Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
1
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
Democrats Stole Your Money it took them 40 years but they are on the way to your bank account
8/11/2009 9:35:26 AM

 

Thomas Jefferson

3rd. PresidentDemocrat

Term of Office: January 20, 1777 to January 20, 1781

 

"A government big enough to

give you everything you want,

is strong enough to take

everything you have"

 

Our Social Security

Franklin Delano. Roosevelt 

(Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945), 

a Democrat,introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program.  

He promised:          

1.)   That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,

2.)   That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,

3.)   That the money the participants elected to put Into the Program would be deductible from Their income for tax purposes each year,

4.)  That the money the participants put into the Independent ' Trust Fund ' rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would Only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and

5.)  That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

 

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are

now receiving a Social Security check every month --

and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of

the money we paid to the Federal government to  'Put

Away ' -- you may be interested in the following: 

 http://gimsreport.com/politics/worth_a_read_regardless_of_polit.html

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to tak
11/10/2009 3:55:18 AM
Quote:

Thomas Jefferson

3rd. President, Democrat

Term of Office: January 20, 1777 to January 20, 1781

"A government big enough to

give you everything you want,

is strong enough to take

everything you have"

Our Social Security

Franklin Delano. Roosevelt

(Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945),

a Democrat,introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program.

He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,

3.) That the money the participants elected to put Into the Program would be deductible from Their income for tax purposes each year,

4.) That the money the participants put into the Independent ' Trust Fund ' rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would Only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are

now receiving a Social Security check every month --

and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of

the money we paid to the Federal government to 'Put

Away ' -- you may be interested in the following:

http://gimsreport.com/politics/worth_a_read_regardless_of_polit.html

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Democrats Stole Your Money it took them 40 years but they are on the way to your bank account
12/23/2009 5:41:19 PM
Quote:
Quote:

Thomas Jefferson

3rd. President, Democrat

Term of Office: January 20, 1777 to January 20, 1781

"A government big enough to

give you everything you want,

is strong enough to take

everything you have"

Our Social Security

Franklin Delano. Roosevelt

(Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945),

a Democrat,introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program.

He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary,

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,

3.) That the money the participants elected to put Into the Program would be deductible from Their income for tax purposes each year,

4.) That the money the participants put into the Independent ' Trust Fund ' rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would Only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are

now receiving a Social Security check every month --

and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of

the money we paid to the Federal government to 'Put

Away ' -- you may be interested in the following:

http://gimsreport.com/politics/worth_a_read_regardless_of_polit.html



Morning Bell: Obamacare’s Constitutional Problems Proliferating

After the Democrats cleared the second of three 60 vote hurdles last night, Republicans ceded enough debate time back to the majority so that passage of Obamacare through the Senate will take place n Christmas Eve at 8 AM. Conservatives have every right to be disappointed that Senate Republicans did not force the maximum amount of debate possible. But they can take heart in a key point of order that will be voted on later today. Sponsored by Sens. Jim DeMint (R-SC) and John Ensign (R-NV), that vote will lay the groundwork for the possible legal dismantling of Obama’s health program.

As we’ve detailed before, the very core of the Senate health plan includes an unprecedented expansion of the power of the federal government over the lives of every American. For the first time in history, every American would be forced to buy federally regulated and approved health insurance or face a $750 fine. As the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) wrote in 1994: “A mandate requiring all individuals to purchase health insurance would be an unprecedented form of federal action. The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States.” The individual mandate and other questionable measures in the bill raise serious questions as to whether Obamacare could survive a Constitutional test:

Enumerated Powers: Article I allocates to Congress “[a]ll legislative powers herein granted,” which means that some legislative powers were intended to remain beyond Congress’s reach. The Supreme Court recognized and affirmed this fundamental principle from the earliest days of the republic, as Chief Justice Marshall famously observed: “The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken, or forgotten, the constitution is written.” Nowhere in the Constitution is Congress given the power to mandate that an individual enter into a contract with a private party or purchase a good or service. Democrats have pointed to both the general welfare taxing power and the commerce clause as possible justifications for the mandate, but as a recent Heritage Legal Memorandum details, neither justification withstands scrutiny.

