Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
2/2/2015 6:11:09 PM




Netanyahu’s Congress invitation raises eyebrows among some US generals

Analysis: Top brass who have questioned Obama’s strategies don't want a foreign leader influencing US decision-making

The uniformed leaders of the U.S. military have had a testy relationship with President Barack Obama since he took office in 2009, with a number of relatively public spats revealing discord over how his administration has approached the use of military force. So it might be assumed that when a politician confronts Obama, portraying his policies on threats overseas as naïve, many in the senior uniformed ranks would nod in silent affirmation. But that’s not what’s happened since House Speaker John Boehner invited Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to attack Obama’s Iran policy in Congress. Instead, the speech planned for next month has rallied senior military figures behind the president, with some warning that there's a limit to what U.S. military officers consider acceptable criticism of their commander-in-chief.

Obama and his generals have clashed privately and publicly since 2009 over his plans to draw down and exit from Afghanistan, and a number of respected recently retired top commanders told Congress that the administration’s “piecemeal” strategy against the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) movement in Iraq and Syria is destined to fail. Some have also publicly recorded misgivings about Obama’s Iran strategy. Still, Netanyahu’s planned speech has prompted a number of senior military men to rally around the office of a president whose policies they regularly, if privately, question.

Currently serving uniformed officers are loathe to comment on an inflammatory political question — “you’re inviting me to end my career,” one senior Pentagon officer told me when asked to comment on Boehner’s invitation to Netanyahu, “but, if it’s all the same to you, I’d rather not.” But a senior Joint Chiefs of Staff officer who regularly briefs the U.S. high command was willing to speak bluntly in exchange for anonymity. “There’s always been a lot of support for Israel in the military,” this officer says, “but that’s significantly eroded over the last few years. This caps it. It’s one thing for Americans to criticize their president, and another entirely for a foreign leader to do it. Netanyahu doesn’t get it — we’re not going to side with him against the commander in chief. Not ever.”

Retired Army Gen. Paul Eaton concurs. Eaton was recently quoted as an avowed friend of Israel, in a widely discussed article in the Israeli daily Haaretz. He warned that Netanyahu’s appearance would be “perilous to both countries,” but saved his harshest criticism for Boehner: “It is highly inappropriate for the speaker of the house to so publicly meddle in foreign affairs,” he said. “It is a gross breach of protocol to invite a head of state without due coordination with the president.” Eaton was quick to add that, despite the controversy, “Israel will never lose me or the American people as the most loyal of friends.”

But retired U.S. Air Force Col. Richard Klass, an Air Force Academy graduate, isn’t so sure. Writing for War On The Rocks, a website popular with currently serving officers, Klass called Netanyahu’s scheduled Congressional appearance “a new level of chutzpa” and argued that it raised the question of “whether Israel is becoming a strategic liability for America.” Klass pointed out that Netanyahu’s scheduled Congressional appearance was specifically timed to derail the Obama administration’s delicate nuclear negotiations with Iran — pointedly describing it as “intrusion” that purposely “undermines U.S. security.” While Klass admits that his argument sparked an outcry from a number of his fellow officers (“several of my War College classmates are upset with the piece” he told me in an email) he staunchly defends his position. “Netanyahu gives new meaning to the term ‘bull in a china shop,’ ” he told me.

Klass isn’t the first military officer to suggest that Israel is becoming more of a liability than an asset. The subject was broached by then U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) Commander Army Gen. David Petraeus back in January of 2010, when he told the Joint Chiefs of Staff that Israel’s intransigence on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was “jeopardizing U.S. standing” among Arab allies in the Middle East. That observation was part of a briefing to then-Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen, but he reiterated it two months later, before a Congressional committee. Petraeus testified that the Israel-Palestine conflict “foments anti-American sentiment, due to the perception of U.S. favoritism for Israel,” and added “Arab anger over the Palestinian question limits the strength and depth of U.S. partnerships with governments and people in the AOR [CENTCOM's area of responsibility] and weakens the legitimacy of moderate regimes in the Arab world.”

Petraeus’s comments prompted a firestorm of criticism from pro-Israel quarters in Washington, prompting Petraeus to reassert his support for strong U.S.-Israel ties. But despite these pressures, the then-CENTCOM commander (known for his friendship with pro-Israel Republicans) never backed off the argument he had presented about the effect of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In fact, Petraeus’s Congressional testimony has been reiterated by every officer who succeeded him as CENTCOM commander.

