Marxist whose political career was created by domestic terrorists and financed by Islam

The “Social Justice” of
the Marxist Messiah

 By Alex LaBrecque  Saturday, November 1, 2008

Just seven years after the 9/11 attacks, half the nation’s voters and myriads of registrants who do not exist will vote in the presidential election for a Marxist whose political career was created by domestic terrorists and financed by Islam. 

Days before the election, the stealth candidate boasts that his campaign is on the verge of “fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” In defiance of the US Constitution, the change he seeks to impose would forever change America from being the nation of liberty the Founders intended it to be.

Many will vote for Barack Hussein Obama because they identify with him racially or feel a need to assuage their white guilt.

Many will vote for him because they feel financially insecure or want other Americans to pay their way through life.

Many will vote for him because their empty souls are mesmerized by his messianic charade, projecting that he is a spiritually enlightened savior bringing hope and
change.

His chief financiers and inner circle will vote for him because they are committed enemies of the United States and oppose the individual liberty that Americans are guaranteed under the Constitution.

As Obama admitted in a 2001 radio interview, he regards the Constitution as deeply flawed because it does not allow redistribution of wealth—the centerpiece of his Marxist agenda for America.[1]That won’t stop him; he also refuses to prove that he is a natural-born citizen of the United States, and government officials have shown no inclination to enforce that constitutional requirement.

This summer he declared that “America’s greatest moral failure in my lifetime has been that we still don’t abide by that basic precept in Matthew that ‘whatever you do for the least of my brothers, you do for me,’” citing our nation’s sins of “poverty,” “racism and sexism.”[2]

According to Obama and his mentors Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright, the root cause of America’s evil is economic inequality. “Social justice” requires the remedy of redistribution of wealth, the transfer of taxpayers’ earnings to whomever their regime will determine has need.

As Karl Marx said, “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” Or as the Marxist messiah told Joe the Plumber: “It’s good to spread the wealth around.”

After inadvertently tipping his hand, Obama denies he is a socialist but affirms redistribution of others’ assets is a virtue. Meanwhile his minions on government computers have scrutinized Joe’s records for the purpose of discrediting him.

Joe the Plumber is every American citizen who dares to challenge the Leader. In Obama’s Marxist utopia, hard questions are disallowed.

To conceal his Muslim background and cloak his Marxist agenda, Obama fabricated the ruse that he is a Christian. In this ruse, one of Obama’s favorite biblical allusions is that “I am my brother’s keeper.”[3] Meanwhile, the millionaire messiah’s own half-brother George has been living in a shantytown hut in Kenya, subsisting on a dollar a month.[4] To his brother in need Obama has given nothing, but in recent years he donated over $20,000 to Wright’s hate-inciting Black Power cult.

Dreams From My Father is the 1995 memoir that the communist terrorist Ayers wrote for Obama to launch his protégé’s political career.[5] In that memoir, Obama’s Kenyan aunt Zeituni was prominently featured as a beloved family member. This week, The Times of London—not the domestic Obama-worshipping propaganda media—broke the news that for five years this aunt has been living in a slum in Boston, just miles where he gained prestige at Harvard Law School for his charm and racial identity. Like many of his supporters, she hopes that Obama’s presidency will change her life for the better.[6]

Obama’s heartless disregard for his own family members proves that he is an authoritarian Marxist, whose real concern is not others’ well-being but his pathological quest for power to control the lives of us all.

Under the guise of concern for the poor, Marxists invoke the name of Jesus as a champion of their cause. But Jesus never condemned economic inequality as a moral failure; both Jesus and the Jewish Bible, the Old Testament, recognized this disparity as a fact of life in the world that God created.

From a biblical perspective poverty can be caused by evil—from theft, swindling and the financial schemes of the ACORN crime organization in collusion with a corrupt Congress, or from government tyranny and seizure of assets, which are standard policies of Marxism. Poverty can also result from illness or be due to personal negligence. But there are valid and blameless reasons that some people have more than others, due to the reality of the world as God created it.

