 Do U.S. Supreme Court Justices Owe? Justices Owe Americans an Opinion on Natural Born Citizen?
Judy v. Obama 14-9396 The [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of the President is not the same as the [Citizen] requirement for U.S. Senators or Representatives. The Qualifications encoded in the U.S. Constitution directly give them a Special Priority in the accountability of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices duty in a Life Tenure. The differing opinions in Constitutional Scholarly Opinions even differ, as does the opinion of every American Citizen judge giving their opinions on Facebook as fact of Law. The differing opinions are not new, however what is relatively new is the application of the qualification in the modern Political Arena affecting Americans now in three major Presidential Elections of 2008, 2012, and now 2016 with Cruz, Rubio, Jindal, McCain, Obama. and the problem is particularly affecting millions of Americans right now in many different ways as well as Candidates, so the question is: Do the U.S. Supreme Court Justices owe America an Opinion on the definition of [natural born Citizen] particularly in the Race for the U.S. Presidency?There is only one Presidential Candidate in America that has a Bi-Partisan Federal Court Record in the defense of the [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of the President who has been a Candidate in every one of the last three Presidential Elections and that is Cody Robert Judy. Bi-Partisan means he has sued both major parties- The Republicans in McCain and The Democrats in Obama. He also has two Cases appealing for an Opinion in the high U.S. Supreme Court ie Case No. 12-5276 and 14-9396.Cody says, " I do believe the U.S. Justices owe Americans an Opinion. Any Constitutional Scholar will tell you the difficulty that exist in getting a Case like mine, with two Presidential Candidates in the same party, running for the same office, which fulfills the difficult the standing requirement to the U.S. Supreme Court and preferably without an Election hanging in the Balance, but that is exactly what I've done in Judy v. Obama 14-9396."
The campaign collection of Candidates who are still questionably qualified under the U.S. Constitution's Standards range:
Sen. John McCain Total: 368 Million
Sen. Barack Obama: 730 Million (2008) 964 Million (2012)
Sen. Ted Cruz: 39 Million
Sen. Marco Rubio: 17 Million
Gov. Bobby Jindal: 1 Million
Total: 2,119 Billion
"It seems incomprehensible to me", said Cody, "that the U.S. Supreme Court Justices would not see the great responsibility to clear up the definition to an over 2 Billion dollar potential or alleged abuse of American's contribution dollars to illegal or unqualified Presidential candidates.
"Its like they have no conscience! Remember that is not counting the dollars to candidates who were qualified under the two generation accountability of [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents], but only the ones that were not. To understand the cognitive dissonance of the Justices is to recite that my case relatively claimed 40 Million in damages of time, talent, and money in elections 2008 and 2012 and their opinion did not count or ask them to disqualify a Candidate from Office but only recognize the [damages] giving the responsibility to Congress to remove if deemed necessary. That's pretty important, and relative to the damages of 2 Billion upon Americans 40 Million is a drop in the bucket, but indeed is able to affect the future of Campaign Contributions as well as Presidential Campaigns. But let's not forget about the 10 Trillion added to the national debt by Obama?"
|