Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/30/2013 12:28:48 AM

Joe Biden Is on Edward Snowden's Case


The Atlantic Wire



Joe Biden Is on Edward Snowden's Case
View Gallery

Up until this point, the search for Edward Snoden has been carried out behind the scenes by low-level diplomats and CIA agents. But things have changed within the last 24 hours, apparently, because the Vice President is the one making the calls now.

RELATED: Ecuador Spikes Halts Snowden's Asylum Because Julian Assange Is a Fame Hog

A phone call has taken place between Vice President Joe Biden and Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa about that pesky former National Security Agency contractor, Edward Snowden, who leaked all those surveillance secrets, still holed up in the transit area at Sheremetyevo airport, according to Russian officials. The Vice President requested Ecuador not grant Snowden asylum.

RELATED: Beyond Moscow: Where Is Edward Snowden Going Next?

The White House was mum to speak about what was discussed beyond the obvious. "They engaged in a broad conversation on the bilateral relationship. They did discuss Snowden," Ben Rhodes, the deputy national security advisor, told NBC News.

RELATED: Obama Is 'Not Going to Be Scrambling Jets' to Nab Edward Snowden

But Correa was much more open about what transpired during the call. He admitted that Biden asked his country not to house the fugitive leaker during the "cordial" telephone call. "He communicated a very courteous request from the United States that we reject the (asylum) request," Correa said during his weekly televised speech. Correa criticized the "brats" in Congress who threatened trade sanctions should Ecuador not comply while praising Biden's good manners. He also stressed that no decision could be made until Snowden arrives on Ecuadorian soil or inside one of its embassies. "When he (Snowden) arrives on Ecuadorian soil, if he arrives ... of course the first opinions we will seek are those of the United States," Correa said.

RELATED: Snowden Speaks: 'I'm Neither Traitor Nor Hero. I'm an American.'

Whether this call occurred before or after Correa halted Snowden's special travel request because the U.S. embassy said it appeared Jullian Assange is "running the show" is unclear. We don't know when the phone call actually took place. We know what was said by who, and that Biden "initiated" the call. Any details beyond that are a mystery.

RELATED: Edward Snowden's Father Tries to Bargain for His Son's Return the U.S.

But now we know why the President said he wouldn't be scrambling any jets to get Snowden: because he was putting Joe Biden on the case. The Vice President is the new thorn in Showden's side, and this call is the highest level talks between the U.S. and Ecuador since the stalemate over Snowden began.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/30/2013 10:31:01 AM
Locust Plagues Are Chewing Madagascar Toward Famine
















As a plague of locusts threatens to decimate Madagascar’s crops, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has sent out an urgent appeal for $22 million to save next year’s planting season.

The FAO believes there are currently one hundred locust swarms ravaging Madagascar’s already embattled crop plantations, each containing around 500 billion locusts that together have the ability to get through 100,000 tonnes of vegetation a day.

“If we don’t act now, the plague could last years and cost hundreds of millions of dollars,” FAO director general Jose Graziano da Silva is quoted as saying.

“This could very well be a last window of opportunity to avert an extended crisis,” he added.

The FAO estimates that by September two thirds of the country could be affected by the plague.

To put that in real terms, the FAO suggests that the food security and livelihoods of 13 million people depend on next year’s crops, and nine million of those people rely directly on agriculture for food and income.

So, to allow the swarms to endanger Madagascar’s crops is to risk the very food stability of this already devastatingly poor nation.

Unfortunately, the locust swarms have already decimated large swathes of last year’s crops.

The country’s rice and maize losses range from 40 to 70 percent of the crop, with certain plots seeing their entire crop destroyed.

The FAO suggests the locust plague in Madagascar could have been stopped earlier if the world’s governments had fully heeded the FAO’s previous calls for funds, which date back as far as 2011.

Then, the FAO calculated it would need $14.5 million in order to stop the locust plague spread. It received only half that amount.