5th Amendment: The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution reads in part: “No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Sen. Ensign will argue today: “The Democrats’ health reform bill would require an American citizen to devote a portion of income – his or her private property – to health insurance coverage. … But, Mr. President, if a Nevadan does not want to spend his or her hard-earned income on health insurance coverage and would prefer to spend it on something else, such as rent or a car payment, this new requirement could be a “taking” of private property under the Fifth Amendment.”

Racial Discrimination: On December 10th, the United States Commission on Civil Rights sent a letter to the Senate regarding racially discriminatory provisions in Obama’s health plan. The letter reads: “No matter how well-intentioned, utilizing racial preferences with hope of alleviating health care disparities is inadvisable both as a matter of policy and as a matter of law. … Ensuring that all Americans, regardless of race, have access to quality health care requires both creativity and hard-nosed attention to data. It also requires staying within the requirements of the Constitution. The current race-based provisions of the Senate Health Care bill display none of these qualities.”

Unequal State Treatment: Speaking to Fox News, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) described Sen. Ben Nelson’s (D-NE) deal to support Obamacare in exchange for a bailout Nebraska’s Medicaid costs as “disappointing, sleazy, unconstitutional.” Graham is not the only one examining Cornhusker Kickback. The Attorneys General of Alabama, Colorado, Michigan, North Dakota, South Carolina, Texas and Washington state are jointly investigating the deal to see if special treatment for only one state in the nation at the expense of the other 49 violates the Constitution.

The leftist majority in the Senate is likely to vote down the DeMint/Ensign constitutional point of order, but the very objection itself will help build a record that courts will look at when determining whether or not Obamacare is unconstitutional. The Senate is not the final arbiter of whether or not the laws it passes are consistent with the United States Constitution. That question was settled over 200 years ago in Marbury v. Madison. Although it is always difficult for the Supreme Court to thwart what is perceived to be the popular will, polling consistently shows that this legislation faces strong popular opposition. If that remains true after enactment, the majority of the Justices who are inclined to preserve the enumerated powers scheme and adhere to the original meaning of the text will have little inclination or incentive to stretch the Constitution to reach so decidedly unpopular and far-reaching a law as this one.

Quick Hits:

  • The 150,000 member National Nurses United organization yesterday called the Senate plan, “a seriously flawed bill that could actually exacerbate the health care crisis and financial insecurity for American families, and that cedes far too much additional power to the tyranny of a callous insurance industry.”
  • With unemployment in the construction sector already at 19.4%, the construction industry was surprised to learn a job killing employment tax especially targeting them made it into the Senate’s final version of Obamacare.
  • Across all sectors of the economy, businesses worry that a series of new taxes and fees to pay for expanding health-care coverage will push up premiums, particularly for smaller employers.
  • Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) says three other senators have told him they want to bargain for the same Medicaid bailout deal Nelson secured for Nebraska.
  • In an Oval Office interview with The Washington Post, President Obama named the Wall Street bailout as the ‘most important thing’ of his first year.

http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/23/morning-bell-obamacares-constitutional-problems-proliferating/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
World Without Dum Dums
12/23/2009 10:00:24 PM

World Without Dum Dums

Diane Francis is a dum dum. Diane Francis, is a writer for the National Post, the USA Today of Canada. Ms. Francis authored a piece this week titled: “The Real Inconvenient Truth (The whole world needs to adopt China's one-child policy)” It begins thusly:

“The ‘inconvenient truth’ overhanging the UN's Copenhagen conference is not that the climate is warming or cooling, but that humans are overpopulating the world.

A planetary law, such as China's one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.

The world's other species, vegetation, resources, oceans, arable land, water supplies and atmosphere are being destroyed and pushed out of existence as a result of humanity's soaring reproduction rate.”

This is mind numbingly stupid on so many levels and proof positive that the world would be much better off without dum dums like Ms. Francis. I don’t mean to suggest by that last statement, or the title of this article, that people like Ms. Francis do not have the right to exist, or should be placed in quarantine so that their epic stupidity doesn’t threaten healthy brains. Instead, I am suggesting that if we returned to teaching facts in our schools with an emphasis on problem solving based on analytical rather than emotional thinking, they would not exist. The few kooks that inevitably fall through the cracks, would be more readily recognizable to a much larger number of people.

Lets shine the light of reason on the three ridiculous statements that Ms. Francis opens her half-baked article with.

