Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
7/21/2013 5:22:45 PM

72 Hours of Earthquakes Rock New Zealand

Stephen: Both the North and South Islands of New Zealand have been rocked by a series ofl major earthquakes centered in the Cook Strait (the waterway separating the north and south islands), near the country’s capital, Wellington, during the past three days. The biggest of these has been a magnitude 6.5, although some media outlets have claimed it was as large as 6.9.

From TVNZ ONE News – July 21, 2013

http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/least-one-injured-severe-quake-strikes-5515737/video?vid=5515883

Wellington’s emergency offices have been activated and Urban Search and Rescue is on standby after a magnitude 6.5 earthquake shook central New Zealand this evening.

The quake, that rumbled for more than a minute, struck at 5.09pm east of Seddon.


Wellington Region Civil Defence Controller, Bruce Pepperell said there have been reports of structural damage to a number of buildings around Wellington City and emergency services and local authorities are continuing to check buildings and infrastructure.

“At the moment we have had only one report of an injury around the region.”

Wellington Electricity says power is now back for the 5000 customers in the Wellington suburb of Karori.

But around 400 households in Wainui are still without power as lines are down.

Geonet reported a “severe” earthquake centered 20 kilometres east of Seddon, at a depth of 19km at 5.09pm but Civil Defence says there is no risk of a tsunami.

The region’s rail network is closed while checks are done on bridges, tunnels and other structures and there have been some reports of damage to CentrePort.

Police have closed sections of Featherston Street, Wakefield Street and Bolton Street in the CBD and may close other streets if they are deemed hazardous.

The Fire Service is dealing with broken water pipes and stuck lifts, Wellington City Council says.

Wellington Airport was closed for three and half hours after the quake. It is now working to clear its backlog.

Political Editor Corin Dann says there has been some damage inside Parliament with cracking on the walls and plaster falling off.

Containers have been pushed off the wharf and some buildings in Wellington’s CBD have been evacuated.

The earthquake has been felt as far north as Auckland.

ONE News reporter Jessica McCarthy survived the Christchurch earthquake in 2011 and told onenews.co.nz that this evening’s 6.5 magnitude quake “felt as bad as the Christchurch earthquake.”

“It’s scary.. there’s not a lot of damage but it was terrifying.”

Since 5.09pm this evening, Geonet has reported three “severe” earthquakes and six “strong” earthquakes on their website.

People in central New Zealand were shaken awake by the severe quake at 7.17am, which struck 30 kilometres east of Seddon at a depth of 19km.

More than 5000 people reported experiencing the earthquake on GeoNet, with felt reports stretching from the bottom of the South Island to as far north as Auckland.

http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/quake-strikes-central-new-zealand-video-5515965


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
7/21/2013 5:46:42 PM

Archbishop John Sentamu: The Scandal of the Millions Not Paid Enough to Live On



Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, says the scale of low pay in Britain is a national scandal. Photograph: Joe Giddens/PA Wire/Press Association Images

Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, says the scale of low pay in Britain is a national scandal. Photograph: Joe Giddens/PA Wire/Press Association Images

Stephen: John Sentamu is the Church of England’s Archbishop of York and wrote this column for the UK paper The Observer today. It seems that the churches – irrelevant of denomination and despite their enormous wealth- are certainly speaking up with increasing frequency and volume about the need for financial equality and fairness across our society.

By John Sentamu, The Observer – July 21, 2013

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jul/20/john-sentamu-living-wage-scandal

Millions of people across the country will get up today, leave their families and travel to work to carry out jobs that we all depend on.

They will care for people, serve us food, clean the spaces that we all use and share.

They will do more than a fair day’s work, but they won’t get a fair day’s pay.

The scale of low pay in Britain is a national scandal.(Stephen: read this in a global context, for it currently applies to every country – even the so-called ‘richest)

Come pay day, nearly five million people in this country won’t have been paid at a rate high enough to live on. Just think about that. Nearly five million people give their time, their skills and their energy to perform jobs – many of which we all depend on – but don’t get paid enough by their employers to even get by. That means not enough money to heat their homes, or feed their families, or plan for a rainy day.

The consequences for so many people and their families are devastating. Women, as the majority of low-paid workers in this country, are hit particularly hard. Low pay threatens the great strides that have been made in gender equality in recent decades because it undermines women’s economic independence. This is a huge loss for them and for society as a whole.

