Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Promote
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
10/21/2014 4:41:09 PM

BERNIE SANDERS: ILLUMINATI EXPOSED AT THE U.S. SENATE ON LIVE TV!!

Bernie apparently said this sometime before Christmas of 2012. Do you think anyone is listening now? Are people waking up? ~J




Published on Mar 20, 2013

Thanks to S.

http://thefrt.com Follow @FolksRtalking

Senator Bernie Sanders Exposes the wealthy elite illuminati on live television.



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
10/21/2014 10:59:00 PM
Russia sends military to protect Arctic oil region after Sweden deploys troops

October 21, 20141:13 PM MST

Russian oil claims in the Arctic
Russian oil claims in the Arctic
Courtesy of Ria.ru

As the crisis over a 'mysterious' and unknown Russian submarine believed to be trapped in Swedish coastal waters escalates, President Vladimir Putin is taking no chances that their Northern European neighbor will use its military to threaten discovered oil fields Russia has made claim to in the Arctic region. And on Oct. 21, the Russian leader has decided to react with force and is deploying troops and robotic sentries to the Arctic to ensure the dispute reaches no further than its current location.

Over the weekend, Swedish news sources reported that a disabled Russian submarine had gone down in the Stockholm archipelago, and that attempts to contact the boat were met with silence. In fact, Russian authorities irrefutably denied that any ship or submarine had entered or was disabled in Swedish waters, but over the past two days tensions have risen between the two neighboring countries that Sweden has now deployed their military in an attempt to track and find this mysterious unknown vessel.

"On the heels of Sweden's military deployment (following the discovery of a damaged Russian sub), it appears Russia is taking no chances with its access to Arctic resources.As Reuters reports, the Russian defense minister announced today that Russian military units will be deployed along the entire Arctic border from Murmansk to Chukotka in 2014.

Interfax adds that combat robots are also being deployed to protect Russian oil and gas infrastructure in the harsh environment of the Arctic. This should be no surprise as The Guardian notes, the Arctic’s hydrocarbon resources nevertheless exert a powerful pull. It has been compared to "a second Middle East", with oil and gas reserves thought to represent 17% and 30%, respectively, of the global total. - Zerohedge

Control over the Arctic oil reserves is of supreme importance to Russia, and any Northern latitude country that seeks economic and political power for the future as energy resources in the Middle East continue to dwindle. In fact, the past 40 years has seen the U.S., and in particular Saudi Arabia, control a large portion of economic policy around the world through their petro-dollar agreement, and OPEC's domination of energy production. But as the world quickly moves away from the dollar, and as the Middle East begins to decline from peak production, nations who can control the next energy frontier will have the power to dictate new economic policies which will also equate to political dominance.

More than at anytime since the height of the Cold War, it seems like the entire world is on the edge economically, militarily, and geo-politically. And where something as small as a foreign vessel being believed to reside in another nation's waters seems trivial in the big picture, the consequences of small events today can quickly lead to escalating tensions, just as the assassination of the Arch-Duke Ferdinand 100 years ago set the dominoes in motion to begin World War I, and a truly global conflict.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
10/21/2014 11:33:40 PM
This Is The ISIS Mastermind Responsible For The Group's Advance Through Western Iraq

Kai Pfaffenbach/Reuters

Smoke rises over Kobane after an airstrike, as seen from the Mursitpinar crossing on the Turkish-Syrian border on Oct. 20, 2014.


Daveed Gartenstein-Ross is a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and an adjunct assistant professor at Georgetown University.

He recently published an article entitled “The Islamic State’s Anbar Offensive And Abu Umar Al-Shisahni” in War on the Rocks that documented the Islamic State’s (ISIS) ongoing Anbar offensive and the role of one of its lead commanders.

I interviewed Gartenstein-Ross in order to shed more light on this insurgent leader and the Islamic State’s strategy and tactics in Iraq and Syria. He can be followed on Twitter at DaveedGR.

You just wrote this great piece about the Islamic State’s (ISIS) Anbar offensive and focused on one its commanders, Abu Omar al-Shishani. Can you explain a little bit about his background?

Omar al-Shishani is of Chechen origin. He was actually born in Georgia, in the Pankisi Valley. He served in the Georgian army, and took part in the 2008 conflict with Russia. He was in an intelligence unit serving near the frontline, where he spied on Russian tank columns and relayed their coordinates to Georgian artillery units. Shishani had to leave the military after he was diagnosed with tuberculosis.

He got into some legal trouble, as he was imprisoned for fifteen months for illegally harboring weapons, seemingly in support of militant groups in Chechnya. Then, as soon as Shishani was released, he left Georgia, only to resurface in 2013 in Syria where he was leading a militant group called the Army of Emigrants and Partisans.

One of the interesting things you talked about in your article was that IS ISis launching this big offensive in Anbar, and they’re trying to take Kobane in Syria, while not seemingly focusing upon Baghdad right now. It seems like they have all these conflicting priorities that sometimes serve their purposes and sometimes don’t. Could you explain that a little bit?

I think Baghdad is important to them. Islamic State leader Abu Omar al-Baghdadi would love to roll in and take Baghdad, but it’s a question of capabilities. Baghdad is a very difficult target to take. As to their tactics, they differ from one area to another, primarily based upon who their commanders are.

But Shishani is somewhat unique among ISIS’s commanders. Shishani is fighting like an insurgent. He’s using a complex style in Anbar, relying on a very small force, compared to the units trying to take Kobane. Shishani’s forces emphasize speed and agility.

They’ll hit multiple targets on the same day, and engage in harassing attacks to try to draw out the enemy, the Iraqi Security Forces or the Sahwa. Then he loves trapping the people he’s able to draw out that are in pursuit of him.

