Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
1
Julia Fyvie

101
306 Posts
306
Invite Me as a Friend
Cancer Linked To Chemicals
6/1/2007 8:40:21 PM

Breast Cancer Linked To Chemicals
Reduced exposure to common products may prevent disease
By Marla Cone
May 14, 2007

More than 200 chemicals -- many found in urban air and everyday consumer
products -- caused breast cancer in animal tests, according to a compilation
of scientific reports published today.

Writing in a publication of the American Cancer Society, researchers said
that reducing exposure to the compounds could prevent many women from
developing the disease. The research team from five institutions analyzed a
growing body of evidence that links environmental contaminants to breast
cancer, the leading killer of U.S. women in their late 30s to early 50s.

Experts say that family history and genes are responsible for a small
percentage of breast cancer cases but that environmental or lifestyle
factors such as diet are probably involved in the vast majority.

"Overall, exposure to mammary gland carcinogens is widespread," researchers
from institutions in the Boston area, Los Angeles and Buffalo, N.Y., wrote
in a special supplement to the journal Cancer. "These compounds are widely
detected in human tissues and in environments, such as homes, where women
spend time."

The scientists said there is insufficient data to estimate the number of
breast cancer cases linked to chemical exposure. But, because the disease is
so common and the chemicals so widespread, "the public health impacts of
reducing exposures would be profound even if the true relative risks are
modest. If even a small percentage is due to preventable environmental
factors, modifying these factors would spare thousands of women."

The three reports and a commentary were compiled by researchers from the
Silent Spring Institute, a women's environmental health institute in Newton,
Mass.; Harvard's Medical School and School of Public Health; the Roswell
Park Cancer Institute; and the University of Southern California's Keck
School of Medicine. Silent Spring Institute Executive Director Julia Brody
led the team.

In response to the findings, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, a breast cancer
prevention group that funded the work, pledged $5 million more for
developing improved research tools to root out environmental causes.

Reviewing hundreds of studies and databases, the team produced what it
called "the most comprehensive compilation to date of chemicals identified
as mammary carcinogens."

They named 216 chemicals that induce breast tumors in animals. Of those,
people are highly exposed to 97, including industrial solvents, pesticides,
dyes, gasoline and diesel exhaust compounds, cosmetics ingredients,
hormones, pharmaceuticals, radiation and a chemical in chlorinated water.

"Almost all of the chemicals were mutagenic, and most caused tumors in
multiple organs and species," they wrote.

For many of the compounds, the federal government has not used the animal
data when conducting human risk assessments, which are the first step toward
regulating chemicals, or in setting occupational standards to protect
workers.

Toxicologists say that mammals such as rats and mice often develop the same
tumors as humans, and that animal tests are efficient means of testing the
effects of chemicals.

Ana Soto, a Tufts University professor of cell biology who specializes in
cellular origins of cancer and effects of hormone-disrupting contaminants,
said there probably is a link between breast cancer and exposure to
chemicals in the environment, particularly early in life. "It's a very
likely, very plausible hypothesis," said Soto, who did not participate in
the new studies. "More and more, cancer looks like an environmental
disease."

Twenty-nine of the breast carcinogens are produced in volumes exceeding 1
million pounds annually in the United States. Seventy-three are in consumer
products, such as 1,4-dioxane in shampoos, or are food contaminants, such as
acrylamide in french fries. Thirty-five are common air pollutants, 25 are in
workplaces where at least 5,000 women are employed, and 10 are food
additives, according to the reports.

There are probably many more than 216, the researchers said, because only
about 1,000 of the 80,000 chemicals registered for use in the United States
have been tested on animals to see whether they induce cancerous tumors or
mutate DNA. Such tests cost $2 million each.

Because epidemiological studies are difficult and full of uncertainties,
human data "is still relatively sparse," the researchers wrote. Only 152
studies have examined whether women exposed to contaminants are more likely
to have breast cancer -- compared with nearly 1,500 that have explored the
links between diet and the disease -- and most of the 216 carcinogens were
not included.

"Despite this large remaining gap, research in the last five years has
strengthened the human evidence that environmental pollutants play a role in
breast cancer risk," the researchers wrote. They said the existing studies
suggested "substantial public health impact."

Human evidence is particularly strong for PCBs -- compounds widely used in
the 1940s to late 1970s that still contaminate fish and other foods -- and
for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, found in exhaust of diesel
vehicles and gasoline-powered cars. Solvents in dry cleaning, aircraft
maintenance and other jobs also seem to increase breast cancer rates.

The scientists hope to lay the groundwork for new human studies and to
persuade officials to use existing animal data to strengthen regulations and
require more testing of chemicals.

Emerging evidence suggests that the roots of breast cancer come early in
life, and more animal and human research should focus on that, said Patricia
Hunt, a professor at Washington State University.

Marla Cone writes for the Los Angeles Times.

Copyright C 2007, The Baltimore Sun <
http://www.baltimoresun.com>  | Get Sun
home <
http://www.baltimoresun.com/subscribe>  delivery

Link to the article:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/health/bal-te.cancer14may14,0,1594768.story
?coll=bal-home-headlines <http://www.baltimoresun.com>

It's easy to reduce the risks to these cancers and others, by simply switching to the Shaklee safe brands like....GET CLEAN!

Order a get clean kit today....

http://www.shaklee.net/followme

Take Care Of Your Family & Our Planet,

Julia Fyvie

Proud member of

THE ADVANCED MENTORING TEAM

http://marketingwiz.ws

P.S. 

They also make great gifts to loved one's

+0
1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!