Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/27/2015 3:57:21 PM

Malaysia says foils plan by suspected militants to attack capital

Reuters

A rain storm clears over central Kuala Lumpur, August 16, 2014. REUTERS/Olivia Harris

KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - Malaysian police have arrested 12 people linked to the militant group Islamic State and seized explosives, foiling a plan to attack several locations in and around the capital, which is hosting the ASEAN summit.

Security had already been heightened in Kuala Lumpur where leaders of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) arrived on Sunday for a meeting that officially opens on Monday. It was not clear whether any of the alleged attacks were linked to the summit.

The male suspects, aged 17 to 41, were arrested on Saturday and Sunday in Ulu Langat and Cheras, suburbs near Kuala Lumpur, police chief Khalid Abu Baker said in a statement on Sunday.

The men were suspected of plotting attacks on "strategic targets and governmental interests around the Klang Valley", he said.

The plans were in response to calls by Islamic State (IS) to launch terrorist attacks on secular Islamic countries seen as "enemies of IS". Authorities said previous arrests of suspected IS militants was another reason behind the intended attacks.

The explosives seized included 20 kg of ammonium nitrate and 20 kg of potassium nitrate, the statement added.

At the summit, Malaysia aims to push for regional cooperation to fight terrorism.

The Southeast Asian country has not seen any significant militant attacks but has arrested 92 citizens on suspicion of links to IS. Authorities have identified 39 Malaysians in Syria and Iraq.

(Reporting by Trinna Leong; writing by Praveen Menon; editing by Jane Baird and Neil Fullick)


Malaysia thwarts militant attack on capital


Malaysian police have arrested 12 people linked to the Islamic State and seized explosives.
Coincides with summit of Asian leaders

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/27/2015 4:09:42 PM

Boko Haram slaughtered civilians in weekend attack: witness

AFP

Residents cross an inlet of Lake Chad in N'Bougoua on April 6, 2015, which was attacked by Islamist group Boko Haram on February 12 (AFP Photo/Philippe Desmazes)

View Gallery

Kano (Nigeria) (AFP) - Boko Haram gunmen massacred residents who tried to jump into Lake Chad seeking safety and burnt others alive after overpowering soldiers in a weekend attack in the restive region, a witness said Monday.

The military and a local official in Niger had previously confirmed the April 25 raid by the Islamists on Lake Chad's Karamga island.

An official in the town of Diffa said the Nigerien army suffered "very heavy" casualties, but precise figures were not immediately available.

Umar Yerima, a Nigerian fisherman living on the targeted island confirmed that troops "were caught off guard" and suffered major losses.

"After finishing with the soldiers, (the Islamists) turned their guns on residents," Yerima told AFP by phone, adding that he was "among the lucky ones" who managed to flee.

"Some sought to escape by plunging into the lake but gunmen stood on the shore shooting them...

"They would aim their gun from the edge of the lake and shoot any head that emerged from the water, shouting Allahu Akbar," he further said. "They burnt the entire village and went on a shooting spree. Many residents were burnt alive in their homes."

Yerima said he managed to stay out of site by hiding in the long grass that lines the water's edge.

After launching the attack shortly before sunrise, the gunmen remained on a rampage until roughly midday, withdrawing when a military jet began bombarding the area.

It was impossible to estimate the death toll, Yerima told AFP, but said he believed the number was "huge" and that he saw the Islamists kidnap a number of women and children as they fled.

Boko Haram has been hit hard by a four-nation offensive launched in February by Nigeria, Niger, Chad and Cameroon, with much of the fighting concentrated in the Lake Chad area.

While the militaries involved have claimed major successes, including the recapture of a series of towns and villages held by the Islamist rebels, experts believe Boko Haram fighters have carved out new hiding spots in remote enclaves.

The Nigerien military said the Islamists stormed Karamga on motorised canoes after setting off from a base elsewhere on the lake.

The Boko Haram conflict has killed more than 13,000 people since 2009, mostly in northern Nigeria, but the fighting has increasingly spread to neighbouring states since 2013.

Despite the apparent gains made the multi-national offensive, security experts say Boko Haram has the capacity to regroup and have urged the region's forces to maintain military pressure.

