98-The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama | View Thread

Networks Hype 'Interesting' Moment With Liberal 'Heckler'; Obama Handled It 'Well'

By Scott Whitlock | November 26, 2013 | 12:46

All three networks on Tuesday hyped an "interesting" exchange between Barack Obama and a liberal heckler. ABC, CBS and ABC declined, however, to specifically note that the man's concern was that the President simply wasn't liberal enough on the issue of immigration reform. On NBC's Today, Natalie Morales praised, "You know, I think that the President handled it well by engaging." [See video below. MP3 audio here.]

Co-host Willie Geist defended the President's insistence that he needs Congress to pass legislation. Geist sympathetically noted, "The President's argument was 'I can't wave the magic wand and make this go away.' But he did do that for some of the younger dreamers." The younger dreamers? Quite the loaded term.

Morales put the blame on the disastrous launch of the health care law, lamenting that with "so much focus on that, immigration has sort of been forgotten."

Al Roker agreed: "A lot of things have been put on the back burner, unfortunately.

It was only on the previous evening's Nightly News that Brian Williams revealed, "The White House confirmed [the hecklers] were invited guests, part of an advocacy group at the event. "

The name of the group is ASPIRE, Asian Students Promoting Immigrant Rights Through Education.

A press release by the organization demands the President be even more activist and liberal in his actions.

On ABC's superficial Good Morning America, Josh Elliott played the same video and described Obama as "forced to confront a heckler demanding that the President stop deportations."

On CBS This Morning, Norah O'Donnell touted Ju Hong as simply "challenging the President's deportation policy." The co-host played a long clip of Obama responding and simply deemed, "An interesting moment there – and the President is calling on House Republicans to act on immigration reform by the end of this year."

Imagine if a right-wing heckler yelled at John Boehner for not being conservative enough. The reaction would likely be to portray this as another example of an extreme base.

A transcript of the November 26 Today segment is below:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

9:02

WILLIE GEIST: Yesterday, the President of the United States was making a speech in San Francisco. He was confronted by a heckler. San Francisco, usually friendly territory for the Democratic president. Had an audience he thought of as supporters as he talked about it was an immigration speech.

NATALIE MORALES: It was an immigration speech. That's right.

GEIST: There was a man in the audience who had an outburst, was angry over the number of deportations since President Obama has taken office. Take a look at the exchange.

BARACK OBAMA: And most importantly we will live – Most importantly, we will live up – most importantly, we will live up to our character as a nation.

JU HONG: Our families are separated. I need your help. There are thousands of immigrants.

OBAMA: That's – Let me finish. No, no, no. He can stay there. The easy way out is to try to yell and pretend like I can do something by violating our laws. And what I'm proposing is the harder path which is to use our democratic processes to achieve the same goal that you want to achieve but it won't be as easy as just shouting. It requires us lobbying and getting it done.

GEIST: So the man was a 24-year-old immigrant from South Korea. He was a graduate of Cal Berkeley. He was there. You know, they vet these crowds pretty well typically. This was kind of a rally.

MORALES: He was right behind the president.

GEIST: And he was right behind the President and said he was speaking for a lot of people that had been detained and couldn't speak up. He thought he was taking up their cause.

MORALES: You know, I think that the President handled it well by engaging and saying let me answer his questions and his concerns. I mean, this is the way sometimes you have to handle it. "Let me take it head on and make the comments I need to make," but at the same time address the issue at large here which is, in this case, immigration, which with ObamaCare and so much focus on that, immigration has sort of been forgotten.

ROKER: A lot of things have been put on the back burner unfortunately.

GEIST: The President's argument was "I can't wave the magic wand and make this go away." But he did do that for some of the younger dreamers. So, there's a whole dialogue within there.

By M. Northrop Buechner

Since President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law, he has changed it five times. Most notably, he suspended the employer mandate last summer. This is widely known, but almost no one seems to have grasped its significance.

The Constitution authorizes the President to propose and veto legislation. It does not authorize him to change existing laws. The changes Mr. Obama ordered in Obamacare, therefore, are unconstitutional. This means that he does not accept some of the limitations that the Constitution places on his actions. We cannot know at this point what limitations, if any, he does accept.

By changing the law based solely on his wish, Mr. Obama acted on the principle that the President can rewrite laws and—since this is a principle—not just this law, but any law. After the crash of Obamacare, many Congressmen have implored the President to change the individual mandate the same way he had changed the employer mandate, that is, to violate the Constitution again.

The main responsibility the Constitution assigns to the President is to faithfully execute the Laws. If the President rejects this job, if instead he decides he can change or ignore laws he does not like, then what?

The time will come when Congress passes a law and the President ignores it. Or he may choose to enforce some parts and ignore others (as Mr. Obama is doing now). Or he may not wait for Congress and issue a decree (something Mr. Obama has done and has threatened to do again).

Mr. Obama has not been shy about pointing out his path. He has repeatedly made clear that he intends to act on his own authority. “I have the power and I will use it in defense of the middle class,” he has said. “We’re going to do everything we can, wherever we can, with or without Congress.” There are a number of names for the system Mr. Obama envisions, but representative government is not one of them.