So far, all governments have been merely applying a sticking plaster to the crisis of low pay. The holes in millions of pay cheques are being plugged by in-work support to the tune of £4bn a year.

But why aren’t those who are profiting from their workers paying up? Why is the government having to subsidise businesses which don’t pay their employees enough to live on? These are questions we need to answer and act on – fast. The cost of living is rising but wages are not.

In the rush for profit, and for high pay at the top, too many companies have forgotten the basic moral imperative that employees be paid enough to live on. So how do we resurrect that imperative?

The living wage: three words that provide hope of an alternative. Championed by community groups across the country, it is a deceptively simple idea. A wage rate set to ensure a basic but acceptable standard of living.

Over the past decade, workers, trade unionists and campaigners at Citizens UK and the Living Wage Foundation have seized on this idea and driven it into mainstream Westminster policy debates.

Because of their tireless efforts, 284 businesses have adopted the living wage, which is currently set at £8.55 an hour in London and £7.45 throughout the rest of the UK. (The minimum wage required by law is £6.19.) Around 45,000 people have seen their pay cheque boosted as a result.

Politicians have started to sing the praises of the living wage, too. Ed Miliband, the Labour leader, called it “an idea whose time has come”. Boris Johnson, the mayor of London, said: “A fair and decent wage for Londoners is critical if the capital is to remain diverse, inclusive and prosperous”, while the prime minister, David Cameron, has described it as a “good and attractive idea”.

I agree. At the end of the day, though, what workers really need is pay, not platitudes. The reality is that despite these warm words, too few companies have stepped up to the mark. For the vast majority of low-paid people in the UK, the living wage remains an abstract concept, not a description of their pay rate.

That has to change. But how is change to be achieved? That is what the Living Wage Commission, which I will be chairing over the next 12 months, will set out to uncover. With colleagues from business, trade unions and civil society, we will investigate the future of the living wage.

What is the full potential of the living wage to both change people’s lives and change the way we do business? What are the barriers to companies adopting the living wage – and how could we surmount them?

To answer those questions, we need to have a national conversation about low pay in Britain. If you are paid less than the living wage, I want to hear from you. If you are a business which is considering the living wage, or which thinks it would be untenable to adopt, I want to hear from you, too.

By mapping the potential of the living wage, and facing the challenging questions about implementation head on, I believe that we can not only build fairer workplaces but also help build a just and good society. Join me.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
7/21/2013 10:24:35 PM

McCain Goes After 'Stand Your Ground'; Cruz Avoids 2016 Talk

The Atlantic Wire

View Gallery

McCain Goes After 'Stand Your Ground'; Cruz Avoids 2016 Talk

Arizona Sen. John McCain said he wants states to review "stand your ground" laws after the George Zimmerman acquittal during his appearance on CNN's State of the Union. And yes, he wants his home state to review the law, too. "I can also see that Stand Your Ground laws may be something that needs to be reviewed by the Florida legislature or any other legislature that has passed such legislation," McCain said Sunday morning. When asked by host Candy Crowley if his advice applies to Arizona too, McCain said it did. "Yes, I do and I’m confident that members of the Arizona legislature will," he said. He was then asked if he agreed with Texas Sen. Ted Cruz's position that the President's view of "stand your ground" laws were another attempt at gun control. "I respect his view, but I don’t frankly see the connection," McCain said.

RELATED: Geithner Gives His State of the Cliff

RELATED: McConnell Isn't Sure If He's Ready to Let the U.S. Default

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz tried to downplay any speculation about a potential run to be the Republican Presidential nominee in 2016 on ABC's This Week. "We are having a national debate about which direction the country should go, and what I am doing now is trying to participate in that national debate," Cruz said, from Iowa, one of the states where campaigning traditionally begins. Besides, he just landed in the Senate! He's still getting his feet under him. "I’m not focused on the politics. I’ve been in the office all but seven months. The last office I was elected to was student council. So this has been a bit of a whirlwind." Of course there's also a small debate over whether or not Cruz, who was born in Calgary, Alberta, is eligible to run for President. He tried to blow that debate off. "My mother was born in Wilmington, Delaware. She’s a U.S. citizen, so I’m a U.S. citizen," he said at first, but that wasn't enough: "I’m not going to engage in a legal debate. The facts are clear," he added. "I can tell you where I was born and who my parents were. And then as a legal matter, others can worry about that. I’m not going to engage." Sorry, Ted: your presidential dreams may be dashed by the law.