One of them was the outspoken Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis, who quietly maintained communications with Israel’s Washington, D.C. based military attaché and, according to a Mattis colleague, had warned the Israeli officer that U.S.-Israel relations were “trending down.”

“Oh, I think there’s been an erosion in the [U.S.-Israel] relationship, no doubt about it,” says retired Marine Corps Gen. Joseph Hoar, a close friend of Mattis and himself a former Centcom commander. “I can’t and won’t characterize how current senior military commanders think about the Boehner-Netanyahu dust-up because I just don’t really know,” Hoar adds, “but I can tell you that every CENTCOM commander since [U.S. Gen. Norman] Schwarzkopf has vetoed Israel’s attempts to be a part of that AOR [area of responsibility]. And I did too. The Israeli’s would just love to get their nose into our relationship with our Arab allies [Israel is a part of EUCOM — the U.S. European Command, and not CENTCOM], but we just won’t let them. And there’s no doubt, that just drives them nuts.”

Official statements from the Pentagon almost ritually tout “the strength of the U.S.-Israel relationship,” and reflect none of the skepticism voiced by Centcom commanders and others over the effect on U.S. interests of Israel’s positions. But there’s widespread concern that by overstepping a line, Netanyahu has actually weakened the position he seeks to advance.

Retired Army Lt. Gen. Robert Gard, a West Point graduate and veteran of two U.S. wars, carefully calibrates his comments to reflect his unease at describing what currently serving officers think about either Israel or Netanyahu. “It’s a really politically freighted question,” he says, “but I can tell you from my own experience that Mr. Netanyahu is way out of his lane. And you can be sure there isn’t a military officer in uniform who would get involved in this issue. It’s not just that Netanyahu is showing disrespect for Mr. Obama; it’s that he’s disrespecting U.S. institutions — he’s thumbing his nose at our way of doing things. Even for those out of uniform this is a mistake. It’s one thing to show disrespect for President Obama, that happens all the time, but it’s another thing to show disrespect for America. That just can’t be tolerated.”

Gard’s comments suggest that Netanyahu’s planned speech has re-ignited questions among a significant number of officers over how the U.S.-Israel relationship is played out in Washington. According to one senior U.S. Army officer, for those in uniform — “from [General Martin] Dempsey on down” — enlisting Netanyahu to intervene in the making of U.S. policy is not simply “inappropriate” or “meddlesome,” but might even violate U.S. law. “Take a look at the Logan Act,” this officer told me in a telephone conversation earlier this week. “It says that it’s a violation of U.S. law for an American citizen to work with a foreign official to purposely undermine U.S. policy.”

For the record, that 1799 legislation makes it a crime when "any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States."

For Hoar, however, the furor suggests that Netanyahu’s planned speech has backfired. “I think that Mr. Netanyahu is making a mistake, but that’s just my personal opinion. You’ll note that his decision to speak before the Congress was meant to highlight his view that the U.S. should impose more sanctions on Iran. But that’s not what happened. Instead, Israel has become the issue — not Iran. Is that really what he intended? So his strategy, to bring us together is actually pulling us apart. It’s unbelievable.”

(ALJAZEERA AMERICA)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
2/2/2015 6:24:49 PM

2 February 2015 Last updated at 09:40 GMT

Kobane: Inside the town devastated by fight against IS


The BBC's Quentin Sommerville in Kobane: "Destruction is everywhere"

At the edge of Freedom Square, in the centre of Kobane, you witness the full cost of the stand taken here against the Islamic State (IS), and it is humbling.

Looking east, the devastation is near complete. Every building, home, shop and street is ruined.

On a wall, above the collapsed lecture theatre of the city's cultural centre, an IS sniper, Abu Tarab, has written in Arabic a promise to the town: "Blood, blood, beheading, destruction."

IS delivered on part of his promise, but not fully. Kobane is broken, but it is not beaten.

The last word goes to the Kurds. Underneath the IS graffiti, a fighter has written: "Kobane is the graveyard of the Islamic State."

A few yards away the corpses of three IS fighters rot beside the crater from a coalition airstrike. The force of the blast tore them to pieces - a skull lies in the gutter.

Destruction in Kobane (January 2015)Much of Kobane has been razed to the ground by the fighting
Mortar bomb in Kobane (January 2015)Throughout the town heavy steel mortars, many still live, can be seen rusting in the streets
Graffiti in Kobane (January 2015)A graffiti war-of-words between the two sides adorns walls in the town

Danger all around

For months IS and the Kurds faced each other, sometimes just yards apart.