Nigeria's president-elect Muhammadu Buhari takes office on May 29 and has vowed to fight Boko Haram more effectively than the country's outgoing leader, Goodluck Jonathan.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/27/2015 4:28:07 PM

Set to begin, U.S. plan for Syrian rebels already mired in doubt

Reuters


A rebel fighter stands on a damaged building near the frontline during what the rebel fighters called a battle to unite rebel factions against forces loyal to Syria's President Bashar al-Assad in Jobar, a suburb of Damascus April 21, 2015. Picture taken April 21, 2015. REUTERS/Amer Almohibany - RTX19TSI

By Dasha Afanasieva, Warren Strobel and Phil Stewart

REYHANLI, Turkey/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Hundreds of Syrian rebels are approaching the start of U.S. training to battle Islamic State, without knowing whether or how Washington would come to their aid on the battlefield and as other rebel leaders say the proxy army could spark opposition infighting.

The U.S. plan to train and arm a force that is expected to eventually total more than 15,000 troops and to get underway in the coming weeks is a major test of President Barack Obama's strategy of engaging local partners to combat extremists.

But administration officials are already scaling back expectations of its impact and some rebel leaders say the force risks sowing divisions and cannot succeed without directly targeting Syrian government forces.

Senior U.S. officials said Obama has not yet decided how extensively and under what circumstances Washington will back the force militarily - a commitment that would risk the very entanglement in Syria that Obama has long sought to avoid. Senior U.S. military officials say protecting the forces will be vital to drawing new recruits and ensuring the success of the program.

The hardline Sunni Muslim Islamic State movement has seized swathes of Syria and Iraq and proclaimed a caliphate.

In the face of its brutal offensive through northern Iraq last June, Obama asked Congress for an initial $500 million to "train and equip" Syria's opposition fighters, whom he later described as "the best counterweight" to Islamic militants and a key pillar in his campaign to defeat them. The total request so far is $1.1 billion.

Ten months later, it is just getting off the launch pad.

U.S. officials say several hundred U.S. and coalition personnel are preparing to start training, initially at sites in Jordan, Turkey, and later in Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The sessions, which were originally expected to start in March, will cover everything from the rules of war to small-arms skills.

The plan reflected the priorities of a president reluctant to get entrenched in another Middle East conflict, but who needed a ground force to complement U.S. air strikes against Islamic State in Syria. Congress approved it last year with two primary goals: to fight Islamic State and boost the chances of a negotiated settlement in the Syrian war by raising pressure on President Bashar al-Assad's forces.

Opposition fighters and some of their backers, including Turkey and Saudi Arabia, say the plan will only succeed if it focuses more directly on fighting Assad's forces and allied militias.

"For Syrians, the biggest motive is to stop the killing, and the biggest killer is the regime," said Abu Hamoud, head of operations at Division 13, a non-Islamist opposition brigade which has received training under a separate CIA-led program.

While fighting Islamic State may be the priority in eastern Syria, the same is not true elsewhere in the country, according to Abu Majid, commander of the Fursan al Haq brigade which has also been helped under the CIA operation launched last year.

"It's a matter of priority. People in the east are suffering

most from Islamic State. In our area, we are suffering from the

regime," he said.

Part of the U.S. strategy, according to Obama administration documents seen by Reuters, is to pressure Assad by steadily increasing the opposition's prowess and territory under control.

But the documents acknowledge that the U.S.-trained rebel force's impact is likely to be modest - at least initially.

"Even when considered as a whole, U.S. government assistance to the moderate armed opposition will not be decisive in defeating regime forces," the State Department wrote to Sen. John McCain, the Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, in March.

"Nor will the fighters who receive this assistance, on their own, force Assad to change his calculus about trying to hold on to power," the letter states.

Obama has also yet to announce whether he will go beyond resupplying and financing the proxy force, and protect them with U.S. fighter jets if they clash with Assad's forces. The United States is already conducting near daily air strikes against Islamic State targets in Syria and Iraq.

Assad, in a January interview with Foreign Affairs magazine, said his army will fight the "illegal" U.S.-backed rebels.

U.S. military officials favor defending them. Army Gen. Lloyd Austin, commander of the U.S. military's Central Command, told a Senate committee last month that he recommended U.S. protection for the force against all adversaries.

"Currently," he added, "that decision has not been taken."

RELUCTANT INTERVENER

Obama has been reluctant to intervene in Syria since the anti-government revolt there erupted in March 2011.