If the President can ignore the laws passed by Congress, of what use is Congress? The President can do whatever he chooses. Congress can stand by and observe. Perhaps they might applaud or jeer. But in terms of political power, Congress will be irrelevant. Probably, it will become a kind of rubber-stamp or debating society. There are many such faux congresses in tyrannies throughout history and around the globe.

Mr. Obama has equal contempt for the Supreme Court. In an act of overbearing hubris, he excoriated Supreme Court Justices sitting helplessly before him during the 2010 State of the Union address—Justices who had not expected to be denounced and who were prevented by the occasion from defending themselves. Mr. Obama condemned them for restoring freedom of speech to corporations and unions.

Ignoring two centuries of practice, President Obama made four recess appointments in January 2012, when the Senate was not in recess. Three courts have found that his appointments were unconstitutional, and the Supreme Court has agreed to take up the case. If the Supreme Court finds against him, what will Mr. Obama do?

We can get a hint by looking at how other parts of his Administration have dealt with Court decisions they did not like.

The Attorney General’s Office is the branch of government charged with enforcing federal laws. After the Supreme Court struck down the key provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Attorney General Holder announced that he would use other provisions of the act to get around the Court’s decision.

The Supreme Court has defined the standard for sexual harassment as “severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive” behavior to a “reasonable person.” In open defiance of that ruling, the Obama Department of Education has declared a new definition of sexual harassment for colleges, that is, “any unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature,” including “verbal conduct,” even if it is not objectively offensive—thus reinforcing the reign of terror over sex on college campuses. If a young man’s request for a date turns out to be unwelcome, he is guilty of sexual harassment by definition.

The lack of respect for the Supreme Court by the Obama administration is manifest. They feel bound by the Court’s decisions only if they agree with them. If they disagree, it is deuces wild; they will embrace any fiction that nullifies the Court’s decision.

The direction in which Mr. Obama is taking us would make possible the following scenario. A Republican Congress is elected and repeals Obamacare over a Democratic President’s veto. The President refuses to enforce the repeal. The Supreme Court rules that the President’s refusal is unconstitutional. The President denounces that ruling and refuses to be bound by it.

If the President persists in rejecting all authority other than his own, the denouement would depend on the side taken by the Armed Forces. Whatever side that was, our national self-esteem would be unlikely to recover from the blow of finding that we are living in a banana republic.

The shocking fact is that our whole system of representative government depends on it being led by an individual who believes in it; who thinks it is valuable; who believes that a government dedicated to the protection of individual rights is a noble ideal. What if he does not?

Mr. Obama is moving our government away from its traditional system of checks and balances and toward the one-man-rule that dominates third world countries. He has said that he wants a faircountry—implying that, as it stands, the United States is not a fair country—an unprecedented calumny committed against a country by its own leader.

What country does he think is more fair than the United States? He has three long years left in which to turn us into a fair country. Where does he intend to take us?

Mr. Obama got his conception of a fair country from his teachers. A fair country is anunfree country because it is regimented to prevent anyone from rising too high. Their ideal is egalitarianism, the notion that no one should be any better, higher, or richer than anyone else. Combined with a dollop of totalitarianism, egalitarianism has replaced communism as the dominant ideal in our most prestigious universities. Mr. Obama and his colleagues are the product of those universities, and they have their marching orders.

The most important point is that Mr. Obama does not consider himself bound by the Constitution. He could not have made that more clear. He has drawn a line in the concrete and we cannot ignore it.

Those who currently hold political office, and who want to keep our system of government, need to act now. Surely, rejection of the Constitution is grounds for impeachment and charges should be filed. In addition, there are many other actions that Congressmen can and should take—actions that will tell Mr. Obama that we have seen where he is going and we will not let our country go without a fight.

At the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Benjamin Franklin was asked what form of government had been created. “A republic,” he replied, “if you can keep it.”

We are losing it. If Mr. Obama’s reach for unprecedented power is not stopped, that will be the end. Everyone who values his life and liberty should find some way to say “No!” “Not now!” “Not yet!” “Not ever!”

M. Northrup Buechner is Associate Professor of Economics at St. John’s University, New York.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/11/19/obamas-disdain-for-the-constitution-means-we-risk-losing-our-republic/

Obama’s Knockout Game Against America

One of the latest fads young people are involved with is called the Knockout Game. A group or a single person is walking down the street of some city and sees an unsuspecting person coming their way. They punch them in the face, and the victim usually falls to the sidewalk unconscious. It is dangerous because the victim isn’t expecting the punch and could land on something that could break their neck. A few of the punchers have been arrested. Often, they don’t think it is a big deal.

But President Obama has been doing his version of the Knockout Game for years. An unsuspecting America elects him and is made to think he will save it. Then he begins lowering the boom on the citizens, and America is still reeling. He said he would make creating jobs his number one priority. WHAM. He makes baling out his supporters and Wall Street his number one priority. He claims he wants students to receive the best education possible. WHAM. He shuts down the Washington, DC voucher program that allows parents in the District of Columbia to receive vouchers so they can send their kids to better schools. Maybe he feared poor students would be better than his two daughters.

