Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: RE: Is thisThe Truth About Muhammad: Is IT THE ROAD TO SERFDOM
9/7/2010 2:34:23 AM

No explanation needed here. Enjoy Sharia for Dummies

Posted by Nonie Darwish on Aug 27th, 2010 and filed under FrontPage. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Imam Feisal Abdel Rauf claims that the U.S. constitution is Sharia compliant. Now let us examine below a few laws of Sharia to see how truthful Imam Rauf is:

1- Jihad, defined as “to war against non-Muslims to establish the religion,” is the duty of every Muslim and Muslim head of state (Caliph). Muslim Caliphs who refuse jihad are in violation of Sharia and unfit to rule.

2- A Caliph can hold office through seizure of power meaning through force.

3- A Caliph is exempt from being charged with serious crimes such as murder, adultery, robbery, theft, drinking and in some cases of rape.

4- A percentage of Zakat (charity money) must go towards jihad.

5- It is obligatory to obey the commands of the Caliph, even if he is unjust.

6- A caliph must be a Muslim, a non-slave and a male.

7- The Muslim public must remove the Caliph if he rejects Islam.

8- A Muslim who leaves Islam must be killed immediately.

9- A Muslim will be forgiven for murder of: 1) an apostate 2) an adulterer 3) a highway robber. Vigilante street justice and honor killing is acceptable.

10- A Muslim will not get the death penalty if he kills a non-Muslim, but will get it for killing a Muslim.

11- Sharia never abolished slavery, sexual slavery and highly regulates it. A master will not be punished for killing his slave.

12- Sharia dictates death by stoning, beheading, amputation of limbs, flogging even for crimes of sin such as adultery.

13- Non-Muslims are not equal to Muslims under the law. They must comply to Islamic law if they are to remain safe. They are forbidden to marry Muslim women, publicly display wine or pork, recite their scriptures or openly celebrate their religious holidays or funerals. They are forbidden from building new churches or building them higher than mosques. They may not enter a mosque without permission. A non-Muslim is no longer protected if he leads a Muslim away from Islam.

14- It is a crime for a non-Muslim to sell weapons to someone who will use them against Muslims. Non-Muslims cannot curse a Muslim, say anything derogatory about Allah, the Prophet, or Islam, or expose the weak points of Muslims. But Muslims can curse non-Muslims.

15- A non-Muslim cannot inherit from a Muslim.

16- Banks must be Sharia compliant and interest is not allowed.

17- No testimony in court is acceptable from people of low-level jobs, such as street sweepers or bathhouse attendants. Women in low level jobs such as professional funeral mourners cannot keep custody of their children in case of divorce.

18- A non-Muslim cannot rule — even over a non-Muslim minority.

19- Homosexuality is punishable by death.

20- There is no age limit for marriage of girls. The marriage contract can take place anytime after birth and can be consummated at age 8 or 9.

21- Rebelliousness on the part of the wife nullifies the husband’s obligation to support her, gives him permission to beat her and keep her from leaving the home.

22- Divorce is only in the hands of the husband and is as easy as saying: “I divorce you” and becomes effective even if the husband did not intend it.

23- There is no community property between husband and wife and the husband’s property does not automatically go to the wife after his death.

24- A woman inherits half what a man inherits.

25- A man has the right to have up to 4 wives and none of them have a right to divorce him — even if he is polygamous.

26- The dowry is given in exchange for the woman’s sexual organs.

27- A man is allowed to have sex with slave women and women captured in battle, and if the enslaved woman is married her marriage is annulled.

28- The testimony of a woman in court is half the value of a man.

29- A woman loses custody if she remarries.

30- To prove rape, a woman must have 4 male witnesses.

31- A rapist may only be required to pay the bride-money (dowry) without marrying the rape victim.

32- A Muslim woman must cover every inch of her body, which is considered “Awrah,” a sexual organ. Not all Sharia schools allow the face of a woman exposed.

33- A Muslim man is forgiven if he kills his wife at the time he caught her in the act of adultery. However, the opposite is not true for women, since the man “could be married to the woman he was caught with.”

34-It is obligatory for a Muslim to lie if the purpose is obligatory. That means that for the sake of abiding with Islam’s commandments, such as jihad, a Muslim is obliged to lie and should not have any feelings of guilt or shame associated with this kind of lying.

