Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/22/2015 4:25:24 PM
2 + 2 = 4

Critical signs of the fast approaching economic apocalypse

When I predicted the economic apocalypse would begin for the US this month, I said the stock market would rise euphorically after the Fed raised its interest target. Rise it did. Steeply, too. I also said it would fall shortly after. Fall it did. Quickly, too. Now I'm saying the Epocalypse is here.

Just as I stated that "the rate at which the market goes up now is a measurement of pure euphoria," by the same token, how quickly that euphoria falls off indicates just how far down the downside is. If you have ever floated in the ocean and felt yourself unexpectedly drop way down with the water, you know that means a huge wave is coming up right behind you.

"Particularly watch out," I warned, "if the euphoria cools quickly because, after more than a year of concern over what would happen when stimulus ended, there is a lot of relief the bulls would like to celebrate. If the euphoria cools quickly, it's likely to mean things are ready to go down hard and fast."

While I said in my last article, "Their party could last for days or end tomorrow," I actually anticipated the euphoric rise in the stock market would last several days, given how long investors feared what might happen when the Fed raised rates and how relieved they'd be that the sky didn't fall that day ... and how persistent they have been in taking bad news as good news.

That the market turned so quickly on itself is a strong indication of how different the Epocalypse will be compared to previous Fed tightenings following previous recessions where the revelry over recovery lasted longer. For such a long "recovery" out of such a deep hole, the celebration sure was short!

During many Fed tightenings, the stock market and overall economy improved for years afterward ... because the Fed stimulus had actually brought a temporary form of economic recovery. Rarely if ever has the mood turned dark so fast after the Fed officially announced that the recovery is sound and the life support can be removed.

So, even while I knew the global economic news was bleak, I didn't expect the market bulls to snuff out their own ecstasy the day after the ball began. I can only imagine how much the permabulls wanted to go on air that next morning to revel in their "We told you so's" about how the economy would do just fine after a Fed rate hike. Only they could not. They woke up to face reality.

As the new week begins, everyone is nervously guessing which way the market will continue. That also tells you the market is starting to realize that bad news is only bad news from this point forward.

The party in the bull pen is over

Federal Reserve Chair, Janet Yellen, looked visibly happy when she was able to make the announcement of her lifetime — the claim that things looked optimistic enough for the Fed's recovery that the Fed could finally end its economic aid. Never before has a Fed chairman looked less dour and more ready to crack open the champagne for the big Fed Christmas party.

Her market minions gleefully rewarded their queen with an immediate rise of 200 points in the Dow Jones Industrial Average during the remains of the day after she delivered her glad yule tidings.

The market, however, decided to crash the street party along Wall Street the next morning by dropping 253 points — farther than it had risen during the celebration. The real gravity of those numbers was proven when the fall picked up speed for a 367-point plunge the next day, bringing the stock market down over 600 points before it closed at the end of last week.

And, so, the Fed's rate hike made this the most volatile December for the Dow since the economic crisis of 2008.Moreover, since 1990 Decembers have been the least volatile month of the year. So, something is different this time. Something is very deeply and disturbingly different if you compare this seventy-degree day of Winter Solstice in Washington to any other.

This isn't your typical placid and merry December. Friday's sell-off was the sharpest one-day plunge since September, and trading volume has been higher than usual in December as investors jockeyed to position themselves for the Fed's anticipate rate rise. This is the feel of something big beginning to creep.

The sharp sell-off of in stocks across all sectors of the Dow in the heaviest trading of the year came because of news that oil prices were still falling and fear over what this means for banks that are heavily involved in financing highly leveraged oil companies. For the past several years, such news would have caused the stock market to rise because it would mean another year of struggle in which the Fed would be hard at work trying to re-inflate the economy by giving free money to its banksters.

All ten sectors of the S&P 500 also closed in negative territory Friday. For the Dow, it was the third weekly decline in four weeks. Reality, in other words, hit the face like a glass of ice water the morning after the party. For the market bulls, it was off to work with a hangover.

The sobering fact that bank stocks were the first to decline was a surprise to many (including myself). Common wisdom throughout the market expected bank stocks to rise the fastest when the Fed raised rates because the rise in interest would actually improve bank profits since so many of their adjustable-rate loans and credit cards are pegged to interest rates that are strongly affected by the Fed's target.

