Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/7/2014 5:27:13 PM

Ukraine shelling claims lives, sets houses ablaze

Associated Press



Reuters Videos
Ukrainian truce shaken by shelling in eastern Ukraine


Watch video

At least two houses blazed in the rural village of Spartak, which lies just north of Donetsk and adjacent to the airport, after they were hit by fire. A man whose house was struck by a shell said rebels had fired from a spot nearby, which appeared to have provoked a retaliatory attack from Ukrainian government troops. This pattern has been regularly observed in the nearly five-month-long military confrontation.

A group of rebel fighters in the village danced and drank Sunday morning in celebration after what they said was a successful assault on a Ukrainian military encampment in the vicinity. One said their group had captured eight government troops, although none of these captives could be seen.

The fighter, who provided only the nom de guerre Khokhol, freely acknowledged that the cease-fire was not being respected by either side.

"There was mortar shelling around 20 minutes ago here in Spartak," he said. "There is no cease-fire for anyone."

The truce signed on Friday appeared to be holding for much of the following day, but was shattered late Saturday by shelling on the outskirts of the southeastern port town of Mariupol, where Ukrainian troops retain defensive lines against the rebels. The city council said Sunday that one civilian was killed there and a serviceman wounded.

The volunteer pro-government Azov Battalion said on Facebook that their positions were also hit by Grad rockets, but did not give details.

Mariupol is located on the coast of the Sea of Azov, 115 kilometers (70 miles) south of Donetsk. Rebels recently opened a new front on the coast, leading to fears that they were trying to secure a land corridor between Russia and the Crimean Peninsula, which Russia annexed in March.

Amnesty International on Sunday condemned all those engaged in the grinding conflict that according to U.N. estimates has claimed at least 2,600 civilian lives and forced hundreds of thousands out of their homes.

"All sides in this conflict have shown disregard for civilian lives and are blatantly violating their international obligations," Amnesty International Secretary General Salil Shetty said in a statement.

Blasts powerful enough to be heard in downtown Donetsk appeared to be coming from the direction of the airport early Sunday morning. The terminal, which has now been rendered little more than a burned-out husk, has been under the control of government troops since May and has come under unremitting attacks from Russian-backed separatist forces since then.

A rebel statement said Ukrainian forces fired on their positions in six locations on Saturday, including near the Donetsk airport, and several rebels were killed.

In nearby Spartak, resident Anastasia Ivanusenko, who has moved to Donetsk to escape the most intense fighting, learned her house had been destroyed Sunday as she was coming to pick up some basic items for her child.

"I have a little baby and we are temporarily living in a dormitory. We wanted to get the stroller, some warm clothes for the child," she said, quietly sobbing on a bench across the road from her burning home. "There was no way to get into the house."

Ukraine, Russia, the Kremlin-backed separatists and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe signed the cease-fire deal in the Belarusian capital, Minsk, on Friday evening in an effort to end the bloodshed. The negotiators agreed on the withdrawal of all heavy weaponry, the release of all prisoners and the delivery of humanitarian aid to devastated cities in eastern Ukraine.

The 12-point agreement, published Sunday by the OSCE, also obliges Kiev to give greater powers to the separatist Donetsk and Luhansk regions and calls for local elections to be held in those Russian-speaking regions.

Western leaders voiced skepticism over Russia's commitment to the deal. A previous 10-day cease-fire, which each side repeatedly accused the other of violating, yielded few results at the negotiating table.

German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said Sunday that the shelling in Donetsk and Mariupol showed the fragility of the cease-fire and described it as only the first step.

"The cease-fire should lead the way for an exchange of prisoners, an effective control of the border and, last but not least, a dialogue about the political participation of the people from eastern Ukraine in Kiev," he said in a statement.

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko's office on Saturday said he and Russian President Vladimir Putin had spoken by telephone and discussed steps "for giving the cease-fire a stable character." But, it said, both leaders assessed the cease-fire as having been "fulfilled as a whole."

Echoing similar allegations by the Ukrainian government and NATO, Amnesty International said that it has evidence that Moscow is fueling the conflict through direct support for separatist fighters. In making its case, the group presented satellite images appearing to show Russian weaponry being brought into Ukraine.

"These satellite images, coupled with reports of Russian troops captured inside Ukraine and eyewitness accounts of Russian troops and military vehicles rolling across the border, leave no doubt that this is now an international armed conflict," said Shetty, who is set to visit Kiev and Moscow in the coming days.

Amnesty also said that the Ukrainian government has subjected residential areas to heavy and indiscriminate shelling.

The group said both pro-government and separatist militia groups had abducted and beaten people suspected of aiding their opponents.

____

Peter Leonard in Donetsk, Ukraine, Lynn Berry in Moscow, and Kirsten Grieshaber in Berlin, contributed to this report.