The above are clear-cut laws in Islam decided by great Imams after years of examination and interpretation of the Quran, Hadith and Mohammed’s life. Now let the learned Imam Rauf tell us: What part of the above is compliant with the U.S. Constitution?

Nonie Darwish is the author of “Cruel and Usual Punishment; the terrifying global implications of Islamic law” and founder of Former Muslims United.

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: RE: Is thisThe Truth About Muhammad: Is IT THE ROAD TO SERFDOM
9/8/2010 6:33:34 AM
Hi Jim,
Yep, you sure got that right. Alex Jones finally getting something right. The film is despicable and it's a sorry state of affairs that Fox is behind it but money talks and possibly just possibly the Muslim investors in Fox have a good reason to foment and cause unrest in the United States.
Jones mentions jihad in this clip but in a Mexican alien context and it runs both ways. We know that aside from Mexican illegals crossing the borders many Muslim jihadis are crossing too. So I simply question the reasoning behind this movie.
One reason is to cause unrest amongst the illegal Mexicans add to the unrest it will cause in the legal Hispanic population and you have a grave situation.
The second reason might be to take the lime light off the Muslim issue in the United States now and make the Mexican illegals the main issue.
When you combine the two you might have a long term Muslim agenda to tranquilize the Americans into "forgetting" about the dangers of radical Isalm in the USA and their agenda's.
While the illegals are an extremely serious problem in the United States B Hussein is dealing with it in his own way by taking Arizona to court for upholding their right to keep their state safe for all its citizens. Compare that to the B Hussein administration's actions in regard to the radical Islam issue in the US you have some very interesting parallels. Nothing positive being done in either of these attacks against America and in most cases the exact opposite is being done. Actions that are to the detriment of the United States.
These thoughts came to mind while watching the Jones video and I wanted to share them with you.
Shalom,
Peter

Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: RE: Is thisThe Truth About Muhammad: Is IT THE ROAD TO SERFDOM
9/9/2010 1:25:01 AM
Citizen Petition:
Say "NO" to the Ground Zero
'Victory' Mosque!

Petition Sponsor: Grassfire Nation
Total signers: 91,732


The Issue



The Islamic "victory"
mosque at Ground Zero

The proposed $100 million Islamic mosque to be built at the site of Ground Zero is sending shock waves across the nation. The planned Islamic center not only dishonors the memories of the 9-11 victims, but as Rush Limbaugh suggests, “[Muslims] are planting the flag of victory with this mosque."

Feisal Abdul Rauf — who is spearheading the effort — has known associations with radical Islamic causes and told “60 Minutes” reporters that “the United States policies were an accessory to the crime that happened” on 9-11.

Despite more than 70 percent of Americans opposing the mosque, both President Obama and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg support the project while House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has even called for an investigation into those opposing the mosque!

The Action
If you oppose the construction of a $100 million Islamic center in the vicinity of Ground Zero in New York City, please sign the petition below. Once 100,000 petitions are gathered, your petition will be delivered to mayor Bloomberg, New York Governor David Paterson as well as other key lawmakers.

The Petition States:

As a concerned American citizen, I oppose the planned construction of the Muslim “victory” mosque at the site of Ground Zero. The selection of the site for the planned Islamic center — where more than 3,000 citizens perished — is no coincidence and sends a strong signal to our enemies that they won. For the memories of those Americans who were murdered, those who remain, and those continuing to fight against our enemies, I urge you to use whatever influence you have to ensure this mosque is not placed on Ground Zero, or anywhere near this hallowed site.


Sign Here: http://www.grassfire.com/136/petition.asp?ref_id=500064

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: RE: Is thisThe Truth About Muhammad: Is IT THE ROAD TO SERFDOM
9/9/2010 10:18:00 AM
Hi Jim,
I already signed a few petitions against the Ground Zero mega mosque disaster over at Atlas Shrugs, Front Page and ACT!. Might be a few more too but these are the ones I remembered. We can now add Grass Roots nation to the list.
Shalom,
Peter

Quote:
Citizen Petition:
Say "NO" to the Ground Zero
'Victory' Mosque!

Petition Sponsor: Grassfire Nation
Total signers: 91,732


The Issue



The Islamic "victory"
mosque at Ground Zero

The proposed $100 million Islamic mosque to be built at the site of Ground Zero is sending shock waves across the nation. The planned Islamic center not only dishonors the memories of the 9-11 victims, but as Rush Limbaugh suggests, “[Muslims] are planting the flag of victory with this mosque."