People are born into different circumstances, with different innate abilities and talents. Individuals apply themselves to their learning and their work with differing levels of personal initiative and responsibility. So in this world there will always be a spectrum between rich and poor. Jesus said “the poor you will always have with you,”[7] and he never proposed the Marxist remedy—involuntary redistribution, known as theft when committed by anyone but the state. The Tenth Commandment also constrains a sinful human impulse that Marxism exploits—coveting another person’s property.

The religion of Barack Hussein Obama is inherently alien to the Bible and the teaching of Jesus.

For Jesus, the problem of being rich is not that others have less but that it is easy to mistake wealth for life’s ultimate purpose, as an end in itself; that is why it is difficult for the rich to enter God’s kingdom. [8] Jesus taught that the greater one’s wealth, the greater one’s obligation to voluntarily use it for the good of others, remembering those in need.[9]

Jesus never advocated compulsory redistribution to offset economic disparity. When Christians voluntarily give from their personal assets to those in need, their generosity is service to the risen Christ. To the Messiah whom Christians serve, “America’s greatest moral failure” is not economic inequality.

Rather, Jesus reserved his strongest condemnation for those who harm innocent children, and he warned of punishment more horrific than drowning, for “it is not the will of your Father who is in heaven that one of these little ones perish.”[10]

Most vulnerable and dependent of all humans, the unborn and the newborn are easily regarded by many as of lesser value and a disposable inconvenience. Abortion and infanticide were acceptable and widespread in Roman society, and with Jewish precedent early Christians took Jesus’ judgment to heart in opposing those two practices.

The first-century Jewish historian Flavius Josephus extolled the respect of Judaism’s scriptures for innocent human life: “The Torah, moreover, enjoins us to bring up all our offspring, and forbids women to cause abortion of what is conceived,or to destroy it afterward; and if any woman appears to have so done, she will be a murderer of her child, by destroying a living creature, and diminishing humankind.”[11] In Psalm 139, the psalmist marvels that God knew him as a person even as he was developing in his mother’s womb.

The Didache, a first-century catechism of Christian morality, is explicit in its application of Jesus’ regard for children: “you shall not murder a child by abortion nor kill the infant already born.”[12] From the same period the Epistle of Barnabas adjoins this to the commandment to love: “You shall love your neighbor more than your own soul. You shall not murder a child by abortion, nor again shall you kill it when it is born.”[13]

But in homage to the narcissism of this age Obamessiah hallows as “reproductive justice”[14] an unfettered right to kill the unborn and the partially-born for personal convenience. Invoking his family values, this champion for abortion declares that he would not want his own daughters to be “punished with a baby” [15]—the birth of an unwanted child, for whom thousands of adoptive parents yearn for years.

Obama surpasses even Planned Parenthood and NARAL in trivializing the value of innocent human life. In a shocking justification of infanticide, Ayers’ and Wright’s state legislator insisted that babies who survive abortion and are born alive must not receive medical care lest they be acknowledged as persons, undermining the
decision to abort.

Three times he voted against Illinois’ Born-Alive Infants Protection Act—the third time, against virtually the same legislation approved 98-0 by the US Senate in 2001. He is fully committed to sign as president the Freedom of Choice Act, to rescind all federal and state restrictions on abortion. He pretends to regard this with all moral gravity, but when asked at the Saddleback Church forum to identify at what point a baby’s human rights begin, he replied flippantly that to answer this specifically is “above my pay grade.”[16]

He claims to follow the Golden Rule, but his own words condemn him: “America’s greatest moral failure--has been that we still don’t abide by that basic recept in Matthew that ‘whatever you do for the least of my brothers, you do for me.’” In the cult of the Marxist messiah, infants in and out of the womb are slain with Jesus on the altar of expediency.

The harm Obama’s “reproductive justice” will inflict on children extends beyond their survival of infancy. In accord with Planned Parenthood’s agenda he claims “it’s the right thing to do to provide age-appropriate sex education” to kindergartners.[17] The purpose of sex education, its proponents initially alleged, is to prevent teen pregnancy and transmission of STDs. How then is sex education “age-appropriate” for kindergartners? Don’t parents already teach their kids no one may touch their privates? Do kindergartners need knowledge of the reproductive process? No, this “age-appropriate sex education” includes STD prevention, and under that guise its purpose is to awaken the sexual curiosity of children prematurely and to exploit their innocent minds for early affirmation of the Left’s lifestyle choices. It’s really the advocacy of “gender” justice.