He did his version of the WPA, which put so many Americans to work during the Great Depression. We are experiencing a similar economic downturn which he may have been partly responsible for since he backed the legislation that crashed our economy when he was in the Senate. But after spending hundreds of billions of dollars to create good permanent jobs, WHAM, we find out there aren’t nearly as many good permanent jobs (and some of the money hasn’t been spent yet.) Also, much of the money was never intended to be used for job creation. Money is invested in companies that go bankrupt, and unions are paid off.

Obama pushes for national health care like Progressives had been supporting for around a century. He says he wants the millions who don’t have health insurance to be covered by what is now called Obamacare. He promised we could keep our doctors and health care insurance policies if we liked them. WHAM. He lied. He said before he was elected that he wanted a single-payer national health care system, and it looks like he may get his way. He said people would save money. But he didn’t tell people that the cost savings might come at the expense of their lives. Doctors are quitting because they know the government doesn’t want to pay them in full. Hospitals are turning down Medicare and Medicaid patients because the government won’t pay all the expenses. Over $700 billion was transferred from Medicare to Obamacare. It was bad enough when Clinton took 10% of retirees’ Social Security checks in taxes in 1993, which has continued for 20 years. But with Medicare about to expire, transferring desperately needed funds into Obamacare is an enormous WHAM.

The latest WHAM comes from the Senate that decided to do away with the filibuster threat. Obama likes the idea of his nominees to the federal benches not being delayed by the Republicans filibustering his choices. The left-leaning DC federal court will now be able to go WHAM whenever it feels like it once the three recently chosen nominees become a part of the court. Will people in the district be able to exercise their Second Amendment right and carry a gun for protection? WHAM. Only the police and military will.

There may come a time in the future when protesters of the government will be arrested and, WHAM, put away for life. A preacher says something the government considers defamatory; and, WHAM, the preacher is locked up for years–and the doors of his church are padlocked. Our government trusts what the Iranians say; and, WHAM, they develop nuclear weapons in secret and receive missiles from North Korea, China, or Russia and can, WHAM, launch an attack on Israel. At least the Israeli missile defense system I will attempt to improve, if given the chance, will destroy the missiles over Syria or Jordan. But millions may die if the warheads are detonated.

When I hear Democrats say Obama doesn’t lie, I want to go, WHAM, wake up in the real world and not the Obamanation. When I hear Democrats say Obama is the greatest President, I again want to go, WHAM. We’ve lost millions of jobs that may never come back, and the real unemployment number is probably over 14%. And if it weren’t for the Fed buying bonds to prop up the stock market, WHAM, we’d have a depression.

When high unemployment causes Social Security to go belly up sooner than expected, our foreign investors decide America is too big a risk and want to redeem their bonds, our friends in the Middle East become our enemies (and our enemies take advantage of our loss of respect in the world), and over $100 trillion in unfunded mandates send our economy crashing, WHAM, this nation will be worst than a Third World Country. At least they can be bailed out. Not America. When a nation has been warned of troubles ahead like this country has been for decades, don’t be surprised if the final WHAM is the sound of the coffin lid on a nation that has expired.

By Fred DeRuvo

Freedomout Post-

Barack Obama, the great Divider-in-Chief, has been doing whatever he can to convince people that his way is the best way, even though the facts provide an opposite picture. Aside from his usual rhetoric, he is now, once again, emphasizing race relations as a reason to ensure that his agenda becomes the law of the land.

In a recent speech (if he isn’t pontificating, he’s vacationing), he essentially said that if Congress doesn’t get in gear and apply his prescriptions to America’s economy, things will get worse. “If we don’t do anything, then growth will be slower than it should be. Unemployment will not go down as fast as it should. Income inequality will continue to rise…Racial tensions won’t get better; they may get worse, because people will feel as if they’ve got to compete with some other group to get scraps from a shrinking pot. If the economy is growing, everybody feels invested.” (emphasis added)

Basically, in spite of the undeniable fact that Obama’s programs (like Obamacare) are destroying America’s economy, he has the gall to say that if Congress doesn’t do what he wants done, then not only will unemployment continue to rise, but race relations will worsen.

Yet, he and other Democrats are totally behind immigration “reform” that will do nothing but hurt those people already having a tough time getting or keeping jobs because of the economy that Obama has done nothing to help. The sad fact is that people hear his speeches and applaud them, fully believing what he says. There is a huge disconnect between Obama’s reality and the actual reality that is affecting millions of Americans daily. People need to start reading into the plans behind the North American Union. Search it out to find out more.

Mr. Obama’s plan appears to be decimating America’s economy. If that’s the case, then he’s doing a perfectly wonderful job.He just took a vacation to Africa that cost taxpayers over $100 million. He’s planning another one to Martha’s Vineyard that will cost millions more. How many vacations does this man need? Meanwhile, we’ve got sequestration that is affecting millions of people and the economy is killing businesses left and right and many jobs with it. People are suffering. Not him. Not his family. He treats himself like a king on the taxpayer’s dime and punishes the average citizen when Congress doesn’t comply with his demands.

