Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Promote
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/20/2019 11:51:29 PM

The Price of “Freedom”? US Drone Massacres Dozens of Afghan Farmers as They Slept
September 19, 2019

Jalalabad, Afghanistan — Imagine for a moment that you had just finished a long day’s work with two hundred other farmers. You were settling down to relax for the night, when out of nowhere, Hellfire missiles rain down from drones in the sky and blow up dozens of your coworkers, maiming and tearing limbs from dozens more. Imagine if this happened inside the United States. Imagine the reaction from politicians and the US war machine looking to right this wrong.

Would you, as an American citizen sit idly back and accept the excuse given by the country who carried out that attack? Would you accept the wholesale slaughter of your fellow citizens by the dozen if the country who led the attack said it was a mistake and we did it to “help” you? What if it was one of your children killed in the attack? Or your brother, sister, father, mother, or grand parent? Would you simply accept that this slaughter was a mistake and the “help” you are receiving from this country is worth it?

Well, that is exactly what the United States is asking Afghanistan to do right now after a drone strike Wednesday night slaughtered 30 innocent civilian farmers as they rested from a long day’s work picking pine nuts. The attack also left 40 others maimed and mangled.

“The workers had lit a bonfire and were sitting together when a drone targeted them,” tribal elder Malik Rahat Gul told Reuters by telephone from Wazir Tangi.

According to Reuters, a survivor of the drone strike said about 200 laborers were sleeping in five tents pitched near the farm when the attack happened.

“Some of us managed to escape, some were injured but many were killed,” said Juma Gul, a resident of northeastern Kunar province who had traveled along with laborers to harvest and shell pine nuts this week.

Naturally, the US is responding to the situation with a canned response and refusing to accept responsibility.

“U.S. forces conducted a drone strike against Da’esh (IS) terrorists in Nangarhar,” said Colonel Sonny Leggett, a spokesman for U.S. forces in Afghanistan. “We are aware of allegations of the death of non-combatants and are working with local officials to determine the facts.”

Residents of the Nangarhar province spoke publicly Thursday and demanded the U.S. take responsibility for this murder.

“Such mistakes cannot be justified. American forces must realize (they) will never win the war by killing innocent civilians,” said Javed Mansur, a resident of Jalalabad city.

Indeed.

This slaughter comes on the heels of a rather disturbing report released by the United Nations in April detailing how in the first part of 2019, US forces and their allies killed more civilians than the Taliban and other terrorist groups.

According to the most recent UN data, Afghan civilians were killed in greater numbers by NATO and pro-government security forces in the first three months of 2019 than by armed militants. Half of those slaughtered by allied troops were women and children.

In spite of countless drone bombs raining down from the skies, Hellfire and Tomahawk missiles flattening buildings, and mass graves filled with collateral damage, the US has absolutely nothing to show for it except physically and psychologically damaged veterans and a massive trillion dollar debt.

The Congressional Research Service, for example, concluded in 2015 that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have cost U.S. taxpayers $1.6 trillion. However, according to a report from TIME magazine last year, that number is a gross underestimate.

As TFTP previously
reported, according to an analysis from the “Costs of War Project” from Brown University’s Watson Institute, by the end of 2018, the U.S. War on Terror cost America taxpayers more than $5.6 trillion, which is an average of $23,386 per taxpayer.

As of late September 2017, the United States wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Syria and the additional spending on Homeland Security, and the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs since the 9/11 attacks totaled more than $4.3 trillion in current dollars through FY2017. Adding likely costs for FY2018 and estimated future spending on veterans, the costs of war total more than $5.6 trillion.

As The Nation
noted, that estimate does not include several factors such as “the psychic costs to the Americans mangled in one way or another in those never-ending conflicts. They don’t include the costs to this country’s infrastructure, which has been crumbling while taxpayer dollars flow copiously and in a remarkably—in these years, almost uniquely—bipartisan fashion into what’s still laughably called ‘national security.’”

After 18 years, there is no sign that the War on Terror is ending anytime soon, but surely the United States is finally close to defeating Al Qaeda—right?

Unfortunately, the opposite is true. A
report from the Los Angeles Times noted that in 2018, “Al Qaeda may be stronger than ever,” and instead of destroying the group, “U.S. policies in the Mideast appear to have encouraged its spread.”

