Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
1
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Dean Beaty

180
447 Posts
447
Invite Me as a Friend
The Threat of Islamic Terrorist Did it start on 9/11?
11/9/2007 7:16:50 PM
If you are concerned about the future of this country please take a few minutes to read this.
 
A pretty long read, but very important.
Though attributed to Dr. Chong, it was, in fact, written by a father to his sons.  Nonetheless, still an excellent read. 
 
This is the most cogent and powerful essay on the threat of Islamic terrorism I have seen by  Dr.  Vernon Chong.  It is without a doubt the most articulate and convincing writing I have read regarding the War in Iraq .  If you have any doubts please open your mind to his essay and give it a fair evaluation.  It's also eerily applicable to other current issues such as Iran 's nuclear program, immigration, NAFTA's impact on American jobs, trade deficits, etc..  I had no idea who Dr.  Chong is, or the source of these thoughts, so when I received them I almost deleted them, as well- written as they are.  But then I did a Google search on the Doctor and found him to be a retired Air Force surgeon and past commander of Wilford Hall Medical Center in San Antonio .
If you would like to see who this fellow is, go to this Air Force web site and look him up:
http://www.af.mil/bios/bio.asp?bioID=5000
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Muslims, terrorist and the USA : A different spin on Iraq war.
This WAR is for REAL!
Dr.  Vernon Chong, Major General, USAF, Retired
To get out of a difficulty, one usually must go through it.  Our country is now facing the most serious threat to its existence, as we know it, that we have faced in your lifetime and mine (which includes WWII).
The deadly seriousness is greatly compounded by the fact that there are very few of us who think we can possibly lose this war and even fewer who realize what losing really means.
First, let's examine a few basics:
1.  When did the threat to us start?
Many will say September 11, 2001.  The answer as far as the United States is concerned is 1979, 22 years prior to September 2001, with the following attacks on us:
* Iran Embassy Hostages, 1979;
* Beirut , Lebanon Embassy 1983;
* Beirut , Lebanon Marine Barracks 1983;
* Lockerbie , Scotland Pan-Am flight to New York 1988;
* First New York World Trade Center attack 1993;
* Dhahran , Saudi Arabia Khobar Towers Military complex 1996;
* Nairobi , Kenya US Embassy 1998;
* Dares Salaam , Tanzania US Embassy 1998;
* Al Den, Yemen USS Cole 2000;
* New York World Trade Center 2001;* Pentagon 2001.
(Note that during the period from 1981 to 2001 there were 7,581 terrorist attacks worldwide).
2.  Why were we attacked?
Envy of our position, our success, and our freedoms.  The attacks happened during the administrations of Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton and Bush 2.  We cannot fault either the Republicans or Democrats as there were no provocations by any of the presidents or their immediate predecessor, President Ford.
3.  Who were the attackers?
In each case, the attacks on the US were carried out by Muslims.
4.  What is the Muslim population of the World?
25%.
5.  Isn't the Muslim Religion peaceful?
Hopefully, but that is really not material.  There is no doubt that the predominately Christian population of Germany was peaceful, but under the dictatorial leadership of Hitler (who was also Christian (?)), that made no difference.  You either went along with the administration or you were eliminated.  There were 5 to 6 million Christians killed by the Nazis for political reasons (including 7,000 Polish priests).
Thus, almost the same number of Christians were killed by the Nazis, as the six million holocaust Jews who were killed by them, and we seldom heard of anything other than the Jewish atrocities.  Although Hitler kept the world focused on the Jews, he had no hesitancy about killing anyone who got in his way of exterminating the Jews or of taking over the world - German, Christian or any others.
Same with the Muslim terrorists.  They focus the world on the US , but kill all in the way -- their own people or the Spanish, British, French or anyone else.  The point here is that just like the peaceful Germans were of no protection to anyone from the Nazis, no matter how many peaceful Muslims there may be, they are no protection for us from the terrorist Muslim leaders and what they are fanatically bent on doing -- by their own pronouncements -- killing all of us "infidels." I don't blame the peaceful Muslims.  What would you do if the choice was shut up or die?
6.  So who are we at war with?
There is no way we can honestly respond that it is anyone other than the Muslim terrorists.  Trying to be politically correct and avoid verbalizing this conclusion can well be fatal.  There is no way to win if you don't clearly recognize and articulate who you are fighting.
So with that background, now to the two major questions:
1.  Can we lose this war?
2.  What does losing really mean?
If we are to win, we must clearly answer these two pivotal questions:
We can definitely lose this war, and as anomalous as it may sound, the major reason we can lose is that so many of us simply do not fathom the answer to the second question - What does losing mean?
It would appear that a great many of us think that losing the war means hanging our heads, bringing the troops home and going on about our business, like post-Vietnam.  This is as far from the truth as one can get.
