Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Promote
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/29/2014 11:12:13 AM

Missouri police sued for $40 million over actions in Ferguson protests

Reuters


FOX News Videos
Ferguson mayor discusses pending lawsuit



A group of people caught up in unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, after a white officer killed a black teenager, sued local officials on Thursday, alleging civil rights violations through arrests and police assaults with rubber bullets and tear gas.

The suit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, says law enforcement met a broad public outcry over the Aug. 9 killing of 18-year-old Michael Brown with "militaristic displays of force and weaponry," (and) engaged U.S. citizens "as if they were war combatants."

The lawsuit seeks a total of $40 million on behalf of six plaintiffs, including a 17-year-old boy who was with his mother in a fast-food restaurant when they were arrested. Each of the plaintiffs was caught up in interactions with police over a period from Aug. 11 to 13, the suit allege.

Named as defendants are the city of Ferguson, St. Louis County, Ferguson Police Chief Tom Jackson, St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Delmar, Ferguson police officer Justin Cosmo, and other unnamed police officers from Ferguson and St. Louis County.

Neither the city, county nor police departments had any immediate comment on the lawsuit.

The lawsuit followed nearly two weeks of racial strife in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson, where Brown's killing prompted protesters to take to the streets. Some stores were looted in nightly protests, and police responded with riot gear and moved in military equipment to try to quell the turmoil.

One of the plaintiffs alleges she and her son were in a McDonald's restaurant when several police officers with rifles ordered them out. According to the suit, an officer threw her to the ground and handcuffed her, with she and her son both arrested.

Another plaintiff alleges he was trying to visit his mother in Ferguson when several police officers in military uniforms in her neighborhood shot him with rubber bullets. When he fell over, he was beaten and sprayed with pepper spray, the lawsuit says.

Two other plaintiffs say they were peacefully protesting when officers in riot gear fired on them with tear gas, rubber bullets and stun grenades. A separate plaintiff says he was trying to record footage of the protests when police took his camera and arrested him.

"This is a blatant example of how police handle African-Americans ... how it can go terribly, terribly wrong. You have a right to peaceful assembly," said attorney Reginald Greene who brought the case.

Police have said police officer Darren Wilson shot Brown in an altercation on a residential street when the officer asked him to move out of the road. Some witnesses have reported that Brown was holding his hands up in surrender when he was shot multiple times, including twice in the head.

A St. Louis County grand jury has begun hearing evidence in the case. The U.S. Justice Department has opened its own investigation.

(Reporting by Carey Gillam; Editing by Peter Cooney)








The lawsuit says law enforcement officers engaged with civilians "as if they were war combatants."
Filed by 6 plaintiffs


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/29/2014 11:17:38 AM

Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy: Time to call Russia-Ukraine conflict a ‘war’


This Aug. 23, 2014, satellite image made by DigitalGlobe and annotated by NATO shows what the military alliance says are Russian self-propelled artillery units near Krasnodon, Ukraine, inside territory controlled by Russian separatists. On Thursday, Aug. 28, 2014, senior NATO official Brig. Gen. Nico Tak said at least 1,000 Russian troops have poured into Ukraine with sophisticated equipment, leaving no doubt that the Russian military had invaded southeastern Ukraine. (AP Photo/NATO, DigitalGlobe)


With Russian forces apparently rolling across eastern Ukraine, Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy told Yahoo News on Thursday that it is past time to call the escalating conflict a “war” and to label Moscow’s actions an “invasion.”

“By any conventional definition of war, there is war happening between Ukraine and Russia. And it’s been occurring essentially since the invasion of Crimea” in February, Murphy, who sits on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a telephone interview.

When Russian forces reportedly rolled into eastern Ukraine on Wednesday, the White House called it a “military movement,” “military activities” and “a continued effort to destabilize the situation in eastern Ukraine.” The State Department referred to an “incursion” and explicitly declined to call the escalating conflict an invasion or “war.”

Back in March, however, National Security Adviser Susan Rice had condemned Putin’s “invasion and annexation of Crimea,” a strategic peninsula in Ukraine’s south.

It's not clear whether calling Russia's latest military moves a "war" or an "invasion" would change much, beyond raising the temperature of already heated rhetorical exchanges between Washington and Moscow. That, in turn, might make an already elusive diplomatic solution even more unlikely.

Murphy said Russian President Vladimir Putin’s decision to “commence a conventional invasion” in eastern Ukraine was part of a pattern of “panicked reactions to moments of weakness.”

Earlier, NATO released satellite images that, the alliance said, showed Russian armored columns operating inside Ukraine. Russia has denied invading its neighbor.

Ukraine government forces had recently enjoyed successes against Russian-backed separatists, said the Connecticut lawmaker, prompting Putin to send in troops to “keep that part of the conflict frozen.”

“I don’t think he’s going to be dumb enough to send 20,000 troops inside Ukraine,” Murphy said.