There are still plenty of dangers here. Throughout the town, heavy steel mortars, still live, are rusting in the streets.

Almost comically, a tailfin protrudes from a wall or a pavement. IS may be gone, but it is not safe for people to return yet.


"These streets tell that with foreign help IS can be defeated, but only at great sacrifice"

It is the Kurds who are left standing, some with trophies from the fight.

I meet one fighter who proudly unfolds an IS flag from his jacket. He tells me the jihadists used car bombs, packed with explosives to target Kurdish checkpoints.

More than 40 car bombs in total, "that's more than they used in Mosul", says another man.

From the same Iraqi city, the militants brought heavy weaponry, artillery and tanks, for the fight here.

Hundreds of Kurds died in the battles, but more than 1,000 IS fighters perished.

Destruction in Kobane (January 2015)
Months of fierce fighting have given way to an eerie silence in the town
Destruction in Kobane (January 2015)Artillery bombardment and street-by-street clashes have left few buildings intact
Kurdish gravestones in Kobane (January 2015)This bleak, makeshift cemetery has become a resting place for fallen Kurdish fighters

Most of its people fled Kobane. Those who stayed draped curtains across the roads, to hide out of sight of IS snipers.

Throughout the fighting, enduring the cold and the dark, Rahima and her 12 children and grandchildren would not leave.

"We faced difficulties," she said. "We were hungry, we were thirsty but we are no different from the fighters.

"They stayed, and we stayed - we were in the basement, when they had food they shared it with us. It was hard, but thank God, we knew we would win."

Her grand-daughter, Leyla, sits up proudly, when I ask her if she was afraid.

"Those who haven't seen the evil that took place here, will see it now," the 12-year-old said.

"Kurdish officials didn't abandon us. We are going to school now. And we are very happy because we will be able to go back to our villages. They liberated our lands," she added proudly.

Heavy price

There is silence now in the town and what is left of its streets, with only occasional gunfire underlying the fact that Kobane is at peace.

Destruction in Kobane (January 2015)Kobane will require a huge re-building effort
Kurdish fighters in Kobane (January 2015)Kurdish fighters are now consolidating their hold over the town

But driving the IS from here came at tremendous cost. Hundreds of coalition airstrikes have flattened most of the town.

And the IS did not go far, they are less than five miles (8km) from here. So while Kobane has been liberated, the fight against the militants goes on.

In the west, between buildings that were once under construction, a graveyard for Kurdish martyrs occupies the mud.

Plastic flowers stand brightly and on the headstones are the names of the dead carefully written in green paint.

Destruction in Kobane (January 2015)Most of the population fled the advancing IS forces, but some families who stayed managed to survive

Two small girls play nearby. They giggle and laugh, and sing a song, "the fighters are coming, the fighters are coming", over and over again.

I head east, closer to the front lines, Here the Kurdish fighters are young and determined. But still on three sides, they are nearly surrounded by the IS.

"The town has been liberated. It's a big victory. But the bigger win will be to free all the villages around Kobane," a fighter says.

"We will never allow a single IS fighter to survive in Kobane, in any villages and anywhere in our land."

Back at the green gate, by the railway line that separates Syria and Turkey, the sound of coalition aircraft can be heard overhead.

It is dark and there is low cloud, but suddenly, four loud and distant explosions. On the frontline to the west, the war against IS continues.

It is a war for which the battle for Kobane will be remembered. These streets tell, that with foreign help, IS can be defeated - but only at great sacrifice.



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
2/2/2015 6:31:31 PM

UN Security Council demands Islamic State hostages freed

AFP
7 hours ago

Safi Kassasbeh, the father of Jordanian pilot Maaz al-Kassasbeh, being held by Islamic State, speaks during a press conference in Amman on February 1, 2015 (AFP Photo/Khalil Mazraawi)


The UN Security Council demanded the immediate release of all hostages held by the Islamic State group, as Jordan vowed to do everything it can to save the life of a pilot captured by the militants.

The 15-member council condemned on Sunday the "heinous and cowardly" murder of a Japanese journalist after the jihadist group claimed he had been beheaded.

"Those responsible for the killing of Kenji Goto shall be held accountable," the Security Council said, demanding "the immediate, safe and unconditional release of all those who are kept hostage" by IS and other Al-Qaeda affiliates.