RELATED: House Takes Up Resolution to Stop Airstrikes in Libya

RELATED: Graham Isn't Afraid of Hillary; Malloy Calls LaPierre a Clown

House Speaker John Boehner refused to tell CBS's Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer whether he supports a path to citizenship in an immigration reform bill or not. Schieffer asked him repeatedly whether he would support a bill with a path to citizenship, clearly growing frustrated with the Speaker, but Boehner wouldn't budge. Initially Boehner would only speak about the need for immigration reform in broad terms. "Bob, we have a broken immigration system. The legal immigration system's broken, we have a problem with 11 million people who are here without documents, 40 percent of them, by the way, came here as legal immigrants," Boehner said. Boehner said that immigration is "a very big problem," before explaining that the bipartisan Senate immigration bill that includes a pathway to citizenship is a problem, too, because border security. "And what I've committed is that one, the House does not like the Senate bill. It's one big, massive bill that in my opinion doesn't have enough serious triggers to protect our border," he told Schieffer. But the veteran host pressed the speaker to stop dodging him: "Are you not going to answer that question?" he asked. Boehner's response was as noncommittal as you'd expect. "I'm not going to predict what's going to be on the floor and what isn't going to be on the floor. And that's what you're asking me to do. I can't do that. And I don't want to do that," he said. "My job in this process is to facilitate a discussion and to facilitate a process, so the American people can see what we're doing and so the members understand that we're dealing with this in a deliberative way." Schieffer tried one last time: "Do you, Mr. Speaker, yourself personally favor a bill that has a path to citizenship for those 11 million?" And, again, Boehner made it both about him and not about him. "It's not about me. It's not about what I want," he said, before making it all about him: "If I come out and say, 'I'm for this and I'm for that,' all I'm doing is making my job harder,' he said. "My job as the leader of the House is to facilitate this conversation and this process that involves members on both sides of the aisle, involves the American people." Finally the two men moved onto a more enjoyable topic, one that Boehner might actually talk about. Schieffer asked Boehner what he thinks will be his legacy as speaker. Boehner's proposal: "He was fair to all and protected the institution." We're sure some observers would disagree.

RELATED: Colin Powell Approves of Chuck Hagel

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder defended authorizing Detroit to file for bankruptcy on NBC's Meet the Press. "This was a very tough decision, but it’s the right decision because ultimately what we need to do is get better services for the 700,000 residents of Detroit," the Republican governor said. "There were no other viable options." Snyder tried to explain the bankruptcy as 60 years of "kicking the can down the road," but he was optimistic that things could turn around in the future. But Snyder said his biggest concern is for the retirees in Detroit and making sure they aren't left behind. "One thing that we’re asking for is the judge right up front to appoint someone to represent the retirees," Snyder said. "The bankruptcy is about the unfunded portion of the pension liability," he added. "The funded piece is safe."

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Mark Leibovich, reporter for The New York Times and author of the Washington party book This Town, toldFox News Sunday's Chris Wallace that the response to his box has been mixed. From outside the beltway, he's only heard praise and flattering words. But inside Washington is another story altogether. "It’s been a combination," Leibovich said. "The criticism from inside Washington has been, 'How dare he?'" Leibo, as his insider-y friends call him, said the praise from outside Washington mostly thanked him for exposing "the carnival" of Washington. "It’s very easy to do well rather than doing good," was how Leibo explained the way Washington works now.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
7/21/2013 10:30:09 PM

Despite outcry, stand-ground law repeals unlikely


Maeguerita Quire, of Miramar, Fla., holds up a Bible as she sings along during a "Justice for Trayvon" rally, Saturday, July 20, 2013 in Miami. The Rev. Al Sharpton's National Action Network organized "Justice for Trayvon" rallies nationwide to press for federal civil rights charges against George Zimmerman, who was found not guilty in the shooting death of unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee)

Associated Press


MIAMI (AP) — Despite an outcry from civil rights groups, a call for close examination by President Barack Obama and even a 1960s-style sit-in at the Florida governor's office, the jury's verdict that George Zimmerman was justified in shooting unarmed teenager Trayvon Martin is unlikely to spur change to any of the nation's stand-your-ground self-defense laws.

"I support stand your ground," Republican Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said last week.

"I do not see any reason to change it," said Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal, also a Republican.