What losing really means is:
We would no longer be the premier country in the world.  The attacks will not subside, but rather will steadily increase.  Remember, they want us dead, not just quiet.  If they had just wanted us quiet, they would not have produced an increasing series of attacks against us, over the past 18 years.  The plan was, clearly, for terrorists to attack us until we were neutered and submissive to them.
We would, of course, have no future support from other nations, for fear of reprisals and for the reason that they would see; we are impotent and cannot help them.
They will pick off the other non-Muslim nations, one at a time.  It will be increasingly easier for them.  They already hold Spain hostage.  It doesn't matter whether it was right or wrong for Spain to withdraw its troops from IraqSpain did it because the Muslim terrorists bombed their train and told them to withdraw the troops.  Anything else they want Spain to do will be done.  Spain is finished.
The next will probably be France .  Our one hope on France is that they might see the light and realize that if we don't win, they are finished too, in that they can't resist the Muslim terrorists without us.  However, it may already be too late for FranceFrance is already 20% Muslim and fading fast!
Without our support Great Britain will go too.  Recently I read that there are more mosques in England than churches.
If we lose the war, our production, income, exports and way of life will all vanish as we know it.  After losing, who would trade or deal with us if they were threatened by the Muslims.  If we can't stop the Muslim terrorists, how could anyone else?
The radical Muslims fully know what is riding on this war, and therefore are completely committed to winning, at any cost.  We better know it too and be likewise committed to winning at any cost.
Why do I go on at such lengths about the results of losing?  Simple.  Until we recognize the costs of losing, we cannot unite and really put 100% of our thoughts and efforts into winning.  And it is going to take that 100% effort to win.
So, how can we lose the war?
Again, the answer is simple.  We can lose the war by "imploding." That is, defeating ourselves by refusing to recognize the enemy and their purpose, and really digging in and lending full support to the war effort.  If we are united, there is no way that we can lose.  If we continue to be divided, there is no way that we can win!
Let me give you a few examples of how we simply don't comprehend the life and death seriousness of this situation.
President Bush selects Norman Mineta as Secretary of Transportation.  Although all of the terrorist attacks were committed by Muslim men between 17 and 40 years of age, Secretary Mineta refuses to allow profiling.  Does that sound like we are taking this thing seriously?  This is war!  For the duration, we are going to have to give up some of the civil rights we have become accustomed.  We had better be prepared to lose some of our civil rights temporarily or we will most certainly lose all of them permanently.
And don't worry that it is a slippery slope.  We gave up plenty of civil rights during WWII, and immediately restored them after the victory and in fact added many more since then.
Do I blame President Bush or President Clinton before him?
No, I blame us for blithely assuming we can maintain all of our Political Correctness, and all of our civil rights during this conflict and have a clean, lawful, honorable war.  None of those words apply to war.  Get them out of your head.
Some have gone so far in their criticism of the war and/or the Administration that it almost seems they would literally like to see us lose.
I think some actually do, I hasten to add that this isn't because they are disloyal.  It is because they just don't recognize what losing means.  Nevertheless, that conduct gives the impression to the enemy that we are divided and weakening.  It concerns our friends, and it does great damage to our cause.
Of more recent vintage, the uproar fueled by the politicians and media regarding the treatment of some prisoners of war, perhaps exemplifies best what I am saying.  We have recently had an issue, involving the treatment of a few Muslim prisoners of war, by a small group of our military police.  These are the type prisoners who just a few months ago were throwing their own people off buildings, cutting off their hands, cutting out their tongues and otherwise murdering their own people just for disagreeing with Saddam Hussein!
And just a few years ago these same type prisoners chemically killed 400,000 of their own people for the same reason.  They are also the same type of enemy fighters, who recently were burning Americans, and dragging their charred corpses through the streets of Iraq .  And still more recently, the same type of enemy that was and is providing videos to all news sources internationally, of the beheading of American prisoners they held.
Compare this with some of our press and politicians, who for several days have thought and talked about nothing else but the "humiliating" of some Muslim prisoners -- not burning them, not dragging their charred corpses through the streets, not beheading them, but "humiliating" them.
Can they be for real?