The government of Jordan, meanwhile, vowed to do it all it can to save air force hero pilot Maaz Kassasbeh, who was captured by IS after his plane crashed in Syria in December.

IS militants have seized swathes of territory in Iraq and Syria, ruling with a brutal version of Islamic law. The group has murdered both locals and foreigners, including two US journalists, an American aid worker and two British aid workers.

IS claimed in a video released online Saturday that it had killed 47-year-old Goto -- the second purported beheading of a Japanese hostage in a week -- but made no mention of the Jordanian pilot it had also threatened to kill.

Jordan's King Abdullah II denounced Goto's murder as a "cowardly, criminal act" and said every effort was being made "to seek the release of the hero pilot Maaz Kassasbeh".

IS has been demanding the release of an Iraqi jihadist on death row in Jordan in exchange for Kassasbeh's life, and Amman said it would hand her over if given proof he is still alive.

The pilot's father Safi Kassasbeh has begged Amman to save his son's life "at any price".

- 'Despicable' -

In Japan, Prime Minster Shinzo Abe condemned the "heinous and despicable terrorist acts" of IS and vowed that his country would "never yield to terrorism".

"We will never forgive terrorists," Abe told reporters in Tokyo, appearing to fight back tears as he spoke.

"We will cooperate with the international community to make them atone for their crimes."

The video, released Saturday, shows Goto, a respected war correspondent, wearing an orange outfit similar to those worn by Guantanamo Bay inmates, kneeling next to a standing man dressed head-to-toe in black with his face covered.

The man, who speaks with a British accent, appears to be the same IS militant who has featured in previous videos showing the execution of Western hostages.

He addresses Abe, saying the killing was the result of Tokyo's "reckless" decisions -- a possible reference to aid it has granted for refugees fleeing IS-controlled areas in Syria and Iraq -- and would mark the beginning of a "nightmare for Japan".

The brief video, whose authenticity Tokyo said was "highly probable", ends with the image of a body and a decapitated head on top of it.

- 'Chills down my spine' -

In a statement, Goto's wife Rinko said she was "devastated" by the news.

"While feeling a great personal loss, I remain extremely proud of my husband who reported the plight of people in conflict areas like Iraq, Somalia and Syria," she said.

"It was his passion to highlight the effects on ordinary people, especially through the eyes of children, and to inform the rest of us of the tragedies of war."

The couple had a second child just weeks before Goto left for Syria late last year in a bid to find his friend Haruna Yukawa, whom IS claimed it beheaded last week. He was then captured himself.

"I can't find the words to describe how I feel about my son's very sad death," Goto's sobbing mother Junko Ishido told reporters.

Officially pacifist, Japan has long avoided getting embroiled in Middle East conflicts and is rarely the target of religious extremism, so the hostage crisis has been especially shocking for the country.

Many braved Tokyo's chilly streets to pick up the Yomiuri newspaper's special supplement about the Goto video on Sunday.

"It's scary -- they (the militants) are saying they'll target Japanese people now," said 21-year-old university student Kyosuke Kamogawa. "That sends chills down my spine."

World leaders reacted with outrage to the video, with US President Barack Obama leading international condemnation of the "barbaric" murder.

On Sunday IS added to its long list of atrocities by claiming to have beheaded an Iraqi police officer and a soldier, according to pictures posted online.

IS had vowed to kill Goto and the pilot by sunset on Thursday unless Amman handed over Sajida al-Rishawi, who is on death row for her part in bombings in the Jordanian capital that killed 60 people in 2005.

Last week IS claimed it had beheaded self-described Japanese contractor Yukawa after Tokyo failed to pay a $200 million ransom -- the same amount it had promised in non-military aid to the region.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
2/2/2015 11:41:26 PM

Hardline Indian Hindus become Modi's enemies from within

Reuters



Indian priest-turned-lawmaker Sakshi Maharaj poses at his residence in New Delhi January 30, 2015. REUTERS/Anindito Mukherjee

By Andrew MacAskill and Rupam Jain Nair

RISHIKESH, India (Reuters) - In an ashram near the Ganges river in the Himalayan foothills, Indian priest-turned-politician Sakshi Maharaj mimes rowing a boat to illustrate what will happen if Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government ignores Hindu nationalist demands."Modi will have to be a boatman: one oar must focus on the economy and the other must concentrate on the Hindu agenda," says Maharaj, clad in saffron robes and sitting cross-legged on a bed.