"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Karen Gigikos

38
230 Posts
230
Invite Me as a Friend
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/7/2014 6:20:26 PM
I HAVE KNOW ABOUT THIS FOR AWHILE NOW. THIS IS WHO IS IN CHARGE OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
karen Gigikos Black Belt Granny
+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/8/2014 12:28:39 AM

After Destroying the Gulf, BP Finally Gets Seriously Stung

by Paul Fassa
See all TBYIL articles by Paul Fassa

Editor's Note: In 2010, British Petroleum's (BP) Deepwater Horizon well exploded and sank in the Gulf of Mexico not far off the Louisiana coast, resulting in a sea-floor oil gusher that flowed for 87 days, until it was capped on 15 July 2010. During that time and afterward, BP attempted to sink the oil with the highly toxic chemical Corexit, further poisoning the Gulf's waters, beaches and sensitive coastal wetlands. Many observers, including The Best Years in Life, believe that the Gulf has been ruined for generations to come and that millions of people will end up going to early graves in the coming decades as a result of the disaster.

Critics have charged that BP's Gulf cleanup efforts and a massive PR campaign that continues to this day have been aimed more at covering up it's culpability and limiting its financial responsibilities than in actually cleaning up the spill and restoring the health of the gulf. This month, a U.S. judge in New Orleans ruled that BP was guilty of "gross negligence" and "willful misconduct" and responsible for the large majority of the spill - a ruling which could quadruple the amount of civil penalties BP must pay to an estimated $18 Billion.

Veteran natural health author Paul Fassa has been covering the Gulf oil spill from the beginning. Here is his report to The Best Years in Life:

---------------------------------------------

(The Best Years in Life) I covered the BP – Gulf disaster of 2010 with articles submitted to Natural News. More recently I was assigned a topic to cover the current state of affairs in the Gulf and on the shorelines of Louisiana and Northwest Florida. Sea and coastal life remains seriously threatened. I may never trust Gulf shrimp again.

Many environmental experts have extended the damage beyond those areas. The Gulf is the source of the Gulf stream, a warm current of water that goes around the southern tip of Florida and up the East Coast to Long Island, New York, then across the Atlantic to England and nearby European shores.

Whatever may alter the Gulf Steam's current, salinity, and temperature affects the weather where ever it goes. Fortunately, BP has not escaped liability or culpability for their reckless pursuit of deep sea floor oil extraction.

Here Comes the Judge!

After almost two years of reviewing hundreds of documents and hearing from BP and several government environmental and citizens' groups, U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier concluded that the London-based oil giant showed a "conscious disregard of known risks" and gross negligence” during the drilling operation and bears most of the responsibility for the blowout.

That may seem obvious to most of us, but the legal technicalities of “conscious disregard of known risks” and “gross negligence” puts BP into a different category, one that may cost them more than they've spent for their misdeeds and more than they had ever intended to spend.

Another $18 billion could be tacked onto the $4 billion BP has agreed to pay in criminal fines and penalties and the whopping $27 billion they claim to have spent on clean-up and compensation to fisheries and other businesses harmed by the surging three month tidal wave of toxic crude oil.


Books and seminar recordings Alternative nutrition practitioner

That $27 billion for clean-up has a caveat almost as big as the area BP polluted in 2010, which still shows an ecological after shock that may never fully recover. Despite advice from some officials in the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) and other experts who offered proven non-toxic effective oil spill remedies, BP stubbornly refused them all and managed to get away with using Corexit.

Corexit is so inefficient and toxic that it was banned for use in the seas around the United Kingdom, BP's home base, and other areas around Europe. Yet they used it to hide the oil by sinking it rather then chemically breaking it down and dispersing it into relatively harmless components.

What does this have to do with the price of their cleanup? Both the manufacturer of Corexit and BP during that time, 2010, had a few senior executive officers holding chair positions in both companies. Buying Corexit financially benefited both BP and Corexit by offloading warehouse stored Corexit, banned from use in several regions, to profit both companies and the board chairmen who straddled both.

One environmentalist observed that using Corexit was an incestuous financial affair because essentially BP bought Corexit from BP! So only a complete independent audit could disclose how much actual cost was endured by BP executives to minimize losses and preserve the stock value while worsening an already bad situation.

It was a financial win-win for those corporate heads who straddled both companies. And it resulted in greater toxicity and pollution by submerging crude oil slicks to lower ocean depths and creating toxic gases into the area's atmosphere.

Judge Barbier's August 2014 decision was that BP made "profit-driven decisions" during the drilling that led to the blowout. "These instances of negligence, taken together, evince an extreme deviation from the standard of care and a conscious disregard of known risks," Babier wrote in his 153 page decision.

His ruling concluded that BP bore 67 percent of the responsibility, Swiss-based drilling rig owner Transocean Ltd. 30 percent, and Houston-based cement contractor (the well housing) Halliburton Energy Services 3 percent.