Now the FAO says it will need $22 million for immediate action and estimates that it will need more than $41.5 million over the next three years in order to adequately deal with this crisis.

“Preventive control measures normally cost $3.3m per year for the 10 affected Sahelian countries. So intervening only when the situation reaches a crisis point cost roughly the same as 170 years of prevention,” the FAO estimates.

The funds, which must be secured by July, will be used to mobilize and equip personnel for a new campaign starting in September to coincide with the new planting season.

This effort will allow the FAO to monitor the swarms and, after assessing where control measures are needed, deploy targeted aerial spraying campaigns across the affected one and a half million hectares of land.

Left unchecked, the problem could escalate to the point where 630,000 tonnes of total rice production would be lost. That’s about 25% of Madagascar’s total rice demand.

In a country where 80% of people subsist on less than a dollar a day, and rice is the cornerstone of their diet, the potential loss of this crop could be devastating.

The FAO stresses that a failure to act now would create conditions for an infestation and potential loss of food stability that could last several years and ultimately end in widespread famine — this is in a country where, according to the last available figures, upwards of 70% of the total population already suffers from malnutrition.


Read more:
, , , ,

Image credit: Thinkstock.


Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/locust-plagues-are-chewing-madagascar-toward-famine.html#ixzz2Xh6YB6Ka

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/30/2013 10:35:27 AM
Your Right to Remain Silent Means You're Gulty
















    “You have the right to remain silent.” Haha, just kidding. That’s just something you hear on TV… or read in the equally fictional “U.S. Constitution.” In reality, not speaking to the police is basically an admission of guilt. Just ask the Supreme Court!

    Amidst a flurry of recent Supreme Court decisions, the June 17 ruling in the Salinas v. Texas case flies in the face of the Constitution. The Fifth Amendment guarantees “no person… shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.” As a result, persons of interest in police investigations are afforded Miranda rights, or the right to say nothing. Yet in a 5-4 decision, the majority of justices felt that in refusing to speak, Salinas was in fact incriminating himself.

    Before going further, it’s important to know the details of the case. Following a double homicide, Houston police asked Genovevo Salinas in for questioning. He cooperated for an hour, even agreeing to give the police his shotgun for them to investigate. When asked whether the shells would correspond with evidence found at the murder scene, Salinas did not respond. Instead, police reported that he “shuffled his feet, bit his lip, and started to tighten up.” This silence was used as evidence of his guilt in a subsequent trial, even though there was no video footage of this questioning to confirm his behavior.

    Appealing the decision to the Supreme Court, Salinas contended that his lack of a response was his right, not an admission of guilt. However, the Supreme Court felt that his Constitutionally protected right to not self-incriminate was in itself an act of self-incrimination. In a decision led by Justice Samuel Alito, the court ruled that since Salinas was speaking to the police voluntarily and did not explicitly say he was utilizing his right to remain silent, his subsequent actions were fair game.

    That’s quite a technicality and not in the spirit of the Fifth Amendment. Although most people know they have the right to remain silent, I doubt many would realize they have to say in no uncertain terms that they are doing just that for it to count. As Justice Stephen Breyer pointed out in his dissenting opinion, “How can an individual who is not a lawyer know that these particular words are legally magic?”

    Slate reporter Brandon L. Garrett poses another good question: “If Salinas had answered the question by exclaiming that he was innocent, could police have reported that he sounded desperate and like a liar?” Surely, prosecutors aren’t meant to mount a case based on “just pausing or fidgeting.”

    Perhaps worse still is the fact that Salinas was called in to participate in an informal conversation with the police. As such, he was never read his Miranda rights, which would have made his silence acceptable. Legal experts expect that the Supreme Court’s ruling will motivate police to badger suspects with probing questions before formal interrogations since these moments are apparently admissible in court.

    Previously, in 2010, the Supreme Court handed down two other rulings that similarly compromised the integrity of citizens’ Miranda rights.