The politicians and pundits have even talked of impeachment of the Secretary of Defense.  If this doesn't show the complete lack of comprehension and understanding of the seriousness of the enemy we are fighting, the life and death struggle we are in and the disastrous results of losing this war, nothing can.
To bring our country to a virtual political standstill over this prisoner issue makes us look like Nero playing his fiddle as Rome burned -- totally oblivious to what is going on in the real world.  Neither we, nor any other country, can survive this internal strife.  Again I say, this does not mean that some of our politicians or media people are disloyal.  It simply means that they are absolutely oblivious to the magnitude of the situation we are in and into which the Muslim terrorists have been pushing us, for many years.
These people are a serious and dangerous liability to the war effort.  We must take note of who they are and get them out of office.  Remember, the Muslim terrorists stated goal is to kill all infidels!  That translates into ALL non-Muslims -- not just in the United States , but throughout the world.  We are the last bastion of defense.
We have been criticized for many years as being 'arrogant.' That charge is valid.  We are arrogant in that we believe that we are so good, powerful and smart, that we can win the hearts and minds of all those who attack us, and that with both hands tied behind our back, we can defeat anything bad in the world!  We can't!
If we don't recognize this, our nation as we know it will not survive, and no other free country in the world will survive if we are defeated.
And finally, name any Muslim countries throughout the world that allow freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, equal rights for anyone -- let alone everyone, equal status or any status for women, or that have been productive in one single way that contributes to the good of the world.
This has been a long way of saying that we must be united on this war or we will be equated in the history books to the self- inflicted fall of the Roman Empire .  If, that is, the Muslim leaders will allow history books to be written or read.
If we don't win this war right now, keep a close eye on how the Muslims take over France in the next 5 years or less.  They will continue to increase the Muslim population of France and continue to encroach little by little, on the established French traditions.
The French will be fighting among themselves, over what should or should not be done, which will continue to weaken them and keep them from any united resolve.  Doesn't that sound eerily familiar?
Democracies don't have their freedoms taken away from them by some external military force.  Instead, they give their freedoms away, politically correct piece by politically correct piece.
And they are giving those freedoms away to those who have shown, worldwide that they abhor freedom and will not apply it to you or even to themselves, once they are in power.
Muslims have universally shown that when they have taken over, they then start brutally killing each other over whom will be the few who control the masses.
What is happening in Iraq is a good example.  Will we ever stop hearing from the politically correct, about the "peaceful Muslims"?
I close on a hopeful note, by repeating what I said above.  If we are united, there is no way that we can lose.  I hope now, after the election, the factions in our country will begin to focus on the critical situation we are in, and will unite to save our country.  It is your future we are talking about!  Do whatever you can to preserve it.  I reiterate.  A national election is months away.
After reading the above, we all must do this not only for ourselves, but our children, our grandchildren, our country and the world.  Whether Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal and that includes the Politicians and media of our country and the free world!
Please forward this to any you feel may want, or NEED to read it.  Our "leaders" in Congress ought to read it, too.  There are those that find fault with our country, but it is obvious to anyone who truly thinks through this, that we must UNITE!
Lastly, I wish to add: At the risk of offending someone, I sincerely think that anyone who rejects this as just another political rant, or doubts the seriousness of this issue or just deletes it without sending it on, is part of the problem.  Let's quit laughing at and forwarding the jokes and cartoons which denigrate and ridicule our leaders in this war against terror.  They are trying to protect the interests and well being of the US and it's citizens.  Best we support them.
Keep them out w/ Home Security... Put them out w/ Pepper Spray. http://www.peacemakerpepperspray.com Where YOU are much more than a Customer. And we are much more than a Webstore! To read more poems by Dean go to: http://biblepoemsbydean.com
+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
Re: The Threat of Islamic Terrorist Did it start on 9/11?
11/9/2007 9:14:01 PM
Lastly, I wish to add: At the risk of offending someone, I sincerely think that anyone who rejects this as just another political rant, or doubts the seriousness of this issue or just deletes it without sending it on, is part of the problem.  Let's quit laughing at and forwarding the jokes and cartoons which denigrate and ridicule our leaders in this war against terror.  They are trying to protect the interests and well being of the US and it's citizens.  Best we support them.
 