He turned down an earlier proposal in summer 2012, backed by virtually all his top security advisers, to arm moderate Syrian rebels. And after Assad crossed Obama's "red line" and used chemical weapons, the U.S. president opted against a military response, instead negotiating a deal with Russia to remove Syrian stockpiles of advanced chemical arms.

About $143 million of this year's $500 million budget for the proxy force has been spent on weapons, ammunition, equipment and other items, the Pentagon told Reuters.

A Pentagon report to Congress suggested the training mission could expand greatly this year, but would be conducted by "fewer than 1,000" U.S. military personnel.

The goal of the program is to train up to 5,400 recruits a year, the Pentagon says. Already, more than 3,000 Syrian candidates have volunteered for the train and equip program and are in various stages of screening and vetting, it says.

Once they are back fighting in Syria, the rebels "will require persistent replenishment of critical supplies," the Pentagon report says. The Pentagon plans to resupply them with equipment and munitions, and provide rebel leaders with cash stipends.

Adnan al Najjar, general military commander of Farouk brigade which has fighters across Syria, said his group had been invited and that he had been told training would start in July, although he did not know how many of his men would take part.

"Most of our fighters are normal guys, civilians, or defected soldiers who don't have full experience, so they would benefit from the training," he said, a brigade flag stretched over his office window in the Turkish border town of Reyhanli.

U.S. officials have made clear that fighters taking part in the program will be strictly vetted to prevent U.S. weapons falling into the hands of Islamist groups such as Ahrar al-Sham or al Qaeda offshoot the Nusra Front.

But a senior opposition commander from Islamic State-controlled Deir al-Zor in eastern Syria said that could result in fighters with the most front-line experience against Islamic State being left out.

"When the Americans see anyone shout "Allahu Akbar!" they think they're Islamists," he told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity because his family still lives in areas controlled by the Sunni militants.

RISK OF INFIGHTING

As Islamist groups cement their hold on the north just over the border from Turkey, it could become increasingly difficult to attract battlefield recruits who meet the U.S. criteria.

Idlib, a short drive from the Turkish border, became only the second provincial capital to fall to insurgents in the four-year-old war when it was captured last month by an alliance of Islamist groups including Nusra.

Such groups could turn on fighters trained by the United States and their allies if they are focused solely on Islamic State, according to Abu Omar, a fighter with the Liwa Ahel al Sham brigade who said he had received U.S. training in Jordan.

"You can't throw a man who can't swim into the sea and ask him to swim," he said. "They have to be well-trained to fight all the threats.”

Some of the most powerful opposition factions are not supported by the United States and complain that the West has a history of choosing poor allies.

"There is a problem of confidence in the people who are trained abroad. There is little confidence in them," said Islam Alloush, spokesman for Jaysh al-Islam, a major Islamist brigade active around Damascus and northern Syria.

(Editing by Nick Tattersall and Stuart Grudgings)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/27/2015 4:38:07 PM

Thousands expected at Monday's funeral for Freddie Gray

Associated Press

Associated Press Videos
Baltimore Mayor: 'This Is Our City'


BALTIMORE (AP) — Thousands were expected Monday at a funeral for a man who died after suffering serious spinal injuries while in the custody of Baltimore police.

Services were planned for 11 a.m. EDT for Freddie Gray, the 25-year-old black man who died April 19 after an encounter days earlier with police left him with grave spinal injuries. Pastor Jamal Bryant, who was to deliver Gray's eulogy, said he expected Baltimore's New Shiloh Baptist Church to be filled for the service.

A small group of mourners was lined up about two hours ahead of the funeral. As they began filing into the church, the white casket with Gray's body was opened, flanked by floral arrangements. A rope was placed in front of the casket to prevent people from getting too close. One person used a cellphone to take a photo of the body.

Placed atop Gray's body was a white pillow with a screened picture of him. A projector aimed at two screens on the walls showed the words "Black Lives Matter & All Lives Matter."

On Sunday, the White House said the head of President Barack Obama's initiative for young men of color would attend the funeral. Broderick Johnson, chairman of the My Brother's Keeper Task Force and a Baltimore native, is to be joined by two other administration officials, according to the White House.

At Gray's wake Sunday, mourners who didn't even know him filed in a steady stream for hours into a funeral home. Some supporters stood outside with signs that read, "We remember Freddie" and "Our Hearts Are With The Gray Family."

Melissa McDonald, 36, who said she was Gray's cousin, wore a shirt with "Freddie Forever" printed on the back. She described her cousin as a nonviolent person.