Likewise, Obama’s opposition to parents’ choosing of their children’s school is because he, like the terrorist Ayers who created his political career, regards education as an instrument of Marxist revolution. To that end Ayers first made him chair of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, and in turn Obama dispensed millions to their communist comrades under the guise of “education reform”—to indoctrinate with the “social justice” of Marxism the fertile minds of Chicago’s children.

Before his campaign restricted her opportunities to expose their agenda, Michelle Obama revealed that despite his denials he really supports gay marriage but the issue is too controversial to openly endorse before the election. “It’s like you gotta do the baby steps,” she told The New Yorker, explaining the community organizer’s ploy. “You don’t start with the hardest, toughest issues when you’re trying to unite a group.”[18] She told the DNC’s Gay and Lesbian Leadership Council that he will repeal the Defense of Marriage Act,[19] and she regards opposition to the gay agenda as morally equivalent to racial discrimination in Selma.[20] Hand in hand with gay marriage is the recruitive adoption of children into such a home.

What may account for his allegiance to this agenda? In his adolescence and teens Barry Obama was mentored by Frank Marshall Davis, a Stalinist agent of the Communist Party USA with an FBI dossier of 600 pages.[21] In his personal life a bisexual, a pedophile, and a lecher who roamed parks seeking sex with strangers, Davis later wrote that he “specialized in sex” during that time frame and previously boasted that his deviance acted out his communist rebellion.[22]

Davis was the mysterious “Frank” whose actual identity and importance was largely concealed in Obama’s memoir. Analysis of the Dreams memoir indicates the principal author was Ayers, the communist terrorist who created Obama’s political career. The memoir is secretive about key aspects of Obama’s life, concealing his activities and his communist and Islamic allies at Columbia, at Harvard and in Chicago.

Nonetheless the memoir does disclose that “Frank” initiated young Barry’s racial obsession and his resentment of whites, and manifests his retributive hatred of America. Despite living in the post-racial paradise of Hawaii and attending a prestigious prep school there, “I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of twelve or thirteen, when I began to suspect that I was ingratiating myself to whites.”[23] The memoir discloses that Frank and Barry’s grandfather had the lad write sexual limericks, that Frank warned him against women and that Frank gave the minor whiskey. Also disclosed is Barry’s discomfort in sensing a transactional arrangement between the two men—the same discomfort he felt at the age of 11 or 12 when Gramps routinely took him to a sleazy bar in the red-light district, adorned with pornographic images on the walls, where the grandfather sought others’ acceptance for being different.[24]

These deviant men had the opportunities to influence Obama’s formative years because his Marxist Kenyan father abandoned him in his infancy, and because for her career his Marxist white mother abandoned both his stepfather and Barry in his youth.

Obama is not responsible for the corrupting influences and damaging experiences to which he was subjected as a child. It is a tragedy, for which he as a private citizen would warrant our compassion. But he is responsible as an adult for seeking to impose those influences and experiences on America, for his determination to act out his narcissistic personality disorder against our nation.

In a 2007 speech reviewing the history and future of Communism in America, Gerald Horne, a contributing editor of the Communist Party journal Political Affairs, identified Frank Marshall Davis as the “Frank” hidden in Obama’s memoir. The speech’s occasion was a university’s reception of the Community Party USA’s archives for its library. Horne hailed Davis as ”a decisive influence in helping [Obama] to find his present identity as an African-American, a people who have been the least anti-communist and the most left-leaning of any constituency in this nation.” With optimism Horne envisioned a future day when Obama’s memoir will be assigned reading for students of Communism alongside Davis’ autobiography. [25]

Young Barry’s Stalinist mentor trained him well—politically, psychologically and culturally.

While Obama opposes applying Jesus’ ethics to the unborn and newborn, he claims the Sermon on the Mount is more definitive on gay marriage than the apostle Paul’s judgment of homosexual behavior in the Romans letter, alleging the latter is only “an obscure line.”[26] In reality the Sermon on the Mount upholds and raises the heterosexual bar of Judaism’s ethics,[27] and Paul likewise affirms without ambiguity the standard Jewish teaching against homosexual conduct.[28] Paul’s argument is that Roman society’s engagement in such practices manifests a rebellion against the world as God created it, against the Creator who designed male and female to be heterosexual as is evident from the procreative function of our bodies.