 
Hello Dean,
 
I thought long and hard about this post and I tend to agree with parts of it, I won't pick it apart but I will say the last part I do disagree with.  Through out our great history it has been the ability to laugh and poke fun at the absurdities of our elected officials,  Especially when they are wrong and misguided.  To call attention to misdirection of our elected officials.
 
The letter writer's belief and warning was that of a father to a son.  I appreciate your sharing it here. 
 
The correlations made about Hitler and the regime he created, started by saying folks need to give up a few civil liberties to accomplish their task.  He was  popularly elected too, he was not a dictator to start with.  He led a reform party.  He destroyed his country from within. 
 
We cannot allow the same to happen here and I fear we are.  When we don't question the actions of our elected officials and ask them to be accountable for their actions.  Following blindly is not the way to protect our way of life.
 
We must ask them to justify spending 10 billion dollars a month with little or no results. 
 
Ask them to justify building a palace at a price tag of over 600 million dollars in Baghdad, weren't there enough of these to begin with?
 
Ask them to justify a better paid, better armed, private security force, with more boots on the ground than our military.   Just to name a few concerns.
 
Ask them why do we not pay attention when oil rich countries are looking for other sources of energy?
 
I agree we should protect our way of life, here in the USA. 
 
But let's not blindly follow war mongers and profiteers either.
 
Respectfully,
 
Jim Allen III
 
PS:  Please keep all posts of this nature in this thread only.  Otherwise they will be deleted.

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
Re: The Threat of Islamic Terrorist Did it start on 9/11?
11/13/2008 3:20:33 PM

Dean,

I was cleaning out threads and found this post. 

You were warning folks all the way back this time last year and here we are on the brink of socialism.  I felt it was time to bring this back to the forefront of this forum.

Respectfully,

Jim

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
Re: The Threat of Islamic Terrorist Did it start on 9/11?
11/17/2008 4:36:34 PM

CHANGING OF THE GUARD
Communist Party strategist maps out Obama's agenda
Powerful unions, socialized medicine 1st crucial steps for long-term plans


Posted: November 16, 2008
4:47 pm Eastern

By Aaron Klein
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

JERUSALEM – The enactment of a "single payer" socialist health care system; passing laws to make joining a labor union easier; raising the minimum wage and increasing labor union support – all these are just some of the policies the Community Party USA has mapped out as crucial for Obama to push through during his term of office.

Just days after the party's official newspaper lauded the role of labor unions in Obama's election victory, another article in the Communist Party's Political Affairs magazine by leading party member and Rutgers University history professor Norman Markowitz outlined the kind of "change" he expects Obama to bring to the U.S.:

"For the people who elected Obama and the increased Democratic majority," Markowitz writes, "'change we can believe in' isn't about bailouts for corporations and banks. It isn't about wearing American flag pins on your lapel. ...

"It is about ending the post-World War II policies that led to the long-term stagnation and decline of the labor movement," Markowitz writes. "It is about creating a national public health care program more than 50 years after it was established in other major industrial nations, and handling a national debt which has increased 10 times since Ronald Reagan became president in 1981."

Markowitz urges Obama to implement a "single payer" national health system, or socialized universal medicine.

"A 'single payer' national health system ... should be an essential part of the change that the core constituencies which elected Obama desperately need," he writes.

As an Illinois state senator, Obama publicly supported universal healthcare and previously expressed support for "single payer," although he later waffled. He also co-sponsored the Bernardin Amendment, which did not pass but which would have amended the Illinois State Constitution to add healthcare to the list of basic rights for residents.

Markowitz also expressed hope Obama will pass the Employee Free Choice Act, which he says would make joining a union easier and would relax current requirements on creating unions.

