Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/13/2015 1:54:34 AM

Internal Displacement in Iraq Reaches
3.2 Million

© AP Photo / Khalid Mohammed

Internal displacement of people in conflict-torn Iraq has reached 3.2 million, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) said in a statement Saturday.

MOSCOW (Sputnik) The displaced Iraqis are living in critical conditions, according to the statement on the IOM website.

“Of the nearly 3.2 million displaced, one out of five are living in critical shelter arrangements, including unfinished buildings and informal settlements,” IOM Iraq Chief of Mission Thomas Lothar Weiss said, as cited by the organization.

The majority of the displaced were reported to be originally from the governorates of Anbar — 42 percent, Ninewa — 32 percent, and Salah al-Din — 13 percent, according to the statement.

According to the statement, the IOM is working with the UN Humanitarian Country Team, government authorities and the organization’s donors to provide non-food item kits, shelter, health care and psycho-social support that the displaced Iraqis need to survive.

The United States, together with its allies, invaded Iraq in March 2003 and officially pulled its troops out in 2011. The war, which resulted in the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's regime, claimed the lives of about 200,000 soldiers and civilians, leaving thousands displaced.

Recently, the Islamic State militants seized vast areas of Iraq, triggering further humanitarian crisis in the country.



Read more: http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20150912/1026919704.html#ixzz3lZxtnqOE


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/13/2015 2:32:29 AM

America's New Nightmare:

How to Cope With Russia on the Ground
in Syria

© Sputnik / Andrei Stenin

No matter how persistent Russia is in insisting that it supports not the mere regime of the Syrian President Assad but rather its fight against the Islamic State, Washington won’t listen: the US media is abuzz with fearmongering over Russia’s military aid to Damascus, trying to guess what it could mean and what to do next.

The US seems to have absolutely no clue how to react to the Russian activity in Syria. While some of its media sources opt to resort to hysteria, such as Fox News, which claims Damascus will soon be occupied by the Russian army, others prefer to look at different options, and are trying to compile something resembling an action plan.


The US-based financial agency Bloomberg has come up with two relatively adequate responses, and examines all the pros and cons for each one.

“The options are to try to confront Russia inside Syria or, as some in the White House are advocating, cooperate with Russia there in the fight against the Islamic State (ISIL),” it said.

“For some in the White House, the priority is to enlist more countries to fight against the Islamic State, and they fear making the relationship with Russia any more heated.


They are seriously considering accepting the Russian buildup as a fait accompli, and then working with Moscow to coordinate US and Russian strikes in Northern Syria, where the US-led coalition operates every day,” the agency says.


Others, however, seem to be so obsessed with the idea of toppling President Assad, that they are paying no attention to the IS threat; they will regard any cooperation with Moscow as a real failure.


“For many in the Obama administration, especially those who work on Syria, the idea of acquiescing to Russian participation in the fighting is akin to admitting that the drive to oust Assad has failed. Plus, they fear Russia will attack Syrian opposition groups that are fighting against Assad, using the war against the Islamic State as a cover.”


However, the real fear for the aforementioned group is that “the US has no real leverage to fight back”.


If “Obama decides not to accept the Russian air force presence in Syria”, the outlet elaborates, he will face another set of options.


“The US could impose new sanctions on Russia, although the current punishments related to Ukraine have not changed Putin’s calculus, and there’s little chance the European countries would join in on a new round.”


“The US might warn Russia that its base is fair game for the opposition to attack, but that could spur Putin to double down on the deployment.”


“The US could try to stop the flow of Russian arms, but that would mean pressuring countries such as Iraq to stand up to Putin and Iran, which they might not agree to.”


“The White House’s concerns about escalating tensions with Russia inside Syria are legitimate, but cooperating with Russian forces on the ground or in the air would undermine whatever remaining credibility the US has with the Syrian opposition and the Gulf States that support it.”


“The US may not be able to stop Russia’s entry into fighting the Syrian civil war, but at a minimum America shouldn't be seen as colluding with Moscow. If that happens, the suspicion that Obama is actually working to preserve the Assad regime will have been confirmed.”



5 Messages Russia Is Sending to the World via Syria


Meanwhile, The National Interest, another US outlet, has come up with its own list of what Russia is trying to tell the world.


