Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Communication
5/7/2016 11:27:23 PM
Forum Topic
inspired by
Roy Leazer
Roy Leazer
&



History of the Bells

(From "$200 Billion Broadband Scandal", January 2006), Updated August 2012.

  • AT&T — SBC, Southwestern Bell, Pacific Telesis, Ameritech, SNET, AT&T, BellSouth
  • Verizon — Bell Atlantic, NYNEX, GTE, MCI, Alltel
  • CenturyLink— Formerly CenturyTel and Qwest, formerly US West.

They put Humpty Dumpty Back together again -- and it is to the detriment of competition, broadband and the US economy.

For over 100 years, Ma Bell, sometimes called the "Bell System" sometimes called "AT&T", controlled almost all telecommunications in the US. Once the largest company in the world with over one million employees, the company consisted of 22 local Bell companies, (including New York Telephone and Ohio Bell), AT&T Long Lines, (the long distance division) as well as Western Electric, (the subsidiary that manufactured telephone equipment) and Bell Labs, one of the premier research organizations.

Then in 1984, because of the monopoly control the company had over phone service, the company was broken-up and the local Bell phone companies were divvied up among seven, artificially created, very large companies called "Regional Bell Operating Companies" (RBOCs, pronounced "R-BOKS") or sometimes the "Regional Bell Holding Companies" (RHC) and sometimes the "Baby Bells".

Each company controls specific geographic regions of the US. For example, Ameritech controlled a five-state region: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin.

This diagram gives the original Baby Bells, the phone company(s) it controlled, and the state(s)

The original seven RBOCs were:

  • Ameritech
  • Bell Atlantic
  • BellSouth
  • NYNEX
  • Pacific Telesis
  • Southwestern Bell
  • US West
Today, because of numerous mergers, there are only 3 Companies:
  • AT&T was purchased by SBC Communications, which owned Southwestern Bell, Pacific Bell, Ameritech, SNET, BellSouth and AT&T, the long distance company. SBC changed its name to 'at&t" (lower case.)
  • Verizon, which owned Bell Atlantic, NYNEX, and GTE and bought MCI, the former long distance company.
  • CenturyLink merged with Qwest, formerly US West
However, there is mass confusion on the part of the customers, not only because of these mergers, but also because of the various name changes.
What's in a Name? Renaming the Local Phone Companies

Over the last seven years, all of the holding companies removed the local Bell name for the name of the holding company.

  • New York Telephone became NYNEX, then Bell Atlantic and the Verizon.
  • Ohio Bell, Indiana Bell, Wisconsin Bell, Michigan Bell and Illinois Bell were all renamed "Ameritech".
Hundreds of Companies with RBOC Name

The holding companies own literally hundreds of other companies, each with their name-brand.For example, here are just a few of the NYNEX companies:

  • Verizon Online
  • Verizon Wireless (which is really a company called "cellco" and owned by Verizon and Vodafone)
  • Verizon Enterprise Solutions
  • Verizon Business
Two Bell Companies Escaped
Cincinnati Bell and Southern New England Telephone (SNET) were both spun off after the break-up. However, SNET was acquired by SBC Communications.
Other Local Companies
There were over 1,400 other local phone companies in 1984, including United/Sprint (renamed Embarq), Lincoln Telephone or Rochester Telephone (renamed Frontier). However, the number of independent companies has been diminishing For example, GTE was the largest independent and was the size of one of the original Bell companies. It was also a holding company, owning numerous local telephone properties throughout the US, from California to Virginia. As mentioned earlier, it is now part of Verizon.
Thousands of Other Telephone Companies
There are literally thousands of communications companies, and their relationships and services they offer are at best, fuzzy to the general public. Here's the basics:
How Did Long Distance, AT&T and MCI, Fit into this Equation?

Originally, the Bell companies were excluded from offering long distance service. — a "Long Distance" phone call crosses state lines. A call from New York to New Jersey or from Texas to Arkansas is a long distance call.