Just as Obama supports abortion and infanticide, so too he opposes legislative efforts by Christians and non-Christians to prevent the Left’s re-definition of marriage. His assault on the family seeks to impose a social novelty never adopted even by Greco-Roman paganism. Thus the lord Obama sanctifies in matrimony males sodomizing males and sanctions the killing of unwanted infants as non-personal tissue masses.

In their rebellion against reality as God made it, Marxists are seeking to impose their political, psychological and cultural pathology on America, with Barack Hussein Obama as the anointed Leader. While posturing as morally enlightened, Obamessiah is antichristian and a malignant narcissist to the core. Big Media’s elite are his adoring disciples, the god whom he worships is himself, and this false messiah’s kingdom is Americare-made an oppressive Marxist state.

The United States faces a far greater risk on November 4, 2008 than it did on September 11, 2001. On this election day, all Americans who value life and liberty have a moral duty to themselves and future generations to vote for John McCain and Sarah Palin, and against the Marxist messiah.

Footnotes:

[1]For a transcript of that interview, see http://obamahood.org/?page_id=37.

[2] “Transcript of Obama, McCain at Saddleback Civil Forum with Pastor Rick Warren” (August 16, 2008), Chicago Sun-Times, August 18, 2008.

[3] Ariel Sabar, “Barack Obama: Putting Faith Out Front,” The Christian Science Monitor, July 16, 2007.

[4] Nick Pisa, “Barack Obama’s ‘Lost’ Brother Found in Kenya,” The Telegraph (UK), August 21, 2008.

[5] Jack Cashill, “Who Wrote ‘Dreams From My Father’?” WorldNetDaily,October 29, 2008.

[6] “Found in a Rundown Boston Estate: Barack Obama’s Aunt Zeituni Onyango,” TheTimes , October 30, 2008.

[7] Matthew 26:6-13.

[8] Luke 12:13-34.

[9] Matthew 6:24-34; 19:23-30; 25:14-30.

[10] Matthew 18:1-14.

[11] Against Apion, Book 2, 25.

[12] Didache 2:2.

[13] Epistle of Barnabas 19:5.

[14] At the 35th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, Obama boasted: “Throughout my career, I’ve been a consistent and strong supporter of reproductive justice, and have consistently had a 100% pro-choice rating with Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America” ("Sen. Barack Obama’s Record on Choice,” NARAL Pro-Choice America).

[15] Speech at Johnston, Pennsylvania, March 31, 2008.

[16] Lynn Sweet, “Transcript of Obama, McCain at Saddleback Civil Forum with Pastor Rick Warren” (August 16, 2008), Chicago Sun-Times, August 18, 2008.

[17] “Sex Ed for Kindergarteners ‘Right Thing to Do,’ Says Obama,” ABC News Blog, July 18, 2007, italics supplied.

[18] Lauren Collins, “The Other Obama. Michelle Obama and the Politics of Candor,” The New Yorker, March 10, 2008.

[19] “Mrs. Obama Reaffirms Husband’s Support to Gay Community,” ABC News, June 27, 2008.

[20] Celeste Katz, “Michelle Obama’s The Belle of Gay Democrats Ball,” New York Daily News, June 26, 2008.

[21] Cliff Kincaid, ”Who Was Frank Marshall Davis?” Kincaid’s website USASurvival.org contains copies of the FBI dossier on Davis.

[22] Cliff Kincaid, “Obama’s Red Mentor Was a Pervert,” Family Security Matters, August 26, 2008.

[23] Dreams rom My Fathers. A Story of Race and Inheritance (New York: Three Rivers Press, 1995), p. xv.

[24] Ibid, pp. 76-77.

[25] Gerald Horne, “Rethinking the History and Future of the Communist Party,” Political Affairs, March 28, 2007, italics supplied.

[26] The Audacity of Hope. Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream (New York: Three Rivers Press, 2006), p. 222.

[27] Matthew 5:27-32.