"He didn't deserve to die the way he did," she said.

Gray's wake followed demonstrations Saturday that turned violent. Roughly 1,200 protesters rallied outside City Hall on Saturday afternoon, officials said. A smaller group splintered off and looted a convenience store and smashed storefront windows. A protester tossed a flaming metal garbage can toward a line of police officers in riot gear as they tried to push back the crowd. Earlier, a group of protesters smashed the windows of at least three police cars.

Some 34 people were arrested, according to Baltimore Police Department, and six police officers sustained minor injuries.

During a news conference Sunday, Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake called for protesters to be peaceful.

"At the end of the day, we are one Baltimore. We need to support peaceful demonstration and continue to enforce in our communities that rioting, violence, and looting will not be tolerated in our city," the mayor said. "Together we can be one Baltimore and seek answers as we seek justice and as we seek peace."

Gray's death has prompted near-daily demonstrations. Gray was arrested one week before he died when officers chased him through a West Baltimore neighborhood and dragged him into a police van.

Police said Gray was arrested after he made eye contact with officers and ran away. Officers held him down, handcuffed him and loaded him into the van. While inside, he became irate and leg cuffs were put on him, police have said.

Gray asked for medical help several times, beginning before he was placed in the van. After a 30-minute ride that included three stops, paramedics were called.

Authorities have not explained how or when Gray's spine was injured.

Police acknowledged Friday that Gray should have received medical attention on the spot where he was arrested — before he was put inside a police transport van handcuffed and without a seat belt, a violation of the police department's policy.

___

Associated Press writer Amanda Lee Myers contributed to this report.








Services were planned for the man who died after sustaining serious injuries in the custody of Baltimore police.
Protests turn violent


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/27/2015 5:16:55 PM

As arguments near, Justice Ginsburg has already made up her mind on gay marriage

Liz Goodwin


Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in the West conference room at the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Nikki Kahn/The Washington Post via Getty)

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the 82-year-old leader of the Supreme Court’s minority liberal wing, has cast aside her usual restraint in the past months and left little doubt where she stands on the upcoming gay marriage case.

The Supreme Court hears arguments in the case, Obergefell v. Hodges, on Tuesday, and will most likely announce in June whether states will still be allowed to ban same-sex marriage and refuse to recognize the rights of couples married in other states.

Ginsburg, a former civil rights lawyer, has been uncharacteristically outspoken in advance of one of the most significant civil rights decisions in decades. In August, she became the first Supreme Court justice to officiate at a same-sex wedding. Since then, she’s highlighted the big shift in public opinion on gay marriage in interviews and public speeches, breaking from her usual reticence when it comes to talking about upcoming cases. In February, Ginsburg told Bloomberg that it “would not take a large adjustment” for Americans to accept nationwide marriage equality, given the “enormous” change in people’s attitudes about same-sex marriage. New York Times columnist Gail Collins wrote in January that Ginsburg has a “strong hunch” about the way the case will turn out. “I would be very surprised if the Supreme Court retreats from what it has said about same-sex unions,” Ginsburg told Collins, referencing the 2012 decision that found the federal government must recognize same-sex marriages.

As arguments near, Justice Ginsburg has already made up her mind on gay marriage

Two anti-gay-marriage groups, the National Organization for Marriage and the American Family Association, have since called on Ginsburg to recuse herself, arguing that she can no longer be impartial. They’ve also targeted Justice Elena Kagan for officiating at a same-sex marriage, asking her to step down from the case, too.

Legal experts say the calls for recusal are unwarranted, given the 2012 ruling that the federal government must recognize same-sex marriages in states that allow them. The constitutional issue at stake in the current case is whether states can ban same-sex marriage at all. Officiating at a same-sex marriage in a jurisdiction that already allows it does not call into question the justices’ impartiality on that question, according to Columbia Law School professor Jamal Greene.

SLIDESHOW: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A look back >>>

The earlier gay rights decision gives Ginsburg more leeway to comment on the issue generally. Though the court did not find a fundamental right to marriage, the majorityopinion held that same-sex marriages have an essential “dignity” like any other marriage and that the federal government does not have a good reason to discriminate against them by refusing to recognize them.