Markowitz calls for labor unions to "expand the base of union voters who supported Obama by nearly 50 points on Nov 4."

In an article last week titled, "Special Interest or Class Consciousness? How Labor Put Obama in the White House," Political Affairs reported on polling data released that revealed the extent of union support for Obama.

The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, or AFL-CIO, sponsored a poll showing union members supported Obama by a 68-30 margin and strongly influenced their family members.

According to the survey, Obama won among white men who are union members by 18 points. Union gun-owners backed Obama by 12 points, while union veterans voted for Obama by a 25-point margin. In the general population, Obama lost these groups by significant margins.

Political Affairs quoted AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, a longtime member of the Boston chapter of the Democrat Socialists for America, expressing hope labor unions can continue working with Obama.

"We have taken the first crucial steps to build a better future for our children and grandchildren. And what we've seen – the stunning voter participation and the common call for change – is an indication of the history we can continue to make together," Sweeney said.

"The election is just step one in delivering the change we need," Sweeney said. "Working men and women are poised to keep the energy pumping to help the Obama administration lead. … There will be no gap or letdown."

In his article, Markowitz goes on to suggest how Obama can win many Americans who voted for Sen. John McCain:

"The best way to win over the portion of the working class in the South or the West that supported McCain and the Republicans is to create important new public programs and improve the social safety net. National health care, significantly higher minimum wages, support for trade union organizing, aid to education should all be on the agenda. These programs will improve the quality of our lives directly, giving us greater security and establishing the social economic changes that will bring reluctant voters into the Obama coalition. That is how progress works," he writes.

The New Zeal blog, which researched connections between Obama and the Communist Party USA, commented: "The best way to determine the Obama administration's likely agenda is to read the communist press. Very few US voters would have any inkling that the approximately 3,000 members of the Communist Party USA have a huge influence on the policy and direction of the Democratic Party."

Markowitz seemed to anticipate such attacks, and claimed it would be strategically beneficial if "the right-wing propaganda machine" labels Obama's policies as socialist.

"The right-wing propaganda machine will scream socialism, and that is also a good thing," Markowitz writes. "Because the more socialism comes to be identified with real policies that raise the standard of living and improve the quality of life for the working class and the whole people, the more socialism will be looked at seriously."

And once America learns to accept socialism as a good thing, Markowitz writes, the country can more easily be pulled even farther.

"A stronger left that follows the tradition of the Communist Party," Markowitz writes, "in its unbreakable commitment to a socialist future and to educating people about the value and necessity of socialist policies in the present could follow."


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=81204

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
Re: The Threat of Islamic Terrorist Did it start on 9/11?
11/17/2008 5:49:00 PM

Illegal immigration and border control, A lesson to learn from India

What Happened to Border Control?

 By Dr. Richard Benkin  Monday, November 17, 2008

imageEven before the US economic crisis pushed all other issues out of the recent Presidential election, an issue that many thought would be a dominant one mysteriously dropped out of the public dialogue:  illegal immigration and border control.  Not only is that curious but dangerous as well.  Most of the Democratic leaders who will try to shape US policy over the next four years have stated their preference for the sort of “comprehensive” immigration reform that a massive popular action defeated in the Senate last year.  During the primaries, candidate Barack Obama charged the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement with “terrorizing” people when they crack down on illegal immigrants.  The subsequent silence about this during the campaign, has given Obama and his allies a sense of entitlement to affect their agenda even though it is at odds with the sentiments of most Americans.  In an August 2008 Rasmussen poll, 69 percent of Americans said that border enforcement is more important than legalizing aliens and only 14 percent thought the government is doing enough to secure the borders.  The survey also showed that 56 percent of Americans favor an enforcement-only approach to immigration reform with no path to citizenship for illegal aliens.

“Enforcement of existing laws is the Number 1, Number 2, and Number 3 priority for immigration reform among Americans”, said Scott Rasmussen.

If anything, sentiments like these have hardened in response to new economic realities.  If the crisis does not end quickly—and no one seems to think it will—conflict between “illegals” and citizens likely will become more intense.  The argument that illegal aliens take jobs Americans refuse to take will be even less compelling for the radicals’ open borders policy.  Already, according to an ABC news report, more English-speaking citizens are competing for jobs previously held by English-impaired citizens.