    This most recent development goes to show that – even if you are completely innocent and not under arrest – it is best to only speak to police with your lawyer present. If police begin to ask you questions, requesting a lawyer will require them to stop the inquiry until you have counsel.


    Read more:
    , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/your-right-to-remain-silent-means-youre-guilty.html#ixzz2Xh7ge1QY


    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +1
    Luis Miguel Goitizolo

    1162
    61587 Posts
    61587
    Invite Me as a Friend
    Top 25 Poster
    Person Of The Week
    RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
    6/30/2013 10:40:41 AM

    Egypt group: 22 million signatures against Morsi


    Supporters of Egypt's Islamist President Mohammed Morsi armed by sticks and shields to protect from stone attack guard their protesting site at a public square outside the Rabia el-Adawiya mosque near the presidential palace in Cairo, Saturday, June 29, 2013. Thousands of supporters and opponents of Egypt's embattled Islamist president held rival sit-ins in separate parts of Cairo Saturday on the eve of opposition-led mass protests aimed at forcing Mohammed Morsi from power. (AP Photo/Amr Nabil)

    Associated Press

    CAIRO (AP) — More than 22 million Egyptians have signed a petition calling for the country's Islamist president to step down, the youth group leading the signature campaign said Saturday on the eve of mass protests aimed at forcing Mohammed Morsi from office.

    The planned demonstrations, which could plunge Egypt once again into a dangerous round of civil unrest, reflect the growing polarization of the nation since Morsi took power, with the president and his Islamist allies in one camp and seculars, liberals, moderate Muslims and Christians on the other.

    Already, clashes across a string of cities north of Cairo over the past week have left at least seven people dead, including an American, and hundreds injured, and there are deep-rooted fears in the country that Sunday's protests will turn violent and quickly spiral out of control.

    On Saturday, an Associated Press reporter saw Morsi supporters at a Cairo sit-in doing military-style fitness drills, with some wearing homemade body armor and construction helmets and carrying sticks. They said they had no intention of attacking opposition protesters, and would only act in self-defense or to protect the presidential palace.

    The Tamarod, or Rebel, youth movement says its petition is evidence of the widespread dissatisfaction with Morsi's administration, and has used the signature drive as the focal point of its call for millions of people to take to the streets Sunday to demand the president's ouster.

    Mahmoud Badr, a Tamarod leader, told reporters Saturday a total of 22,134,460 Egyptians have signed the petition. He did not say whether there had been an independent audit of the signatures.

    Morsi's supporters, who have long doubted the validity and authenticity of the collected signatures, expressed skepticism about the final count.

    "How do we trust the petitions?" asked Brotherhood member Ahmed Seif Islam Hassan al-Banna. "Who guarantees that those who signed were not paid to sign?"

    If authenticated, the collection of so many signatures would deal a symbolic blow to Morsi's mandate and put in stark terms the popular frustrations with an administration that critics say has failed to effectively deal with the country's pressing problems, including tenuous security, inflation, power cuts and high unemployment.

    Tamarod, which began its campaign with the goal of collecting more signatures than the 13 million votes Morsi garnered in his 2012 election win, announced its final tally the day before protests that organizers vow will bring millions into the streets to push the president from power.

    Morsi, meanwhile, sought to project a business-as-usual image Saturday, meeting with the defense and interior ministers to review preparations to protect the protesters and vital state facilities during Sunday's demonstrations.

    Egypt has been roiled by political unrest in the two years since the uprising that ousted autocrat Hosni Mubarak, but the round of protests set to kick off Sunday promises to be the largest and holds the potential to be the bloodiest yet.

    In the past week alone, at least seven people have been killed in clashes between the president's supporters and opponents in cities in the Nile Delta, while on Friday protesters ransacked and torched as least five Brotherhood offices across the country.

    Adding to the tension, eight lawmakers from the country's interim legislature announced their resignation Saturday to protest Morsi's policies. The 270-seat chamber was elected early last year by less than 10 percent of Egypt's eligible voters, and is dominated by Islamists who support Morsi.