AT&T, MCI and Sprint were the largest long distance companies in the 1990’s. In 1996, the Telecom Act of 1996 formally opened the “Public Switched Telephone Networks” (PSTN), the local phone networks, to competition. The long distance companies started to enter the local markets. Meanwhile, the Telecom Act also allowed the Bell companies to enter long distance once the networks were officially “open”.

Because of seriously flawed regulations and the power of the Bell companies to control the regulatory environment, the long distance companies were forced out of local service. Renting the local phone lines became unprofitable. Meanwhile, by 2005, the Bell companies have been able to garner over 60% of the long distance market because they could upsell local and long distance as a package.

In the "Unauthorized Bio of the Baby Bells" we argued that the Bells should never have been allowed into long distance services until there was stable competition. AT&T and MCI are currently sold, and merged into SBC and Verizon, respectively. SBC has taken the AT&T name.

As we will discuss, local and long distance distinctions are blurring — it’s all just
electrons over wires or through the air. The companies that own the wires can block competition, either through bad legislation or "friendly regulators", who have essentially been bought off or have not bothered to enforce the laws on the books.

In 2005, Verizon purchased MCI. SBC purchased AT&T and is now called “AT&T”, thus killing off the 2 largest competitors. AT&T and Verizon no longer compete, except with wireless services.

Other Important Distinctions: Local Competitors

CLECs (Competitive Local Exchange Companies)

There was another group of companies referred to as Competitive Local Exchange Companies (CLECs) , who also offer local telephone service. . Some companies have their own installations, while other rented the networks from the Bell companies. Most companies only offered local business services in selected area codes in America. However, because of seriously flawed FCC regulations, most of these companies were put out of business.

D-LECS and B-LECs

There are other types of local competitors: For example, the D-LECs (shorthand for Data-CLEC) offer primarily data or DSL services, such as Covad , while the B-LECs (shorthand for Building-CLEC) offer services by wiring buildings, such as ARC. Most of these companies were also put out of business because of flawed FCC regulations.

Verizon's FiOS and AT&T's U-Verse

in 2004, AT&T and Verizon announced plans to roll out cable/broadband services. Verizon has deployed FiOS, a fiber-to-the-home service, while AT&T rolled out U-Verse, a service that relys on the old copper wiring.

As of 2010, the companies both claimed that they were no long expanding their deployments of FiOS or U-Verse, having reached about 50% of their customers.

Other Important Distinctions: Wireless

"Wireless," "PCS", "Cellular" "Wifi"

There are hundreds of other companies who offer a wide array of non-wireline services, such as the wireless, wifi, PCS, or cellular companies.However, over the last decade, there has been a serious consolidation of these companies and today, Verizon and AT&T are the largest wireless companies.

Originally, the Bell companies were given the wireless spectrum for all of their territories -- for free. However, by the 1990's the companies were able to merge.

  • Bell South and SBC formed "Cingular", which was renamed "AT&T once the company aquired AT&T wireless,
  • Bell Atlantic and NYNEX spun off their wireless services to become "Verizon Wireless"
  • But there were many other deals to build these companies, which should be thought of as playing cards being maneuvered.

In it's wisdom, originally there was only 1 competitor allowed to the phone companies in each market, and the other players of note were McCaw, and Sprint-Nextel and T-Mobile.

Today, Verizon and AT&T have about 80% of the marketplace and as of this writing, Verizon has offered to purchase many of the cable companies' wireless spectrum, which they purchase but never fully deployed.

Wi-Fi and Municipality Community Buildouts.

Over the last few years, a number of municipalities have decided to now wait for the Bell companies to deliver and have created new community networks using both fiber optic cables as well as wireless services, known as "Wi-Fi"

VOIP, "Voice Over the Internet Protocol" Services

A host of companies have started to offer "VOIP", Voice Over the Internet Protocol, which uses a broadband connection and the standard Internet protocols "IP", to offer voice and data services.

