Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/18/2015 12:22:20 AM

Putin signs decree suspending free trade treaty with Ukraine starting January 1, 2016

Published time: 16 Dec, 2015 15:56

Russian President Vladimir Putin. © Alexei Druzhinin / Sputnik

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday signed a decree to suspend the free trade treaty with Ukraine, starting from January 1, 2016.

“Due to exceptional circumstances affecting the interests and economic security of the Russian Federation which require immediate measures, I order ... from January 1, 2016 to suspend the Agreement on the free trade zone with Ukraine, which was signed in St. Petersburg on 18 October 2011," said the decree.



Europe, not Russia pressured over EU association agreement – frmr PM http://on.rt.com/9oo18p

Currently, Russia and Ukraine are trading in accordance with the free trade agreement between CIS countries. However, starting next year the economic part of Kiev's Association Agreement with the EU comes into force making Ukraine part of the European trading bloc.

Last month, Russia’s Economic Development Minister Aleksey Ulyukaev said Moscow will impose a food embargo on Ukraine from January 1. According to him, the food ban is to be introduced to counteract Ukraine joining economic and financial sanctions against Russia.

The minister explained the measure aims to protect the Russian market from the illegal supply of embargoed European goods that will become available in Ukraine under the Association Agreement.

Moscow banned agricultural and other products from European countries that joined anti-Russian sanctions.

Ulyukaev also said the Kremlin plans to introduce customs tariffs on imports of other goods from Ukraine. The tariffs will be introduced because Ukraine will no longer be part of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) free trade zone and therefore should not enjoy membership benefits, according to the minister.


(RT)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/18/2015 12:36:36 AM

New York State Supreme Court Says NO to Mandatory Flu Vaccinations for Kids

will's picture

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Wednesday, December 16, 2015, may become a day of ‘infamy’ in the annals of mandatory vaccinations.

On that day, His Honor, Judge Manuel J. Mendez, J.S.C., handed down the decision overturning a Mayor Bloomberg-era regulation requiring all children 6 months through 59 months of age must obtain a flu vaccine in order to attend pre-schools, day care centers and Head Start Programs regulated by the City of New York.

Interestingly, the Judge in his order wrote on page 6, “The Court of Appeals further stated that §558(b) of the New York City Charter ‘contains no suggestion that the Board of Health has the authority to create laws’.”

That very issue of authority to create laws should be challenged whenever parents, employees, or individuals are being force-fed the standard vaccine ‘dogma’ of “it’s the law” to get vaccinated or else you can’t work or your child can’t go to school.

Everyone who has done his/her homework about the ‘safety and efficacy’ of vaccines knows how dangerous they truly are, and should do as several NYC parents did: Brought suit against The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; The New York City Board of Health; and Dr. Mary Travis Bassett in her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Mental Health and Hygiene.

His Honor, Judge Mendez further stated that NYC Board of Health, et al, lacked statutory authority to require such vaccinations. Here is the court order, which I think every parent should print out, study and save for future reference, as the judge got this one right, I say. Consequently, the NYC Board of Health, et al, are permanently enjoined from implementing and enforcing forced flu vaccinations on infants and toddlers in order to attend pre-schools, day care centers and Head Start Programs regulated by New York City.

Next, what needs to happen is a lawsuit against vaccine manufacturers challenging vaccine trials and the unfavorable data withheld, which was not presented during vaccine licensure applications.

Image Credit

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Article courtesy of ActivistPost.com, republished under Creative Commons.
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/12/new-york-state-supreme-new-court-says-no-to-mandatory-flu-vaccinations-for-kids-6-months-to-5-years-in-order-to-attend-head-start-pre-school-or-day-care.html


Category:

World News & Politics

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/18/2015 9:57:01 AM

Russia open to Assad's ouster after Syria transition: diplomats

Reuters

Russian President Vladimir Putin (R), pictured with Syrian counterpart Bashar al-Assad at the Kremlin on October 20, 2015, is among the few allies Assad believes are "ready" to help end his country's five-year civil war, the Syrian said December 17 (AFP Photo/Alexey Dryzhinin)


By Louis Charbonneau and Parisa Hafezi

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Russia has made clear to Western nations that it has no objection to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad stepping down as part of a peace process, in a softening of its publicly stated staunch backing of Assad ahead of talks in New York, diplomats said.

Russia, like Iran, has been a firm ally of Assad and is intervening militarily on his behalf against anti-government forces in the five-year civil war that has claimed more than a quarter million lives. Both Russia and Iran have long insisted Assad's fate should be decided in a nationwide vote.

Western powers, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and others reluctantly agreed to allow Assad to remain in place during a transition period, a compromise that has opened the door to a shift on the part of Russia, Western diplomats said.

"What you've got is a move that will end up with Assad going," a senior Western diplomat said on condition of anonymity.

"And the Russians have got to the point privately where they accept that Assad will have gone by the end of this transition, they're just not prepared to say that publicly," he added.