The most troubling part of what Obama says though is how the worsening of our economy may affect race relations negatively. He is simply planting seeds of discontent. He is giving minorities a reason to go on the warpath if Obama doesn’t get what he wants. He is, in a very real way, telling minorities to take note of what happens and if his agenda is not rolled out, then they should take their frustrations out on whites. That is the implication and this is not what a president – who is supposed to represent all people – do. This type of rhetoric is despicable, yet this is what Obama does. Many blacks have asked things like, “what do you mean, Obama has made race relations worse? He’s telling it like it is!” and that is what they firmly believe.

I know plenty of white people who are working two to three jobs just to try to make ends meet. Some have no job at all and have been out of work too long. Where is the help for them? What about all of the things Obama has asked for and received from Congress and yet it’s clear that we are not one step closer to a better economy. In fact, our economy continues to worsen on a weekly, if not daily, basis.

Obamacare, if it doesn’t cave in on itself, is going to be the most costly program that our government ever created. We already know that the promises about paying less for insurance and being able to keep your own doctor are promises that will not come to pass. In some states, insurance premiums have risen or are slated to rise by up to %140. How is this creating better situations for the average American?

In the end, the truth is that Obama may be fighting a losing battle and knows it. He may realize that he stands a good chance of watching the Democrats lose seats in 2014. If so, he will not get what he wants. It won’t stop him though because he will likely continue to do whatever he wants to do and it appears as though no one in Congress knows how or is willing to take the necessary steps to stop him. It’s all talk, hearings, and more talk. He’s a rogue president. He does what the global elite tells him to do. They are his master(s) and he is their willing slave.

He doesn’t work for the American people. We only pay him and pay for his many vacations. He works for the global elite. He routinely sends millions and billions of American taxpayer dollars overseas for “projects” all the while, Americans here at home receive little to nothing. How is it that this administration can ignore Congress and continue to send that type of money overseas while Americans at home are without work and being hemmed in on every side? Meanwhile, Obama says that things may get worse.

Yes, things will get worse because he has no interest in doing anything that will help America’s economy. He seems hell bent on destroying it, while blaming others.

Tighten your seat belts folks, because the ride ahead appears to be very bumpy. Take stock of yourself and your family. Obama certainly isn’t and neither is Congress. Trouble is coming, encouraged by the man in the Oval Office.

http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/uncategorized/obama-divider-chief-warns-race-relations-may-worsen-doesnt-get-wants/