First, it says, “the Kremlin is clearly signaling that it plans to take an active role in setting the agenda in the Middle East — and not to passively accept an American vision for how the future should unfold”.


Second, “Putin is making it clear that he will not accept Washington's default position that the removal” of President Assad “is a path to greater long-term stability in the Middle East.”


Third, “Russia is more confident of its position in Ukraine”, with “Moscow retaining most of the leverage.”


Fourth, “the Kremlin enforces its red lines. Just as Moscow would not permit the Donbass separatists to face catastrophic defeat last summer in Ukraine, Russia has signaled that it will not sit by and allow Bashar Assad to be overthrown or removed by outside military action.”


And, finally, fifth, “for Middle Eastern countries, like Egypt and Azerbaijan, that have opposed Russian policy in Syria, Putin's decision to up the ante may lead them to reassess whether the path to a viable settlement resides not in Washington, soon to be increasingly distracted by an election campaign, but through Moscow.”



Read more: http://sputniknews.com/world/20150912/1026918344/us-russia-syria-assad.html#ixzz3la6VFVjB


Read more:
http://sputniknews.com/world/20150912/1026918344/us-russia-syria-assad.html#ixzz3la5yU0Vf


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/13/2015 11:18:56 AM

Why Europe’s refugee crisis reached a tipping point

Yahoo News


The world could no longer ignore what’s been called the worst refugee crisis since World War II when a Syrian toddler's body washed ashore last week.

Pictures of 3-year-old Aylan Kurdi lying on a Turkish beach drew attention to the human cost of the crisis where statistics had failed.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rightssays that about 330,000 people have died since the brutal Syrian civil war began in March 2011.

An estimated 12.2 million people need humanitarian assistance in Syria, 7.6 million have been displaced internally, and four million have fled the country altogether, according to the United States Agency for International Development.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) says that among the 4,088,099 registered Syrian refugees who have left for neighboring countries, 1,938,999 settled in Turkey, 1,113,941 are in Lebanon, 629,266 are in Jordan and 249,463 are in Iraq. There are also 132,375 in Egypt and 24,055 in other North African countries.

The UNHCR has been warning that conditions for these refugees, many of whom live in camps, will keep deteriorating without more international support.

Syrian refugee Sarah Ali, 53, center, holds her grandson Jood, 2 months, while she and other members of her family rest on the ground near a makeshift camp for asylum seekers, after crossing the Serbian-Hungarian border near Roszke, southern Hungary, Saturday, Sept. 12, 2015. (Photo: Muhammed Muheisen/AP)

"This worst humanitarian crisis of our era should be galvanizing a global outcry of support, but instead help is dwindling,” U.N. high commissioner for refugees António Guterres said in a statement. “With humanitarian appeals systematically underfunded, there just isn't enough aid to meet the colossal needs — nor enough development support to the hosting countries creaking under the strain of so many refugees.”

Sherif Elsayed-Ali, deputy director of global issues at Amnesty International, says few have heeded the U.N.’s warning that these countries could not absorb the crisis without it reaching a tipping point.

“This was entirely predictable and many people warned that this would become a crisis if the EU — and the international community more generally — didn't act,” Elsayed-Ali said in an interview with Yahoo News. “But they did very little, with a few notable exceptions like Germany and Sweden.”

The nearly two million Syrian refugees in Turkey do not necessarily see it as a permanent home because they do not have the right to work.

Furthermore, as The Guardian reported, Turkey's Justice and Development Party (AKP), which is viewed as sympathetic to the refugees' plight, suffered recent setbacks at the polls. This has made many Syrians uneasy about their future in the country.

"More and more Syrians are losing hope. Thousands have tried to reach Europe by taking often deadly land or sea routes after paying their life savings to smugglers,” a UNHCRstatement reads. “Many have not made it. Those who do, face rising hostility as refugees are conflated with security concerns in a climate of rising panic.”

So far this year, more than 300,000 refugees and migrants have sailed across the Mediterranean Sea: nearly 200,000 landing in Greece and 110,000 in Italy, according toUNHCR. This is a drastic increase over the 219,000 people who crossed the Mediterranean for the whole of last year.