Banks will be collecting more in interest but they will be slow to start paying more interest on deposits, so were expected to benefit. Yet, financials went down because banks ensnared in a commodities massacre look edgy.

Even high-tech stocks, which have been supporting the narrowly traded market fell last week with the King of Stocks, Apple, down 10% for the month! That means Apple, leader of the Dow, is already in correction territory.

It looks like there'll be no Christmas rally for stocks this year because the Federal Reserve turned off the free money ... just in time for Christmas.

The global market went into a similar slide two weeks ago when the European Central Bank did a little quantitative wheezing that didn't satisfy the demands of its junkies. Likewise with the Quantitative Queen, Japan, where five rounds of QE have now failed to jack up the economy any longer than the QE lasted. QE is so unsuccessful that Japanese income and household spending are in decline again, even with the money pumps still running.

The Epocalypse is everywhere.

Santa Claws Offers Little Hope for a Christmas Rally

Some might say that stocks have only fallen because of a badly timed bout of bad news, which just happened to hit as the Fed raised rates; but that has been my point throughout this year of predicting the global economy and US stock market would both crash in the fall of 2015. This is the same bad news that has been happening all year — the same bad news that I said would only become more intense by the time the Fed finally did raise rates, so that it would be making its transition with the worst possible timing and be totally blind to that because the Fed doesn't look at the right indicators.

The news trend all year has been tilting from moderately bad toward terrible. My predictions of the Epocalypse have been based on the loss of the loft effect from the Yellen put at a time when economic down pressures would become intense. We went back to reality on December 16. The market will now drop when bad economic news happens, and there is a lot of bad economic news happening all around the globe right now, so the kinds of drops in the market we saw last week will keep happening because there is little upside to bad news anymore and little chance of that trend changing anytime soon.

What market investors need to realize is that the critical importance of the Fed's rate hike is not the meager quarter-of-a-percent rise in its interest target; it is the fact that the move off of the zero bound puts us back into the real world where bad news is now onlybad news because bad news can no longer stave off the Fed's first rate increase. That's done.

So, gone are the drunken years of dissipation when bad news came to mean that speculators could anticipate a vault full of new free money from the Fed. No longer will the market get a rise rise out of the hope of more stimulus. This is an environment many market investors and advisors have never experienced in their neophyte careers. The market right now is hunting for news, looking for some clue of which way to go in this new environment, and it will go the direction the news takes it.

What everyone is — or at least should be — starting to understand is that when this stock market crashes the market has no airbags. There will be wounded.

There are plenty of skeletons in the closet for Christmas:
  • The commodities market has already crashed, and from all appearances it will go down further, as economic conditions are worsening in China.
  • The impact of the commodities crash has already started a junk-bond bloodbath, which has already leaked over into investment-grade funds, which saw record outflows last week.
  • More hedge funds have already failed in 2015 than in any year since the 2008 financial crisis.
  • Now that bad news is only bad news, stocks have finally begun to slide, including the high-tech stocks that were helping support the market when other stocks were falling. Now, every sector of the stock market is falling.
  • Banks are heavily involved in the failure of junk bonds and in the decline of their own stocks. As sub-prime housing loans, subprime auto loans, student loans fail, banks will experience more downward pressure. So, banks will fail; but this time banks willfollow the cascade of events, rather than lead it.
Look at those events and ask yourself, "Aren't those the conditions under which central banks normally begin stimulus, not bring it to a close?" That ought to tell you a lot about where the Fed's tightening is going to go, and the Fed cannot simply reverse course if things go from bad to worse because to do so would clearly be to admit its recovery was an immediate failure.

To do so would also require overcoming huge inertia the Fed must feel toward starting back down a course that it had such a hard time getting out of and which it so rejoiced to bring to an end. To do so, will also require overcoming the Fed's denial, which causes it to really believe it's program was a big success. To do so would also require Yellen to lose face for having just pronounced the economy sound like Ben Bernanke stated in 2008 when he saw no recession in sight.

One thing after another will now unravel as the most massive asset bubble in history unwinds globally, and the heaviest mountain of debt ever known to humankind crushes down upon it. The market is only starting to realize that there will be no Fed support in the short term if things do go bad. They still have no idea that an economic apocalypse is dawning.