Jim 5804 11253 Holiday	RE: The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama 11/30/2013 2:49:06 PM
	A good memory of our friend... Quote: Jim, I am too brief, and just can now do copy and paste. One of next days I will translate. Or, if his time permit him, ask my dearest Joe Downing to translate you, he became and expert for my native :) ... But trust me, even though my English is not to be too much praising, your patience would be paid if you wait for my translation. HERE, OBAMA IS PRAISED AS THE MOST TALENTED WRITER AMONG POLITICIANS EVER! i DIDN`T HAVE TIME TO READ WHOLE ARTRICLE, BUT I`LL BET HE WASN`T TRANSLATED JUST ON BEHALF OF HIS WRITNG TALENTS. B.Obama "The Courageous of Hope" ~click~ Kritičari su Baraka Obamu proglasili najboljim književnikom koji je ikada ušao u svet savremene politike. „Smelost nade” je jedna od najprodavanijih knjiga u SAD, i u osnovi spada u mešovite književne vrste – autobiografija kroz koju je prikazan politički program za novu Ameriku. Memoari po pravilu označavaju kraj karijere, a „Smelost nade” obeležava jedan veliki politički početak. Naslov knjige, kao i „Da, mi možemo” i „Promena u koju verujemo” slogani su koji kao eho prate novu zvezdu na političkom nebu Amerike i sveta. Obama je za samo četiri godine prošao put od kandidata za senatora države Ilinois do najpopularnije političke ličnosti na planeti. On se čitaocima obraća lako razumljivim jezikom, na jedan duhovit način, mirnim tonom koji je istovremeno pun žara. Političar je koji se vešto bavi temama od nacionalnog i globalnog značaja, ali izdvaja ga sposobnost da se uhvati ukoštac sa problemima jednog prosečnog Amerikanca i njegove porodice. Kada se bavi svakodnevnim temama kao što su zaštita prava radnika, zdravstvena zaštita, zaštita prava manjina, problemi vaspitanja dece, sloboda seksualnog opredeljenja, sloboda veroispovesti, imate osećaj kao da neposredno razgovara sa vama, izbegavajući frazeologiju i uopštenost tipičnu za politički govor. Ova knjiga se može preporučiti i studentima pravnih i političkih nauka, svima koji na ozbiljan način proučavaju međunarodne odnose, političarima, ali i onima koji vole da čitaju briljantne političke autobiografije. Kada sam pre osam meseci obavestio prijatelje i poznanike da nakon „Memoara” Dejvida Rokfelera nameravam da objavim knjigu Baraka Obame, najčešći komentar bio je: „Skromne su šanse da jedan Afroamerikanac postane predsednik Amerike”. Kao i tada, tako i danas verujem u pobedu senatora Obame, ali njegov eventualni izbor za predsednika SAD nije razlog zbog kojeg objavljujemo ovu knjigu na srpskom jeziku. Prateći njegovu kampanju uglavnom na Si-En-Enu i čitajući „Smelost nade” postalo mi je jasno da se na zapadnoj strani sveta posle dužeg vremena pojavio harizmatičan lider koji sa sobom nosi optimizam, veru u ljudsku čestitost i razvoj. U predgovoru srpskog izdanja kongresmen iz Ilinoisa Melisa Bin piše: „Vizija budućnosti senatora Obame je vizija preobraženja. Kao Amerikanka srpskog porekla ponosna sam što će je podeliti sa narodom Srbije u izdanju ’Smelosti nade’ na ćirilici. Nadam se da će knjiga biti ohrabrujuća za vas, kao što je bila za mene.” Predgovor za srpsko izdanje napisao je i Dan Šomon, prijatelj i politički direktor Obamine kampanje za senatora Ilinoisa u Kongresu SAD: „Kao neko ko je proveo stotine sati sam sa Obamom u vožnji Ilinoisom, mogu reći da je on jedinstven čovek, koji veruje u Boga, porodicu i ljude uopšte”. Barak Obama je sin jedinac afričkog imigranta i belkinje sa Srednjeg zapada. Kao pripadnik srednjeg staleža upisao se na Harvard i diplomirao pravo 1991. godine. Bio je prvi Afroamerikanac koji je postao urednik časopisa „Harvardska revija prava”. Pre nego što je postao mlađi senator Sjedinjenih Američkih Država iz Ilinoisa, bio je advokat građanskog prava i profesor pravnih nauka. Vrtoglavi uspon njegove političke karijere počinje govorom koji je održao na Nacionalnoj konvenciji Demokratske partije u Bostonu 2004. godine. Čitavih 17 minuta, bez prekida i gotovo u jednom dahu, govorio je o svojoj viziji nove, pravednije, moralnije i odgovornije Amerike. Taj govor ga je učinio poznatim izvan granica SAD, i počela je jedna neverovatna politička karijera. Američki i svetski analitičari još tada su mu predviđali budućnost prvog crnog predsednika SAD. Čak je i bračni par Klinton verovao u to predviđanje, ali tek nakon što Hilari Klinton ostvari ambiciju da postane prva žena predsednik. Svi političari u izbornim kampanjama govore o promenama, ali Obami veruju kada ih najavljuje, upravo zbog snažnog ličnog pečata, snažne lične dimenzije u nastupu i iskrene, duboke vere u ono što govori. Barak Obama svoju politiku zasniva na povratku zaboravljenim moralnim vrednostima, na zdravom razumu, uspostavljanju dijaloga i prevazilaženju barijera. Njegovi govori, gotovo propovedi, opisuju Ameriku onakvom kakva bi ona trebalo da bude, zemlja bez rasizma i straha, zemlja koju ne vode lideri koji su za to predodređeni svojim poreklom, zemlja u kojoj se poštuju moralna načela i principi, zemlja slobode i jednakih šansi za sve. Tajna njegove harizme je u tome što objedinjuje Ameriku, bogatu i siromašnu, belu i obojenu. Za jedne novi Kenedi, za druge novi Martin Luter King, Barak Obama ih u suštini spaja, jer njegova misija je prevazilaženje podela koje opterećuju ne samo Ameriku već i savremeni svet. Od 52 američke države jedna ima specifičnu vezu sa Srbijom. To je država Ilinois u kojoj je guverner Amerikanac srpskog porekla Rod Blagojević, predstavnik u Kongresu Amerikanka srpskog porekla Melisa Bin, a najveći grad Čikago u kome živi oko 600.000 Srba. Senator te države u Kongresu SAD je upravo Barak Obama. Ova veza Baraka Obame i Srbije ne sme biti razlog za sindrom preteranih očekivanja u našoj javnosti, ali je ipak dovoljan početni kapital za bolje dane u srpsko-američkim odnosima nakon priželjkivane pobede mladog senatora iz Ilinoisa. Goran Perčević (Generalni direktor „Interkomerca” i HUGS, Branka
	May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you, Jim Allen III Skype: JAllen3D Everything You Need For Online Success
	+0

