Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
Ebola as Political, Not Medical, Problem
10/17/2014 9:36:40 PM

Ebola as Political, Not Medical, Problem


The naming of Ron Klain as the new Ebola czar leaves me with a couple of questions. Do we need a “czar” at all? And why is this guy who we picked?

On the positive side, one of the biggest problems with the Ebola response so far is the poor communications effort, and lack of confidence. Perhaps getting Center for Disease Control chief Dr. Thomas Frieden, a poor communicator, off the podium and back to managing the medical/public health aspects full time may improve both functions.

Klain can probably be the public face, and if he is willing to consult his experts, things could improve. America needs to help beat the outbreak in West Africa, and better manage the cases that crop up here. The growing public lack of confidence is understandable, and should be addressed.

On the negative side, “czars” have a very poor track record. They either become mildly helpful staff functionaries, or completely useless window dressing. We already have a surgeon general, a secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and a secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. Would not one of them do?

Klain is a political operative, close lieutenant of Obama and claims his old boss Joe Biden as his mentor, vice an expert in public health. They are touting his “management” skills, but frankly he is a “fixer.”

This just shows that this administration is looking at Ebola as a political problem, not a medical or public health problem. What does it feel like to you?

That President Obama has chosen to add a coordinator to better synchronize the nation’s efforts to fight Ebola sounds like a great decision. The choice of Ron Klain is enlightening because it shows how Obama sees this serious issue.

Once again, he is trying to manage perceptions and do political damage control. Instead he should be standing up as a leader, and finding a real expert to protect the American people.

http://dailysignal.com/2014/10/17/choice-klain-ebola-czar-suggest-white-house-sees-ebola-political-medical-problem/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+2
Dave Cottrell

2900
2802 Posts
2802
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 100 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Ebola as Political, Not Medical, Problem
10/17/2014 10:04:47 PM
Ebola IS a medical problem. What is very scary, however, is how politicized the response has become. In fact, it should terrify people to find politicians heading medical organizations, period. It should not make people feel one whit better if they happen to have the letters "DR" in front of their name.

Ebola kills 50% to 80% of the people who are infected, so far. This means that, unlike the flu, which kills a HUGE number of people around the world every year, and by far more than this ebola outbreak has killed so far, ebola kills a far higher percentage of the people who are infected.

Neither the flu, nor ebola, are actually curable by anything other than our own immune system. Claims to the contrary have historically been false, but it appears that pharmaceutical companies are making such claims for profit in regards to ebola. This could lead gullible westerners into a false sense of security.

The reality is that the only known way to combat ebola successfully is via containment. When a disease kills such a high percentage of those infected, it needs to be contained, no matter how few people have been infected world wide to date. Any infectious disease can grow exponentially, if it is not contained.
+2
Joyce Parker Hyde

808
1967 Posts
1967
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 100 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Ebola as Political, Not Medical, Problem
10/17/2014 10:51:11 PM
Jim my understanding is that this guy is more of a traffic manager put in place to make sure things flow easily. That has to be a good thing and would not require medical input only good management skills.
The medical people are already doing what they do, so I don't see how this is political-other than the fact that everything is-so how could anything not be.
+2
Michael Caron

9348
2248 Posts
2248
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 100 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Ebola as Political, Not Medical, Problem
10/18/2014 3:49:29 PM
10_1_136.gifHi Jim,

I agree with Joyce. However, I do have a question about an observation I have made. The patient is in a controlled environment while being treated. Those that are in attendance are wearing protective clothing from head to toe. When they leave that area they enter another containment area to remove their protective gear. Once the gear is removed, it is then placed in a disposal unit. First, you cannot place it in the disposal unit before first touching it. Even if that were not bad enough, the germs that had been in contact with the protection gear, are now airborne in the containment room. Therefore, when the nurse or doctor leaves the containment area, he or she is now carrying the germ. There would have to be a second room set up with some sort of sanitized shower system so that once the nurse or doctor leaves the area, it would be fairly safe to assume that dangers of passing on the germ to others is minimal. In the case of ebola, I believe there is a 21 day gestation period for the germ to grow, complicating things even further. Homeland Security would be the most logical agency to handle.
GOD BLESS YOU
~Mike~
http://www.countryvalues65/epilepsy
Michael J. Caron (Mike) TRUTH IN ADVERTISING!! Friends First. Business Later.
+1
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Ebola as Political, Not Medical, Problem
10/19/2014 4:51:11 PM
Hey Dave,

Thanks for your reply and I agree. The EBOLA scare is a a concern because it has become so politicized.

Check this out.