How bad will it be? One of the most reliable leading indicators of a market crash has historically been a sharp rise in the difference between the yields of reasonably safe investment-grade bonds and junk bonds. An article today in Bloomberg asks the same question about how bad a stock market crash right now might be:
How bad? In the three months before August 1929, the high-yield spread spiked by 47 basis points, and in the three months before May 1937, it shot up 85 basis points. In the past six weeks of 2015, it has spiked by about 120 basis points.
Investors are just starting to see in the meager light through their fuzzy hangovers, but still have little idea how bad this crash is going to be. So, there is a lot of fear to set in when denial breaks.

Denial and a nearly religious belief in political-economic ideas of both parties, however, are hard to break. So, many will think I'm foolish to name something like this the "Epocalypse" and to claim that it has now begun. And the stock market, of course, will attempt rallies, maybe even a brief one for Christmas, as it loves to rally then anyway. If it does, it is nothing but a spurt of optimism cheered on by holiday feelings, the hope of getting some of that party spirit back that was shorted after two hours, and the lack of much economic news to go on today, leaving the market scouting around for a sense of direction in this fuzzy new world they are unaccustomed to. It probably won't even have enough holding power to last the week. If it doesn't rally at this generally upbeat time of year, which is usually a great time for the stock market, it really is going down fast.

I am willing to take the chance of people saying such things because I am fully certain proof that the US stock market crash began the day after December 16 and was triggered by the Fed's change of course on December 16 will quickly become a fact of history. I think the Epocalypse will even be big enough to break through nearly everyone's denial, and critics of this claim will have to stuff their words back in their mouths in a hurry.

Even afterward, some will still argue foolishly for their own ideas about how and why it happened; but they will believe no more in the Fed's phony recovery, and they will soon enough be forced to realize the Fed delivered a bear at Christmas.


(sott.net)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/22/2015 4:34:38 PM

FROM JOSEPH FARAH'S G2 BULLETIN

WORLD WAR 3 FEARS AS RUSSIA FRETS OVER ISIS

U.S. intel officer: Moscow aims to divide, conquer Afghanistan
Published: 15 hours ago

author-imageF. MICHAEL MALOOF



russian-bomber-jet-600


WASHINGTON – Fearful that Islamic State fighters – many from the North Caucasus – will return to their homeland and wage jihad in the Russian Federation, Moscow now is focusing its military action in Syria on killing those potential sources of bombings, shootings and massacres, according to a new report in Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.

But a Russian official has told G2 Bulletin that there is another, more immediate, concern – of jihadist fighters coming from Afghanistan and infiltrating Russia through Central Asia.

And a U.S. military intelligence source independently has confirmed to G2 Bulletin what the Russian official said, because he’s already seeing the Russians taking action to make sure there is a buffer between ISIS in Afghanistan and Russia.

That would be by exerting its influence in the northern part of the country.

Both officials insisted on anonymity to speak about the issue.

“Our concern is that ISIS is increasing in Afghanistan and could enter through Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and then through Kazakhstan where the borders are virtually unprotected,” the Russian official said.

The Russian said ISIS is training militants from Russia in Afghanistan and there are an increasing number of foreign fighters providing the training. He added that among the captured or killed ISIS fighters, some had American and British passports.

And he said there also are instructors from Arab countries and Pakistan to train people from Central Asia and the North Caucasus region of Russia.

The Kremlin estimates that there are some 3,500 ISIS militants now in Afghanistan, with that number quickly rising.

The concern also has been the speed at which ISIS showed up in Afghanistan, starting only a year ago, turning the jihadist fighters a high-priority threat.

Russian Army Gen. Valery Gerasimov, who heads the Russian general staff, estimates that there are some 50,000 fighters in Afghanistan.

The Afghan Taliban number some 40,000 in Afghanistan and are Sunni Muslims, like ISIS, and have begun to join ISIS ranks, officials said.

At a recent conference in Moscow, RT reported that Col. Gen. Igor Sergun, who heads Russia’s main intelligence directorate of its military intelligence agency, said ISIS is using the worsening of the political situation in Afghanistan to strengthen its position.

“We estimate that ISIS gets new troops by bribing field commanders of Taliban, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) and other radical religious organizations operating on Afghan territory,” Sergun said.

Get the rest of this report and others from Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/world-war-3-fears-as-russia-frets-over-isis/#siIOKuKO1mjTiO7Z.99



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/22/2015 5:10:49 PM
Arrow Down

The horrific truth about factory farmed chickens

Today about 9 billion chickens are raised for food in the U.S. annually, a staggering 1400% increase from 50 years ago. Back then, the chicken were raised by more than 1.6 million independent farmers, while today less than 30,000 farms — many of them concentrated factory farms — raise billions of chickens.