Jim 5804 11253 Holiday	Re: The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama 11/30/2013 2:53:36 PM
	11/19/2013 @ 8:00AM 67,879 views Obama's Disdain For The Constitution Means We Risk Losing Our Republic Comment Now Follow Comments By M. Northrop Buechner Since President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law, he has changed it five times. Most notably, he suspended the employer mandate last summer. This is widely known, but almost no one seems to have grasped its significance. The Constitution authorizes the President to propose and veto legislation. It does not authorize him to change existing laws. The changes Mr. Obama ordered in Obamacare, therefore, are unconstitutional. This means that he does not accept some of the limitations that the Constitution places on his actions. We cannot know at this point what limitations, if any, he does accept. By changing the law based solely on his wish, Mr. Obama acted on the principle that the President can rewrite laws and—since this is a principle—not just this law, but any law. After the crash of Obamacare, many Congressmen have implored the President to change the individual mandate the same way he had changed the employer mandate, that is, to violate the Constitution again. The main responsibility the Constitution assigns to the President is to faithfully execute the Laws. If the President rejects this job, if instead he decides he can change or ignore laws he does not like, then what? The time will come when Congress passes a law and the President ignores it. Or he may choose to enforce some parts and ignore others (as Mr. Obama is doing now). Or he may not wait for Congress and issue a decree (something Mr. Obama has done and has threatened to do again). Mr. Obama has not been shy about pointing out his path. He has repeatedly made clear that he intends to act on his own authority. “I have the power and I will use it in defense of the middle class,” he has said. “We’re going to do everything we can, wherever we can, with or without Congress.” There are a number of names for the system Mr. Obama envisions, but representative government is not one of them. If the President can ignore the laws passed by Congress, of what use is Congress? The President can do whatever he chooses. Congress can stand by and observe. Perhaps they might applaud or jeer. But in terms of political power, Congress will be irrelevant. Probably, it will become a kind of rubber-stamp or debating society. There are many such faux congresses in tyrannies throughout history and around the globe. Mr. Obama has equal contempt for the Supreme Court. In an act of overbearing hubris, he excoriated Supreme Court Justices sitting helplessly before him during the 2010 State of the Union address—Justices who had not expected to be denounced and who were prevented by the occasion from defending themselves. Mr. Obama condemned them for restoring freedom of speech to corporations and unions. Ignoring two centuries of practice, President Obama made four recess appointments in January 2012, when the Senate was not in recess. Three courts have found that his appointments were unconstitutional, and the Supreme Court has agreed to take up the case. If the Supreme Court finds against him, what will Mr. Obama do? We can get a hint by looking at how other parts of his Administration have dealt with Court decisions they did not like. The Attorney General’s Office is the branch of government charged with enforcing federal laws. After the Supreme Court struck down the key provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Attorney General Holder announced that he would use other provisions of the act to get around the Court’s decision. The Supreme Court has defined the standard for sexual harassment as “severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive” behavior to a “reasonable person.” In open defiance of that ruling, the Obama Department of Education has declared a new definition of sexual harassment for colleges, that is, “any unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature,” including “verbal conduct,” even if it is not objectively offensive—thus reinforcing the reign of terror over sex on college campuses. If a young man’s request for a date turns out to be unwelcome, he is guilty of sexual harassment by definition. The lack of respect for the Supreme Court by the Obama administration is manifest. They feel bound by the Court’s decisions only if they agree with them. If they disagree, it is deuces wild; they will embrace any fiction that nullifies the Court’s decision. The direction in which Mr. Obama is taking us would make possible the following scenario. A Republican Congress is elected and repeals Obamacare over a Democratic President’s veto. The President refuses to enforce the repeal. The Supreme Court rules that the President’s refusal is unconstitutional. The President denounces that ruling and refuses to be bound by it. If the President persists in rejecting all authority other than his own, the denouement would depend on the side taken by the Armed Forces. Whatever side that was, our national self-esteem would be unlikely to recover from the blow of finding that we are living in a banana republic. The shocking fact is that our whole system of representative government depends on it being led by an individual who believes in it; who thinks it is valuable; who believes that a government dedicated to the protection of individual rights is a noble ideal. What if he does not? Mr. Obama is moving our government away from its traditional system of checks and balances and toward the one-man-rule that dominates third world countries. He has said that he wants a faircountry—implying that, as it stands, the United States is not a fair country—an unprecedented calumny committed against a country by its own leader. What country does he think is more fair than the United States? He has three long years left in which to turn us into a fair country. Where does he intend to take us? Mr. Obama got his conception of a fair country from his teachers. A fair country is anunfree country because it is regimented to prevent anyone from rising too high. Their ideal is egalitarianism, the notion that no one should be any better, higher, or richer than anyone else. Combined with a dollop of totalitarianism, egalitarianism has replaced communism as the dominant ideal in our most prestigious universities. Mr. Obama and his colleagues are the product of those universities, and they have their marching orders. The most important point is that Mr. Obama does not consider himself bound by the Constitution. He could not have made that more clear. He has drawn a line in the concrete and we cannot ignore it. Those who currently hold political office, and who want to keep our system of government, need to act now. Surely, rejection of the Constitution is grounds for impeachment and charges should be filed. In addition, there are many other actions that Congressmen can and should take—actions that will tell Mr. Obama that we have seen where he is going and we will not let our country go without a fight. At the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, Benjamin Franklin was asked what form of government had been created. “A republic,” he replied, “if you can keep it.” We are losing it. If Mr. Obama’s reach for unprecedented power is not stopped, that will be the end. Everyone who values his life and liberty should find some way to say “No!” “Not now!” “Not yet!” “Not ever!” M. Northrup Buechner is Associate Professor of Economics at St. John’s University, New York. http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/11/19/obamas-disdain-for-the-constitution-means-we-risk-losing-our-republic/
	May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you, Jim Allen III Skype: JAllen3D Everything You Need For Online Success
	+0

