I bring a statement forward for rebuttal. " Companies like Shell, BB, TEXACO that are quoted with their Chief
Mechanics paid by them, to say what the normal Joe Block NEEDS to hear.
IT DOES NOT WORK. Of course it does not work for them when they suddenly would sell 15% less on fuel. LOL hahaha. Ignorance repeats itself over and over again."
First, it would be the fuel designing engineers that would speak for any oil company and only through their Public Relations Office after all materials were looked at by their legal team. If this were the case as you state above and your product were to work the industry would buy out your product and remove it from the market as they have done with other products in the past that proved to work. As example is of a carburator/evaporative system that was designed to get 100 MPG's and was tested and proven in the 70's. It was designed and tested by a student (Tom Ogle) from UTEP's engineering dept. The design was bought by a car manufacturer later on and then was never to be seen again. News article on Tom Ogle June 17th, 1977: http://www.fuelvapors.com/best/inventors/Ogle/pollution_free.htmAs to how real this story is there is now a film being made on the story. "100 MPG is the story of a young man who, in the 1970s, invented and
patented a 100 MPG (miles per gallon) fuel system for automobiles and
his efforts to market the system. The story was suggested by real
events that took place in El Paso, TX, Las Cruces, NM and Deming, NM." http://cmi.nmsu.edu/Archive/work100mpg.htmlI surely wouldn't think that New Mexico State University would make such claims and do a film without knowing the facts on it. With all this said, if a top fuel producing firm hasn't bought your product to either take it off the market if it worked or took it and added it to their product to raise the cost and value of their own product then it's just not worth looking into or using. Common business sense here. Kenneth R Sword Jr
|