As you may have guessed, this increase has brought a ton of unintended consequences. Most people don't realize it, but a "simple" chicken dinner from the grocery store could have any of these 6 horrifying backstories attached to it:

200 Million Baby Chicks Are Killed As Soon As Hatched

Annually it has been estimated that 200 million baby chicks are killed, many ground up alive, as soon as they hatch. The only reason? They're male and therefore useless for egg production.

In the past they were killed by asphyxiation with carbon dioxide, but the American Veterinary Medical Association recently added grinding to the list of acceptable ways to kill them. The chicks are not anesthetized before going through a grinder alive, according tothis post from Discovery.

A non-profit Mercy for Animals recorded this undercover video (also below) of Hy-Line egg factory in Iowa, where factory workers threw live male chickens into the grinder.


"Given that the nervous system of a chicken originates during the 21st hour of incubation, and that a chick has a fully developed nervous system at the time of hatching, it is reasonable to conclude, as a fact of neurophysiology, that the chicks are suffering extreme pain as they are being cut up by macerator blades," said Dr. Karen Davis, the founder and president of United Poultry Concerns.

Human Medicine Antibiotic Use in Chickens

Just like with pigs and cattle, factory farmers often use antibiotics for growing more animals as cheaply as possible, according to theNPR. Many of these antibiotics are used in human medicine, and using them on animals have caused millions of people to get sick with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. According to the CDC, a lot of antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary.

Recently a few companies have announced that they will stop using antibiotics that are used in human medicine, but will keep using other antibiotics such as ionophores.

Chickens are 4X Bigger Today Compared to 1940s

Researchers at the University of Alberta found that chickens are four times bigger today than they used to be in the late 1940s. While they are claiming that the difference is due to selective breeding only (which may be true for the specific groups of chickens they have studied), there might be more to this picture.

It is illegal to use growth-hormones on chickens, however, use of other drugs that can promote growth is not illegal. In 2011 FDA announced that Pfizer will no longer sell 3-Nitro drug (Roxarsone) that was added to chicken feed and helped the chickens to gain weight. The halt of sale was due to inorganic arsenic being found in the chickens. Roxarsone was banned alongside carbarsone and arsanilic acid. The fourth drug that causes weight gain, Nitarsone, is still on the market, but there is apending withdrawal of its approval of use by the FDA. All four drugs cause chickens to gain weight, but all four became controversial over a different reason - arsenic levels in chickens who ate these drugs in their food. Which brings us to our next topic: arsenic.

Levels of Inorganic Arsenic in Chicken

John Hopkins University published a study in 2013 about levels of inorganic arsenic found in chicken, which raised health concerns. According to the Food Safety News, FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine determined that the safe level of inorganic arsenic is 1 part per billion (ppb). Samples of chicken meat from the study found 1.8 ppb of arsenic in chicken raised with antibiotics. All types chicken still contains arsenic even if the level is "low" by the FDA standards. Antibiotic-free chicken measured at 0.77 ppb, and organic chicken measured at 0.6 ppb of inorganic arsenic.

97% of Chicken Breasts Were Contaminated With Bacteria

According to a Consumer Reports analysis, 97% of chicken breasts of 316 studied samples contained bacteria, including salmonella. More than half of the samples contained fecal contaminants. Many contained bacteria that was antibiotic-resistant. Bacteria found included campylobacter, staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, enterococcus, and klebsiella pneumoniae. Levels of contamination were about the same for conventional, antibiotic-free and organic brands, removing the argument that usage of antibiotics and other drugs in meat protects the consumers. Most people get ill from the bacteria by improperly handling raw meat. Consumers Reports suggest the following tips: put chicken in plastic bag while shopping in the store, buy chicken last so it does not get warm while you are shopping, wash chicken before cooking it, use a cutting board designated for raw meat, and wash your hands after handling the meat.

Chicken Waste Is Contaminating Our Water

Figuring out what to with the waste of billions of chickens has become a nightmarish problem that harms both our health and the environment, according to recent research.

"[M]anagement programs for chicken waste have not kept pace with" how fast the industry is growing, said Karen Steuer of Pew Environment Group.