Earlier this year, I traveled along India’s borders with Nepal and Bangladesh.  The former is an open border, which allows free movement and transportation of goods without so much as an inspection.  The latter is merely out of control.  Conditions there could very well be a cautionary tale of what the future might look like for us if our new leaders follow an open borders agenda and provide amnesty for people who broke the law and became squatters in the United States.

Proponents of this policy have alleged that it lets the United States act as a “safety valve” to relieve the pressure on Mexico’s economy and prevent economic catastrophe, if not outright revolution.  Economic problems in Bangladesh and Nepal make Mexico’s seem minor.  Bangladesh is the world’s poster child for poverty; and when I was there, I saw a reality much worse than the poster.  Nepal’s economy is even worse.  While, according to the World Bank, Mexico’s per capital income was $8240 in 2007; Bangladesh’s was $430 and Nepal’s was $260.  Both countries also had a greater percentage of their populations living below the poverty line, according to the World Bank.  It should come as no surprise, then, that the “mules” who carry out massive smuggling activities are—like the border jumpers to our south and many of the Palestinians stopped by the Israeli border fence—only trying to make a living, their partisans tell us.

One early February afternoon, my Indian colleagues and I arrived at the tiny border town of Panitanki.  Not unlike those in border towns elsewhere throughout the world, Panitanki’s streets were lined with small shops and itinerant peddlers hawking every sort of ware, legal and otherwise.  There was even a plastic tote bag with the words Mazel Tov in Hebrew.  How it got there is anyone’s guess since I was probably the only Jew ever to visit the town.  Panitanki’s main road ends in a bridge over the Mechi River that forms the border between India and Nepal and where people and vehicles could cross freely.  As a steady stream of trucks, covered wagons, and men carrying large packages on their heads crossed into India, my Bengali colleagues would point to one and say ‘Arms’; to another and say ‘Drugs.’ And they would do so again and again.  ‘That one,’ they would say, ‘has counterfeit banknotes.  A big smuggling business.’ I knew that we were in the “Chicken’s Neck”; a 24 kilometer wide strip of Indian territory bordered by Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan, and Tibet.  The area is notorious for arms, drug, and counterfeit banknote smuggling and a known entry point for Islamist and Communist terrorists into India.

The illegal activity is so open that it did not raise so much as an eyebrow among the people of Panitanki.  Worse, the Indian Border Security Force (BSF) soldiers did not react either.  So, I pulled out my video camera and started shooting.  The contents were carried into India so brazenly that even I got somewhat adept at identifying which parcels contained arms or other contraband.  As we moved closer to the bridge, the shops and rickshaw drivers gave way to official outposts.  Many were abandoned; many simply empty.  Soldiers remained at some posts but were inert to the illegal activity that threatened their nation.  No one checked any packages or stopped a single individual—until I came along with my camera.  As we passed a pile of sandbags, two soldiers emerged and brandished their rifles.

“Put away your camera.”

(Sometimes we spoke through my Bengali friends; sometimes directly in English)

“Why?”

“Put away your camera!”

Pointing to their rifles and uniforms, “What?  Are you afraid that I will pick up some great military secret for the US Army?”

“If you do not put your camera away now, we will confiscate it.”

“You got me.” Then putting my camera away, I turned to my friends and said, “I thought this was a free country.” Turning back to the soldiers, “Gee, I guess I was wrong.”

Having complied with the soldiers’ orders, I told them we were moving on to the bridge.  But there was a problem.  As an American citizen, I needed a visa from the Nepalese government to cross.  So the soldiers demurred (even though third country nationals frequently take rickshaws or other conveyances across the border without any difficulty.  A discussion ensued, and we established that the border was in the middle of the bridge and that if I kept my camera packed and did not go even a millimeter into Nepal; we could proceed.  But the soldiers made sure to tell me that if I violated either of those conditions, they would arrest me and confiscate my camera.

As we moved forward, it became clear why the soldiers did not want me taking pictures.  The flow of dangerous contraband across the border was heavy, continuous, and apparent to anyone with eyes, as was the lack of response by the BSF.  Moreover, it was the dry season.  From the middle of the bridge, one could see people crossing the border through the dried river bed on either side of the bridge, most carrying large parcels with them.