“She’s not saying anything that she hasn’t said in an opinion,” said Margo Schlanger, a former Ginsburg clerk who is now a law professor at the University of Michigan. “So it’s not like, ‘Wow, that’s a new one and the court hasn’t ruled on it since Baker v. Nelson,’” she said, referencing the 1971 case that upheld a state same-sex marriage ban.

A gay rights advocate in front of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., in 2013. (Photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

Gay marriage and rights issues have come up often enough before the Supreme Court that it’s fairly clear where the justices stand on the fundamental question — with the exception of Chief Justice John Roberts, who some believe may depart from his earlier stance and support a fundamental right to same-sex marriage. (Anthony Kennedy, a conservative justice who sometimes sides with the liberal wing, has consistently ruled in favor of gay rights.)

“I don’t think there’s anyone who has any doubt where Justice [Antonin] Scalia or Justice Ginsburg is going to be when they take a vote on this issue,” said Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the law school at the University of California, Irvine. “Whether they say things in public about it or not, there’s no doubt. She’s not going to recuse herself; Justice Scalia is not going to recuse himself. We’re just in an era where some of the justices are speaking more publicly than ever before.”

It’s rare for Supreme Court justices to recuse themselves. The U.S. Code lists reasons when they should do so, but the justices themselves get to decide when the rules apply to them. The disqualifying reasons include: a personal bias against any of the people in the case, a financial stake in its outcome or independent knowledge of the facts of the case outside of their roles as justices. (Kagan, for example, has recused herself several times when she has previously worked on specific cases as solicitor general for the Obama administration.)

Nothing in the code prohibits justices from publicly airing their opinions about cases, but it’s an unspoken rule that the nine do not comment on pending cases. Occasionally, justices have recused themselves after getting too loose-lipped about their opinions, even though they’re not required to. In 2003, Scalia — by far the most outspoken justice — recused himself from a case about whether the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance in school classrooms violated the establishment clause after he told a Catholic group that he believed the words should be allowed.

But Scalia has long been known for spouting his opinions in off-the-cuff remarks to groups and the media. Until recently, Ginsburg has been known more for her discretion.

“I think she’s fairly restrained,” said her former law clerk Elizabeth Porter, now a law professor at the University of Washington. “She thinks fairly deliberately about everything that she says and writes.”

Ginsburg’s public appearances have been characterized more often by prepared speeches about her passions, like the opera or the role of women in the law, than by relaxed question-and-answer sessions about the court and its upcoming cases. Her dissents as a leader of the court’s minority wing have long been fiery and feisty, but until recently, her public appearances were more muted.

“She’s a tiny bit less cautious,” Schlanger, the former clerk, said. “I think that she’s talking more freely.”

Ginsburg speaks at an annual Women’s History Month reception on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Allison Shelley/Getty)

The world has noticed. Ginsburg has become something of a pop culture touchstone in the past two years, as younger women have begun to view the frail justice as a liberal crusader and women’s rights hero. In 2013, a New York University law student created the “Notorious R.B.G.” Tumblr, likening Ginsburg to rapper the Notorious B.I.G. Since then, a new generation of young female fans have celebrated her scorched-earth dissents, particularly in the Hobby Lobby birth control case and recent voting rights decision Shelby v. Holder. Notorious R.B.G. T-shirts and other merchandise abound. (Ginsburg told Katie Couric last year that she thinks the site is “wonderful.”)

Court watchers have different theories about why Ginsburg appears to have loosened up a bit in public.

“I think that some of the catalyst was her responding to those like me who suggested she should retire,” Chemerinsky said. “That’s carried over to being willing to speak more to the press and more publicly.”

Liberals started to suggest that Ginsburg should retire in President Barack Obama’s first term, to give him ample time to nominate another liberal jurist to replace her. Ginsburg flatly refused. “All I can say is that I am still here and likely to remain for a while,” she told Couric.

Others, including Dahlia Lithwick at Slate, dated the shift to 2005, when Sandra Day O’Connor retired and left Ginsburg as the only woman on the court. Ginsburg began to see the court lean to the right and issue opinions that she believedinfringed on women’s rights, such as the ban on partial-birth abortions in 2007.

But perhaps what’s freed the justice is simply time. Ginsburg has survived two bouts of cancer, two broken ribs and the death of a beloved spouse while on the bench. She’s a survivor who loves her job and feels freed by her seniority.

“She’s 80-something years old. What’s going to happen?” Schlanger said. “She doesn’t have any further ambitions except to be the best justice she can be for a while longer.”

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0