Pew's report reviews in detail the issues that come with chicken waste. Huge amounts of chicken manure is disposed on open fields and croplands. Rain washes it into waterways and pollutes our drinking water supply. Besides bacteria, the waste contains high-level antibiotics, which adds to the antibiotic-resistance in humans who later drink the water.

The report recommends stricter measures as a solution: balancing the amount of waste generated with how many crops are available for waste disposal; having the broiler industry sharing responsibility for proper waste management; better programs and required permits for transporting manure; and better cleanup programs.

Comment: CAFO's: The facts about factory farms

(sott.net)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/22/2015 5:29:10 PM

CDC incompetence on display in yet another laboratory error exposing scientists to deadly viral strains

Monday, December 21, 2015 by: J. D. Heyes



(NaturalNews) The past 12 months have not been good ones for the once-well respected Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as a series of accidents, missteps, mistakes and miscalculations have seriously undermined the public's confidence in the federal health agency.

The latest gaffe could have proven deadly -- and may still yet -- because it involved mishandling of the highly contagious Ebola virus.

As recently reported by The New York Times, a laboratory mistake at the CDC in Atlanta exposed a technician working there to the deadly virus which continues to ravage West Africa, federal officials have said.

The technician, who is currently showing no signs of infection, will be monitored for 21 days, as per standard protocol (though, as
Natural News has reported, the incubation period for Ebola can be as long as 42 days).

"Unacceptable" pattern of behavior

News of the mistake prompted cries of concern and disbelief from some safety experts, the Times noted, adding that additional employees who went into the lab where the mistake took place were being looked at for potential exposure. Officials said the number of people who entered the lab was less than a dozen, and only the one worker is being actively monitored for exposure, Thomas Skinner, a spokesman for the agency, told the Times.

Reuters reported that the lone technician being monitored "may have been exposed... when working with
Ebola specimens that were supposed to have been inactivated but which may instead have contained live virus."

Ron Klain, the outgoing Ebola czar appointed by President Obama last fall, called the incident "unacceptable." He said
CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden promised him a report on the incident within a month.

He nevertheless praised the agency. "The American people should be very proud of the job that is being done in Atlanta by Dr. Frieden and the team at CDC," said Klain, a Democratic functionary who was once a top aide to Vice President Joe Biden.

But the agency has had a rough 2014, to be sure:

-- Regarding the Ebola outbreak in the U.S., initially the agency was handing to travelers returning from West Africa fliers instructing them to "call a doctor" if they felt ill, CNN reported. Also, Frieden made a number of gaffes, such as this one:

"Essentially any hospital in the country can safely take care of Ebola. You don't need a special hospital to do it."

Also, Frieden early on said that the
virus could only be contracted through direct contact, though later he admitted that coughing and sneezing could spread it as well, The Huffington Post noted.

"One of the most deadly flu viruses known"

-- Over the summer, Frieden told a House panel that his agency "missed a critical pattern" when technicians mishandled live anthrax samples, exposing more than 80 workers when they were transferred between CDC labs in June.

But that wasn't the first time (or, as it turns out, the last time) such incidents occurred. As noted by The Washington Post, which was reporting on the anthrax incident:

As a result of the CDC's internal investigation, the agency disclosed last week that there had been four other incidents in the past decade when deadly pathogens were mishandled. None had been previously disclosed by the CDC.

-- The CDC also had a mishap involving a deadly flu virus as well. As reported by The Wall Street Journal, following the anthrax and flu strain accidents, the agency "temporarily halted the shipment of samples from its high-security laboratories and said it will review safety procedures with external advisors."

According to the paper, an agency lab that routinely works with flu viruses had accidentally cross-contaminated a low-pathogenic H9N2 virus sample with an H5N1 flu strain, which is one of the most deadly viruses known. That sample was then sent to a lab at the federal Department of Agriculture, where technicians there discovered the contamination.

Sources:

http://www.nytimes.com

http://www.nbcnews.com

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://www.cnn.com

http://www.huffingtonpost.com

http://www.washingtonpost.com

http://www.wsj.com




"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/22/2015 5:49:51 PM

MATTERS OF LIFE AND DEATH

JUDGE ORDERS PRO-LIFERS TO PROMOTE ABORTION

'The public interest would be served'

Published: 16 hours ago





A federal judge in California has ordered pro-life and faith-based pregnancy centers to promote abortion, because “the public interest would be served.”