He twirls his bejeweled fingers in the air, explaining that otherwise the boat will spin in circles.The Hindu priest, who has been charged with rioting and inciting communal violence, is the embodiment of hardline religious elements in Modi's party whose strident behavior is dragging on the government's economic reform agenda.In recent months, Maharaj has created uproar by describing Mahatma Gandhi's Hindu nationalist assassin as a patriot, saying Hindu women should give birth to four children to ensure the religion survives and by calling for Hindus who convert to Islam and Christianity to be given the death penalty.For the first time since the election last year, some lawmakers in Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) are rebelling against his focus on mending the economy and governance at the expense of promoting Hinduism.

This is testing the authority of a leader who captured power to a degree not seen since Indira Gandhi ruled India more than three decades ago.Hardline Hindu politicians impatient with Modi's refusal to champion their cause are beginning to advance their own agendas.

Maharaj, for example, wants to make it illegal for Hindus to change religions and seeks the death penalty for slaughtering cows, an animal revered by Hindus.

Protests erupted at the most recent parliamentary session over a campaign by hardliners to convert Muslims and Christians to Hinduism, torpedoing key foreign investment legislation that the opposition had earlier agreed to pass.

Modi had to use executive orders to drive policy, but they are seen as a stopgap measure that cannot replace reforms needed to address India's slowing economic growth.

"Modi has a major problem with these extremist elements," said S. Chandrasekharan, director of the South Asia Analysis Group in New Delhi. "If he can't bring them under control they are going to ... sap the energy needed to carry out reforms."

In a sign the world is watching, U.S. President Barack Obama warned on a recent visit that India's success depended on it not splintering along religious lines.

"I AM A POWERFUL MAN"

At the spiritual retreat, or ashram, elderly disciples with long gray beards bend to kiss the feet of Maharaj, who wears light brown socks with sandals, an orange turban, gold-framed Dolce and Gabbana glasses and a chunky gold-colored watch.With a self-proclaimed following of 10 million people, Maharaj, a four-time member of parliament, draws support through a network of dozens of ashrams and colleges."I am aware that I am a powerful man," Maharaj says. "I can make or break the government."Maharaj is charged by police with rioting and inciting a mob after helping tear down a 16th-century mosque in Ayodhya in 1992, an event sparking riots in which around 2,000 people died.

He admits being present at the demolition but says he could not stop the crowds. In India, trials can take decades because of a shortage of judges.

Modi will have a clearer idea of whether radicals elements are alienating voters when the BJP fights elections in New Delhi. Also this month, the government must present the budget and try to enact three emergency decrees in parliament.In December, Modi told lawmakers their behavior was hurting the party and warned them not to cross the Lakshman Rekha, a forbidden line in Hindu mythology, according to party officials briefed on the meeting."The message is loud and clear: there is no room for any diversion from the economy," said G.V.L. Narasimha Rao, a spokesman for the BJP.

"GAME OF CHESS"The battle for the government's direction is particularly acute for Modi, because he and his party are ideologically rooted in Hindutva, or Hinduness, a concept sometimes defined in strident opposition to Muslims and Christians.

Modi himself has consistently denied accusations that, as chief minister of Gujarat, he did not do enough to prevent riots in which more than 1,000 people died, most of them Muslims. A Supreme Court inquiry found no evidence to prosecute him.

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the powerful ideological wing of the BJP, supports lawmakers like Maharaj who are working to make India a Hindu nation, said a senior RSS official who asked not to be named.

"We will support them because it is all for a Hindu cause," he said. There was no evidence to suggest that the RSS was actively involved in pushing the hardliners' agenda, however.

Modi's ties with radical Hindus "can be best described as a game of chess," said Ramchandra Guha, one of India's leading historians. "Both sides are on board when it comes to establishing the Hindu supremacist agenda, but they want to follow a different strategy to achieve it."Maharaj says most Indians, including Modi, privately share his views, and he will continue promoting Hindu supremacy."The only difference is he is refined and maybe we are crass," Maharaj says of Modi. "We may have to fine-tune the message but the message will remain the same."