She compounds the already vapid reality of a world conference being held to discuss world wide climate change, a phenomenon that man has no power to control outside of science fiction novels and comic books, with the concept that the world is in danger of being overrun with people. This is patently absurd when one considers that man lives in cities, towns, villages etc., which constitute a mere 2% of the earth’s geography, including roads and highways.

I remember reading years ago that the entire population of the earth could fit comfortably in the state of Texas. Being the type that has to see it for himself I did the math. Texas is 268,581 square miles according to texasalmanac.com, a square mile = 27,878,400 square feet, the earth's population was at 6,714,632,542 at the time of this notation. (March 2006)

268,581 x 27'878,400= 7,487,608,550,400 divided by 6,714,632,542 = 1,115 square feet per person.

To put this in perspective, a family of 5 like my own, could have a 5,575 square foot mansion. Much larger than our current digs. The world population neatly in Texas, with the rest of the breathtakingly fertile and verdant U.S. for farmland and not a single soul anywhere else on the surface of the earth, how does that fit into your Malthusian world view?

“And the number of the army of the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand: and I heard the number of them.” Revelation 9:13

The Bible states that the King of the East, an enormous Asian power, will field an army of 200 Million men during the Battle of Armageddon. An incredible number until you remember that China has a population of 1.3 Billion.

China’s one child per family policy has rendered China the most desperate nation in the history of the world. Because of the bias towards male children in their culture, there are not enough women to go around as girls are aborted in staggering numbers in favor of boys. This means millions of boys born, who will never have a wife or family of their own. They literally have nothing to lose.

China has a suicide rate that is 2.3 times the global average, with a high percentage consisting of rural females. This is unnatural and it is wreaking havoc in Chinese society. Ms. Francis made an appearance on The Factor. With Laura Ingraham serving as guest host wherein she declared that she was a feminist. How do you enforce a policy like China’s one child rule without forcing women to have abortions? You can’t! It would mean the end of reproductive rights for women. Not a very sound feminist notion and decidedly ungodly.

As for man destroying resources, people really do not have an appreciation for the shear immensity of the earth. I don’t care if you gave a brand new box of super straws to every living person after we move them to Texas, we couldn’t put a dent in the Great Lakes alone. Silly ideas like climate change and population control cause real suffering to befall real people.

The policies driven by idiotic notions like anthropogenic climate change will hurt poor and needy people more than anyone else. We refuse to exploit enormous supplies of natural resources while people struggle to heat their homes. We pay higher prices for goods and services because of false and unnecessary energy shortages.

We have this thing twisted, the greatest natural resource on earth is man. We need more people not less. The late great American economist Julian Simon debunked all of this sort of simpleminded hokum years ago. I implore you to read this brilliant article about Simon on wired.com “The Doomslayer”. Especially you liberal global warming kool-aid drinking, green blooded, tree hugging alarmist, empty headed democratic party supporting, Obama lickspittles.

The very idea that the media has focused 15% more attention on the amorous misadventures of Tiger Woods, than the real world impacting Climategate story is appalling. The notion that the Democrats are about to shove energy policies down our throats that are going to cripple us, based on a lie, should be front page news.

It has since come to light that Ms. Francis, herself, is the mother of two children. Given her new philosophy on population control, I wonder, if given a do over, which of her two children she would wish unborn so that she could be compliant with her earth friendly family ideas?

To Ms Francis, I can only quote William F. Buckley, Jr. as I am wont to do on occasion:

“I won't insult your intelligence by suggesting that you really believe what you just said.”

Ms. Francis, Al Gore, Barack Obama and the whole liberal Democratic crackpot party are not a few fries short of a happy meal in the sense that they didn’t get all the fries they should have, they are not crazy. We the American people are the fries. And if I can mix metaphorical franchises here, in an attempt to “have it their way” the politicians are not ordering fries with their meals at all as they disregard the will of the people in this “post political” Obama administration’s approach to governing.

Everything they plan to do is contrary to common sense, everything! Please stop and think before you nod your head in agreement because you identify with a political party or a person’s skin color. Use your head for something other than a place to try out the latest hair product, Think! If you do, by and by, we can realize a world without dum dums.

Digital Publius http://regularfolksunited.com/index.php?tab=article_view&article_id=3053

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!