Late last month, UNHCR spokesperson Melissa Fleming said 2,500 refugees and migrants have died trying to make the journey this year. For all of last year, 3,500 people died or were reported missing.

The top three countries of origin for people arriving in Europe by sea are Syria, Afghanistan and Eritrea. A majority of westerners are more familiar with the conflicts in the first two nations than the third.

The UN Human Rights Council has cited Eritrea, a northeast African country bordered by Sudan in the west, for “systematic, widespread and gross human rights violations.”

The difference between refugees and migrants

There has been some confusion in the media over whether these people are refugees or migrants — but the distinction is important and these terms are not interchangeable. They mean specific things in the eyes of the international community.

The U.N.’s 1951 Refugee Convention defines a refugee as someone who "owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality, and is unable to, or owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country."

View gallery

.
A Syrian refugee father holds his child whille waiting to cross the border from Greece into Macedonia, September 12, 2015. (Photo: Yannis Behrakis/Reu...

A Syrian refugee father holds his child whille waiting to cross the border from Greece into Macedonia, September …

In other words, a refugee is fleeing armed conflict or persecution and would face potentially deadly consequences if denied asylum.

The 1951 Refugee Convention also guarantees certain rights that states must afford refugees. Chief among them is the right not to be expelled or returned to situations in which their lives would be under threat.

UNHCR says that migrants “choose to move not because of a direct threat of persecution or death, but mainly to improve their lives by finding work, or in some cases for education, family reunion, or other reasons. Unlike refugees who cannot safely return home, migrants face no such impediment to return. If they choose to return home, they will continue to receive the protection of their government.”

To deal with migrants, countries use their own immigration laws and could turn them away.

The international community’s response

Confusing the terms migrant and refugee could have dire consequences for people seeking safe haven.

Several conservative European politicians, such as Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, have recently been arguing that most of the immigrants are economic migrants.

On Monday, for instance, Orban said that if they were refugees they would stop in the first safe country they reach rather than continue on to Germany and other western European nations.

“If they want to continue on from Hungary, it’s not because they are in danger, it’s because they want something else,” he said.

View gallery

.
A Syrian refugee rests at Idomeni train station where refugees and migrants are gathering before crossing Greece's border to Macedonia near the Greek ...

A Syrian refugee rests at Idomeni train station where refugees and migrants are gathering before crossing Greece's …

Other European leaders, notably German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt, have been far more welcoming. Germany has resettled 98,700 Syrian refugees and Sweden has resettled 64,700. In August alone, more than 100,000 asylum seekers entered Germany.

"I am happy that Germany has become a country that many people outside of Germany now associate with hope," Merkel said on Sept. 7.

Merkel and Reinfeldt have called upon other EU countries to shoulder their fair share of the burden through a quota system, in the spirit of European solidarity.

Responding to public uproar, British Prime Minister David Cameron announced his country, which had accepted fewer refugees than its neighbors, would resettle 20,000 Syrians over the next five years.

Israel is the only nation that shares a border with Syria that has not accepted any Syrian refugees.

"Israel is not indifferent to the human tragedy of Syrian and African refugees," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, "but Israel is a small country — very small — without demographic or geographic depth. That is why we must control our borders."

The United States, which has only resettled about 1,500 Syrian refugees since the start of the conflict, has also come under pressure to do more.

“The U.S. is generally speaking the largest provider of refugee resettlement in the world, but its processes are also very slow,” Elsayed-Ali said.

U.S. President Barack Obama called for at least 10,000 Syrian refugees to be welcomed into the country next year, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Thursday. This is a 2,000-person increase from the country's previous commitment to resettle 8,000.

Bara'ah Alhammadi, 10, a Syrian refugee, is carried on the back of her father as they make their way along a railway track after they crossed the Serbian-Hungarian border near Roszke, southern Hungary, Friday, Sept. 11, 2015. (Photo: Muhammed Muheisen/AP)

The International Rescue Committee (IRC) responded to the announcement with dismay, calling upon the U.S. to resettle 100,000 Syrian refugees in 2016.

