Hello,

The medical system wants you to believe that they are the only
ones that can help you when it comes to improving your health.
Good health is really pretty simple and comes down to mainly
controlling your thoughts, as how you think has a direct affect
on health, you can think yourself sick or well and even think
yourself into dying. You need plenty of good nutrition which
also includes getting enough pure water, the right food, the
right supplementation, sunshine, exercise and enough good
sleep as well as controlling stress. The last aspect is to
avoid toxins as much as possible and to help your body to
detox on a continual basis.

More and more doctors are believing that if pregnant women
were to get proper nutrition and avoid toxins that almost all
birth defects could be prevented. Good health is each and
every persons responsibility.

When it comes to the medical system only about 13% of what
they do has ever been proven effective. So many drugs that
have come out on the market have had to be recalled that I
am really surprised that so many people keep going beck and
using products from this industry. How could you ever trust
anything that comes from a drug company? Drugs and vaccines
will never give you good health because both are toxic to the body.
Drugs and vaccines are not about health, they are all about money.

When it comes to cancer it will help you to understand that this is
not a disease. Cancer is a symptom of a weak immune system.
Strengthening your immune system is one of the best things you can
do to help with all types of problems. God gave us an immune system
for a reason and if it is working properly it can do amazing things.

The medical industry seems to think that it is a good idea to treat
cancer with radiation and chemo both of which actually cause cancer.
Doesn't make much sense does it. Below is a really good article that
will make you question most anything in regards to the medical
establishment.

Thursday, April 19, 2012 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer

(NaturalNews) The vast majority of so-called scientific studies focused on cancer research are inaccurate and potentially fraudulent, suggests a new review published in the journal Nature. A shocking 88 percent of 53 "landmark" studies on cancer that have been published in reputable journals over the years cannot be reproduced, according to the review, which means that their conclusions are patently false.

C. Glenn Begley, a former head of global cancer research at drug giant Amgen and author of the review, was unable to replicate the findings of 47 of the 53 studies he examined. It appears as though researchers are simply fabricating findings that will garner attention and headlines rather than publishing what they actually discover, which helps them to maintain a steady stream of grant funding but deceives the public.

"These are the studies the pharmaceutical industry relies on to identify new targets for drug development," said Begley about the false studies. "But if you're going to place a $1 million or $2 million or $5 million bet on an observation, you need to be sure it's true. As we tried to reproduce these papers we became convinced you can't take anything at face value."

Begley says he cannot publish the names of the studies whose findings are false. But since it is now apparent that the vast majority of them are invalid, it only follows that the vast majority of modern approaches to cancer treatment are also invalid.

Back in 2009, researchers from the University of Michigan's Comprehensive Cancer Center also published an analysis that revealed many popular cancer studies to be false. As can be expected, one of the primary causes of false results was determined to be conflicts of interest that tended to favor "findings" that worked out best for drug companies rather than for the people (http://www.naturalnews.com/026314_cancer_research_studies.html).

Published research for other conditions also found to be invalid
The Nature study also confirms what was previously uncovered by Dr. George Robertson from Dalhousie University, who found the same inconsistencies in published research studies on Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Just like with cancer, it appears that the foundation upon which drugs for these conditions have been developed is fallacious as a result of phony research.

And scientists working for drug giant Bayer have run into similar problems in other areas as well, which they outlined in a 2011 paper entitled Believe it or not. According to their findings, much of the published data with which they were expected to develop new drugs could not be reproduced, either.

"The scientific community assumes that the claims in a preclinical study can be taken at face value," add Begley and his colleague Dr. Lee Ellis in their review. This published research also assumes that "the main message of [papers] can be relied on [...] Unfortunately, this is not always the case."

Ironically, the only thing all these scientists have been able to successfully reproduce over the years is research showing that much of modern science is unsound. Whether it is funded by drug companies or by agenda-driven federal grants, the so-called "gold standard" of science has been debunked as a greed-driven myth.

Peace, Health and Prosperity,
Barb Doyle, Sc.

This isn't just another one of "those sites".
Take the time to go through the information
and you will see why.
http://empower.thisworks.biz