Jim 5804 11253 Holiday	RE: Is white bread more racist than whole whttp://community.adlandpro.com/aheat? 11/30/2013 4:31:28 PM
	Obama’s Knockout Game Against America NOVEMBER 29, 2013 BY RICK BADMAN 3 COMMENTS Email7 Share2.4K 10 Share2.5K Tweet77 One of the latest fads young people are involved with is called the Knockout Game. A group or a single person is walking down the street of some city and sees an unsuspecting person coming their way. They punch them in the face, and the victim usually falls to the sidewalk unconscious. It is dangerous because the victim isn’t expecting the punch and could land on something that could break their neck. A few of the punchers have been arrested. Often, they don’t think it is a big deal. But President Obama has been doing his version of the Knockout Game for years. An unsuspecting America elects him and is made to think he will save it. Then he begins lowering the boom on the citizens, and America is still reeling. He said he would make creating jobs his number one priority. WHAM. He makes baling out his supporters and Wall Street his number one priority. He claims he wants students to receive the best education possible. WHAM. He shuts down the Washington, DC voucher program that allows parents in the District of Columbia to receive vouchers so they can send their kids to better schools. Maybe he feared poor students would be better than his two daughters. He did his version of the WPA, which put so many Americans to work during the Great Depression. We are experiencing a similar economic downturn which he may have been partly responsible for since he backed the legislation that crashed our economy when he was in the Senate. But after spending hundreds of billions of dollars to create good permanent jobs, WHAM, we find out there aren’t nearly as many good permanent jobs (and some of the money hasn’t been spent yet.) Also, much of the money was never intended to be used for job creation. Money is invested in companies that go bankrupt, and unions are paid off. Obama pushes for national health care like Progressives had been supporting for around a century. He says he wants the millions who don’t have health insurance to be covered by what is now called Obamacare. He promised we could keep our doctors and health care insurance policies if we liked them. WHAM. He lied. He said before he was elected that he wanted a single-payer national health care system, and it looks like he may get his way. He said people would save money. But he didn’t tell people that the cost savings might come at the expense of their lives. Doctors are quitting because they know the government doesn’t want to pay them in full. Hospitals are turning down Medicare and Medicaid patients because the government won’t pay all the expenses. Over $700 billion was transferred from Medicare to Obamacare. It was bad enough when Clinton took 10% of retirees’ Social Security checks in taxes in 1993, which has continued for 20 years. But with Medicare about to expire, transferring desperately needed funds into Obamacare is an enormous WHAM. The latest WHAM comes from the Senate that decided to do away with the filibuster threat. Obama likes the idea of his nominees to the federal benches not being delayed by the Republicans filibustering his choices. The left-leaning DC federal court will now be able to go WHAM whenever it feels like it once the three recently chosen nominees become a part of the court. Will people in the district be able to exercise their Second Amendment right and carry a gun for protection? WHAM. Only the police and military will. There may come a time in the future when protesters of the government will be arrested and, WHAM, put away for life. A preacher says something the government considers defamatory; and, WHAM, the preacher is locked up for years–and the doors of his church are padlocked. Our government trusts what the Iranians say; and, WHAM, they develop nuclear weapons in secret and receive missiles from North Korea, China, or Russia and can, WHAM, launch an attack on Israel. At least the Israeli missile defense system I will attempt to improve, if given the chance, will destroy the missiles over Syria or Jordan. But millions may die if the warheads are detonated. When I hear Democrats say Obama doesn’t lie, I want to go, WHAM, wake up in the real world and not the Obamanation. When I hear Democrats say Obama is the greatest President, I again want to go, WHAM. We’ve lost millions of jobs that may never come back, and the real unemployment number is probably over 14%. And if it weren’t for the Fed buying bonds to prop up the stock market, WHAM, we’d have a depression. When high unemployment causes Social Security to go belly up sooner than expected, our foreign investors decide America is too big a risk and want to redeem their bonds, our friends in the Middle East become our enemies (and our enemies take advantage of our loss of respect in the world), and over $100 trillion in unfunded mandates send our economy crashing, WHAM, this nation will be worst than a Third World Country. At least they can be bailed out. Not America. When a nation has been warned of troubles ahead like this country has been for decades, don’t be surprised if the final WHAM is the sound of the coffin lid on a nation that has expired. Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamas-knockout-game-america/#17ABik8rQG21O7G4.99
	May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you, Jim Allen III Skype: JAllen3D Everything You Need For Online Success
	+0

