Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
ABC, NBC Fail To Use The Term ‘Illegal’
7/2/2014 11:41:09 AM

ABC, NBC Fail To Use The Term ‘Illegal’ In Story On Illegal Immigrants Being Bused Across Country


Jeffrey Meyer's picture

On Tuesday, July 1, all three network evening newscasts hyped a protest in Murrieta, California where residents objected to busloads of illegal immigrants being sent to their town to be processed by border patrol agents.

While all three networks covered the story, only the CBS Evening News with Scott Pelley actually called the 140 passengers “illegal immigrants” with ABC and NBC choosing to call them “migrants” and “undocumented immigrants” respectively. [See video below.]

Even though CBS was the only network to use the term “illegal” in its report, all three networks ignored any reference to how President Obama’s confusing signals and comments on the border crisis may have contributed to the surge in illegal border crossings.

CBS News anchor Scott Pelley introduced the story by detailing the confrontation between residents in California and illegal immigrants attempting to enter their town:

This evening in San Diego, a wall of protesters turned away three bus loads of illegal immigrants. Parents with their children. The federal government was transferring them from Texas. There has been a surge of illegal immigrants recently and apparently some folks in San Diego have had enough.

However, when Pelley turned to CBS reporter John Blackstone for the full story, he immediately failed to use the term “illegal immigrant” in his report. Instead, he called them “migrants” and “undocumented immigrants.” In the report, the CBS reporter hyped the standoff between the residents of Murrieta and the buses full of illegal immigrants:

Residents here have been resisting plans to have the migrants brought here for processing and health checks. The bus windows were blocked but the shouts made it clear to those on board they are not welcome here.

Over on ABC, anchor David Muir only provided a news brief on the protests, and failed to identify the busload of immigrants as being illegal:

We’ve reported here on the overwhelming number of immigrants, especially children pouring into the country, many without their parents. Today, flag-waving protestors turned them away from an immigration processing center in Southern California. Residents there are so angry they’re being processed there the buses were forced to move on after they blocked them. We have not been told tonight where the passengers on the bus were taken instead.

Finally, NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams also refused to use the term “illegal immigrants” when he introduced a full story on the protests. Instead, Williams commented how “more than 100 undocumented migrant children and their parents were flown from Texas to southern California today, in the latest chapter of what has become an overwhelming border crisis in this country.”

Reporter Miguel Almaguer continued to sidestep the illegality of those entering this country:

At this hour, 140 undocumented immigrants from Central America have been diverted from this facility...This was expected to be the first of several waves of immigrants coming to this facility, now it's unclear where those buses will go, and what those futures have for those immigrants who were on board.

NBC's Brian Williams concluded the segment by condescendingly criticizing the protestors by proclaiming “an awful scene there” in Murrieta, California.

See relevant transcripts below.

ABC

ABC World News with Diane Sawyer

July 1, 2014

DAVID MUIR: And now to a developing story along America's southern border. We’ve reported here on the overwhelming number of immigrants, especially children pouring into the country, many without their parents. Today, flag-waving protestors turned them away from an immigration processing center in Southern California. Residents there are so angry they’re being processed there the buses were forced to move on after they blocked them. We have not been told tonight where the passengers on the bus were taken instead.

CBS

CBS Evening News with Scott Pelley

July 1, 2014

SCOTT PELLEY: This evening in San Diego, a wall of protesters turned away three bus loads of illegal immigrants. Parents with their children. The federal government was transferring them from Texas. There has been a surge of illegal immigrants recently and apparently some folks in San Diego have had enough. John Blackstone is following this.

JOHN BLACKSTONE: The charter aircraft from Texas landed at San Diego carrying 140 undocumented immigrants many of them children. They boarded buses for a one hour drive to Murrieta, California. In Murrieta demonstrators blocked the road leading to the border patrol station. Residents here have been resisting plans to have the migrants brought here for processing and health checks. The bus windows were blocked but the shouts made it clear to those on board they are not welcome here. Alan Long is mayor of Murrieta.