“This offer to 2,000 people is cold comfort to the victims of the Syrian conflict," IRC president David Miliband said Thursday in a statement. "With 4 million living in limbo and tens of thousands making desperate choices to reach safety, the U.S. has a moral responsibility to lead and is fully equipped to respond in a far more robust way."

How you can help

Several humanitarian organizations are accepting donations for Syrian refugees. These include UNHCR, the American Refugee Committee, Catholic Relief Services and Save the Children. A longer list can be found at Charity Navigator, an independent nonprofit that evaluates American charities.

View Gallery

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/13/2015 4:03:48 PM

On Iran deal, Obama threw everything into uniting Democrats

Associated Press

Associated Press Videos
House Votes Against Iran Nuclear Deal

Watch video

WASHINGTON (AP) — A lame-duck president, an empowered opposition, a looming election: They're hardly the ingredients for a resounding White House triumph.

Yet President Barack Obama clinched a huge victory on the Iran nuclear deal in Congress this past week when Senate Democrats blocked GOP attempts to get a disapproval resolution to his desk and frustrated House Republicans settled for passing two related measures destined to go nowhere.

The outcome was especially notable for a White House with a history of bungling legislative initiatives on Capitol Hill, and a president known for a hands-off relationship with lawmakers, even his own Democrats.

This time was different, according to administration officials and lawmakers of both parties. The reasons involved policy, politics and a president looking for one last big success to burnish his foreign policy legacy

Obama threw everything into uniting Democrats behind the accord, writing letters and flying lawmakers on Air Force One with him to Africa. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., gave the White House the names of 57 House Democrats to call in August; Obama called each one.

"The White House gets great credit for this. This is the crowning jewel achievement in foreign policy of the White House," said Democratic Rep. Alan Lowenthal of California, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee who was lobbied heavily by both sides before finally deciding in favor of the deal.

"I'm glad it's over," he added. "This has sucked the air out of Congress."

The president was aided by a complex congressional review process that gave minority Democrats unusual leverage, and he was backed by the same Capitol Hill leaders who helped him push his health care law through a bitterly divided Congress in 2010.

Some GOP congressional aides are calling the Iran deal the president's "Foreign Policy Obamacare" because it was secured over unanimous Republican opposition and will be Democrats' to defend for years. Frustrated in defeat, opponents complain they barely stood a chance.

___

Years in the making, the accord was aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear program in exchange for billions of dollars in relief from international sanctions. From the start, the agreement faced fierce GOP opposition.

As negotiations progressed this year, partisan hues sharpened even though foreign affairs are traditionally more divorced from partisan politics and the U.S. was negotiating along with five international partners: Britain, Germany, France, Russia and China.

In March, Senate Republicans led by freshman Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas infuriated the White House and Democrats by releasing an open letter to the leaders of Iran warning them about the limits of any deal with Obama.

That same month, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke to Congress at the invitation of House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and warned against the deal. The occasion was arranged without the knowledge of the White House. Pelosi fumed visibly throughout the speech.

By hardening partisan lines, both events made it harder for Democrats to buck Obama in the end.

___

In the days after the agreement was finalized in July, the White House set up a command center in the West Wing basement to oversee outreach efforts to Congress. It became known as the "anti-war room" and housed staffers with whiteboard lists of lawmakers for and against.

Obama and senior officials were in frequent contact with Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and his No. 2, Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, along with Pelosi.

As lawmakers left Washington for their August recess, the White House was cautiously optimistic despite the opposition of New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, a prominent Jewish Democrat.

With lawmakers spread around the country, Energy Secretary Ernie Moniz emerged as one of the administration's most effective messengers. A floppy-haired nuclear physicist who spent most of his career outside of politics, Moniz was seen as a highly credible voice.

He popped up in surprising places.

As the administration courted Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D., Moniz called into a radio show her brother hosted. When Moniz learned that a top Israeli official was in Montana to step up pressure on Democratic Sen. Jon Tester, the secretary contacted a local newspaper for an interview.

Throughout August, the White House's message to Democrats was simple: If you support the deal, say so publicly.

___

Durbin organized a vote-gathering operation out of his ornate office on the third floor of the Capitol.

He invited ambassadors from the other countries in the accord to meet with 30 Senate Democrats. The diplomats' message: This is the best deal you will get.