Several other Western officials confirmed the diplomat's remarks.

The United States, Russia along with Iran, Saudi Arabia and major European and Arab powers have agreed on a road map for a nationwide ceasefire, to have six months of talks between Assad's government and the opposition on forming a unity government to begin in January, and to have elections within 18 months.

There will be a third round of talks in New York on Friday at which U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and over a dozen other ministers will aim to keep up the momentum to get a deal to end the war.

U.S. and European officials say that Assad cannot run in any elections organized along the lines major powers agreed in the two previous ministerial meetings in Vienna.

Despite the narrowing of disagreements, there is still a deep divide in the negotiations on ending Syria's five-year civil war, diplomats and officials close to the talks said on condition of anonymity.

"Gradually the gap is narrowing but there is still a big gap," said one senior Western diplomat. "There are still countries that think Assad is the solution to fighting Daesh (Islamic State), which is the complete opposite of our view."

Diplomats say that Russia has moved further than Iran on the question of abandoning the Syrian president if a transition plan can be agreed. For years, Iran has backed Assad with its own military personnel and, like Russia, with weapons, and it would lose face and influence if it gives up.

The senior Western diplomat added that "Iran is not in the same place yet" as Russia on Assad.

Another Western official said the key would be getting both Russia and Iran to agree precisely on how to abandon Assad.

"They have to drop him together and getting them to coordinate on that won't be easy," the official said.

According to one senior Western diplomat, Russia already has a list of possible replacements for Assad, though he declined to provide details. It was not clear whether Iran had a list too.

The fate of Assad will not be a focus of the ministerial meeting on Friday, though it is one that Washington and Moscow will continue to grapple with in bilateral talks, diplomats said.

After those talks the Security Council is hoping to adopt a resolution endorsing the push for a political transition. Council diplomats say the five permanent members - Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States - have yet to agree on a text.

Other challenges for the Syria talks include agreeing on a lineup for an opposition delegation to negotiate with Assad's government. A recent meeting in Saudi Arabia of opposition figures made significant headway, Western officials say, in coming up with an opposition bloc.

"Now we have a clear opposition that is not Daesh," Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir said. "We have negotiators sitting at the table. If the other side is serious, then, Bashar al-Assad and his allies, show me your team and let's have them get together."

Syria accuses the Saudis, Qatar and Turkey of supporting Islamic State and other jihadist groups, something that all three have denied.

(Additional reporting by John Irish and Michelle Nichols in New York, Arshad Mohammed and Lesley Wroughton in New York, Tom Perry, Mariam Karouny and Sylvia Westall in Beirut,; Writing by Louis Charbonneau; Editing by Leslie Adler)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/18/2015 10:11:34 AM

Number of people forced to flee war, violence to hit record in 2015: UN

AFP

The UN refugee agency released a report showing rocketing numbers of people living as refugees, asylum seekers or displaced within their countries during the first half of the year, and indicated that the full-year figures would be devastating (AFP Photo/Aris Messinis)


Geneva (AFP) - The number of people who have been forced to flee war, violence and persecution looks set to soar in 2015 past last year's record of nearly 60 million, the UN said Friday.

The UN refugee agency released a report showing rocketing numbers of people living as refugees, asylum seekers or displaced within their countries during the first half of the year, and indicated that the full-year figures would be devastating.

"With almost a million people having crossed the Mediterranean as refugees and migrants so far this year, and conflicts in Syria and elsewhere continuing to generate staggering levels of human suffering, 2015 is likely to exceed all previous records for global forced displacement," UNHCR said.

Last year, the number of displaced soared to a record 59.5 million worldwide, and Friday's report indicated that this year the figure "has far surpassed 60 million".

That basically means that one in every 122 people on the planet is today someone who has been forced to flee their home, the agency said.

- 4,600 new refugees daily -

"Forced displacement is now profoundly affecting our times," UN refugee chief Antonio Guterres said in a statement.

"Never has there been a greater need for tolerance, compassion and solidarity with people who have lost everything."

During the first six months of the year, at least five million people were newly displaced, with 4.2 million of them remaining inside their country and 839,000 crossing borders -- the equivalent of 4,600 people becoming refugees every single day, the report said.

By the end of June, 20.2 million people were living as refugees worldwide, marking a 45-percent jump since 2011.

The main contributor is the ruthless conflict in Syria, which by June this year had created 4.2 million refugees, UNHCR said.

Without this factor, the global increase in refugee numbers from 2011 to mid-2015 would have been just five percent, the agency said.

UNHCR meanwhile pointed out that Europe's migration crisis -- its worst since World War II -- is only partially reflected in the new numbers, since arrivals have escalated dramatically in the second half of 2015, a period not covered by the report.

Global asylum applications shot up 78 percent compared to the first half of 2015 to nearly a million, the report showed.

Germany was the world's biggest recipient of asylum claims, clocking 159,000 during the six months leading to June -- close to the total for all of 2014.