Feisal Abdul Rauf — who is spearheading the effort — has known associations with radical Islamic causes and told “60 Minutes” reporters that “the United States policies were an accessory to the crime that happened” on 9-11.

Despite more than 70 percent of Americans opposing the mosque, both President Obama and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg support the project while House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has even called for an investigation into those opposing the mosque!

The Action
If you oppose the construction of a $100 million Islamic center in the vicinity of Ground Zero in New York City, please sign the petition below. Once 100,000 petitions are gathered, your petition will be delivered to mayor Bloomberg, New York Governor David Paterson as well as other key lawmakers.

The Petition States:

As a concerned American citizen, I oppose the planned construction of the Muslim “victory” mosque at the site of Ground Zero. The selection of the site for the planned Islamic center — where more than 3,000 citizens perished — is no coincidence and sends a strong signal to our enemies that they won. For the memories of those Americans who were murdered, those who remain, and those continuing to fight against our enemies, I urge you to use whatever influence you have to ensure this mosque is not placed on Ground Zero, or anywhere near this hallowed site.


Sign Here: http://www.grassfire.com/136/petition.asp?ref_id=500064

Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: RE: Is thisThe Truth About Muhammad: Is IT THE ROAD TO SERFDOM
9/9/2010 1:33:01 PM
I read this over on Resist Net and the first thought that came to my mind after reading this story is... " Sounds like our friends from the east and south of the border. But only in fish form." I couldn't help myself and knew this had to be shared.


The White House has tapped a former leader of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources and the
Indiana Wildlife Federation as the Asian carp czar to oversee the
federal response to keeping the invasive species out of the Great Lakes.

On a conference call today with Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin and other
congressional leaders, President Obama's Council on Environmental
Quality announced the selection of John Goss to lead the near $80
million, multi-pronged federal attack against Asian carp.


"This is a serious challenge, a serious threat," Durbin said. "When it comes to the Asian carp threat, we are not in denial. We are not in a
go-slow mode. We are in a full attack, full-speed ahead mode. We want to
stop this carp from advancing."

Asian carp, which have steadily moved toward Chicago since
the 1990s, present a challenge for scientists and fish biologists. The
fish are aggressive eaters, consuming as much as 40 percent of their
body weight a day in plankton, and frequently beat out native fish for
food, threatening those populations.

They are also prolific breeders with no natural predators in the U.S.
The fish were imported in the 1970s to help wastewater treatment
facilities in the South keep their retention ponds clean. Mississippi
River flooding allowed the fish to escape and then move into the
Missouri and Illinois rivers. Some species can grow to more than 100
pounds.

The challenge for Goss, who was director of the Indiana DNR under two
governors and served for four years as the executive director of the
Indiana National Wildlife Federation, will be to make sure millions in
federal money is spent efficiently, to oversee
several on-going studies -- including one looking into the possibility
of permanently shutting down the Chicago waterway system linking Lake
Michigan to the Mississippi River--and to bring together Great Lakes
states currently locked in a courtroom battle over the response to the
Asian carp threat.

"Certainly there are some legal questions that are in process, but there
has been a history already of good cooperation among the states," Goss
said. "I believe that will be one of my strengths, talking at the level
of the department of natural resources in each of the states so that we
can very carefully coordinate our efforts."

Today also marks the second day of what is expected to be a three-day
hearing in federal court in Chicago to deal with Asian carp. Michigan
and four other Great Lakes states are suing the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago to try
and force closure of two shipping locks in the Chicago waterway system
that could serve as a barrier to keep Asian carp from entering Lake
Michigan.

Testimony on Tuesday focused on the reliability of the environmental DNA
research that has been used to track the movement of Asian carp through
the Chicago Sanitary and Shipping Canal as they have inched closer to
Lake Michigan. The architect of the research, University of Notre Dame
scientist David Lodge, said the method is sound and that Asian carp pose
a "a very imminent risk of invasion." He added that such "invasions are
often irreversible."

Attorneys for the defense countered that the DNA research has never been
used in this manner and was unreliable. They argued that even
scientists disagree about the likelihood that Asian carp are capable of
sustaining a large and destructive population if allowed to enter the
Great Lakes.

--Joel Hood


http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2010/09/us-names-asian-carp-czar...

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!