Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
1
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
Glenn Beck Documentary: "The Revolutionary Holocaust: Live Free...Or Die"
2/3/2010 10:11:59 PM

Glenn Beck Documentary: "The Revolutionary Holocaust: Live Free...Or Die" - 01/22/10



Part 2| Glenn Beck Documentary: "The Revolutionary Holocaust: Live Free...Or Die" - 01/22/10


Part 3| Glenn Beck Documentary: "The Revolutionary Holocaust: Live Free...Or Die" - 01/22/10




Part 4| Glenn Beck Documentary: "The Revolutionary Holocaust: Live Free...Or Die" - 01/22/10



Part 5| Glenn Beck Documentary: "The Revolutionary Holocaust: Live Free...Or Die" - 01/22/10



Part 6| Glenn Beck Documentary: "The Revolutionary Holocaust: Live Free...Or Die" - 01/22/10


I hope you watched each and every one of these, I believe you will find the facts are fact.

Jim Allen


Please participate in the following poll.

Do you remeber your history and does this documentary depict what you know as true, correctly?
A lot of revisions to our history is happening. Before replying with negatives, be sure your facts are true. Not just conjecture.
Total Votes: 1

Please login to vote.

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
Social Security, How It Really Got Stolen
2/4/2010 4:10:50 PM

Worth a read regardless of political affiliation.

If there is anyone out there that doesn't

know this, this is the best visual presentation, I have ever seen.

Now don't be mad at old people, just remember who did this, when you vote in the future.

Social Security,

How It Really Got Stolen

Franklin Delano. Roosevelt

32nd. President, Democrat

Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945

GOOD TO HERE !

Our Social Security

Franklin Delano. Roosevelt (Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945), a Democrat,introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program.

He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,

3.) That the money the participants elected to put Into the Program would be deductible from Their income for tax purposes each year,

4.) That the money the participants put into the Independent ' Trust Fund ' rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would Only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'Put Away ' -- you may be interested in the following:


----------THEN----------------------------------------------

Dwight David Eisenhower

34th. President, Republican,

Term Of Office: January 20, 1953 to January 20, 1961

If I recall correctly, 1958 is the first year thatCongress voted to remove funds from Social Security and put it into the General Fund forCongress to spend.

If I recall correctly, it was a democratically Controlled Congress.

From what I understand, Congress's logic at that time was that there was so much money in Social Security Fund that it would never run out/be used up for the purpose it was intended/set aside for.


-----------WORSE STILL-------------------------------

Lyndon Baines Johnson36th. President, Democrat

Term Of Office: November 22, 1963 to January 20, 1969

Question: Which Political Party took Social Security from the Independent 'Trust Fund ' and put it into the General Fund so that Congress could spend it?

Answer:

It was Lyndon B. Johnson (Democrat, Term Of Office: November 22, 1963 to January 20, 1969) and the democratically Controlled House and Senate.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Question: Which Political Party

Eliminated the Income

Tax Deduction

for Social Security (FICA)

withholding?

Answer: The Democratic Party.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

William Jefferson Clinton

(Bill Clinton)

42nd. President

Democrat Term of Office:January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001

Albert Arnold Gore, Jr.

(Al Gore)

45th. Vice President

Democrat Term of Office:January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001

Question:

Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

Answer:

The Democratic Party, with Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. (Al Gore) [Vice President Term of Office: January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001] casting the

'tie-breaking ' deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US

----------THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMEL'S

BACK !!--------

James Earl Carter, Jr(Jimmy Carter)

39th. President,Democrat

Term of Office: January 20, 1977 to January 20, 1981

Question:

Which Political Party decided to start giving Annuity payments to immigrants?

AND MY FAVORITE:

Answer:

That ' s right! James Earl Carter, Jr. (Jimmy Carter) (Democrat, Term of Office: January 20, 1977 to January 20, 1981) and the Democratic Party.

Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of Awareness will be planted and maybe changes will Evolve.

Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully Sure of what isn't so.

Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.

AND CONGRESS GIVES THEMSELVES 100% RETIREMENT

FOR ONLY SERVING ONE TERM!!!

Thomas Jefferson

3rd. President, Democrat

Term of Office: January 20, 1777 to January 20, 1781

"A government big enough to

give you everything you want,

is strong enough to take

everything you have"

Thomas Jefferson



May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to..
2/5/2010 2:31:37 AM

Thomas Jefferson

3rd. President, Democrat

Term of Office: January 20, 1777 to January 20, 1781

"A government big enough to

give you everything you want,

is strong enough to take

everything you have"

Thomas Jefferson

Quote:

Worth a read regardless of political affiliation.

If there is anyone out there that doesn't

know this, this is the best visual presentation, I have ever seen.

