Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/19/2012 5:14:18 PM

Who’s Sabotaging Iran’s Nukes?

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/19/2012 5:32:28 PM
Here is a case involving a big corporation and its innocent victims from a 3rd world country. Will the Supreme Court rule against the latter to favor the former?

Corporations Should Have to Pay For Torturing People








NOTE: This is a guest post from Katie Redford, Co-founder and U.S. Director of EarthRights International. EarthRights International (ERI) is a nongovernmental, nonprofit organization that combines the power of law and the power of people in defense of human rights and the environment.

Two years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in Citizens United v. FEC that, because they are “legal persons,” corporations have free speech rights, opening the floodgates to corporate and SuperPac spending on our elections. Earlier this year, in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum (Shell), Shell asked the Supreme Court to make an even more absurd decision: that corporations, and corporations alone, should get a special exemption from lawsuits over human rights abuses abroad. Kiobel returns to the Supreme Court on October 1st, with the future of a critical human rights tool hanging in the balance.

Shell is accused of financing, arming, and conspiring with the Nigerian military to suppress non-violent opposition to Shell’s extraction operations in Ogoniland. The abuses, which occurred during the 1990s, included crimes against humanity and, most famously, the torture and execution of Dr. Barinem Kiobel, one of the “Ogoni Nine,” a group of community leaders who, following an internationally condemned sham trial, were executed in 1995.

In 2003, survivors and family members sued Shell in a U.S. federal court under a 200-year-old American law, the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), which has been used for decades to offer human rights victims a chance to seek justice in U.S. Courts. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals broke from precedent and ruled that the ATS doesn’t apply to corporations, and the case was then appealed to the Supreme Court. A ruling in favor of Shell could slam shut the door for many other human rights victims seeking justice in U.S. federal courts.

Unfortunately, confronting corporations in court over human rights abuses is nothing new to me. I was one of the lawyers who helped bring the first successful human rights case against a corporation, using the ATS, when my organization, EarthRights International, represented villagers from Burma in a lawsuit against Unocal (now Chevron). Our clients included men and women who were forced against their will by the Burmese army to work on infrastructure for Unocal’s gas pipeline, and who were raped and tortured and had family members killed by Burmese soldiers working for Unocal to provide pipeline “security.” That case, Doe v. Unocal, followed precedents established in Nuremburg that held corporations accountable for their complicity in Holocaust-era crimes. Even though only a handful of cases have proceeded since that time, U.S. courts offered a forum for human rights survivors to seek justice from corporations involved in terrorist attacks, torture, genocide, slavery and abusive child labor.

All of this progress is at stake in Kiobel. If the Supreme Court sides with Shell, corporations will be given a green light to commit atrocious crimes abroad, knowing that they are immune under U.S. law. Even worse, individual human rights abusers may be let off the hook as well, making the U.S. a safe haven for torturers. Few countries have the courage or legal mechanisms to hold human rights abusers accountable, so if the U.S. takes this huge backwards step, human rights standards could deteriorate across the globe.

I plan on attending the Kiobel arguments on October 1st, with a knot in my stomach as I listen to Shell’s absurd attempts to win at any cost. In the end, the fate of human rights litigation using the ATS will be decided by the same nine justices who gave us Citizens United — a case that few of us knew about until it was too late. We can’t let corporations get away with another huge power grab. We have two weeks to make our voices heard and I hope you’ll raise yours now. Please join our TooBigToPunish? campaign and show your support for human rights and corporate accountability.

Related Stories:

Force Isn’t Enough: U.S. Must Make Friends

Husbands to Pay Wives for Doing Chores: Ingenious or Insulting?

Success! Shell Backs Away From Arctic Drilling

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

Photo by Ed Kashi, courtesy of EarthRights International.




"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/19/2012 9:56:21 PM
More on Artic ice melt

Dramatic Arctic Ice Melt Blows Away Previous Record

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/19/2012 9:59:23 PM

US identifies 117 Iranian aircraft it says are involved in arming Syria's Assad regime


WASHINGTON - The Obama administration has identified 117 Iranian aircraft it says are ferrying weapons to Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime.

The Treasury Department says the planes operated by Iran Air, Mahan Air and Yas Air are delivering weapons and Iranian forces under the cover of "humanitarian" shipments.

The airlines are already subject to U.S. sanctions: Americans cannot do business with them and any assets they have in the U.S. are frozen.

But it is now listing planes individually, partly to pressure Iraq to crack down on Iranian weapons shipments to Syria via Iraqi airspace.

Washington also set sanctions Wednesday on a Syrian army bureau, the director of a Syrian military research centre and a Belarusian arms exporter for their roles in weapons of mass destructionproliferation.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/19/2012 10:01:41 PM

Western report: Iran ships arms, personnel to Syria via Iraq


Syrians clear the rubble of a house which was destroyed in government airstrike on Saturday, in Kal Jubrin, on the outskirts of Aleppo, Syria, Sunday, Sept. 16, 2012. (AP Photo/Muhammed Muheisen)

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Iran has been using civilian aircraft to fly military personnel and large quantities of weapons acrossIraqi airspace to Syria to aid President Bashar al-Assad in his attempt to crush an 18-month uprising against his government, according to a Western intelligence report seen by Reuters.