Now BP is vulnerable to higher fines under the federal Clean Water Act. Normally a polluter can be forced to pay a maximum of $1,100 in civil fines per barrel of spilled oil, and up to $4,300 per barrel if the company is found grossly negligent.

Judge Barbier found BP grossly negligent, so that $4300 per barrel fine, using the government's estimate of 4.2 million barrels, could addanother $18 billion in fines. Yet another set of penalties under the federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990 could cost BP more than $10 billion added to the potential $18 billion. Each barrel contains 42 gallons of crude oil.

BP has vowed to appeal, claiming the “gross negligence” accusation is inaccurate and the spill amount should be 2.45 million barrels for calculating any Clean Water Act penalties. Judge Barbier plans to decide exact fine amounts in January of 2015.

Attorney General Eric Holder supports Barbier's ruling, commenting that this ruling "will ensure that the company is held fully accountable for its recklessness" and "serve as a strong deterrent to anyone tempted to sacrifice safety and the environment in the pursuit of profit."

During the 2010 crisis, rumor has it a BP executive had arrogantly included the sarcastic comment “bye-bye fishies” in an email. Maybe now if all the potential fines stick, we can say “bye-bye stock values” to BP.

See also:

Research: Gulf Shrimp Widely Contaminated With Carcinogens

Natural Help for Removing Benzene and Other Gulf Spill Toxins

Avoiding Toxins and Removing Them from Your Body

If you live near the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, think "house plants"

Sources:

http://trove.com/me/content/QXB0W?chid=145749&utm_content=sediginax20140904-4952&utm_medium=email&utm_source=toppicks&utm_campaign=il20140904&email=pfassa%40yahoo.com
http://www.naturalnews.com/029127_Gulf_Coast_cleanup.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/046421_oil_spill_gulf_of_mexico_corexit.html


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/8/2014 12:34:53 AM

Hamas Rebuilding Tunnels, Making Rockets: Next Gaza War Soon

Hamas has renewed rocket manufacturing and tunnel building two weeks into the ceasefire, according to a report by Ynet News quoting a senior political source.

Why should anyone be surprised? Hamas makes no secret of the fact that its only raison d’etre is the destruction of the State of Israel and all Jews. At a time when the focus is supposed to be on rebuilding Gaza, Hamas takes what little materials there are for its own military needs.

There can be no greater demonstration of its cynical disregard of the requirements of the citizens who elected it to power with the assumption that their welfare would be paramount.

Indirect negotiations regarding future arrangements for a long-term peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians were set to begin in Cairo shortly. However, Hamas has decided to challenge Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and test his response to their extensive reinforcement efforts.

It is not clear how Israel will respond to Hamas rearming, resupplying, and – most importantly – rebuilding the tunnels leading into Israeli territory. Although Israel is capable of acting militarily, the overall situation in the volatile Middle East has changed, even in the last month.

Terrorist activity has increased on Israel’s northern borders. The abduction of United Nations observers on its Syrian border, and rumblings emerging from Hezbollah in Lebanon mean Israel can not only focus on Hamas.

Yedioth Ahronoth’s political analyst, Shimon Shiffer, said Israeli Military Intelligence is shortly expected to present a comprehensive report to the political establishment regarding Hamas’ rehabilitation efforts.

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said on Sunday that he did not believe it is possible to demilitarize Gaza. Like Benjamin Netanyahu, he compared Hamas to the Islamic State (ISIS), claiming that the Gaza group was no less dangerous.

To prove his point, Mahmoud al-Zahar, a senior Hamas official in the West Bank spoke on the subject.

“If the Palestinian resistance in the West Bank held a quarter of the tools at the disposal of the resistance in Gaza – Israel would be demolished in a day.

He added that, as far as Hamas is concerned, the security coordination in the West Bank between the Palestinian Authority and Israel was a crime. He intimated that if Hamas wrested control of the West Bank from Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian Authority, Israel’s days would be numbered.

Al-Zahar also dismissed Israeli claims that the IDF destroyed all the group’s tunnels.

“Who is stopping us right now from building new tunnels?”

Certainly not the world, which has now shifted its attention to other trouble-spots.

All the signs point to yet another round in the Israel – Hamas conflict. It’s simply a question of when.


Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/1459382/hamas-rebuilding-tunnels-making-rockets-next-gaza-war-soon/#3u1FjVhwkCkQJqU7.99


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Joyce Parker Hyde

808
1967 Posts
1967
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 100 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/8/2014 12:37:29 AM
Miguel this is another topic close to my heart, of course I live here.
For me the most tragic aspect of this that doesn't get talked about too much is the human costs of this fiasco.
First the eleven men killed in the blast, and then the destruction of families who have made their living for generations going back to the 1700's-gone!
Poof!
Oh well.
Some things once broken can never be repaired and it will take many years to see all the damage that was done.
+1