Now don't be mad at old people, just remember who did this, when you vote in the future.

Social Security,

How It Really Got Stolen

Franklin Delano. Roosevelt

32nd. President, Democrat

Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945

GOOD TO HERE !

Our Social Security

Franklin Delano. Roosevelt (Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945), a Democrat,introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program.

He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,

3.) That the money the participants elected to put Into the Program would be deductible from Their income for tax purposes each year,

4.) That the money the participants put into the Independent ' Trust Fund ' rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would Only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'Put Away ' -- you may be interested in the following:


----------THEN----------------------------------------------

Dwight David Eisenhower

34th. President, Republican,

Term Of Office: January 20, 1953 to January 20, 1961

If I recall correctly, 1958 is the first year thatCongress voted to remove funds from Social Security and put it into the General Fund forCongress to spend.

If I recall correctly, it was a democratically Controlled Congress.

From what I understand, Congress's logic at that time was that there was so much money in Social Security Fund that it would never run out/be used up for the purpose it was intended/set aside for.


-----------WORSE STILL-------------------------------

Lyndon Baines Johnson36th. President, Democrat

Term Of Office: November 22, 1963 to January 20, 1969

Question: Which Political Party took Social Security from the Independent 'Trust Fund ' and put it into the General Fund so that Congress could spend it?

Answer:

It was Lyndon B. Johnson (Democrat, Term Of Office: November 22, 1963 to January 20, 1969) and the democratically Controlled House and Senate.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Question: Which Political Party

Eliminated the Income

Tax Deduction

for Social Security (FICA)

withholding?

Answer: The Democratic Party.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

William Jefferson Clinton

(Bill Clinton)

42nd. President

Democrat Term of Office:January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001

Albert Arnold Gore, Jr.

(Al Gore)

45th. Vice President

Democrat Term of Office:January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001

Question:

Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

Answer:

The Democratic Party, with Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. (Al Gore) [Vice President Term of Office: January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001] casting the

'tie-breaking ' deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US

----------THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMEL'S

BACK !!--------

James Earl Carter, Jr(Jimmy Carter)

39th. President,Democrat

Term of Office: January 20, 1977 to January 20, 1981

Question:

Which Political Party decided to start giving Annuity payments to immigrants?

AND MY FAVORITE:

Answer:

That ' s right! James Earl Carter, Jr. (Jimmy Carter) (Democrat, Term of Office: January 20, 1977 to January 20, 1981) and the Democratic Party.

Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of Awareness will be planted and maybe changes will Evolve.

Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully Sure of what isn't so.

Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.

AND CONGRESS GIVES THEMSELVES 100% RETIREMENT

FOR ONLY SERVING ONE TERM!!!

Thomas Jefferson

3rd. President, Democrat

Term of Office: January 20, 1777 to January 20, 1781

"A government big enough to

give you everything you want,

is strong enough to take

everything you have"

Thomas Jefferson



May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Glenn Beck Documentary: "The Revolutionary Holocaust: Live Free...Or Die"
2/11/2010 5:11:40 PM
Quote:

Worth a read regardless of political affiliation.

If there is anyone out there that doesn't

know this, this is the best visual presentation, I have ever seen.

Now don't be mad at old people, just remember who did this, when you vote in the future.

Social Security,

How It Really Got Stolen

Franklin Delano. Roosevelt

32nd. President, Democrat

Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945

GOOD TO HERE !

Our Social Security

Franklin Delano. Roosevelt (Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945), a Democrat,introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program.

He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,

3.) That the money the participants elected to put Into the Program would be deductible from Their income for tax purposes each year,

4.) That the money the participants put into the Independent ' Trust Fund ' rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would Only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'Put Away ' -- you may be interested in the following:


----------THEN----------------------------------------------

Dwight David Eisenhower

34th. President, Republican,

Term Of Office: January 20, 1953 to January 20, 1961

If I recall correctly, 1958 is the first year thatCongress voted to remove funds from Social Security and put it into the General Fund forCongress to spend.

If I recall correctly, it was a democratically Controlled Congress.

From what I understand, Congress's logic at that time was that there was so much money in Social Security Fund that it would never run out/be used up for the purpose it was intended/set aside for.


-----------WORSE STILL-------------------------------

Lyndon Baines Johnson36th. President, Democrat

Term Of Office: November 22, 1963 to January 20, 1969

Question: Which Political Party took Social Security from the Independent 'Trust Fund ' and put it into the General Fund so that Congress could spend it?

Answer:

It was Lyndon B. Johnson (Democrat, Term Of Office: November 22, 1963 to January 20, 1969) and the democratically Controlled House and Senate.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Question: Which Political Party

Eliminated the Income

Tax Deduction

for Social Security (FICA)

withholding?