Earlier this month, U.S. officials said they were questioning Iraqabout Iranian flights in Iraqi airspace suspected of ferrying arms to Assad, a staunch Iranian ally. On Wednesday, U.S. Senator John Kerry threatened to review U.S. aid to Baghdad if it does not halt such overflights.

Iraq says it does not allow the passage of any weapons through its airspace. But the intelligence report obtained by Reuters says Iranian weapons have been flowing into Syria via Iraq in large quantities. Such transfers, the report says, are organized by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

"This is part of a revised Iranian modus operandi that U.S. officials have only recently addressed publicly, following previous statements to the contrary," said the report, a copy of which was provided by a U.N. diplomatic source.

"It also flies in the face of declarations by Iraqi officials," it said. "Planes are flying from Iran to Syria via Iraq on an almost daily basis, carrying IRGC (Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps) personnel and tens of tons of weapons to arm the Syrian security forces and militias fighting against the rebels."

Although the specific charges about Iraq allowing Iran to transfer arms to Damascus are not new, theintelligence report alleges that the extent of such shipments is far greater than has been publicly acknowledged, and much more systematic, thanks to an agreement between senior Iraqi and Iranian officials.

Ali al-Moussawi, Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's media adviser, dismissed the intelligence report.

"Iraq rejects baseless allegations that it allows Iran to use its airspace to ship arms to Syria," he said. "The prime minister has always called for a peaceful solution to the Syrian conflict and ... the need for a ban on any state interfering in Syria whether by sending arms or helping others to do so."

The issue of Iranian arms shipments to Syria came up repeatedly at a Senate hearing in Washington on Wednesday on the nomination of Robert Beecroft as the next U.S. ambassador to Baghdad. Beecroft is currently deputy chief of mission there.

John Kerry, the Democratic chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, asked Beecroft what the embassy was doing to persuade the Iraqis to prevent Iran from using their airspace for flights carrying weapons to Syria. Beecroft said that he and other U.S. officials made clear to Iraq the flights must stop.

U.S. THREAT TO REVIEW AID

Kerry said he was alarmed that U.S. efforts thus far had not persuaded Baghdad to halt the overflights, and suggested that the United States could in future make some of the hundreds of millions of dollars in assistance it gives to Iraq contingent on their cooperation on Syria.

"Maybe we should make some of our assistance or some of our support contingent on some kind of appropriate response," he said. "It just seems completely inappropriate that we're trying to help build democracy, support them, put American lives on the line, money into the country, and they're working against our interest so overtly."

The intelligence report, which Western diplomats said was credible and consistent with their information, said Iran had cut a deal with Iraq to use its airspace.

One envoy said it was possible that Tehran and Baghdad did not in fact have any formal agreement, but only an informal understanding not to raise questions about possible arms transfers to Syria.

In comments published by Iranian media on Sunday, IRGC commander-in-chief Mohammad Ali Jafari said members of the force were providing non-military assistance in Syria and Lebanon. He added that Tehran might get involved militarily in Syria if its closest ally came under attack. A day later, however, Iran's Foreign Ministry denied those remarks.

Two Boeing 747 aircraft specifically mentioned in the intelligence report as being involved in Syria arms transfers - an Iran Air plane with the tail number EP-ICD and Mahan Air's EP-MNE - were among 117 aircraft hit with sanctions on Wednesday by the U.S. Treasury Department.

The Treasury Department also blacklisted aircraft operated by Iran's Yas Air for supplying Syria with weapons. A U.N. panel of experts that monitors compliance with U.N. sanctions against Iran has repeatedly named Yas Air, along with Iran Air, as a supplier of arms to Syria.

The Treasury Department statement on the new blacklistings said the move would "make it easier for interested parties to keep track of this blocked property, and more difficult for Iran to use deceptive practices to try to evade sanctions."

The statement did not mention Iraq.

Earlier this year, the U.N. panel of experts recommended that Yas Air be put on the U.N. blacklist for helping Iran skirt a U.N. arms embargo. So far the Security Council has not taken any action on that recommendation.

The U.N. panel's reports have described Iranian arms shipments to Syria via Turkey, not Iraq.

The intelligence report said such transfers across Turkish airspace had ceased.

"Since Ankara adopted a firm position against Syria, and declared that it would intercept all weapons shipments sent to the Assad regime through Turkish territory or airspace, Tehran has all but completely stopped using this channel," it said.

Tehran is forbidden from selling weapons under a U.N. arms embargo, which is part of broader sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program.

Earlier this month, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said Syria's conflict had taken a brutal turn with other countries arming both sides, spreading misery and risking "unintended consequences as the fighting intensifies and spreads.

(Additional reporting by Andrew Quinn, Mark Hosenball and Susan Cornwell in Washington and Ahmed Rasheed in Baghdad; editing by David Brunnstrom and Mohammad Zargham)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!