But the situation has escalated dramatically since then, with Germany now expected to take in one million asylum-seekers by the end of the year.

Russia came in second place in terms of asylum applications, receiving 100,000 in the first half of 2015, mainly from people fleeing the conflict in Ukraine.

The overall number of internally displaced people (IDPs), subtracting those who have returned home, swelled by two million over the six month period to about 34 million, the report said.

War-ravaged Yemen alone saw 933,500 new IDPs in the first half of the year, while the war in Ukraine displaced 559,000 internally, and the Democratic Republic of Congo counted 558,000 new internally displaced.

UNHCR meanwhile warned the global IDP numbers were likely higher, since the report only covers internally displaced people under UNHCR protection, and not those cared for at a national level.



Record number forced to flee war, violence in 2015


The number of refugees, asylum seekers and internally displaced will exceed 60 million this year, the U.N. says.
4,600 new refugees daily

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/18/2015 10:26:06 AM

Dear Donald Trump: No, You Can’t Shut Down Parts of the Internet

Rob Pegoraro
Tech Columnist
December 17, 2015

Photo: Associated Press

Well, I guess Donald Trump wasn’t kidding about that whole close-off-the-Internet thing.

The veteran loudmouth and Republican presidential candidate brought up the notion of “maybe, in certain areas, closing the Internet up in some way” in a December 8 speech, then returned to his idea of unplugging terrorist groups from the Internet during Tuesday night’s GOP debate when CNN moderator Wolf Blitzer asked about it.

“I would certainly be open to closing areas where we are at war with somebody,” Trump said. “I sure as hell don’t want to let people that want to kill us and kill our nation use our Internet.”

Don’t get me wrong: Recruitment by terrorist groups via social media is an actual problem. And among those groups, none deserve Internet access — make that, continued physical existence — less than the Daesh death cult that fancies itself an “Islamic State.”

Unfortunately, the Donald’s understanding of Internet architecture is every bit as nuanced and fact-based as his grasp of immigration policy or of the Islamic faith.

You can’t block somebody from getting online

If you want to stop somebody from using the Internet, killing him with a missile or a bomb will unquestionably work. But we’re already trying to do just that in Iraq, Syria, and elsewhere. Our other options aren’t as good.

That is our fault for designing the Internet as a resilient network of networks that routes around damage and dropped connections. It’s also the fault of the entire telecom industry for developing so many different ways to get online. As long as wired and wireless phone service reaches a given area, anybody in it can get online with little trouble.



There’s a reason they call it the World Wide Web. (Image: Tech Republic)


But that’s the entire problem with talking about “our Internet.” The Internet arguably stopped being a U.S. property when the National Science Foundation ended its control over core Internet routing functions in 1998 — well before the two most recent Trump corporate bankruptcies.

Cutting off access to the wrong sites isn’t easy either

Trump would be well advised to ask his friends in Hollywood how well they’ve done at stopping people from sharing copies of copyrighted works online. Spoiler alert: As Trump might say, it’s a loser of an idea.

Just stopping search engines from pointing people to undesirable sites becomes, at best, a whack-a-mole exercise in which search sites can never keep up with new undesirables. At worst, you get a situation like Europe’s “right to be forgotten,” where the very act of trying to suppress searches for a topic makes it more notorious than ever.

And even if you could magically force every search site in the world to blackball particular sites, you’d still have people sharing the “wrong” sites on social media of various sorts.



Block one undesirable website and another will pop up somewhere else. (Photo: Amazon.com)












Stopping people from directly navigating to a site is even harder, as proponents of the loathsome Stop Online Piracy Act found out to their dismay. If you ban Internet providers from connecting people to blacklisted sites, determined users can switch to third-party domain-name services — such as Google Public DNS or OpenDNS — to route their requests properly.

Or they can navigate to sites by directly typing in the appropriate numerical Internet Protocol addresses. And no, banning Internet providers from routing traffic to blacklisted IPs won’t work either. You can use a proxy server to fake out any such blocking.

You can, however, kick somebody off your own site

But if you run a site and you don’t like the conduct of some of the people using it, you can go ahead and boot them anytime you like. That’s because, while the Internet is a public space, individual sites tend to be private property.

They can set their own rules banning abusive behavior — it can be a bigger problem if they don’t — and only nincompoops squawk about censorship when it’s just the proprietor of an establishment exercising her traditional right to refuse a customer’s business.

But Twitter, Facebook, and other social networks are already cracking down on the abuse of their property by the likes of Daesh to recruit new members. Twitter has been sufficiently aggressive at this that Daesh hascalled for the assassination of Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. At Facebook, this effort led to the mistaken shutdown of the account of a user whose parents probably thought they were doing her a favor by naming her “Isis.”

Somebody with as much knowledge of self-promotion as Donald Trump should know all of these things. But when your reputation as a blustering blowhard is at stake, why get hung up on facts or logic?

Email Rob at rob@robpegoraro.com; follow him on Twitter at@robpegoraro.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!