VOIP is a technolofy as much as it is a service and many of the traditional voice services, when offered in a package, are using VOIP.


URL


+0
Communication ~ Navajo Code Talkers
5/7/2016 11:39:09 PM
World War II History & Facts

August 1997
Research by Alexander Molnar Jr., U.S. Marine Corps/U.S. Army (Ret.)
Prepared by the Navy & Marine Corps WWII Commemorative Committee

Guadalcanal, Tarawa, Peleliu, Iwo Jima: the Navajo code talkers took part in every assault the U.S. Marines conducted in the Pacific from 1942 to 1945. They served in all six Marine divisions, Marine Raider battalions and Marine parachute units, transmitting messages by telephone and radio in their native language — a code that the Japanese never broke.

NAVAJO CODE TALKER
Navajo code talker Joe Morris Sr. is pictured in 2002 at the Computer Museum of America speaking about heroic Native American efforts by his fellow young Marines serving in World War II. Photo courtesy of Warren Brader. The Computer Museum, Joe Morris, Sr., reservation-born Dine'/Navajo Indian nation, described his 1944-46 experiences as a code talker on Guadalcanal, Guam, Saipan, Okinawa, and Tinstao, China.

The idea to use Navajo for secure communications came from Philip Johnston, the son of a missionary to the Navajos and one of the few non-Navajos who spoke their language fluently. Johnston, reared on the Navajo reservation, was a World War I veteran who knew of the military's search for a code that would withstand all attempts to decipher it. He also knew that Native American languages — notably Choctaw — had been used in World War I to encode messages.

Johnston believed Navajo answered the military requirement for an undecipherable code because Navajo is an unwritten language of extreme complexity. Its syntax and tonal qualities, not to mention dialects, make it unintelligible to anyone without extensive exposure and training. It has no alphabet or symbols, and is spoken only on the Navajo lands of the American Southwest. One estimate indicates that less than 30 non-Navajos, none of them Japanese, could understand the language at the outbreak of World War II.

Early in 1942, Johnston met with Major General Clayton B. Vogel, the commanding general of Amphibious Corps, Pacific Fleet, and his staff to convince them of the Navajo language's value as code. Johnston staged tests under simulated combat conditions, demonstrating that Navajos could encode, transmit, and decode a three-line English message in 20 seconds. Machines of the time required 30 minutes to perform the same job. Convinced, Vogel recommended to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the Marines recruit 200 Navajos.

CAMP PENDLETON CALIF c1942
Navajo code talkers, Camp Pendleton, CA., USMC official photo.

In May 1942, the first 29 Navajo recruits attended boot camp. Then, at Camp Pendleton, Oceanside, California, this first group created the Navajo code. They developed a dictionary and numerous words for military terms. The dictionary and all code words had to be memorized during training.

Once a Navajo code talker completed his training, he was sent to a Marine unit deployed in the Pacific theater. The code talkers' primary job was to talk, transmitting information on tactics and troop movements, orders and other vital battlefield communications over telephones and radios. They also acted as messengers, and performed general Marine duties.

Praise for their skill, speed and accuracy accrued throughout the war. At Iwo Jima, Major Howard Connor, 5th Marine Division signal officer, declared, "Were it not for the Navajos, the Marines would never have taken Iwo Jima." Connor had six Navajo code talkers working around the clock during the first two days of the battle. Those six sent and received over 800 messages, all without error.

The Japanese, who were skilled code breakers, remained baffled by the Navajo language. The Japanese chief of intelligence, Lieutenant General Seizo Arisue, said that while they were able to decipher the codes used by the U.S. Army and Army Air Corps, they never cracked the code used by the Marines. The Navajo code talkers even stymied a Navajo soldier taken prisoner at Bataan. (About 20 Navajos served in the U.S. Army in the Philippines.) The Navajo soldier, forced to listen to the jumbled words of talker transmissions, said to a code talker after the war, "I never figured out what you guys who got me into all that trouble were saying."