FDA actively blocking fast Ebola detection technology in America

(NaturalNews) Common sense would lead you to believe that the U.S. government would be doing everything in its power, now that Ebola has reached American shores, to combat the deadly virus. But if you assumed that, you would be mistaken.

Most people don't know that there is an Ebola screening machine; it is currently available to the U.S military, and the military is using it now. So why aren't U.S. hospitals using it? Because government guidelines prevent hospitals from doing so.

According to military news site Defense One:

It's a toaster-sized box called FilmArray, produced by a company called BioFire, a subsidiary of bioMerieux and it's capable of detecting Ebola with a high degree of confidence -- in under an hour.

Incredibly, it was present at Dallas Presbyterian Hospital when Ebola patient Thomas Eric Duncan walked through the door, complaining of fever and he had just come from Liberia. Duncan was sent home, but even still, FDA guidelines prohibited the hospital from using the machine to screen for Ebola.


Government bureaucracy preventing its use

The machine sells for about $39,000 a piece and is capable of screening for the genetic markers of a number of respiratory, gastrointestinal and other pathogens, and that includes the Ebola virus. However, it has to have the correct "kit" in place.

And right now, current guidelines from the Food and Drug Administration prohibit hospitals -- including the Dallas hospital where Duncan was treated and where two of his nurses became infected -- from getting that kit. "That's despite the fact that it can provide results with higher than 90 percent certainty and it's one of the machines that the military is currently using to screen for Ebola in Africa," Defense One reported.

The FilmArray works by performing polymerase chain reaction tests to see if Ebola is present, based on a set of genetic markers. A company official told the military news site, "It will take the Ebola cells, break them open, expose the [ribonucleic acid] in the Ebola and match those with a target we've identified." The device works using either blood or saliva samples.

A Utah-based firm that manufactures the disease-detection technology, BioFire Diagnostics, confirmed to Defense One that Texas Health Presbyterian did indeed have a FilmArray machine -- for as long as two years, possibly -- sitting on a shelf when Duncan presented himself to the emergency room.

But in order to use the machine, hospitals must agree to do so only for research purposes instead of actually using it to diagnose incurable diseases like Ebola.

What is the reason for this lunacy? The military site explains:

The FDA rules in what are called "research use only" machines are far more lax than for machines that must provide clinical diagnosis. According to representatives from BioFire, even after the FDA approved the use of the machine for Ebola screening and allowed workers at the hospital to acquire the proper kit for Ebola testing, a 10-20 day "validation" procedure would kick in before they could change the machine's use from diagnostics to research -- and the results would have to go to the Centers for Disease Control for confirmation.

Device used to diagnose first two American Ebola patients

Proper controls or just more inane government bureaucracy? It's not as if the machine's Ebola diagnostic kit hasn't already been proven; after all, it is currently being used by U.S. troops in Africa.

To add further insult to injury, Defense One reported that FilmArray was the device used by medical officials at Emory University Hospital to diagnose the first two American Ebola patients, Kent Brantly and Nancy Writebol (Emory is where Amber Joy Vinson, the second nurse to become infected by Thomas Eric Duncan in Dallas, is being treated).

In a recent paper, published in the journal Lab Medicine, the Emory medical team wrote, "Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based microbiological analyzer (BioFire FilmArray [BioFire Diagnostics, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT]) designed to detect a panel of viral, bacterial, fungal, or parasitic pathogens, many of which might be found in patients returning from a resource-poor region and might complicate care. Among other pathogen-specific markers, this instrument detects Ebola viral RNA, a capability that we believe could have value for monitoring progression of and recovery from Ebola infection in this setting."

Learn all these details and more at the FREE online Pandemic Preparedness course atwww.BioDefense.com

Sources:

http://www.defenseone.com

http://labmed.ascpjournals.org [PDF]

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://science.naturalnews.com

Also give this a look. It is all too politiczed almost as if part of some grand plan or scheme. Or even a board game similar to "Monopoly". I mean we have scientist skewing their results on vaccines coming out now with proof. Through Alternative News sources to say the least. But what makes anyone believe you could trust what a scientist says about anything now? Especially if they rely on government grants and political fat cats for the funding of their experiments and studies. Who's to say they would withhold evidence to create a scare for something else? Like "Global Warming" now changed to a natural occurrence "Global Climate Change" which has happened since the beginning of recorded time and before! Amazingly creating millionaires and billionaires overnight thru regulation and policy. Yep it happens with pandemics too. As if they are playing with prophecy in their own ways.

Pandemic Preparedness FREE Online How-To Course
By the Health Ranger, Mike Adams

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!