While Al Qaeda may have started out as a small terrorist group, it has now grown into a massive network that is flourishing in Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, Syria, and Libya—all countries where the U.S. has actively carried out bombing campaigns in recent years. Coincidence? Not at all.

Ask yourself this question, how many future terrorists did the United States create yesterday? Do you think that the children of those slain by a decade of bombing and constant threats of drone strikes will simply forget about the atrocities inflicted upon them? Do you think that the parents who watched their babies blown apart by predator drones, or the hospital workers who watched as US bombs rained down from the sky — will just turn the other cheek?

In reality, the US War on Terror has had the opposite effect on “fighting terrorists.” It is creating them. For the last 18 years, the US has actually been planting a garden in which a million Osama Bin Ladens would grow.

The truth is that since 9/11, the US and their NATO allies have fostered a breeding ground for extremist and fundamentalist groups. As Americans have sat back and said nothing over the last two decades, the military industrial complex was sowing the seeds for perpetual war, which left unchecked will inevitably lead to the demise of the American empire or total human annihilation—whichever comes first.

_________________________________________________________________

Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the
Free Thought Project, where this article first appeared. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Minds.



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/21/2019 2:45:22 AM

Terrifying video shows entire European cities wiped out in US-Russia nuclear war horror

US-Russia war: 34 million would be killed within 5 hours, according to the simulation (Image: Princeton University)

HORRIFYING footage shows the locations that would initially be targeted in a nuclear war between the United States and Russia, with 34million people being killed in less than five hours.

By KATIE WESTON

Princeton University researchers released the bleak video simulation, which lays bare how a nuclear war between Russia and the US would unfold. Towards the start of the video, titled Plan A, Russia sends 3000 nuclear warcraft to NATO bases across Europe. The simulation then shows London and surrounding areas targeted, with the whole European continent being wiped out in just three hours, with an estimate 2.6million killed or injured.

London is depicted as being carpet-bombed, and Europe is devastated, at which point NATO launches a further 600 warheads from US soil and via nuclear submarines aimed at Russian nuclear forces, with Russia responding with a salvo of its own.

There are a further 3.4 million casualties in just 45 minutes.

Both sides then launch further strikes on major population centres, with another 85.3 million people killed and wounded in the course of 45 minutes.

By the end of the exchanges, there are a total of 91.5 million casualties, including 34.1 million deaths.

In the four-minute video from Princeton University’s Program on Science and Global Security, it is explained: “What follows is a depiction of how a conflict between Russia and the United States could escape from conventional war to all-out nuclear war. The simulation is based on real force postures, targets and fatality estimates.


US-Russia war: London is carpet-bombed towards the start of the simulation (Image: Princeton University)

“The simulation behind in the context of a conventional conflict. In hopes of halting a US-NATO advance, Russia launches a nuclear warning shot from a base near the city of Kalingrad. NATO retaliates with a single tactical nuclear air strike.

“As the nuclear threshold is crossed, fighting escalates to a tactical nuclear war in Europe. Russia sends 3000 nuclear warheads via aircraft and short-range missiles to hit NATO bases and advancing troops. NATO responds with approximately 180 nuclear warheads via aircraft.”

For the counterplea, it describes: “With Europe destroyed, NATO launches a strategic nuclear strike of 600 warheads from US land and submarine-based missiles aimed at Russian nuclear forces.

“Before losing its weapon systems, Russia launches on warning, responding with missiles launched from silos, road-mobile vehicles and submarines.

“The counter value plan: With the aim of inhibiting the other side’s recovery, Russia and NATO each target the other’s 30 most populated cities and economic centres, using 5-10 warheads on each city depending on population size.

US-Russia war: London is carpet-bombed towards the start of the simulation (Image: Princeton University)

“The simulation behind in the context of a conventional conflict. In hopes of halting a US-NATO advance, Russia launches a nuclear warning shot from a base near the city of Kalingrad. NATO retaliates with a single tactical nuclear air strike.

“As the nuclear threshold is crossed, fighting escalates to a tactical nuclear war in Europe. Russia sends 3000 nuclear warheads via aircraft and short-range missiles to hit NATO bases and advancing troops. NATO responds with approximately 180 nuclear warheads via aircraft.”