In 1942, there were about 50,000 Navajo tribe members. As of 1945, about 540 Navajos served as Marines. From 375 to 420 of those trained as code talkers; the rest served in other capacities.

Navajo remained potentially valuable as code even after the war. For that reason, the code talkers, whose skill and courage saved both American lives and military engagements, only recently earned recognition from the Government and the public.

Navajo Code Talker Dictionary

When a Navajo code talker received a message, what he heard was a string of seemingly unrelated Navajo words. The code talker first had to translate each Navajo word into its English equivalent. Then he used only the first letter of the English equivalent in spelling an English word. Thus, the Navajo words "wol-la-chee" (ant), "be-la-sana" (apple) and "tse-nill" (axe) all stood for the letter "a." One way to say the word "Navy" in Navajo code would be "tsah (needle) wol-la-chee (ant) ah-keh-di- glini (victor) tsah-ah-dzoh (yucca)."

Most letters had more than one Navajo word representing them. Not all words had to be spelled out letter by letter. The developers of the original code assigned Navajo words to represent about 450 frequently used military terms that did not exist in the Navajo language. Several examples: "besh- lo" (iron fish) meant "submarine," "dah-he- tih-hi" (hummingbird) meant "fighter plane" and "debeh-li-zine" (black street) meant "squad."

Department of Defense Honors Navajo Veterans


President George W. Bush presents gold and silver medals to Navajo Code Talkers (PDF)
, July 2001.

Long unrecognized because of the continued value of their language as a security classified code, the Navajo code talkers of World War II were honored for their contributions to defense on Sept. 17, 1992, at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C.

Thirty-five code talkers, all veterans of the U.S. Marine Corps, attended the dedication of the Navajo code talker exhibit. The exhibit includes a display of photographs, equipment and the original code, along with an explanation of how the code worked.

Dedication ceremonies included speeches by the then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Donald Atwood, U.S. Senator John McCain of Arizona and Navajo President Peterson Zah. The Navajo veterans and their families traveled to the ceremony from their homes on the Navajo Reservation, which includes parts of Arizona, New Mexico and Utah.

The Navajo code talker exhibit is a regular stop on the Pentagon tour.

Related Resources:

Navajo Code Talker Dictionary
Navajo Code Talkers in World War II: A Bibliography
American Indian Medal of Honor Winners
President George W. Bush honors Native Code Talkers with military medals of honor.
TOP 10 best military poems inspirational writings.


URL


+1
RE: Communication ~ Navajo Code Talkers
5/7/2016 11:47:41 PM
Honoring Navajo Code Talkers - 2013 Gathering of Nations Pow Wow


Navajo Code Talkers



+1
The Privacy Problem with
5/25/2016 4:41:29 PM
Digital Assistants


AP


For the last century, we’ve imagined a future where we’re surrounded by robotic butlers that are classy, smart, and discreet. We wouldn’t think twice of asking an embarrassing question of a robo-assistant, or entrusting him/her/it with sensitive information, because the robot’s directive would be to serve only its owner.

Already, there are millions of proto-Jarvises running around in pockets, in the form of digital assistants like Apple’s Siri, Microsoft’s Cortana, Amazon’s Alexa, and (soon) Google’s search assistant. These virtual helpers use artificial intelligence to parse what users say or type, and return useful information. More recent updates to Siri and Google have taught the assistants to guess at what users want to know before they’re asked, chiming in with notifications about a traffic jam at the appropriate time.

Read more

+0
Patricia Bartch

2952
9394 Posts
9394
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The Privacy Problem with
5/27/2016 1:59:46 AM
Speaking about communication, i can't respond to your Adland notes you've sent to my inbox Jan. You need to correct this if you want me to reply.



Pat
I'm Your AVON LADY: http://youravon.com/pbartch *Ask me how to get FREE Shipping.
+2


facebook
Like us on Facebook!