New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, in backing the deal, referenced the ambassadors' meeting in her statement, and concluded: "Going back to the negotiation table is not an option."

That sentiment emerged as a refrain from other Democrats.

As September began and lawmakers were getting ready to return to Washington, the decisive 34th Senate Democrat announced support for the deal — enough to ensure Democrats could uphold Obama's veto of any congressional disapproval resolution.

But by the time that announcement came from Sen. Barbara Mikulski of Maryland, the White House and Democrats were already aiming higher: 41, the number needed to bottle up the disapproval resolution with a filibuster.

___

Last Tuesday, coordinated announcements from Sens. Ron Wyden of Oregon, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Gary Peters of Michigan — all seen as possible Democratic opponents of the deal — put backers over the top.

One question remained: Would Democratic and independent senators hold together and block the disapproval resolution with a filibuster?

Reid was confident, or at least decided it was smart to pretend he was.

As the Senate came back into session, but before the C-SPAN microphones were on, Reid approached Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky on the Senate floor and told him Democrats had the votes to block the disapproval resolution. When aides asked Reid later if that was really the case, the Nevadan just shrugged.

Pressure from the powerful pro-Israel lobby AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee) was intense to allow a final vote on the disapproval resolution, even if senators were going to oppose it.

Democratic senators were repeatedly losing their nerve and coming to Reid or the White House to explain they couldn't back a filibuster. They were told, in essence, not to screw things up.

"They faced a lot of pressure to go the other way," Durbin said.

In the end Republicans fell two votes short of the 60 needed to move the disapproval resolution to a final vote.

The White House and Democrats had won. "An historic step," Obama exulted in a statement.

Opponents took bitter consolation in the fact that Republicans united against the deal, even if they couldn't stop it.

"Let's face it. On foreign policy, the administration holds more cards," said Republican Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

___

Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Deb Riechmann contributed to this report.



Obama put everything into uniting Dems on Iran


The president is known for a hands-off relationship with lawmakers, but this time was different.
'Crowning jewel achievement'



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/13/2015 5:20:10 PM

Putin Calls Ukraine Ceasefire 'Heartening'


Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, and Silvio Berlusconi, the former Italian prime minister, sign a guest book as they visit Livadia Palace outside the town of Yalta, Crimea, September 11. ALEXEI DRUZHININ/RIA NOVOSTI/KREMLIN/REUTERS


CHERSONEUS, Crimea (Reuters) - Russia's President Vladimir Putin said on Saturday it was welcome that fighting had stopped in eastern Ukraine, a change in rhetoric compared to his previous accusations against Ukraine for violating a ceasefire.

Until recently Putin has repeatedly criticized Ukraine for failing to implement a peace deal agreed in February, including by continued shelling of rebel-held areas.

"It's heartening that the main thing is the cessation of shelling of the Donbass (eastern Ukraine) from the side of the armed forces as well as the so-called volunteer battalions ofUkraine," he said in the Crimean town of Chersoneus.

"I think that today this is the main achievement."

Putin was on the latest of several visits to Crimea, again putting Russia's stamp on the region it annexed from Ukraine last year during political upheaval in that country.

This time he was meeting his old friend Silvio Berlusconi, the former Italian prime minister, on a private visit.

Both Ukrainian and rebel forces have blamed each other for repeated ceasefire breaches but both sides are now broadly respecting a new ceasefire that came into effect on September 1, according to international monitors from the Organization for Security and Co-operation inEurope.

Putin also reiterated his call for Ukraine to implement other elements of February's peace deal, including that Kiev hold direct talks with rebel representatives, and implements laws on amnesty for the rebels and on an autonomous status for the rebel regions.

He said it was possible that the deadline for implementing the Minsk peace agreement could be extended, an idea mentioned by a Kremlin aide on Friday.

Under the original deal, major points of the peace plan are supposed to be fulfilled by the end of this year, a prospect that now looks remote.

Putin also said that Russia could solve the issue of gas supplies to Ukraine and rebuild bilateral relations.

"I think that we will also solve questions connected with supplies of gas and electricity," Putin said. "In general it is necessary to rebuild relations on a full-scale format.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1