Jim 5804 11253 Holiday	RE: Is white bread more racist than whole wheat? 12/2/2013 10:30:30 PM
	Obama – Divider-in-Chief – Warns Race Relations May Worsen if He Doesn’t Get What He Wants Posted on Sunday, December 1st, 2013 at 3:09 am. by: Benjamin Franklin By Fred DeRuvo Freedomout Post- Barack Obama, the great Divider-in-Chief, has been doing whatever he can to convince people that his way is the best way, even though the facts provide an opposite picture. Aside from his usual rhetoric, he is now, once again, emphasizing race relations as a reason to ensure that his agenda becomes the law of the land. In a recent speech (if he isn’t pontificating, he’s vacationing), he essentially said that if Congress doesn’t get in gear and apply his prescriptions to America’s economy, things will get worse. “If we don’t do anything, then growth will be slower than it should be. Unemployment will not go down as fast as it should. Income inequality will continue to rise…Racial tensions won’t get better; they may get worse, because people will feel as if they’ve got to compete with some other group to get scraps from a shrinking pot. If the economy is growing, everybody feels invested.” (emphasis added) Basically, in spite of the undeniable fact that Obama’s programs (like Obamacare) are destroying America’s economy, he has the gall to say that if Congress doesn’t do what he wants done, then not only will unemployment continue to rise, but race relations will worsen. Yet, he and other Democrats are totally behind immigration “reform” that will do nothing but hurt those people already having a tough time getting or keeping jobs because of the economy that Obama has done nothing to help. The sad fact is that people hear his speeches and applaud them, fully believing what he says. There is a huge disconnect between Obama’s reality and the actual reality that is affecting millions of Americans daily. People need to start reading into the plans behind the North American Union. Search it out to find out more. Mr. Obama’s plan appears to be decimating America’s economy. If that’s the case, then he’s doing a perfectly wonderful job.He just took a vacation to Africa that cost taxpayers over $100 million. He’s planning another one to Martha’s Vineyard that will cost millions more. How many vacations does this man need? Meanwhile, we’ve got sequestration that is affecting millions of people and the economy is killing businesses left and right and many jobs with it. People are suffering. Not him. Not his family. He treats himself like a king on the taxpayer’s dime and punishes the average citizen when Congress doesn’t comply with his demands. The most troubling part of what Obama says though is how the worsening of our economy may affect race relations negatively. He is simply planting seeds of discontent. He is giving minorities a reason to go on the warpath if Obama doesn’t get what he wants. He is, in a very real way, telling minorities to take note of what happens and if his agenda is not rolled out, then they should take their frustrations out on whites. That is the implication and this is not what a president – who is supposed to represent all people – do. This type of rhetoric is despicable, yet this is what Obama does. Many blacks have asked things like, “what do you mean, Obama has made race relations worse? He’s telling it like it is!” and that is what they firmly believe. I know plenty of white people who are working two to three jobs just to try to make ends meet. Some have no job at all and have been out of work too long. Where is the help for them? What about all of the things Obama has asked for and received from Congress and yet it’s clear that we are not one step closer to a better economy. In fact, our economy continues to worsen on a weekly, if not daily, basis. Obamacare, if it doesn’t cave in on itself, is going to be the most costly program that our government ever created. We already know that the promises about paying less for insurance and being able to keep your own doctor are promises that will not come to pass. In some states, insurance premiums have risen or are slated to rise by up to %140. How is this creating better situations for the average American? In the end, the truth is that Obama may be fighting a losing battle and knows it. He may realize that he stands a good chance of watching the Democrats lose seats in 2014. If so, he will not get what he wants. It won’t stop him though because he will likely continue to do whatever he wants to do and it appears as though no one in Congress knows how or is willing to take the necessary steps to stop him. It’s all talk, hearings, and more talk. He’s a rogue president. He does what the global elite tells him to do. They are his master(s) and he is their willing slave. He doesn’t work for the American people. We only pay him and pay for his many vacations. He works for the global elite. He routinely sends millions and billions of American taxpayer dollars overseas for “projects” all the while, Americans here at home receive little to nothing. How is it that this administration can ignore Congress and continue to send that type of money overseas while Americans at home are without work and being hemmed in on every side? Meanwhile, Obama says that things may get worse. Yes, things will get worse because he has no interest in doing anything that will help America’s economy. He seems hell bent on destroying it, while blaming others. Tighten your seat belts folks, because the ride ahead appears to be very bumpy. Take stock of yourself and your family. Obama certainly isn’t and neither is Congress. Trouble is coming, encouraged by the man in the Oval Office. Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/barack-obama-the-divider-in-chief-says-race-relations-may-worsen-if-he-doesnt-get-what-he-wants/#1TpUYq9H5s42JhDV.99 http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/uncategorized/obama-divider-chief-warns-race-relations-may-worsen-doesnt-get-wants/
	May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you, Jim Allen III Skype: JAllen3D Everything You Need For Online Success
	+0

Menu

Forums

Networks Hype 'Interesting' Moment With Liberal 'Heckler'; Obama Handled It 'Well'

About the Author

11/19/2013 @ 8:00AM 67,879 views

Obama's Disdain For The Constitution Means We Risk Losing Our Republic

Obama’s Knockout Game Against America

Obama – Divider-in-Chief – Warns Race Relations May Worsen if He Doesn’t Get What He Wants

Like us on Facebook!