    With a sense of doom hanging over the country, Defense Minister Gen. Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi last Sunday gave the president and his opponents a week to reach a compromise and warned that the military would intervene to prevent the nation from entering a "dark tunnel." It was the strongest expression of the military's discontent with conditions in the nation since Morsi took office a year ago.

    In South Africa, President Barack Obama said the U.S. supports freedom of speech in Egypt and the right of protesters to peacefully assemble, and called on called on both sides in Egypt to avoid violence.

    "We would urge all parties to make sure they're not engaging in violence (and) police and military are showing appropriate restraint," he said.

    The opposition, feeling that Morsi may be on the ropes and frustrated by past offers of dialogue that proved to be mostly symbolic, has shown no inclination to compromise, and Morsi offered no concessions to his opponents when he addressed the nation for 2 ½ hours on Wednesday.

    The focus of Sunday's protests is Morsi's Ittihadiya palace in Cairo. As a precaution, the president and his family are reported to have moved into the Cairo headquarters of the Republican Guard, the branch of the army tasked with protecting the president and presidential palaces.

    As the country waits to see what transpires Sunday, thousands of supporters and opponents of the embattled president held rival sit-ins Saturday in separate parts of the capital.

    With expectations of violence running high, the military has dispatched troops backed by armored personnel carriers to reinforce military bases on the outskirts of cities expected to be flashpoints.

    In Cairo, the additional forces were deployed to military facilities in the suburbs and outlying districts. Army troops are also moving to reinforce police guarding the city's prisons to prevent a repeat of the nearly half dozen jail breaks during the chaos of the 2011 uprising.

    The opposition is demanding Morsi's ouster, saying he has lost his legitimacy through a series of missteps and authoritarian policies. They say early presidential elections should be held within six months of his ouster.

    Hard-line Islamists loyal to Morsi have repeatedly vowed to "smash" the protesters, arguing that they were a front for loyalists of Hosni Mubarak, the autocrat ousted in Egypt's 2011 revolt, determined to undermine Morsi's rule. They also say that Morsi is a freely elected president who must serve out his four-year term before he can be replaced in an election.

    Many Egyptians fear the new round of unrest could trigger a collapse in law and order similar to the one that occurred during the 2011 revolt. Already, residents in some of the residential compounds and neighborhoods to the west of the city are reporting gunmen showing up to demand protection money or risk being robbed.

    The police, who have yet to fully take back the streets after they disappeared in unclear circumstances in 2011, have stepped up patrols on the outskirts of the city, ostensibly to prevent weapons and ammunition from coming into the city to be used in the case of an outbreak of violence. The army is advertising hotlines for civilians to call if they run into trouble.

    In the latest reminder of the near lawlessness that has plagued the Sinai Peninsula bordering Gaza and Israel since the 2011 revolt, a senior security official officer was assassinated Saturday in the coastal city of el-Arish as he arrived home from work. Police Brig. Mohammed Tolbah was instantly killed and his driver seriously injured.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Maggie Michael contributed to this report.


    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +1
    Luis Miguel Goitizolo

    1162
    61587 Posts
    61587
    Invite Me as a Friend
    Top 25 Poster
    Person Of The Week
    RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
    6/30/2013 5:52:35 PM

    Atheists unveil Fla monument near Ten Commandments


    People gather around to sit and take photos during the unveiling of an Atheist monument outside the Bradford County Courthouse on Saturday, June 29, 2013 in Stark, Fla. The New Jersey-based group American Atheists unveiled the 1,500-bound granite bench Saturday as a counter to the religious monument in what's called a free speech zone. Group leaders say they believe it's the first such atheist monument on government property. About 200 people attended the event.(AP Photo/The Gainesville Sun, Matt Stamey)

    Associated Press


    View Gallery

    STARKE, Fla. (AP) — A group of atheists unveiled a monument to their nonbelief in God on Saturday to sit alongside a granite slab that lists the Ten Commandments in front of the Bradford County courthouse.