At the State Department, spokeswoman Jen Psaki bristled Thursday at the notion that avoiding the term “invasion” had any significant bearing on U.S. policy.

“There’s no new set of obligations based on that kind of terminology,” Psaki said.

“Our focus is more on what Russia is doing, what we’re going to do about it, than what we’re calling it,” she told reporters. “Regardless of what it’s called, Russia’s actions need to stop.”



Senator: Time to call Ukraine conflict a 'war'



When Russian forces reportedly rolled into eastern Ukraine, the White House called it a "military movement."
Avoiding the term 'invasion'



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/29/2014 11:27:29 AM
Anger over Russian move

Obama leads condemnation as West rounds on Russia

AFP



CBSTV Videos
Obama threatens further consequences against Russia



Kiev (AFP) - Ukraine and the West said that Russian troops were actively involved in the fighting tearing apart the east of the country, raising fears of a direct military confrontation between Kiev and its former Soviet master.

US President Barack Obama led a chorus of growing international condemnation over the escalating crisis, saying it was "plain for the world to see" that Russian forces were fighting in Ukraine, despite more repeated denials by Moscow.

Obama and German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned that Russia's actions "cannot remain without consequences" as the US and Europe raised the prospect of fresh sanctions against Russia.

"Russia has deliberately and repeatedly violated the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, and the new images of Russian forces inside Ukraine make that plain for the world to see," Obama said on Thursday, ratcheting up the pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"This ongoing Russian incursion into Ukraine will only bring more costs and consequences for Russia."

NATO said at least 1,000 Russian troops were on the ground supporting pro-Kremlin separatists who have been fighting against Kiev's rule since April.

The United States and the European Union have already imposed a series of punishing sanctions on Moscow over the crisis, the worst standoff between Russia and the West since the Cold War.

Merkel said European leaders would discuss possible new measures against Moscow at a summit in Brussels on Saturday.

On a day of fast-moving developments, US envoy Samantha Power, at an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council in New York, demanded in blunt terms that Russia "stop lying".

"The mask is coming off," she thundered.

"We see Russia's actions for what they are: a deliberate effort to support and now fight alongside illegal separatists in another sovereign country."

Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko described the situation as "extremely difficult" but "manageable for us not to panic", as security chiefs announced that mandatory army conscription would resume in the autumn.

US officials have accused Russian troops of being behind a lightning counter-offensive that has seen pro-Moscow rebels seize swathes of territory from Ukrainian government forces, dramatically turning the tide in the four-month conflict.

Kiev said Russian soldiers had seized control of a key southeastern border town and a string of villages in an area where fighting had been raging for days.

- Russians 'directly involved' -

The US ambassador to Kiev, Geoffrey Pyatt, wrote on Twitter that Moscow's troops were now "directly involved in the fighting" in Ukraine.

A NATO official said the supply of weapons to the rebels had also increased in both "volume and quantity," with a diplomatic source later adding that ambassadors to the alliance would hold an emergency meeting Friday.

Fears that the flare-up in the conflict could lead to all-out war pushed stocks down in Europe and the United States, and Asia looked set to follow suit.

Russia's ruble sunk to a five-month low as stock markets in the country plummeted over the possibility of new sanctions.

Kiev had called on the West for urgent help after a counter-offensive from the southeast border smashed through an army blockade around the separatist stronghold of Donetsk and threatened the government-held port city of Mariupol.

The gains by the separatist fighters come after weeks of government offensives that had seen troops push deep into the last holdout rebel bastions in Ukraine's industrial heartland.

Ukraine's Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk blasted Putin for having "deliberately unleashed a war in Europe" and pleaded for urgent action.

A top rebel leader, Alexander Zakharchenko, has admitted that Russian troops were fighting alongside his insurgents, but said they were on "holiday" after volunteering to join the battle.

The spiralling tensions come only days after Poroshenko and Putin held their first meeting in three months, but they failed to achieve any concrete breakthrough despite talk of a peace roadmap.

- No Ukraine guarantee -

The latest claims of Russian manoeuvres are sparking fears that Moscow is seeking more than Crimea, which it annexed in March in the face of Western outrage.

"The latest newsflow from eastern Ukraine suggests an increased risk that Russian President Putin may go well beyond snatching Crimea and destabilising the pro-Western government in Kiev. Instead, he is edging closer to an almost-invasion to occupy parts of southeastern Ukraine," said Berenberg bank analyst Christian Schulz.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov insists the Kremlin is "not interested in breaking up" Ukraine.

The United Nations estimates the conflict has killed over 2,200 people and forced more than 400,000 to flee since April.

Russia vehemently opposes closer ties between Ukraine and NATO.

Concerns that Kiev could be drawn closer into the Western security alliance -- and towards Europe -- are seen as a key motivation behind Russia's actions in recent months.