But the ruling from U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White is a long way from the end of the conflict. Several parallel cases in other jurisdictions challenge the constitutionality of the state demand that pro-life centers post a sign promoting the state’s abortion services.

The pro-life care centers sued, arguing the Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care and Transparency Act was a blatant violation of the constitutional principle that government cannot force individuals to convey government-mandated speech.

White determined, nevertheless, that “the public interest would be served by denying the stay pending appeal and allow the development of government policies generated through legislation or regulations developed through presumptively reasoned democratic processes.”

The Trial Insider blog reported the law was signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in the fall, and enforcement is set to begin Jan. 1.

Living Well Medical Clinic and others sued over the requirement to carry a government message.

Focusing on its aim of recognizing “human life from the moment of conception and to minister in the name of Jesus Christ to women and men facing unplanned pregnancies,” the care centers said the mandated state notice “is inconsistent with their religious commitments as they believe that ‘abortion is wrong and have never referred, nor would they refer, a client to have an abortion.’”

WND reported similar legislation was thrown out by the courts when it was attempted in New York. It also has failed in several other federal court jurisdictions.

Nevertheless, California advanced the idea, and now a number of cases have been brought both by the Pacific Justice Institute and the American Center for Law and Justice.

“It is imperative that we stop the government from forcing people of conscience to advocate messages to which they are morally and religiously opposed. If the government can do this, none of our First Amendment freedoms are secure,” said PJI President Brad Dacus.

Read the tested and proven strategies to defeat the abortion cartel, in “Abortion Free: Your Manual for Building a Pro-Life America One Community at a Time.”

Courthouse News reported White found “the disclosures do not include language endorsing or recommending such services. Rather, the mandated notice only notifies consumers of the existence of state-funded options.”

The care centers already have said they will not post the notice, which they believe violates their faith and their freedom of speech.

Other cases were argued in just the past few days, but the judge, Kimberly Mueller, has not released her opinion.

Dacus said it appears simply to be a new way of generating business for an abortion industry that is failing as fewer and fewer women choose that option.

The law, AB 775, still faces trial on its constitutionality, no matter the preliminary ruling from the judges.

Read the tested and proven strategies to defeat the abortion cartel, in “Abortion Free: Your Manual for Building a Pro-Life America One Community at a Time.”

“Forcing a religious pro-life charity to proclaim a pro-abortion declaration is on its face an egregious violation of both the free speech and free exercises clauses of the First Amendment,” said Dacus when the cases were announced.

“We will not rest until this government mandate is completely halted,” he said.

One complaint explains: “The content of the government message memorialized in AB 775 directly contradicts the foundational religious principles upon which A Woman’s Friend operates, as well as the message it conveys to its clients regarding abortion. As a result, A Woman’s Friend is subject to imminent adverse enforcement action against it by defendant.”

California’s Democrat attorney general, Kamala Harris, urged the legislature to adopt the bill and fine faith organizations $500 if they fail to provide the abortion information the first time. Fines thereafter would be $1,000 per incident.

The law requires faith groups to tell women: “California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services (including allocating FDA-approved methods of contraception), prenatal care, and abortion for eligible women. To determine whether you qualify, contact the county social services office at (insert the telephone number).”

It also requires that the message not only be handed out but also posted on the walls of waiting rooms on signs with specified dimensions.

WND reported the resolution to a similar case in New York.

In New York, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said the state could require crisis pregnancy centers to disclose whether they have a licensed medical provider on staff but not whether the center provides abortions or referrals, because that violates the First Amendment.

The ruling was left untouched by the Supreme Court.

Attorney Herbert W. Titus of William J. Olson, P.C., who has taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for decades at several universities, told WND it’s “not the government’s business to force anybody to carry the message of anyone else.”

“That is certainly what’s being done here,” he said.

Thomas Jefferson, he noted, described that very action as “sinful and tyrannical.”

“It’s fairly typical of California, [which is] always on the cutting edge of making us more and more like a fascist country, in which the state determines what we can say and what we can’t say,” Titus told WND.

Titus also has served as a trial attorney and special assistant U.S. attorney with the Department of Justice. He holds degrees from Harvard and the University of Oregon and for several years had his own daily radio program. He has testified on constitutional issues before Congress and state legislatures.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/12/judge-orders-pro-lifers-to-promote-abortion/#zPPz1a2WI33rXlbJ.99


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!