At least 22 states have laws similar to that in Florida, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Many are conservative and lean toward laws that defend gun owners' rights. So far, there does not appear to be an appetite in Florida or other states to repeal or change the laws, which generally eliminate a person's duty to retreat in the face of a serious physical threat. In fact, some states are moving in the opposite direction.

"The debate about stand-your-ground laws largely reproduces existing divisions in American politics, particularly between blacks and whites and between Democrats and Republicans," said John Sides, associate professor of political science at George Washington University.

Zimmerman, a 29-year-old former neighborhood watch volunteer, was acquitted this month of second-degree murder and manslaughter charges in the 2012 shooting of 17-year-old Martin in a gated community in Sanford, Fla. Zimmerman told police he shot Martin only after the African-American teenager physically attacked him; Martin's family and supporters say Zimmerman, who identifies himself as Hispanic, racially profiled Martin as a potential criminal and wrongly followed him.

Zimmerman's lawyers decided not to pursue a pretrial immunity hearing allowed by Florida's stand-your-ground law. But jurors were told in final instructions by Circuit Judge Debra Nelson that they should acquit Zimmerman if they found "he had no duty to retreat and had the right to stand his ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he reasonably believed that it was necessary."

Before the stand-your-ground law was passed in 2005, the instruction would have read that Zimmerman "cannot justify his use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm if by retreating he could have avoided the need to use that force."

Since the law was enacted, justifiable homicides in Florida have risen from an annual average of 13.2 between 2001 and 2005 to an average of 42 between 2006 and 2012, including a record 66 in 2012, according to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. FBI data have shown similar increases in some states that enacted similar laws, such as Texas, while others haven't seen an uptick.

Beyond Florida, these states have some form of a stand-your-ground law, according to the national group: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and West Virginia.

Attorney General Eric Holder, in a speech last week to the NAACP convention in Orlando, said the Martin shooting demonstrates a need to re-examine stand-your-ground laws nationwide. He said they "senselessly expand the concept of self-defense" and increase the possibility of deadly confrontations.

On Friday, Obama said the nation needed to do some "soul-searching." He questioned whether a law could really promote peace and security if it sent a message that someone who is armed "has the right to use those firearms even if there is a way for them to exit from a situation."

Civil rights leaders, including the Rev. Al Sharpton, said they would push for repeal of the laws, starting in Florida, where a group of young protesters occupied GOP Gov. Rick Scott's office demanding change.

"If we can do it in Florida, we can affect other states," Sharpton said last week.

On Saturday, Sharpton's National Action Network organized "Justice for Trayvon" rallies in more than 100 cities. In addition to pushing for federal civil rights charges against Zimmerman, the rallies attacked stand-your-ground laws.

"By standing his ground, George Zimmerman was able to get away with murdering a 17-year-old black man," said Chelsea Jones, a student who spoke at a Dallas rally. "I can only imagine what the black community can achieve by standing their ground."

Even entertainer Stevie Wonder has joined the outcry, vowing not to perform in Florida as long as stand-your-ground remains on the books. Sharpton suggested that the law's opponents might boycott Florida orange juice, and other groups want a boycott on the state's tourist destinations, both multibillion-dollar industries.

Florida state Sen. Chris Smith, a Fort Lauderdale Democrat, said the Zimmerman verdict was a "wakeup call" that should at least open fresh debate on stand-your-ground laws.

He noted that in the wake of the 2011 acquittal of Casey Anthony in the killing of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee, Florida lawmakers passed legislation making it a felony for a parent or guardian to fail to report a missing child within 36 hours. Caylee's disappearance was not reported for 31 days.

"We are calling for the same type of action," Smith said.

But The Associated Press has found scant support for repeal of the laws in Florida and elsewhere. Scott told reporters Thursday that he agreed with the findings of a task force he appointed on the subject after Martin's shooting, which recommended no changes to the stand-your-ground law. Of the protesters in his Capitol office, Scott said, "I think it is great that people are exercising their voices."

After Holder's speech, the National Rifle Association, which strongly backs stand-your-ground laws and holds great sway in many state legislatures, issued a statement claiming that Obama's administration was aiming more at the broader political goal of restricting gun rights.

"The attorney general fails to understand that self-defense is not a concept, it's a fundamental human right," said Chris W. Cox, executive director of the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action. "To send a message that legitimate self-defense is to blame is unconscionable."

