Hi Peter!
Thank you for posting information about new law suit against Barack Hussein Obama. Before the primary election, I have seen numerous articles about whether or not Obama is a U.S. citizen. It will be very interesting to know how the truth will unfold.
Since we are talking about Barack Hussein Obama's qualifications to be the president of the United States of America, I would like to share with you an important detail of Obama's voting records. The following excerpt is from an article that was written on August 25, 2008, by Matt Barber who is Director of Cultural Affairs with Liberty Counsel and Associate Dean with Liberty University School of Law:
Last year the U.S. Supreme Court upheld in Gonzales v. Carhart the federal ban on the barbaric practice of partial-birth abortion.
Congress overwhelmingly passed the ban in 2003. Even some of the most
liberal members of Congress experienced unexplained fits of common
sense, voting for the ban in the face of angry demands from
mouth-foaming feminists.
Although the American Medical Association has determined that
partial-birth abortion is never necessary under any circumstances,
Obama threw a hissy, nonetheless, after the opinion came down. While
deriding the Court for its ruling, he whined, "For the first time in
Gonzales versus Carhart, the Supreme Court upheld a federal ban on
abortions with criminal penalties for doctors."
So what, exactly, did the ban ban? What "hard-won right" -- as he
later called partial-birth abortion -- was Obama so steadfast to
preserve?
During a partial-birth abortion, the abortionist pulls a fully
developed, fully "viable" child -- often kicking and thrashing -- feet
first from her mother's womb, leaving only the top of her head in the
birth canal. He then stabs her through the skull with scissors or some
other sharp object, piercing her brain until her kicking and moving
about suddenly and violently jerk to a halt. Her brains are then sucked
out -- collapsing her skull -- and her now limp and lifeless body is
tossed aside like so much garbage.
Again, medical science has determined that this horrific practice,
which is nothing short of infanticide, is never necessary. But Barack
Hussein Obama -- the man who would be President -- doesn't see it that
way. He called the partial-birth abortion ban, "a concerted effort to
roll back the hard-won rights of American women."
But it gets worse! Mr. Barber continued:
Although Obama's love affair with partial-birth abortion has served
to chip away at his finely polished veneer, his opposition to the Born
Alive Infants Protection Act (BAIPA) has revealed to the world that
backward extremism permeates his marrow.
BAIPA very simply requires that when a baby survives an attempted
abortion -- when she is "born alive" -- further attempts to kill her
must immediately cease, and steps must be taken to ensure her health
and well-being.
Makes sense, right?
Not to Barack Obama. While serving in the Illinois state senate, he
led the fight against a state version of Born Alive that was
substantively identical to the federal BAIPA. In 2002, BAIPA passed the
U.S. Senate with unanimous, bipartisan support; yet, Obama vehemently
opposed its Illinois twin. This places him on the furthest fringe of
pro-abortion extremes. The man's devotion to the pro-abortion industry
is so fixed that he would rather allow the murder of newborn babies
than give an inch to the sanctity of human life.
Link to complete article: http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/guest/2008/jmb_08251.shtml
Personally, this makes me sick to my stomach!
For those American voters who are contemplating to vote for Senator Barack
Hussein Obama, I would like to ask one question: Why do you want someone who advocates for infanticide -- even the willful murder of a child who is living outside of the womb -- to be president of the United States of America?
Thank you, Peter, for allowing me to post my opinion. Until next time --
Have an Awesome Weekend!
JoAnne Green
Principal / International Risk Management Advisor
Integrity
Experience
Dependability