ALAN LONG: We have droves of immigrants coming and nothing in place to really prevent that. What's happening now is that they're basically dispersing them to many different backyards and I think there are people and residents here in Murrieta that are ready to take a stand against that.

BLACKSTONE: The nearly 50,000 unaccompanied children who poured over the Texas border are being held in crowded facilities as authorities try to find family members in the U.S. to care for them. Since most come from Central America, they cannot simply be put on buses and sent back across the border to Mexico. Enrique Morones president of the immigrant aid organization Border Angels wants more done to discourage parents from sending their children on the dangerous trek north. Isn’t the way to send a message by sending them back to say look it's no good coming there you’ll just get sent back again.

ENRIQUE MORONES: We can't send back the kids that are here, the overwhelming majority of the kids that are here because it's sheer death and we don't want to sacrifice anybody.

BLACKSTONE: After an hour long standoff with the protesters here the buses turned around and left, Scott. The immigrants will now be taken to another border patrol station in the San Diego area for processing.

PELLEY: John Blackstone. Thank you, John.

NBC

NBC Nightly News

July 1, 2014

BRIAN WILLIAMS: More than 100 undocumented migrant children and their parents were flown from Texas to southern California today, in the latest chapter of what has become an overwhelming border crisis in this country. NBC's Miguel Almaguer is back in Murrieta, California tonight, not far from San Diego. Miguel, good evening.

MIGUEL ALMAGUER: Brian, good evening. At this hour, 140 undocumented immigrants from Central America have been diverted from this facility. They were supposed to be processed here and released but the buses they were on have been turned around, this was the scene earlier today at Lindbergh Field in San Diego. One by one, many mothers carrying their babies were flanked by border patrol officers as they boarded buses for the one hour drive to Murrieta.

Here they were greeted by angry protesters, furious they say by what they call refugees being bused into their small cities. They blocked streets, waived flags and squared off with immigration advocates as tempers flared. Police stood between buses and protesters as the vehicles turned around, headed back on a freeway toward San Diego. This was expected to be the first of several waves of immigrants coming to this facility, now it's unclear where those buses will go, and what those futures have for those immigrants who were on board. Brian?

WILLIAMS: An awful scene there, Miguel Almaguer, Murrieta, California tonight. Miguel, thanks.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeffrey-meyer/2014/07/01/abc-nbc-fail-use-term-illegal-story-illegal-immigrants-being-bused-ac

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+1
Chuck Bartok

460
258 Posts
258
Invite Me as a Friend
RE: ABC, NBC Fail To Use The Term ‘Illegal’
7/2/2014 1:15:48 PM
Perfect example of how the Socialist minions in the Media are using Alinsky's tactics of creating False illusions.

Calling a Spade a Spade is NO Longer the method of reporting.
The most dangerous System in USA today is Political Correctness.
It puts unsubstantiated FEAR in the hearts of the sheeple
Chuck & Shirley Bartok Northern California http://bestbusinessmindset.com http://youcanbuildit.info 530-798-0245
+2
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: TEA Party Makes It's Voice Heard!
7/2/2014 1:41:26 PM
Washington, DC: Nothing beats the nations capital for patriotic festivities. Celebrations kick off with a parade on the National Mall, followed by the "A Capitol Fourth" concert, and concluding with an impressive fireworks display set against the backdrop of the Washington Monument and Lincoln Memorial. (Photo: Getty Images)

Republicans: EPA Rule Could Ruin Fourth Of July

While Americans get ready for the thousands of fireworks shows that will be occurring across the country this weekend, Republicans are warning that pending federal water regulations could ruin fireworks displays next year.

The Environmental Protection Agency is trying to expand its authority under the Clean Water Act. Republicans warn that the agency’s proposal to expand the definition of “waters of the United States” could allow the EPA to regulate bodies of water on private property.

Republicans are now warning that EPA water rules could threaten fireworks by allowing environmental activists to sue and shut down shows across the country.