For the counterplea, it describes: “With Europe destroyed, NATO launches a strategic nuclear strike of 600 warheads from US land and submarine-based missiles aimed at Russian nuclear forces.

“Before losing its weapon systems, Russia launches on warning, responding with missiles launched from silos, road-mobile vehicles and submarines.

“The counter value plan: With the aim of inhibiting the other side’s recovery, Russia and NATO each target the other’s 30 most populated cities and economic centres, using 5-10 warheads on each city depending on population size.

Both sides then launch further strikes on major population centres, with another 85.3 million people killed and wounded in the course of 45 minutes.

By the end of the exchanges, there are a total of 91.5 million casualties, including 34.1 million deaths.

In the four-minute video from Princeton University’s Program on Science and Global Security, it is explained: “What follows is a depiction of how a conflict between Russia and the United States could escape from conventional war to all-out nuclear war. The simulation is based on real force postures, targets and fatality estimates.


US-Russia war: London is carpet-bombed towards the start of the simulation (Image: Princeton University)

“The simulation behind in the context of a conventional conflict. In hopes of halting a US-NATO advance, Russia launches a nuclear warning shot from a base near the city of Kalingrad. NATO retaliates with a single tactical nuclear air strike.

“As the nuclear threshold is crossed, fighting escalates to a tactical nuclear war in Europe. Russia sends 3000 nuclear warheads via aircraft and short-range missiles to hit NATO bases and advancing troops. NATO responds with approximately 180 nuclear warheads via aircraft.”

For the counterplea, it describes: “With Europe destroyed, NATO launches a strategic nuclear strike of 600 warheads from US land and submarine-based missiles aimed at Russian nuclear forces.

“Before losing its weapon systems, Russia launches on warning, responding with missiles launched from silos, road-mobile vehicles and submarines.

“The counter value plan: With the aim of inhibiting the other side’s recovery, Russia and NATO each target the other’s 30 most populated cities and economic centres, using 5-10 warheads on each city depending on population size.

US-Russia war: NATO launches a strategic nuclear strike of 600 warheads from US land (Image: Princeton University)

“Number of immediate casualties, including fatalities (34.1million) and injuries (57.4million), resulting from the series of nuclear exchanges. Deaths from nuclear fallout and other long-term effects would significantly increase this estimate.”

A blog post carried on Princeton’s website said: “This project is motivated by the need to highlight the potentially catastrophic consequences of current US and Russian nuclear war plans.

“The risk of nuclear war has increased dramatically in the past two years as the United States and Russia have abandoned long-standing nuclear arms control treaties, started to develop new kinds of nuclear weapons and expanded the circumstances in which they might use nuclear weapons.

US-Russia war: by the end of the simulation, there are a total of 34.1million deaths (Image: Princeton University)


“This four-minute audio-visual piece is based on independent assessments of current US and Russian force postures, nuclear war plans, and nuclear weapons targets.

“It uses extensive data sets of the nuclear weapons currently deployed, weapon yields, and possible targets for particular weapons, as well as the order of battle estimating which weapons go to which targets in which order in which phase of the war to show the evolution of the nuclear conflict from tactical, to strategic to city-targeting phases.”

Kaliningrad is located in the Kalingrad Oblast, a Russia enclave on the Baltic Sea sandwiched between Poland and Lithuania.

In 2016, after years of threats, Vladimir Putin ordered nuclear-capable Iskander missiles with a range of 440 miles to be deployed in the region, putting Berlin comfortably in range.

Then-Polish Defence Minister Antoni Macierewicz described the move, likely a response to the deployment of US-controlled missile defence systems in his own country, as “very alarming”.

Russia has a total of 6,850 nuclear weapons at its disposal, while the US has 6,550. The UK has 215.


Watch video



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
11/25/2019 5:43:44 PM
PUBLISHED: 7:04 PM 19 NOV 2019

Fanatical Vegan Couple Charged After Toddler Starves To Death

The other children of the couple were also severely malnourished, and there were signs indicating problems for at least a week before the death.

Georgette by

Can a person truly be this delusional?


Apparently, some people are so fanatical in their beliefs that the welfare of others is ignored, even if those others are their own children.

One couple in Cape Coral, Florida have been charged after their toddler died from starvation because he was only fed raw vegetables and fruit.