My own observations are not anomalous.  Bengali informants explained the BSF’s inaction.  They insisted that the BSF and other military units (such as the Assam Rifles) are not corrupt, but they have been told that they have no authority to stop smuggling.  That is the responsibility of the local police, in this case that of Communist West Bengal.  But the West Bengali police are thoroughly corrupt and are easily bribed to allow the illegal activity.  The same is true in the impoverished areas of Uttar Pradesh bordering Nepal.  Moreover, Panitanki is one of only 22 check points along the 1,400 kilometer border; most of the area is open to smuggling and terrorist infiltration.

The situation, according to evidence published in The Hindustan Times (HT) and other major Indian papers, is extremely damaging.  In February, HT ran a series about the India-Nepal border. HT and others write that it is a conduit for illicit activity, including arms and drugs, illegal and impoverished Nepalese immigrants, and terrorist infiltration.  Islamist terrorists originate in Pakistan and Bangladesh (although many of the latter cross across the porous India-Bangladesh border as well).  Maoist terrorists originate in China or communist Nepal.  These terrorists have been responsible for attacks throughout India and not only in the border areas.  This past summer, for instance, Indian authorities arrested one Sheikh Nayeem from Bangladesh.  He was able to transport four Islamist terrorists into India by bribing junior officers 200 Indian Rupees or about $4.00 apiece.  In 2007, those four terrorists carried out terrorist bombings in Hyderabad, a state thousands of miles from Bangladesh in the India’s far south.

With Hezbollah terrorists long established in Central and South America, the United States could face the same future if its citizens allow the same open border policy in their country.


(1) Reader Feedback | Click here to get Canada Free Press in your email

Dr. Richard L. Benkin secured the release of Bangladeshi journalist Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury in 2005.  The two continue working together to fight Islamist radicals and their allies in South Asia and elsewhere.  For more information on how to help, please contact Dr. Benkin at drrbenkin@comcast.net

Dr. Richard Benkin most recent columns
To reprint article, permission of the writer is required. Please email us at cfp@canadafreepress.com.


What's New On CFP:
  1. Hope when it’s needed most
  2. What Does Vale Inco’s Annoucement Mean for NL?
  3. Not “Conservative” Enough?
  4. The Cost of Democracy
  5. The Timing Is Suspicious
  6. NACOP: Acid Attack by Taliban Shape of Things to Come
  7. Unions Killing Detroit
  8. Boston Globe: Talk Radio Now ‘Irrelevant’?
  9. The Post-Election Obama Emerges
  10. When Almost Everyone is Lying to You
  11. Global Socialists Toast Victory over America
  12. The Audacity of Impertinent Questions!
  13. Obama: Fear and the Security Force
  14. Canadians love affair with Obama may be short lived
  15. Barack Obama’s Bucket Brigade
  16. What Happened to Border Control?
  17. It’s beginning to look a lot like Christmas--except at N.Y. City Public Schools
  18. Islamist rebels whip 32 dancers in Somalia
  19. Acid attack girl vows to continue school
  20. Taliban kill mullah critical of suicide attacks
  21. Every major terror threat involves Pakistan: CIA
  22. Look In The Mirror When You Say That
  23. Palestine, President Peres and Poppycock
  24. Government Solution to High Mortgage Payments
  25. Lessons for Canada’s Conservatives – Building a Lasting Base
  26. Welcome to the new Sunday `World of the Global Citizen’
  27. Let Them Eat Spam
  28. Turning Boom into Bust
  29. The Big Lie About Immigration Enforcement
  30. Labor’s role in Detroit’s disaster
  31. Physicist predicts man-made global warming bubble to burst in 2008
  32. The world has never seen such freezing heat
  33. Slumping Carbon “Cap-and-Trade” Price Worries Greens
  34. Our Government Has Become A Rogue Spider
  35. What Exactly Are They Protesting?
  36. “Liberal Fascism” - The end of freedom and prosperity
  37. Just Say No to Detroit
  38. Signposts
  39. Why Europe is secretly afraid of a socialist America
  40. Heads to Roll at RNC. Who will Lead Party Reform?

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!