[28] Romans 1:26-28.

(0) Reader Feedback | Click here to get Canada Free Press in your email

To reprint article, permission of the writer is required. Please email us at cfp@canadafreepress.com.


What's New On CFP:

1. Mighty Marxists from Little Acorns Grow!
2. Illegal Alien Fugitives Nailed in Pennylvania. Delaware and New Jersey
3. Obama’s Immigration Bill Helps Community Organizers but Not His Illegal Alien Aunt Zeituni
4. Metcalfe Authors Legislation Requiring Presidential Candidates to Prove United States Citizenship
5. McCain’s Honor
6. What Do The Democrats Have Against Women?
7. The “Social Justice” of
the Marxist Messiah
8. This Is What a Vote for Obama Gets You
9. My dear friends throughout the World, be you Christian or Jew.
10. A tribute to veterans I thought you would like
11. OBAMA’S TYRANNY OF SOCIALISM
12. Infants Born Alive During Abortions Left to Die: ‘It Does Happen’
13. Obama’s Contempt for the U.S. Constitution
14. Rashid Khalidi’s Appointment at Columbia University
15. Hillary Camp Assails Obama Anti-Palin Ad
16. Hooks and Pincers
17. No Jewels in Crowns
18. Uncork the Competition
19. Obama and the Potential Blackmail Factor
20. YOU could be Funding the Obama Campaign?
21. Limbaugh Predicts McCain Victory
22. Obama: Love him or…..he’ll throw you off the plane
23. America Is Better Than All That
24. And the survey says…
25. US Anti-Money Laundering Efforts Improving
26. Boots Alleged Conservative Reporters Off His Campaign Plane
27. Ads on Craigslist Include “Sex for Tickets” to Obama Rally!
28. Assigning blame for Fannie and Freddie
29. To socialism, moral downfall, exposure and danger to our enemies and economic ruin!
30. Tito the Builder slammed Barack Obama and especially the mainstream media on Hannity and Colmes.
31. Iran Has Potential WMD Capabilities, Reports Say
32. The Right to Health in Zimbabwe suffering a heavy blow
33. We Can Win The Election, It’s Up To You
34. Code Pink could be red alert that election’s not in the bag for Obama
35. Rashid Khalidi and Edward Said: Barack Obama’s Good Friends
36. Voting for the wealth creation America needs
37. Christian Anti-Defamation Commission Challenges Obama Christianity Claims
38. Ford Flexes its Marketing Muscles with New Crossover
39. Government, Business, Threatens Drivers’ Freedom
40. Big Media Pull Out All Stops to Elect Obama

I FOUND THIS " URGENT MESSAGE "  IN MY EMAIL THIS MORNING. IT STATED THAT THE SENDER WAS HELPED BY HIS MOTHER TO SEND THE MESSAGE, NOT COMPOSE IT.

READ...AND BRING YOUR CRYING TOWEL....

Hi:

mine name is freddy polan and I live with my mom and dad in newbrasca. I am 5. I am very scared about what I hear on my tv and radio about america and voting. how come people want to fight and be mean to each other and not play nice. I cry at night because i hear such bad stuff and the war and people hurting each other and not making the world a nice place to be when i grow up to be a older person. does everyone really want to kill each other and do bad things. i hope not because I don't have a dog if a bad person comes to hurt us. mom and dad told me and my little sister who is 3 that we should say a prayer for the world to be safer for me and my friends. i hope God still listens to me when I pray. I asks for a ipod last christmas and did not get one. my dad said santa only had as few to give away last year. maybe this christmas i am going to ask God for people to be nicer and not fight so much. my mom said that would be nice but not Gods job. it is up to people to play and be like a family. thank you about reading my leter. my mom and dad said all people in the USandA must vote for people that will make me feel safe at night. i hope my dad will get me and my sister a puppy soon. I promise to take care of it.

freddy polan

Note: this young person has cerebral palsy

 

Hello Joe,

I sincerely hope we can answer young Freddy's wish with this election.  Unfortunately it will not.  We have become a divided nation.  We seem to have a willingness to overlook our own core values to allow Obamanation to become a reality.

