Greetings All
I apologize for bringing politics into my mental health forums but I need to reach more people. Actually though, it is very hard to separate politics from mental health. It is our government that has slashed mental health budgets. It is our government that has put more people with a mental illness behind bars than are in treatment.
For many people that I have spoken with, contentment and complacency seem to be the next order of business as the result of the midterm sweep of both houses of congress by the Democrats. Think again folks. Think about the message that we, the citizens of The United States Of America, will be sending out to the rest of the world if this administration is not held accountable for their actions. If these people are allowed to get away with what they have done to the reputation of this nation, the whole world will see that as our condoning the ruthlessness of this administration. If these people are not held accountable it will mean that we are OK with what has happened in the middle east. We are OK with what has happened to our constitutional rights. We are OK with the buildup to war with Iran. If the members of this administration were so certain that what they were doing was legal and humane, why are they so busy changing the laws that define such things as war crimes. Abuse of power. Crimes against humanity and even the Geneva Convention.
Having attempted to right the wrongs committed by our government by electing what we hope will be a new and better leadership is just not enough. There must be accountability. Without it there is no law. There is no order and most importantly, there is no justice.
Please read the entire article below. The link for the rest is at the bottom. This article is full of other links that will take you to documentation of the facts about how this administration got us to where we are now. It is our duty now to use this information to bring accountability and integrity back into our government. Tell Nancy Pelosi that we didn't elect her to forgive and forget. We elected her to do what is fair and just and that is to hold this administration accountable.
Bush's Belated Accountability Moment
By Nat Parry November 12, 2006 |
After securing a second term in November 2004, George W. Bush was asked by the Washington Post why no one in his administration had been held accountable for the problems facing U.S. troops in Iraq. Bush replied dismissively, “We had an accountability moment, and that’s called the 2004 elections.”
The President echoed that sentiment two weeks before this year's Nov. 7 balloting, rejecting the notion that the midterm elections could serve as a check on his administration. Accountability, Bush said, is “what the 2004 campaign was about.”
But it appears Bush may have spoken too soon. With the Democratic sweep of Congress, the White House finds itself confronting the likelihood of a more systematic and more rigorous form of accountability from congressional Democrats newly armed with subpoena powers.
Rep. John Conyers, who has been holding investigative hearings into administration wrongdoing from the Capitol basement because the Republican congressional leadership denied him a committee room, now stands poised to become chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
Though handicapped in his earlier investigations, the Michigan Democrat unearthed and documented a staggering array of White House deceptions that led the United States into war, as well as evidence of other abuses such as torture, warrantless domestic surveillance by the National Security Agency, and erosion of civil liberties.
Constitution in Crisis
Conyers's 350-page report, “Constitution in Crisis,” deals with the so-called Downing Street Minutes, which revealed that the Bush administration was “fixing” the intelligence on weapons of mass destruction to justify a pre-ordained policy of war against Iraq.
The “single overriding characteristic running through all of the allegations of misconduct … has been the unwillingness of the Bush Administration to allow its actions to be subject to any form of meaningful outside review,” the report said.
“Not only were 122 Members of Congress unable to obtain any response to their questions posed regarding the Downing Street Minutes,” the report goes on, “but neither the House nor the Senate has ever engaged in any serious review of the facts surrounding the NSA domestic spying programs.”
That dynamic could change with the new make-up of Congress. Not only will Conyers be chairing the Judiciary Committee, but Henry Waxman, D-California, will be taking over the House Committee on Government Reform.
Complementing Conyers’s investigations into pre-war manipulations of intelligence have been Waxman’s investigations into administration favoritism toward Halliburton, which was formerly run by Vice President Dick Cheney.
The Texas-based company has profited handsomely by securing no-bid contracts for everything from rebuilding in Iraq, to supplying U.S. troops with food, to repairing government facilities damaged by Hurricane Katrina, to building detention facilities in the U.S. [For more information on the latter, see Consortiumnews.com’s “Bush’s Mysterious ‘New Programs.’”]
According to an analysis by Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-New Jersey, these no-bid contracts have contributed to the value of Cheney’s Halliburton stock options rising by more than 3,000 percent. In 2005, Cheney’s stock options increased in value from $241,498 to over $8 million.
“It is unseemly,” noted Lautenberg, “for the Vice President to continue to benefit from this company at the same time his administration funnels billions of dollars to it.”
Another issue that could be explored by Waxman’s committee is the content of the Energy Task Force meetings during the early days of the Bush administration. Though ordered by a federal judge to release the task force records completely, the administration heavily redacted the 13,500 pages of documents.
Before turning the records over to the Natural Resources Defense Council as ordered by the judge, the administration removed extensive portions of information. “Some pages were empty,” said the NRDC. “Whole strings of correspondence were stripped to just a few words.”
Nevertheless, the records revealed that energy industry lobbyists played a pivotal role in developing the administration’s national energy strategy, and actually wrote much of it themselves.
“The administration sought the advice of polluting corporations early and often and then incorporated their recommendations into its policy, sometimes verbatim,” according to the NRDC.
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/111106a.html
May a smile follow you to sleep each night,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
and be there waiting,,, when you awaken.
Sincerly, Bill Vanderbilt
Mental Health And Political Forums Respectively