believe that the first 500 paratroopers will go to Iraq in February this year. A week earlier, E.Carter visited the cantonment of the 101st Division at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, where he specified the number of troops to be sent- 1,300 paratroopers, reported the Military.com portal They will be posted in Baghdad and Erbil to train the Iraqi army and Kurdish militia “Peshmerga” who are expected to move in the direction of Mosul in the coming months where the headquarters of the “Islamic State” is located.

In this regard, the Arab media reported that US special forces conducted a military operation in the Iraqi city of Tikrit, which was controlled by fighters of the “Islamic State”. The Americans landed in the northern part of the city and attacked the local extremist cell of the IS. As yet, journalists do not know the results of the operation, but it is not the first action of American special forces in this region. “And it was conducted without the consent of Baghdad”, caustically noted Iraqi newspaper Al Sabah Al Jadid on January 26, “and it is not the first blow to strike the country’s sovereignty, causing damage to the prestige of both the country and the government

As you know, the US President can personally send a small contingent, but he must notify the Congress about the commencement of military operations within 48 hour after they start. To continue military operations, the President should receive the approval of the Congress within 60 days. This period may be extended for another 30 days at the request of the President. The existing Republican composition of the Congress is unlikely to give such consent to Barack Obama simply because of the election race. Moreover, the Democrats do not need “to send in troops” today either. The US withdrew its troops from Iraq in 2011 fulfilling Barack Obama’s campaign promise, who had called the Iraq war “unjust”. Apparently, now the history is repeating itself with the new sending of troops, yet this time as a caricature of itself .

It cannot be said that all of American society quietly and unconditionally accepts the new quirks in the Middle East policy of the Nobel Peace Prize Winner and members of his administration. This is particularly evident in the debates that take place before the election of candidates for presidential nomination from the parties. For example, former US Secretary of State and Democratic presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, said at a meeting with voters in Iowa that American soldiers should not take part in ground operations in Iraq and Syria: “The most important and obligatory task for the President of the United States is striving to avoid military actions. And I will certainly act in this way”, she said stressing the need to use diplomacy. However, the American public lacks belief in the eloquent Mrs. Clinton who has a bloody trail of egregious blunders that resulted in, for example, the death of employees of the US Embassy in Libya. Psychologists usually say that if someone has committed a characteristic mistake, the same mistake will be repeated continuously in the future, and if H. Clinton has committed bloody mistakes in the past, who can guarantee that she will not repeat them in the future, but on a larger scale this time.

According to public opinion polls, the Americans are most likely to listen to the US presidential candidate Donald Trump who has clearly and explicitly said that it was the current leader of the United States and the former Secretary of State of the country who provoked the intensification of activities of the “Islamic State”. At the same time, D.Trump made it clear that he knew how and in what way not only to fight against international terrorism, but to claim victory over it: “I think it would be good if we had good relationships with Russia. That would be great,” he said.

Quite naturally, the reaction of Damascus and Baghdad to the plans of the new transatlantic strategists was extremely negative. A military intervention in Syria, including a possible ground operation, without the authorization of Damascus will be regarded as aggression, said Riad Haddad, Ambassador of Syria to Russia. Iraq opposes the foreign military presence imposed on it and intends to fight against terrorist groups on its own, said the country’s Foreign Minister, Ibrahim al-Jaafari

According to experts, today’s statement by the head of the Iraqi Ministry of Foreign Affairs concerning the “independence” of Baghdad and criticism of the Pentagon’s intentions in planning operations against the jihadists was probably the result of the recent victories of the Iraqi army. For example, after regaining control over the city of Ramadit, the administrative centre of the Anbar Province of Iraq. But no matter what assurances the Iraqi minister gives, the local military will be unable to fight back Mosul from the terrorists without American support. Despite the fact that seizing Mosul is a priority issue for Baghdad, the Iraqi government has recently once again said that the Turkish military in the north of the country, in the province of Nineveh, were the occupants and demanded their immediate withdrawal. So, Baghdad used the argument of “independence” to demonstrate its out and out protest against the continuing Turkish military presence in Iraq. Baghdad does not intend to tolerate it, even when the fate of Mosul is at stake.

Washington’s statements about “bringing troops” are considered by many political analysts as a PR campaign aimed at seizing the initiative in the “fight against terrorism” in the Middle East. There are hardly any clear significant wins of the Pentagon in this fight. They are making such hasty and bravura statements to gild the pill for the leaving President. Incidentally, in this regard, it is possible to recall the infamous US campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq, where they did not just have to leave but beat a hasty retreat.

But the Nobel Peace Prize Winner has decided to end his ignominious presidency with a “triumph”, and hence there is the forlorn hope for progress in the fight against terrorism.

Victor Mikhin, Associate member of Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”