This election will decide if Freddy's wish is possible though.  It is our choices today that will decide young Freddy's fate.  I do not fear God.  I fear the Dogma and ideology of Obama as we all should, for the following reasons:

Obama’s Contempt for the U.S. Constitution

 By Joan Swirsky  Saturday, November 1, 2008

On February 10, 2007, Senator Barack Obama stood outside the Old State Capitol building in Illinois and announced his intention to run for the presidency.

“I recognize there is a certain presumptuousness, a certain audacity, to this announcement,” Obama said. “I know I haven’t spent a lot of time learning the ways of Washington. But I’ve been there long enough to know that the ways of Washington must change.”

Of course, that depends on what his definition of “been there long enough” is. Actually, after he took office in November 2004, he spent a total of 143 days “on the job” – the number of days the senate was in session – before beginning his campaign for President of the United States. So now we know that, to Obama, “been there long enough” means that four months and change is quite enough preparation to be not only president but also the Commander in Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces, chief executive of the federal government, and leader of the free world.

At least he got the “audacity” part right.

In responding to disparagement from his opponents about the three years he spent as a community organizer in Chicago, Obama explained – with startlingly unselfconscious narcissism – that it was a good preparation for the top job in the world because it helped in “understanding where I’m coming from, who I believe in, who I’m fighting for and why I’m in this race.”

“They haven’t talked about the fact that I was a civil rights lawyer;” Obama added. “They haven’t talked about the fact that I taught constitutional law…”

Okay, let’s talk about that, especially because it is on the basis of a Constitutional challenge that Obama was sued by lawyer Philip J. Berg. In short, Berg has insisted that Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen, was possibly born on foreign soil to an American mother and Kenyan father, may hold dual American-Indonesian citizenship, and therefore does meet the eligibility requirements that are spelled out in exquisite detail in the United States Constitution. He asked that Obama’s name be removed from the ballot.

Berg’s case was dismissed on October 24 by Judge Barclay Surrick, but he promptly took the case before Judge David Souter of the Supreme Court, whose disposition is anticipated before the election on Tuesday, November 4 If no judgment is rendered, Berg anticipates that if Obama is elected, a Constitutional crisis will ensue. At this point, numerous citizens throughout the country have petitioned their own courts to disqualify Obama.

“I TAUGHT CONSTITUTIONAL LAW”

Well, I ask, what part of the Constitution did Obama not “get”?

In the U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, it states: No person except a natural born citizen or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

Title 8 of the U.S. Code explains what “natural born citizen” means:

Anyone born inside the United States.

Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe.

Anyone born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.

Anyone born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national.

Anyone born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year.

Anyone found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21.

Anyone born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time).

A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
Anyone falling into these categories is considered natural-born, and is eligible to run for President or Vice President. These provisions allow the children of military families to be considered natural-born. For example, separate sections of the U.S. Code address territories that the United States has acquired over time, such as Puerto Rico, Alaska, Hawaii, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam. And the law contains one other section about the Panama Canal Zone and the nation of Panama. It states that anyone born in the Canal Zone or in Panama itself, on or after February 26, 1904, to a mother and/or father who is a United States citizen, was “declared” to be a United States citizen.

Because this section doesn’t carry the words “natural-born” or “citizen at birth,” this became an issue for Sen. John McCain when he ran for president in 2000. But that issue was resolved when it was found that McCain was considered a natural-born citizen under 8 USC 1401(c): “a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person.

If Obama meets the above criteria, then why has he still not produced a certifiably authentic birth certificate?

UNDISGUISED CONTEMPT

Selwyn Duke, in the American Thinker, writes, “Leftists…could attempt to change the Constitution so that it reflects their agenda, but this is a long, drawn-out, difficult process that requires, of all things, actual public support for your aims. And it’s easier to change the courts – and install `ideological’ justices who will impose left-wing orthodoxy from the bench – than the will of the subjects. Consider that liberals are ever trying to destroy tradition, as it stands in the way of progressivism. Consider that a consistent definition of liberalism – one that epitomizes the modern left (those progressives) – involves the desire to change the status quo. So what it means is that, by definition, a liberal who understands the Constitution cannot believe in it.”