(Editing by John Chalmers and Mike Collett-White)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
2/3/2015 12:08:03 AM

Rebels pound Ukrainian troops after peace talks fail

Reuters

WSJ Live
Deadly Clashes in Ukraine as Cease-Fire Talks Break Down

Watch video

By Aleksandar Vasovic

YENAKIEVE, Ukraine (Reuters) - Separatist rockets streaked across hills in eastern Ukraine on Monday as rebels pounded the positions of Ukrainian government troops holding a strategic rail town while both sides pressed ahead with mobilizing more forces for combat.

Kiev's military said five more Ukrainian soldiers were killed in clashes while municipal authorities in the big rebel-controlled city of Donetsk said 15 civilians were killed at the weekend by shelling in a surge of violence following the collapse of a new peace effort on Saturday.

Talks between Ukraine, Russia and rebel officials in Minsk, Belarus, had raised hopes of a new ceasefire to stem the violence in a conflict that has claimed more than 5,000 lives. But they broke up without progress with Ukraine and the separatists accusing each other of sabotaging the meeting.

Donetsk reverberated to the thud of artillery and mortar fire through the night and several homes were destroyed with at least one civilian death on Monday.

But separatists kept up attacks on Debaltseve, a strategic rail hub to the northeast of Donetsk, in an attempt to dislodge government forces there.

The outskirts of Yenakieve and Vuhlegirsk, both on the main highway to Debaltseve, were under heavy artillery fire as rebel multiple rocket launchers and artillery pummeled the positions of Ukrainian troops in the area.

At one point, a salvo of around three dozen rockets fired from rebel positions screamed across surrounding hills towards Debaltseve. It was followed 15 minutes later by incoming fire from government forces.

"The toughest situation is around Debaltseve where the illegal armed formations are continuing to storm the positions of Ukrainian military," military spokesman Andriy Lutsenko told a briefing. But he said Ukraine's forces in the town were enough to hold it and he denied government forces were encircled.

According to Kiev officials January was one of the bloodiest months in eastern Ukraine since the conflict erupted. Regional police spokesman Vyacheslav Abroskin said 112 civilians were killed by separatist shelling and attacks.

The rebels, in a statement quoted by Russia's RIA Novosti news agency, said 242 civilians were killed in the month as well as 92 of their number.

GENERAL MOBILIZATION

The separatists, whom the West says are armed by Russia and supported by several thousand Russian troops, defiantly announced a general mobilization plan which they said would boost their fighting forces to 100,000 men.

Kiev itself is also pressing ahead with a fourth wave of military call-up aimed at raising an extra 50,000 men.

The Western powers support Kiev's view that a peace deal reached last September, which included a ceasefire and a commitment for foreign fighters and military equipment to be withdrawn from Ukraine, is the only viable roadmap to ending the conflict.

But the separatists, who have declared their own 'people's republics' and have notched up several military successes since then including taking Donetsk airport from government troops, now appear to want to negotiate a new blueprint.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel appealed for a ceasefire to be urgently restored in Ukraine, under the terms of the Minsk peace plan, and said Germany would not support Kiev's military forces through deliveries of weapons.

The New York Times reported on Sunday that President Barack Obama's administration was however taking a new look at providing Ukrainian forces with defensive weapons and equipment in the face of the rebel offensive.

The separatist rebellion erupted last April after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimea in response to the ousting of a Moscow-back president by street protests in Kiev which ushered in a government committed to integration with Europe.

Moscow denies it has any regular troops in Ukraine despite what the West and Kiev say is incontrovertible proof.

In a street on Yenakieve outskirts, a shell landed directly onto a 3rd floor apartment of a nine-story building, instantly killing a woman and wounding her husband.

"We had to climb across the balcony to evacuate the man, and we left her lying in the rubble. She was picked up later by a sanitary team," said Anatoly Pomazanov, 42, who owns a grocery shop in the building.

"It is like this every day. The shelling is incessant. We keep children in cellars. We let them out only during lulls in shelling, for about 30 minutes at most. I want to ask President Poroshenko: are we also Ukrainians or simply targets?"

Several residents were seen loading bags in cars and hastily lea‎ving the neighborhood.

Natalya, 68, who with her daughter lives in an apartment a floor below the one destroyed, was weeping. "Tell me what do I do now? This is all I had, the soldiers are two kilometers away, there are no targets here."

Dmytro Boichuk, 78, a retired miner, said people were already immune to the shelling. "We are numb. We go about our businesses. Someone gets killed, someone gets wounded, but we carry on."

(Additional reporting by Natalia Zinets in Kiev; Writing by Richard Balmforth; Editing by Giles Elgood and Sophie Walker)





"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1