Answer: The Democratic Party.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

William Jefferson Clinton

(Bill Clinton)

42nd. President

Democrat Term of Office:January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001

Albert Arnold Gore, Jr.

(Al Gore)

45th. Vice President

Democrat Term of Office:January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001

Question:

Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

Answer:

The Democratic Party, with Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. (Al Gore) [Vice President Term of Office: January 20, 1993 to January 20, 2001] casting the

'tie-breaking ' deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US

----------THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMEL'S

BACK !!--------

James Earl Carter, Jr(Jimmy Carter)

39th. President,Democrat

Term of Office: January 20, 1977 to January 20, 1981

Question:

Which Political Party decided to start giving Annuity payments to immigrants?

AND MY FAVORITE:

Answer:

That ' s right! James Earl Carter, Jr. (Jimmy Carter) (Democrat, Term of Office: January 20, 1977 to January 20, 1981) and the Democratic Party.

Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of Awareness will be planted and maybe changes will Evolve.

Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully Sure of what isn't so.

Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.

AND CONGRESS GIVES THEMSELVES 100% RETIREMENT

FOR ONLY SERVING ONE TERM!!!

Thomas Jefferson

3rd. President, Democrat

Term of Office: January 20, 1777 to January 20, 1781

"A government big enough to

give you everything you want,

is strong enough to take

everything you have"

Thomas Jefferson





Obama's healthcare summit sets stage for end-game

WASHINGTON
Tue Feb 9, 2010 6:39am EST
A resident of south Florida holds a sign protesting healthcare reforms during a visit by President Obama to Miami, October 26, 2009. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's call for a healthcare summit including both his fellow Democrats and Republicans sets the stage for a final push to get stalled legislation through Congress, but skeptical Republicans said on Monday the only solution is to start over.

Barack Obama | Healthcare Reform

Obama asked Republicans to bring their best ideas for overhauling the U.S. healthcare system to the February 25 conference in hopes of rejuvenating the issue, which has floundered since Democrats lost their crucial 60th Senate vote last month.

The summit, which Obama wants televised, would give him another chance to sway public opinion on the unpopular legislation, which is critical to his domestic agenda.

The meeting also would answer criticism that Obama did not engage Republicans and instead negotiated backroom deals in an effort to get healthcare legislation passed.

"The president is trying to turn around the sour mood on this issue and mitigate the criticism that he's ramming this bill down people's throats," said Bob Blendon, a health policy and political analyst at Harvard University.

But congressional Republicans said they were wary of Obama's intentions and in no mood to compromise on a plan that polls show is opposed by a majority of Americans.

"Republicans welcome honest discussion, but this event reeks of political gamesmanship," said Republican Representative Tom Price. "The only constructive discussions will start with a blank sheet of paper."

The White House said the summit was not intended as a vehicle to start the healthcare debate all over again.

The reform effort would lead to the biggest policy changes in the $2.5 trillion U.S. healthcare system since the creation of the Medicare government health insurance program for the elderly in 1965.

"The president doesn't think we should start over," White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer said.

The session will give Republicans a chance to explain their unified opposition to the bill. They see their stance as a key to their upset victory in Massachusetts last month, when Republican Scott Brown claimed the Senate seat of late Democratic Senator Edward Kennedy.

NO COMPROMISE

"I don't think it's probably possible to compromise on this bill," Representative Dave Camp, the top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee, told Reuters.

"The structure of it is done in such a way that it is going to raise costs, raise taxes and empower government to get between people and their doctors," he said.

Some said the setting -- a televised meeting of top leaders in both parties -- could lead to more political point-making than compromise and progress.

"In Washington, negotiations don't happen in front of cameras," Concept Capital, a private firm that tracks Congress and the White House for investors, wrote in a report.

Fox News said on Monday it had obtained a letter sent to Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff, by John Boehner and Eric Cantor, the top two Republicans in the House, questioning Obama's commitment to working with members of both parties.

Obama's press secretary, Robert Gibbs, said that, on the contrary, the president was looking forward to reviewing Republican ideas.

"He's open to including any good ideas that stand up to objective scrutiny," Gibbs said in a statement. "What he will not do, however, is walk away from reform and the millions of American families and small business counting on it. The recent news that a major insurer plans to raise premiums for some customers by as much as 39 percent is a stark reminder of the consequences of doing nothing."

A summit marked by more partisan gridlock could give Obama an excuse to move ahead on the bill through a budget process that requires only a simple majority of 51 votes in the 100-member Senate, bypassing Republican opposition.

"Obama seems to be sending a signal they are going to go for the end run," Blendon said. "When he does, he can say 'I tried.'"