In fact, in states with stand-your-ground laws similar to Florida's, the trend has been toward greater gun rights. In Oklahoma, for example, lawmakers in 2012 passed an "open-carry" measure that allows people with a concealed carry permit to now display their handguns openly in a holster. Other states have sought to expand what are known as "castle doctrine" laws — the right to defend one's self with deadly force in the home — to apply to businesses.

New Hampshire lawmakers this year considered repealing the state's-stand-your ground law, which was enacted in 2011 by a Republican Legislature over a Democratic governor's veto. After narrowly passing the Democratic-led House in March, the bill died in the Republican-led Senate.

Holder also announced this week that the Justice Department would investigate whether Zimmerman could be charged under federal civil rights laws, which would require evidence that he harbored racial animosity against Martin. Most legal experts say that will be a difficult charge to bring, leaving Martin's supporters to concentrate on trying to change stand-your-ground laws.

Republican Sen. John McCain joined the call on stand-your-ground laws Sunday, urging state legislatures to review their statutes — including the one in his home state of Arizona.

"I'm confident that the members of the Arizona legislature will ... because it is a very controversial legislation," he said on CNN.

Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League, appeared Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press" and called the laws "one of the things that has incited and ignited, I believe, this movement across the nation, which I think is the beginning of a new civil rights movement."

Michael Steele, former chairman of the Republican National Committee, said during the show that the question now is whether it's proper for the federal government to tell states with stand-your-ground laws how to change or remake them. His answer: "No. I mean, this is something that's going to have to be worked out state by state."

Charles Ogletree, a Harvard Law School professor who taught both Barack and Michelle Obama, agreed: "The reality is that this is not a federal issue. This is a state issue."

____

Associated Press writers Kyle Hightower in Orlando and Philip Elliott in Washington contributed to this report.

_____

Follow Curt Anderson on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Miamicurt.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
7/21/2013 10:33:33 PM

A look at recent notorious cases in Cleveland area

FILE - In this Monday, June 6, 2011 file photo, accused serial killer Anthony Sowell appears for the start of his trial in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court in Cleveland. Sowell was arrested Oct. 31, 2009, after police investigating a woman’s report that she had been raped at his house began finding bodies. Eventually, the remains of 11 troubled women were discovered. There are other recent high-profile cases involving the disappearance of women from the Cleveland area. On Sunday, July 21, 2013, authorities say a suspect is in custody after three bodies were found wrapped in plastic bags in an East Cleveland neighborhood, and a police chief says he believes one or two more victims could be found. (AP Photo/Marvin Fong, Pool, File)

Associated Press

View Gallery

A suspect is in custody after three bodies were found wrapped in plastic bags in an East Cleveland neighborhood, and a police chief says he believes one or two more victims could be found.

Here is a look at some of the most recent high-profile cases involving the disappearances of women from the Cleveland area:

— Anthony Sowell was arrested Oct. 31, 2009, after police investigating a woman's report that she had been raped at his house began finding bodies. Eventually, the remains of 11 troubled women were discovered. Prosecutors say that the victims began disappearing in 2007 and that Sowell lured them to his home with the promise of alcohol or drugs. The victims were disposed of in garbage bags and plastic sheets, then dumped in various parts of the house and yard. Sowell was convicted in 2011 and sentenced to death in the women's murders. He now sits on death row.

— In May of this year, a woman missing for a decade escaped from a run-down Cleveland home, saying she and two other women had been held captive there for years. Former school bus driver Ariel Castro was later charged with nearly 1,000 counts of kidnapping, rape and other crimes. The three women disappeared separately between 2002 and 2004, when they were 14, 16 and 20 years old. Each said she had accepted a ride from Castro, who fathered a daughter, now 6, with one of the women. He has pleaded not guilty and is jailed on $8 million bond.

— And on Friday, a report of a foul odor at an East Cleveland home led police to the discovery of one body and the arrest of a suspect, who engaged authorities in a standoff. Two other bodies were found in the same neighborhood Saturday — one in a backyard and the other in the basement of a vacant house. The three bodies, all female, were wrapped in trash bags. A 35-year-old registered sex offender was in custody Sunday but hasn't been charged. Mayor Gary Norton said the suspect made comments that he might have been influenced by Sowell. Police Chief Ralph Spotts says he believes searchers could uncover one or two more bodies.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1