Even the most basic public school system is supposed to teach the food pyramid, and the fact that protein is essential, but apparently, these vegans decided that it wasn’t for their kids. In fact, two other children were also extremely malnourished.

News Press reported:

The toddler who died Sept. 27 in the care of his parents, Ryan and Sheila O’Leary, weighed 17 pounds, police reports indicate. His diet was supplemented with breast milk.

An average weight for an 18-month-old boy is 24 pounds, 1 ounce. The toddler weighed as much as an average 7-month-old, according to www.babycenter.com.

The autopsy findings determined that his death was caused by complications of malnutrition, including dehydration, microsteatosis of liver and slight edema (swelling) of hands, feet and lower legs, according to a Cape Coral probable cause statement.

Sheila O’Leary called 911 when she noticed her son was not breathing and was cold. Ryan O’Leary tried to resuscitate the child, but he was pronounced dead when Lee County Emergency Medics arrived at their Cape Coral home.

When a detective met with the O’Learys, they were standing near their minivan, which had three other children inside.

Two of those children are Ryan and Sheila O’Leary’s biological children and were described as extremely small for their ages, 3 and 5, and were pale and yellowish in color, the statement says.

They both weighed under the third percentile for their ages, and one of those children also had blackened teeth indicating dental decay, which required surgery.

The third child in the minivan appeared to be the healthiest of the children, and is Sheila O’Leary’s daughter with a different father who lives in Virginia.

According to the parental custody, the older child visits the biological father in Virginia every two months for a few weeks, which is likely explains her healthier appearance, police said in the statement.

In 2009, she was placed with the biological father in Virginia because she “failed to thrive” in Sheila O’Leary’s care.

According to jail records, the parents appear close to a normal range for their heights and weights. Sheila O’Leary is 5 feet tall weighed 90 pounds at her booking; Ryan O’Leary is 6 feet and weighs 160 pounds.

According to medical websites, the average weight for a woman Sheila O’Leary’s height is 97 to 123 pounds. For Ryan O’Leary, it is 140 to 183.

When police spoke with Sheila O’Leary, she said that her 18-month-old hadn’t eaten in a week and was only being breast fed. She said she thought it was because he was teething.

At 4 a.m., the boy was nursed for about a minute and then he began to have shallow breathing. Shelia O’Leary told police that he had never done that before and she should have called someone because she was worried, the statement says.

Instead, the pair fell asleep.

Police asked about the boy’s medical history and Shelia O’Leary said he was born at home and he had never seen a doctor. Ryan O’Leary told police that was the family’s preference.

She also said the family is vegan and only eats fruit and vegetables. The children only eat raw foods, which mainly consisted of mangoes, rambutans, bananas and avocados.

Sheila O’Leary said that she home-schools the children, but police determined they were not actively enrolled in a home-school program, according to the probable cause statement.

She also told police that the boy’s feet had been swollen off and on for a few weeks and he was not walking as much as he used to.

Ryan said he works two jobs so Sheila can care for the children.

The O’Learys turned themselves in to Cape Coral Police shortly after the boy’s cause of death was determined on Nov. 6.

The pair were arrested for negligent manslaughter, neglect of a child with great bodily harm and neglect of a child without great bodily harm. They both had bond set for $250,000.



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
11/27/2019 7:11:06 PM

Officials baffled from ‘hovering’ object that prompted lockdown in DC

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
1/3/2020 7:12:42 PM
JANUARY 2, 2020 / 5:42 PM / UPDATED 8 HOURS AGO
Iran promises to avenge U.S. killing of top Iranian commander Soleimani

Ahmed Rasheed, Ahmed Aboulenein


Iran promised harsh revenge after a U.S. air strike in Baghdad on Friday killed Qassem Soleimani, commander of Iran’s elite Quds force and architect of its growing military influence in the Middle East.

Soleimani was a general who was regarded as the second most powerful figure in Iran after Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

The overnight attack, authorized by President Donald Trump, marked a dramatic escalation in a “shadow war” in the Middle East between Iran and the United States and its allies, principally Israel and Saudi Arabia.

Top Iraqi militia commander Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, an adviser to Soleimani, was also killed in the attack.