The battle over healthcare has consumed Congress since summer and Democrats are anxious to focus on job creation and the economy before congressional elections in November.

The bills would extend coverage to millions of the uninsured and impose restrictions on insurers like requiring them to cover those with pre-existing medical conditions.

The Senate and House of Representatives had passed separate bills last year and were working to merge them when Brown's election cut the process short.

Democrats said they hope to end the process before the summit so they have a final product to offer and that their bills already include many Republican ideas.

"We have promoted the pursuit of a bipartisan approach to health reform from day one," Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid said.

(Additional reporting by Donna Smith, Steve Holland, Susan Cornwell and Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Vicki Allen)


May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
Obama's healthcare summit sets stage for end-game
2/11/2010 5:13:22 PM

Obama's healthcare summit sets stage for end-game

WASHINGTON
Tue Feb 9, 2010 6:39am EST
A resident of   south Florida holds a sign protesting healthcare reforms during a visit   by President Obama to Miami, October 26, 2009. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's call for a healthcare summit including both his fellow Democrats and Republicans sets the stage for a final push to get stalled legislation through Congress, but skeptical Republicans said on Monday the only solution is to start over.

Barack Obama | Healthcare Reform

Obama asked Republicans to bring their best ideas for overhauling the U.S. healthcare system to the February 25 conference in hopes of rejuvenating the issue, which has floundered since Democrats lost their crucial 60th Senate vote last month.

The summit, which Obama wants televised, would give him another chance to sway public opinion on the unpopular legislation, which is critical to his domestic agenda.

The meeting also would answer criticism that Obama did not engage Republicans and instead negotiated backroom deals in an effort to get healthcare legislation passed.

"The president is trying to turn around the sour mood on this issue and mitigate the criticism that he's ramming this bill down people's throats," said Bob Blendon, a health policy and political analyst at Harvard University.

But congressional Republicans said they were wary of Obama's intentions and in no mood to compromise on a plan that polls show is opposed by a majority of Americans.

"Republicans welcome honest discussion, but this event reeks of political gamesmanship," said Republican Representative Tom Price. "The only constructive discussions will start with a blank sheet of paper."

The White House said the summit was not intended as a vehicle to start the healthcare debate all over again.

The reform effort would lead to the biggest policy changes in the $2.5 trillion U.S. healthcare system since the creation of the Medicare government health insurance program for the elderly in 1965.

"The president doesn't think we should start over," White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer said.

The session will give Republicans a chance to explain their unified opposition to the bill. They see their stance as a key to their upset victory in Massachusetts last month, when Republican Scott Brown claimed the Senate seat of late Democratic Senator Edward Kennedy.

NO COMPROMISE

"I don't think it's probably possible to compromise on this bill," Representative Dave Camp, the top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee, told Reuters.

"The structure of it is done in such a way that it is going to raise costs, raise taxes and empower government to get between people and their doctors," he said.

Some said the setting -- a televised meeting of top leaders in both parties -- could lead to more political point-making than compromise and progress.

"In Washington, negotiations don't happen in front of cameras," Concept Capital, a private firm that tracks Congress and the White House for investors, wrote in a report.

Fox News said on Monday it had obtained a letter sent to Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff, by John Boehner and Eric Cantor, the top two Republicans in the House, questioning Obama's commitment to working with members of both parties.

Obama's press secretary, Robert Gibbs, said that, on the contrary, the president was looking forward to reviewing Republican ideas.

"He's open to including any good ideas that stand up to objective scrutiny," Gibbs said in a statement. "What he will not do, however, is walk away from reform and the millions of American families and small business counting on it. The recent news that a major insurer plans to raise premiums for some customers by as much as 39 percent is a stark reminder of the consequences of doing nothing."

A summit marked by more partisan gridlock could give Obama an excuse to move ahead on the bill through a budget process that requires only a simple majority of 51 votes in the 100-member Senate, bypassing Republican opposition.

"Obama seems to be sending a signal they are going to go for the end run," Blendon said. "When he does, he can say 'I tried.'"

The battle over healthcare has consumed Congress since summer and Democrats are anxious to focus on job creation and the economy before congressional elections in November.

The bills would extend coverage to millions of the uninsured and impose restrictions on insurers like requiring them to cover those with pre-existing medical conditions.

The Senate and House of Representatives had passed separate bills last year and were working to merge them when Brown's election cut the process short.

Democrats said they hope to end the process before the summit so they have a final product to offer and that their bills already include many Republican ideas.

"We have promoted the pursuit of a bipartisan approach to health reform from day one," Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid said.

(Additional reporting by Donna Smith, Steve Holland, Susan Cornwell and Patricia Zengerle; Editing by Vicki Allen)

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!