“If the proposed ‘waters of the United States’ rule becomes final and serves as the eventual basis for future citizen suits against those who organize fireworks shows, we fear fewer homeowners, communities, or local organizations will be able to conduct fireworks displays as they have for decades or longer,” wrote Republican Senators, including David Vitter of Louisiana and John Barrasso of Wyoming, in a letter to the EPA.

Environmentalists have already been using litigation to stop fireworks shows from happening near or over federally protected waters. In Lake Tahoe, Californiaenvironmentalists sued the city, alleging their fireworks show violated the Clean Water Act.

Environmentalists said the fireworks show would result in the unpermitted discharge of pollutants into the lake. The lawsuit demanded that Lake Tahoe pay $37,500 per day in penalties for each violation of the Clean Water Act. Lake Tahoe officials nearly cancelled the show, but luckily for residents the city settled with environmentalists in April.

“By expanding federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction to include ditches, small streams, ponds, and other purely local waterbodies, EPA and the [Army Corps of Engineers] may be exposing landowners and municipalities across the country to costly citizen suit litigation if they should attempt to conduct a neighborhood fireworks show,” Republicans wrote.

“Commemorative fireworks displays have been a part of our nation’s history since its founding. However, there are individuals and groups who would like to significantly limit this tradition through heavy-handed citizen suit litigation under the Clean Water Act and other laws,” Republicans added.

In March, the EPA published its proposed “waters of the United States” rule. The agency said the rule was meant to clear up confusion surrounding two federal court decisions on the agency’s Clean Water Act authority.

But Republicans have said it’s no more than a power grab by the Obama administration. The rule could allow federal agents to regulate water on private property, they warned.

“As expected, the EPA’s proposed water rule expands the agency’s control over natural and man-made streams, lakes, ponds and wetlands,” said Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith. “If approved, this rule could allow the EPA to regulate virtually every body of water in the United States.”

The EPA’s draft rule defines “waters of the United States” as “traditional navigable waters; interstate waters, including interstate wetlands; the territorial seas; impoundments of traditional navigable waters, interstate waters, including interstate wetlands, the territorial seas, and tributaries, as defined, of such waters; tributaries, as defined, of traditional navigable waters, interstate waters, or the territorial seas; and adjacent waters, including adjacent wetlands.”

But the agency says additional bodies of water could be regulated if they have a “significant nexus” to a “traditional navigable water, interstate water, or the territorial seas.” The EPA says it will provide a definition of “significant nexus” when the rule is published.

These waters need not even be navigable — the type of water body the federal government has traditionally regulated. Republicans have questioned how the EPA could justify regulating water bodies that are no longer connected to navigable waterways or other traditionally regulated bodies of water.

“In preparing this proposal, the EPA failed to incorporate adequate peer-reviewed science in accordance with the agency’s own statutory obligations,” Smith said. “It’s troubling that the Administration proposed this expansion before its independent science advisers have had the chance to complete its review of the underlying science. The Obama administration continues to sidestep scientific integrity in order to fast track an abusive regulatory agenda.”

http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/01/republicans-epa-rule-could-ruin-fourth-of-july/?advD=1248,244274

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+1
RE: TEA Party Makes It's Voice Heard!
7/2/2014 5:51:47 PM

Too many Americans still believe Obama is doing a good job despite ample evidence of the “transformation” of America has harmed the nation
All great movements are popular movements. They are the volcanic eruptions of human passions and emotions, stirred into activity by the ruthless Goddess of Distress or by the torch of the spoken word cast into the midst of the people. The new freedom of expression brought by the Internet goes far beyond politics. People relate to each other in new ways, posing questions about how we should respond to people when all that we know about them is what we have learned through a medium that permits all kinds of anonymity and deception. Truth is, I'll never know all there is to know about you just as you will never know all there is to know about me. Humans are by nature too complicated to be understood fully. So, we can choose either to approach our fellow human beings with suspicion or to approach them with an open mind, a dash of optimism and a great deal of candour. We, the People, recognize that we have responsibilities as well as rights; that our destinies are bound together;
+1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!