Iran has been locked in a long conflict with the United States that escalated sharply last week with an attack on the U.S. embassy in Iraq by pro-Iranian militiamen following a U.S. air raid on the Kataib Hezbollah militia, founded by Muhandis.

The Pentagon said the “U.S. military has taken decisive defensive action to protect U.S. personnel abroad by killing Qassem Soleimani” and that the strike was ordered by Trump to disrupt future Iranian attack plans.

U.S. officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Soleimani was killed in a drone strike. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said he was killed in an attack by U.S. helicopters.

Concern about disruption to Middle East oil supplies pushed oil prices up nearly $3.

Khamenei said harsh revenge awaited the “criminals” who killed Soleimani. His death, though bitter, would double the motivation of the resistance against the United States and Israel, he said.

In a statement carried by state television he called for three days of national mourning.

The U.S. embassy in Baghdad urged all American citizens to depart Iraq immediately.


‘HEROES NEVER DIE’

Soleimani led the Quds Force, the foreign arm of the Revolutionary Guards, and had a key role in fighting in Syria and Iraq.

Over two decades he had been at the forefront of projecting the Islamic Republic’s military influence across the Middle East, acquiring celebrity status at home and abroad.

Iranian state television presenters wore black and broadcast footage of Soleimani peering through binoculars across a desert and greeting a soldier, and of Muhandis speaking to followers.

President Hassan Rouhani said the assassination would make Iran more decisive in resisting the United States, while the Revolutionary Guards said anti-US forces would exact revenge across the Muslim world.

Hundreds of Iranians marched toward Khamenei’s compound in central Tehran to convey their condolences.

“I am not a pro-regime person but I liked Soleimani. He was brave and he loved Iran, I am very sorry for our loss,” said housewife Mina Khosrozadeh in Tehran.

In Soleimani‘s hometown, Kerman, people wearing black gathered in front of his father’s house, crying as they listened to a recitation of verses from the Koran.

“Heroes never die. It cannot be true. Qassem Soleimani will always be alive,” said Mohammad Reza Seraj, a high school teacher.

Trump, who is facing impeachment charges, made no immediate comment but posted a picture of the US flag on Twitter.

US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat and strong critic of the Republican president, said the attack was carried out without consultation with Congress and without authorisation for the use of military force against Iran.

Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi condemned the killings as a violation of the conditions of the US military presence in Iraq and an act of aggression that breached Iraq’s sovereignty and would lead to war.

Iraqi Shi’ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, who portrays himself as a nationalist rejecting both Iranian and US influence, ordered his followers to be ready to defend Iraq and urged all sides to behave wisely.

The Syrian government of President Bashar al-Assad condemned what it called criminal US aggression.

Israel has long regarded Soleimani as a major threat. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cut short a trip to Greece and Israeli Army Radio said the military had gone on heightened alert.

The slain commander’s Quds Force, along with paramilitary proxies from Lebanon’s Hezbollah to Iraq’s Popular Mobilisation Forces grouping of Iran-backed militias – battle-hardened militias armed with missiles – has ample means to respond.

In September, US officials blamed Iran for a missile and drone attack on oil installations of Saudi state energy giant Saudi Aramco.

Iran, for its part, has absorbed scores of air strikes and missile attacks, mainly carried out by Israel against its fighters and proxies in Syria and Iraq.

LEGENDARY FIGURE

Analysts say Iran is likely to respond forcefully to the targeting of Soleimani, who had survived several assassination attempts against him by Western, Israeli and Arab agencies over the past two decades.

The Quds Force, tasked with carrying out operations beyond Iran’s borders, shored up support for Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad when he looked close to defeat in the civil war raging since 2011 and also helped militiamen defeat Islamic State in Iraq.

Soleimani became head of the force in 1998, after which he quietly strengthened Iran’s ties with Hezbollah in Lebanon, Syria’s government and Shi’ite militia groups in Iraq.

Muhandis, who was killed with Soleimani, oversaw Iraq’s PMF, an alliance of paramilitary groups mostly comprising Iran-backed Shi’ite militias that was formally integrated into Iraqi armed forces.

His Kataib Hezbollah militia, which received battlefield training from Lebanon’s Hezbollah, has long targeted US forces and was one of the earliest groups to send fighters to Syria to support Assad.

BAGHDAD (Reuters) -


____________


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!