Aha! So that is why Obama told an NPR radio interviewer in 2001 that the Warren Court did not “break free from the essential constraints” found in the Constitution and therefore one of the “tragedies” of the civil rights movement was that “the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth...”

Upon hearing a tape of the interview, Ed Morrissey of CaptainsQuarters"> ">http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/010421.php">CaptainsQuarters blog fame, “The government does not exist to determine the acceptable level of wealth of its individual citizens. For government to assume that role, it would have to end private property rights and assume all property belonged to the State. That is classic Marxism. Barack Obama complains that the Constitution is a `charter of negative liberties.’ That’s because the Constitution was intended as a limiting document, to curtail the power of the federal government vis-à-vis the states and the individual. Barack Obama wants to reverse that entirely. And that’s radical change you’d better believe in, or else.”

Rush Limbaugh also weighed in: “Barack Obama calls himself a `constitutional professor’ or a `constitutional scholar.’ In truth, Barack Obama was an anti-constitutionalist professor. He studied the Constitution and he flatly rejected it.  He doesn’t like the Constitution. He thinks it is flawed. Now I understand why he was so reluctant to wear the American flag lapel pin….he says that the Constitution `is a charter of negative liberties. This is nothing short of a condemnation of the Constitution, and he calls himself a professor. The greatest government, the freest society in the history of the world, and Professor Obama calls it a charter of negative liberties!  To me, ladies and gentlemen, the Constitution is a gift of God.  The Constitution is not a disappointment.  It’s a blessing.  What kind of person does not understand the purpose and meaning of a document written by the greatest defenders of liberty the world has ever known? Jefferson, Madison, Adams, Washington, Hamilton – they created a charter of negative liberties?”

In the same radio interview, Obama said: “I think we can say that, uh, uh, the Constitution reflected a enormous blind spot in this culture that carries on until this day and—and, uh,—and, uh, that the framers had that same blind spot.”

“This is how he views the Supreme Court,” Limbaugh railed. “And he will have the power to populate it with people who believe in those very things. How is he going to place his hand on the Bible and swear that he, Barack Hussein Obama, will uphold the Constitution that he feels reflects the nation’s fundamental flaw?”

It is now no wonder that Obama has refused to provide his birth certificate! He wants to circumvent the Constitution and, by so doing, “prove” that it’s a fundamentally flawed document, worthy of the efforts he and his radical far-left acolytes will lead to challenge every Amendment in the Bill of Rights, including: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to keep and bear arms, freedom of assembly, freedom to petition, and the prohibition against depriving any citizen of life, liberty, and property, et al.

THIS WAS THEIR FIRST STEP

In April of this year, a number of Obama’s congressional supporters – including Gov. Claire McCaskill (D-MOi), Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), and Sen. James Webb (D-VA) –proposed and passed a Resolution (S.Res.511) entitled: Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

Duh.

This was the Resolution:

· Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;

· Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

· Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;

· Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;

· Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

· Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and

· Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

· Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United Calendar No. 715110th CONGRESS2d SessionS. RES. 511RESOLUTION Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.April 24, 2008. Reported without amendment States.

Just how dumb do McCaskill and Obama & Co. think the American people are? Here they attempt to create a blanket Resolution that says ALL foreign-born candidates are eligible for the U.S. presidency, when in fact McCain did not need this Resolution and neither did Bill Richardson when he ran for president this year. In fact, to my knowledge no presidential nominee in American history has ever needed a Resolution of this kind until Obama – who has still not produced a valid birth certificate! – entered the race.

So why this weird Resolution? Clearly so Obama could circumvent the Constitution he finds so distasteful.

According to Raymond S. Kraft, an attorney and writer: “The president, The Supreme Court justices, and all members of Congress, have taken an oath to defend and protect the Constitution and have an affirmative duty to protect the Constitution by doing whatever is necessary to insure that presidential (and congressional) candidates meet the Constitutional requirements for the offices they seek. It is a mandatory duty, and failure to do so violate their oaths of office. If they don’t follow this oath in Obama’s case, it will be the biggest swindle in American history, allowing Obama and the DNC to have concealed his true identity and lack of citizenship, thereby conning Democrats out of hundreds of millions of dollars of campaign contributions. If justice is served, dozens of `leading’ Democrats should go to prison for fraud.”

