BREAKING: Obama DOJ Bombshell, FOIA Lawsuit Reveals Multimillion Dollar Campaign To “Replace The Government”

Obama funded chaos in the Middle East.

A Freedom of Information Act lawsuit from the American Center for Law and Justice revealed that former President Barack Obama’s administration led a multimillion-dollar campaign to “replace the government” in Israel.

The bombshell lawsuit detailed how Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’ son, Yasser Mahmoud Abbas, and a senior official in the anti-Israel group OneVoice received millions of dollars from the U.S. State Department.

The funds from the Obama administration were explicitly supposed to be used to remove Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and replace Israel’s entire government.

Between 2013 and 2014, the State Department began issuing grants to OneVoice totaling more than $350,000. That was four times the size of the average grant the State Department allowed for foreign entities.

In the memo below, the FOIA memo clearly shows the Obama administration was plotting to have a terrorist-connected offshoot take out the Israeli government.

Here’s the memo.

The FOIA documents plainly state that the Obama administration was aware of OneVoice’s alliance with terrorist groups in the region and their intention to use them to overthrow the Israeli government.

This strongly reads like the Obama administration was funding a secret operation to “take out” Netanyahu and allow the terrorist-supporting Palestinians to take over Israel.

Using American taxpayer dollars from Obama’s State Department, OneVoice played a major role in launching “a multimillion-dollar grassroots campaign” with one objective: “replace the government of Israel.”

Making matters even worse, the Obama administration gave taxpayer money to a terrorist-affiliated organization to remove a duly elected leader of the only free democracy in the Middle East.

Obama knew exactly what he was doing.

The ACLJ said they tried to get these documents for years, but had to fight the battle in court because Obama’s State Department actively sought to conceal these explosive reports.

Federal documents clearly show the Obama administration gave a terrorist-affiliated group millions of dollars from American taxpayers to literally replace the government in Israel and remove Netanyahu.

Why is this not being plastered across the media? Because Obama’s Deep State acts of corruption and anti-Israel agenda have been swept under the rug for years.

But with Trump in office, these swamp creatures are finally starting to be exposed.

AL-QAEDA CALLS FOR MUSLIMS TO ATTACK AMERICANS AND JEWS OVER TRUMP'S JERUSALEM DECISION

WOMAN ISIS FIGHTER IS FIRST FEMALE FOREIGNER SENTENCED TO DEATH FOR JOINING MILITANTS

A female member of the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) has been sentenced to death by an Iraqi court, the first female foreign fighter to be given the death penalty for joining the group.

The German woman, who is of Moroccan origin, traveled to Iraq with her two daughters to join ISIS. Both daughters went on to marry ISIS fighters.

AFP reported that she was sentenced to death by hanging, according to judicial spokesman Abdel Settar al-Bayraqdar. The woman, who has not been named, had reportedly provided logistical support to the terror group, aiding and abetting in their crimes.

"The accused admitted during interrogations that she left Germany for Syria, then Iraq, to join ISIS with her two daughters who married members of the terrorist organization," Bayraqdar said.

A member of the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), an alliance of Arab and Kurdish fighters, removes an Islamic State group flag in the town of Tabqa, Syria, on April 30, 2017.AFP PHOTO / DELIL SOULEIMAN

She also had participated in attacks against the Iraqi security forces, according to Vice news, which confirmed the German national was the first foreign woman given the death penalty for joining ISIS in Iraq.

In September, a Russian national captured in Iraq’s second city of Mosul was sentenced to death by hanging after he was found guilty of fighting for ISIS.

The nine-month battle to retake Mosul, ISIS’ de facto capital in Iraq, ended in July 2017. The end of three years of rule by the militant group in the city dispersed a great number of fighters to the desert areas on Iraq’s western frontier with Syria. Many of the militants were captured attempting to flee the city as refugees. More than 4,000 jihadis were arrested following the fighting, police chief General Wathiq al-Hamdani said.

In December, Iraq’s Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi declared victory over ISIS, ending a more tgab three-year fight-back against the militants.

The German newspaper Der Speigel reported that the woman was being held in Baghdad with three other German women and another woman of Moroccan origin. While there are no official statistics for the number of ISIS fighters arrested in Iraq, hundreds are currently being held in Iraqi jails.

(newsweek)

Written by Darius Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed) — The recently leaked draft of the Pentagon’s Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) has revealed a number of concerns, including the allegation that Russia has a nuclear underwater drone with a range of 10,000 km and the ability to devastate U.S. ports and harbors.

A more recently highlighted bombshell in the NPR alleges the Pentagon will find other arenas to create the pretext for nuclear first strikes, including cyber attacks. According to the NPR, a nuclear first strike is presented as the only “realistic” option to such threats, a devastating claim.

As AntiWar.com has noted, the problem with this posture is its potential to spiral out of control:

“US assignments of blame in cyberattacks are rarely grounded in evidence or reality, but rather they blame whoever is politically expedient at the time, whether it’s Russia, China, or North Korea. Such reckless blame is relatively consequence-free when the US just responds with angry threats, but nuclear strikes could quickly start massive, civilization ending nuclear warfare.” [emphasis added]

While the NPR doesn’t explicitly state the intended target of this strategy, reading between the lines requires us to ask a couple of simple questions. One, why would the U.S. want to propose a tactical nuclear first strike in response to cyber attacks, and two, which of the adversarial states would they propose using such a policy against? Russia, China, and North Korea all have nuclear weapons or capabilities, meaning a nuclear first strike may have unforeseen and catastrophic blowback potential.

In December of last year, NATO reportedly made the decision to integrate cyber warfare into its command. As Anti-Media explained at the time, this policy is most likely aimed at the alleged threat held by Iran, which – in the absence of major military spending to rival that of the U.S. and its allies – turns to other disruptive activities to counter American aggression:

“Iran has allegedly conducted a number of very successfully damaging cyber attacks against the United States in recent years, though these have received little to no media hysteria compared to the attention and outrage the alleged Russiagate scandal has garnered.”

From the Conversation:

“It was clear by the mid-2000s that Iran would become a source of cyberattacks: Its hackers had started taking over websites worldwide and posting their own messages on them, a practice called ‘defacing.’ Often it was just for fun, but some hackers wanted to stand up for their country and Muslims. One prominent group, Iran Hackers Sabotage, launched in 2004 ‘with the aim of showing the world that Iranian hackers have something to say in the worldwide security.’”

The U.S. has had Iran in its crosshairs for decades, though finding a way to crack the Iranian regime to the point of no return has not proven easy. As Anti-Media has explained, the U.S. more or less has an official regime-change policy targeting Iran, and the CIA has essentially set up an office to achieve this goal.

Just weeks ago, U.S. intelligence agencies reportedly gave the green light to Israel to assassinate General Qassem Soleimani, a stalwart leader of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Even now, the U.S. is laying the groundwork to confront Iran both in Syria and Lebanon.

In September of last year, Reuters reported that the Trump administration was weighing a more aggressive strategy against Iran, including the permission to “open fire” when harassed by armed speedboats operated by the IRGC, as well as directly targeting “cyber espionage and other activity and potentially nuclear proliferation.”

Reading between the lines seems to indicate that the U.S. is certainly keeping its options open on the Iran question if regime change can’t be achieved through more covert means. While it is generally under-reported, Iran is one of the only countries successfully rattling the U.S. and its allies through cyber espionage tactics, and the U.S. is openly discussing a nuclear strike as the only “realistic” option to counter this threat.

Let’s hope we’re wrong on this one.

Op-ed / Creative Commons / Anti-Media