Quote: Hi Pauline,
when I read your thread the words of a german philosoph (when I remember well Immanuel Kant) came into my mind:
Freedom ends where it collide with the boundaries of the next.
What does this mean? My behaviour has always to be in a way that it doesn't hurt, limit with my actions the person next to me. This implies no murder, steal, a.s.o.
First of all it's s.th. which comes out of myself: I'm able to decide, act independent of other influences like media, parents, friends etc. Freedom is the capability to make own decisions based on knowledge and experience, listening to others free of prejudice. Freedom means living and concede the same to everybody else.
On the other hand we are living in a comunity where are different understandings, behaviours which make it sometimes difficult to persue freedom. Therefore it's difficult to see freedom as a global value. It is very individual.
When Bogdan says, that all inhabitants of the world should have equal rights I answer: basicly should it be like this. But seeing all the different mentalities, religions, races it's impossible to realize this. Although - speaking about religion - to my opinion every religion and because of this every social community bases more or less on the 10 commandments (as I'm catholic) the interpretation over the milleniums has changed remarkable. Reflecting about this I would say that freedom under this aspect means: maintain the different populations as they are and not try to convince them in a manner that they have to be in a way or another like me or you. Freedom means to show them to develop there capacities, to use their treasures but never ever force them to be equal to someone else!
Pauline you're really inspirational. These are my words for today. I'm going to bed now but before
hugs and sunshine and embracement
Rieke
P.S. Pauline I got the enlightenment HUGS!!!!!! Nothing slang, nothing abbreviation - you are phantastic.
When I wrote this, it was late in the evening - now mentally fresh in the morning, I would like to add, that we have to distinguish between - spiritual freedom and - physical freedom What does it mean? Spiritually free is what I described that comes out of ourselfs, that depends on our own. We take responsability for whatever we are doing. To progress spiritually, educationally (exist this word?), in our capability to be of help for others etc. Whereas the physical freedom depends on others while we are living in a society, together with others. The past and our daily life shows, when there are more than 2 people together, ohe has to be the leader of this little group (as you Pauline here :-) ) Basically this isn't bad. But we are also egoists and when this egoism doesn't any harm in our small group, it could and do harm in a society. Rules become law and law means punishing, get others who didn't accept the law to pay for it - with money or life. In the end, what we call freedom means being conditioned by others. This process is so sublime that the major part of the people isn't able to realize what's happening. Or they cry for more laws which 'garantee the personal freedom' or thinking of politicians, their collegues do everything that 'unpopular ideas' (which would be of help for others) cannot be developed. FREEDOM, what a great word and so difficult to have it! A wonderful day to all of you. Hugs and light Rieke
|