(1) Reader Feedback | Click here to get Canada Free Press in your email

Joan Swirsky is an award winning author and journalist. Her work can be found at [url http://www.joanswirsky.com http://www.joanswirsky.com[/url]

Joan can be reached at JoanSharon@aol.com

Joan Swirsky most recent columns

To reprint article, permission of the writer is required. Please email us atcfp@canadafreepress.com.

What's New On CFP:

1. Mighty Marxists from Little Acorns Grow!
2. Illegal Alien Fugitives Nailed in Pennylvania. Delaware and New Jersey
3. Obama’s Immigration Bill Helps Community Organizers but Not His Illegal Alien Aunt Zeituni
4. Metcalfe Authors Legislation Requiring Presidential Candidates to Prove United States Citizenship
5. McCain’s Honor
6. What Do The Democrats Have Against Women?
7. The “Social Justice” of
the Marxist Messiah
8. This Is What a Vote for Obama Gets You
9. My dear friends throughout the World, be you Christian or Jew.
10. A tribute to veterans I thought you would like
11. OBAMA’S TYRANNY OF SOCIALISM
12. Infants Born Alive During Abortions Left to Die: ‘It Does Happen’
13. Obama’s Contempt for the U.S. Constitution
14. Rashid Khalidi’s Appointment at Columbia University
15. Hillary Camp Assails Obama Anti-Palin Ad
16. Hooks and Pincers
17. No Jewels in Crowns
18. Uncork the Competition
19. Obama and the Potential Blackmail Factor
20. YOU could be Funding the Obama Campaign?
21. Limbaugh Predicts McCain Victory
22. Obama: Love him or…..he’ll throw you off the plane
23. America Is Better Than All That
24. And the survey says…
25. US Anti-Money Laundering Efforts Improving
26. Boots Alleged Conservative Reporters Off His Campaign Plane
27. Ads on Craigslist Include “Sex for Tickets” to Obama Rally!
28. Assigning blame for Fannie and Freddie
29. To socialism, moral downfall, exposure and danger to our enemies and economic ruin!
30. Tito the Builder slammed Barack Obama and especially the mainstream media on Hannity and Colmes.
31. Iran Has Potential WMD Capabilities, Reports Say
32. The Right to Health in Zimbabwe suffering a heavy blow
33. We Can Win The Election, It’s Up To You
34. Code Pink could be red alert that election’s not in the bag for Obama
35. Rashid Khalidi and Edward Said: Barack Obama’s Good Friends
36. Voting for the wealth creation America needs
37. Christian Anti-Defamation Commission Challenges Obama Christianity Claims
38. Ford Flexes its Marketing Muscles with New Crossover
39. Government, Business, Threatens Drivers’ Freedom
40. Big Media Pull Out All Stops to Elect Obama

 

HOW LONG DO WE HAVE?

I have always heard about this democracy countdown. It is interesting to see it in print. God help us, not that we deserve it.

About the time our original thirteen states adopted their new constitution in 1787, Al exander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh , had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years earlier:

"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government."

"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury."

"From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship."

"The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years"

"During those 200 years, those nations always progressed through the following sequence:

1. from bondage to spiritual faith;

2. from spiritual faith to great courage;

3. from courage to liberty;

4. from liberty to abundance;

5. from abundance to complacency;

6. from complacency to apathy;

7. from apathy to dependence;

8. from dependence back into bondage"

Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul , Minnesota , points out some interesting facts concerning the 2000 Presidential election:

Number of States won by: Democrats: 19 Republicans: 29 Square miles of land won by: Democrats: 580,000 Republicans: 2,427,000

Population of counties won by: Democrats: 127 million Republicans: 143 million

Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by: Democrats: 13.2 Republicans: 2.1

Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of this great country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..." Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegal's and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.

If you are in favor of this, then by all means, delete this message. If you are not, then pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.

WE LIVE IN THE LAND OF THE FREE, ONLY BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE

AND NOW....AFTER ALL HAS BEEN SAID AND DONE.... HERE IS YOUR....

3 MINUTES OF COMIC RELIEFE :)

http://www.peteyandpetunia.com/VoteHere/VoteHere.htm