    As a small group of protesters blasted Christian country music and waved "Honk for Jesus" signs, the atheists celebrated what they believe is the first atheist monument allowed on government property in the United States.

    "When you look at this monument, the first thing you will notice is that it has a function. Atheists are about the real and the physical, so we selected to place this monument in the form of a bench," said David Silverman, president of American Atheists.

    It also serves another function — a counter to the religious monument that the New Jersey-based group wanted removed. It's a case of if you can't beat 'em, join 'em.

    American Atheists sued to try to have the stone slab with the Ten Commandments taken away from the courthouse lawn in this rural, conservative north Florida town best known for the prison that confines death row inmates. The Community Men's Fellowship erected the monument in what's described as a free speech zone. During mediation on the case, the atheist group was told it could have its own monument, too.

    "We're not going to let them do it without a counterpoint," Silverman said. "If we do it without a counterpoint, it's going to appear very strongly that the government actually endorses one religion over another, or — I should say — religion in general over non-religion."

    About 200 people attended the unveiling. Most were supportive, though there were protesters, including a group from Florida League of the South that had signs that said "Yankees Go Home."

    "We reject outsiders coming to Florida — especially from outside what we refer to as the Bible Belt — and trying to remake us in their own image," said Michael Tubbs, state chairman of the Florida League of the South. "We do feel like it's a stick in the eye to the Christian people of Florida to have these outsiders come down here with their money and their leadership and promote their outside values here."

    After a cover was taken off the 1,500-pound granite bench Saturday, people rushed to have their pictures taken on it. The bench has quotes from Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and Madalyn Murray O'Hair, the founder of American Atheists. It also has a list of Old Testament punishments for violating the Ten Commandments, including death and stoning.

    "Some people think it's an attack simply by us exerting our existence. They put a monument on a public lawn that, if you put it in context, says atheists should be killed," Silverman said. "It is an attack, but it's an attack on Christian privilege, not an attack on Christians themselves, and not so much an attack on Christianity."

    At one point someone in a car driving by tossed a toilet seat and a roll of toilet paper at the crowd. Neither struck anyone. At another point, Eric Hovind, 35, of Pensacola jumped atop the peak of the monument and shouted his thanks to the atheists for giving him a platform to declare Jesus is real. Atheists shouted at him, and he stepped down after about a minute. One man yelled that religion is a fairy tale.

    "The problem is it's not a fairy tale," Hovind said. "We definitely have freedom of religion, not freedom from religion."

    Hovind and Tubbs did say they respect the right of the group to install the monument, even if they disagree with the message behind it.

    And the atheists said they expected protesters.

    "There always are," said Rick Wingrove, the director of a Washington D.C.-area office of American Atheists. "We protests their events, they protests our events. As long as everybody's cordial and let people speak. This is our day, not theirs. We're fine with them being here."

    A call to the group that sponsored the Ten Commandments monument, the Community Men's Fellowship, wasn't returned. But the group gave Facebook updates on the legal battle with the American Atheists and praised the compromise that allowed them to keep their monument.

    "We want you all to remember that this issue was won on the basis of this being a free speech issue, so don't be alarmed when the American Atheists want to erect their own sign or monument. It's their right. As for us, we will continue to honor the Lord and that's what matters," the group posted.

    While Silverman said he believes religion is wrong and teachings in the Bible are violent, he said he welcomes non-Christian religions to follow the atheists' example and put in their own monuments in free-speech zones.

    "I will back them because it will be their right," he said. "This is one of the tricks that Christians have used, because they go up and call it a free-speech zone and then they're unopposed. They get their government legitimization because nobody else calls their bluff and puts something in."

    ____

    Follow Brendan Farrington on Twitter: http://twitter.com/bsfarrington

    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +1


    facebook
    Like us on Facebook!