Obama, who will host Poroshenko at the White House on September 18, said while ex-Soviet states now in the alliance could expect a US military defense, such guarantees did not apply to non-member Kiev.




Outrage over Russian invasion in Ukraine


European leaders urge Moscow to change course or suffer "very serious consequences."
U.S. envoy: 'Stop lying'

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/29/2014 4:37:06 PM

Jihadists behead Iraq Kurdish fighter: monitor

AFP


Reuters Videos
Kurdish forces pound Islamic State militants northeast of Baghdad



Baghdad (AFP) - The jihadist Islamic State group has posted video of the execution of a captured Kurdish fighter, in a warning to Iraqi Kurdish leaders to end military cooperation with Washington, a monitoring group said.

The United States has carried out a wave of air strikes against the jihadists in northern Iraq, helping Kurdish forces to claw back ground lost to the militants earlier this month.

The video, titled "A message in blood to the leaders of the American-Kurdish alliance," opens with 15 men in orange jumpsuits standing around the IS flag.

Three of the men ask Kurdish regional president Massud Barzani "and the Kurdish government to end their relationship with the US... military intervention in northern Iraq," the SITE Intelligence Group monitoring service said.

"Any mistake or recklessness from you will lead to the (loss) of our life," SITE quoted one of the men as saying.

The video then cuts to three masked men dressed in black standing in front of a mosque with another man wearing an orange jumpsuit kneeling in front of them. They then behead him.

The video follows another released by IS showing the beheading of American journalist James Foley and threatening another kidnapped reporter Steven Sotloff with the same fate if US air strikes are not halted.

It also comes hot on the heels of video of scores of bodies that IS boasted were those of Syrian soldiers they had captured and executed following their seizure of a northern key air base last weekend.

The jihadists control a vast swathe of territory straddling Iraq and Syria where their abuses have sparked an international outcry.



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/29/2014 5:08:45 PM

NATO’s summit
Mr Putin’s wake-up call


The Western alliance is responding better to Russian aggression in Ukraine.
But there is more to do

| From the print edition


THE fighting in Ukraine, which Vladimir Putin further escalated this week by sending Russian forces over the border, provides a sombre backdrop to the NATO summit in Wales. But it ensures that the meeting on September 4th will not have to spend time agonising over what the 65-year-old alliance is for (see article). The timing was originally meant to coincide with the end of combat operations in Afghanistan in January. Around 14,000 American and NATO troops may remain in the country to “train, advise and assist” Afghan security forces for a few years more. But the summit’s main task, thanks to Mr Putin, is a return to NATO’s old business: ensuring that when it pledges to defend its members, it can do so.

The alliance was hesitant, at first, when Russia forcibly annexed Crimea in March. It took a few modest steps to reassure the new members closest to Russia that NATO stood by its obligation under Article 5: an attack on one is an attack on all. But despite the energetic leadership of the outgoing secretary-general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, some members (notably the Germans, the Italians and the Dutch) were loth to be “provocative” towards the Russians; a subsequent Polish request for 10,000 troops, including a sizeable American contingent, to be permanently based in that country was rejected, because it was too close to Russia’s borders.

Thankfully, appeasement of Mr Putin is no longer on the cards. Russia’s orchestration of the civil war in east Ukraine and the shooting down of MH17, with 193 Dutch nationals on board, by separatists recklessly armed by the Kremlin have hardened European opinion. It is clear that the alliance must prepare to deal with an antagonistic Russia for a long time to come. Yet, even now, the risk is that NATO will do too little.

The summit is likely to back a “readiness action plan” aimed at strengthening deterrence. It is good—but not good enough. A new high-readiness brigade will be formed, deployable within hours; heavy weapons will be pre-positioned in Poland which could be used later by “follow-on” forces; and a new command-centre will be established. Yet NATO would send a stronger signal to Russia if it had followed the Polish suggestion and set up a base for 10,000 combat troops there.

One-way street

This would contravene the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act, which was intended to end the mutual suspicions of the cold war and pave the way for partnership between the alliance and Russia. However, Mr Putin has never treated NATO as anything but an enemy. So NATO members have no need to feel bound by a document that is not honoured by the other side.

NATO’s European members should show their serious intent in another way, too. Fiscal austerity and a false sense of security have resulted in years of defence-budget cuts, whereas Russia has doubled its military spending (in nominal terms) since 2007. The complacent assumption in European capitals has always been that America would fill any capability gaps. Mr Rasmussen says that Mr Putin’s “wake-up call” has jolted half of NATO’s members into promising not to cut further, but that is not enough. In 2006 all member countries pledged to spend 2% of their GDP on defence. In Europe only Britain, France, Greece and Estonia come even close (although Poland is getting there). What NATO needs above all is more deployable and better-equipped forces—and European leaders prepared to tell their voters why they should pay for them.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1