In contrast, in Kobane ISIS is fighting a very conventional war, nothing even resembling insurgent tactics. They have committed more and more men in an effort to take the city. It’s been incredibly costly to the Islamic State. In general, I think ISIS has made a lot of mistakes, but if you look at Shishani, he’s made very few errors. I think he’s a pretty remarkable commander.

Why do you think the Islamic State is spending so much time and effort on Kobane when it doesn’t seem to be a strategic city? It has a large Kurdish population. It’s right on the Turkish border. It’s putting a lot of pressure on Ankara, which has turned a blind eye to ISIS because it’s more concerned about the Assad government. It seems like Kobane is doing more harm than good to ISIS. Why do you think they’re going after this city?

Omar al-Shishani appears in this image made from an undated video posted on an ISIS social media account in late June.



I think it’s a mistake for ISIS to do so, but they have gained some concrete things from their advance on Kobane. For one thing, the advance on Kobane has been a PR victory for them — although that’s changing: as time passes and ISIS remains unable to capture Kobane, its assault is being transformed from a symbol of strength to one of weakness. A lot of ISIS’s business model is based on constantly winning.

They’re dependent upon both drawing in fighters from overseas and also preventing defections from their ranks. A good portion of their current manpower came from people who defected to them in Syria because of ISIS’s apparent strength.

But if ISIS starts losing on the battlefield, the group could end up losing a lot of manpower — something I think will ultimately happen. On the other hand, in terms of a geographic location, Kobane is pretty out of the way. ISIS has taken a lot of damage in their attempt to capture it.

As they’ve gone in to try to take Kobane, Turkey has put its military on the border, which makes it extraordinary difficult for ISIS to build off of any victory it might achieve. So I think that Kobane doesn’t gain them much, even if they do capture it. It’s not a strategic advance.

In contrast, they have gained quite a bit from Shishani’s advance in Anbar.

Do you have any predictions about how ISIS is going to progress in the next couple months. What kinds of targets they might go after, etc.?

It’s hard to say. Clearly they’ve been making some moves toward Baghdad. Before that happens, they’re going to try to take Ramadi. The key question is whether they’re going to be put under serious military pressure.

If coalition forces undertake an offensive against Mosul, for example, that could put IS on their back foot: It could cause them to play defense rather than claim new territory.

This article originally appeared at Musings On Iraq. Copyright 2014. Follow Musings On Iraq on Twitter.



Read more: http://musingsoniraq.blogspot.com/2014/10/a-discussion-of-islamic-states-strategy.html#ixzz3GpEHytwG




"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
10/21/2014 11:44:26 PM

ISIS Fighters Pick Up Weapons Airdropped By U.S.-Led Coalition

AP
Posted: Updated:

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
10/22/2014 10:58:34 AM

As the Islamic State group pushes across Anbar, Iraqi tribes in Abu Ghraib block takeover


In this Saturday, Oct. 18, 2014, Sheik Khalil Ibrahim Haidan, a local tribal elder, speaks during an interview with The Associated Press in Baghdad's Abu Ghraib suburb, Iraq. The city of Abu Ghraib will never fall to the Islamic State group, Haidan said at his family farm. After the revelation of prisoner abuse at the hands of U.S. troops following the 2003 invasion, Abu Ghraib became the scene of brutal insurgent attacks. Al-Qaida in Iraq, which eventually would morph into the group now known as Islamic State, targeted tribal leaders opposed to its ideology throughout Iraq’s Sunni heartland in the years that followed. (AP Photo/Karim Kadim) (The Associated Press)


The city of Abu Ghraib will never fall to the Islamic State group, Sheikh Khalil Ibrahim Haidan said, launching into discussion at his family farm.

As the Sunni militants creep dangerously close to the city known for its iconic prison, the capital has been on alert amid fears that Abu Ghraib will be easy prey as the group vows to continue its march toward Baghdad.

Some fear Abu Ghraib has all the makings for a takeover — it's majority-Sunni population long at odds with the Shiite-led central government over issues like discrimination, political exclusion and claims of widespread arrests and prosecution — some of the very issues that prompted many Iraqis in the country's north and west to embrace this radical alternative.

But Haidan, an elder in al-Zoba tribe, believes the city's dark past has taught its citizens about the dangers of flirting with the country's radical elements.

"Al-Qaida could not break the tribes of Abu Ghraib," he said, sitting under a palm tree alongside his farm, as chickens pecked for food and three white camels galloped playfully behind him. "The tribes believe there is no place here for Daesh or anyone else."

In 2004, the revelation that American soldiers had tortured detainees at the prison, formally known as Baghdad Central Prison, thrust Abu Ghraib into the limelight and would later become the scene of brutal insurgent attacks.

Al-Qaida in Iraq began targeting tribal leaders in 2007 in an effort to weaken communities around Anbar and along the Baghdad belt for the conquering. That year, al-Qaida conducted a suicide attack at the home of Sheikh Thahir al-Dhari, the leader of the al-Zoba tribe, killing al-Dhari's son and two of his aides.

The incident drove two Anbar tribes — Al-Zoba, which also has a presence in Fallujah, and al-Zaidan — to rise up against the militant group. Several other tribes followed suit.

The tribes "saw terrible days when al-Qaida was around — especially in 2006," said Saad Maan Ibrahim, a spokesman for the Iraqi military. "They really have no other choice but to work in cooperation with the military on security matters because the cost is losing their homes and their livelihood."

Earlier this month, news reports emerged that the city had fallen to Islamic State, sparking fears that Baghdad International Airport — the tower of which is visible from Abu Ghraib — was within shelling distance of the militant group.

But a visit to this community paints a very different picture. The main market in the center of town is abuzz with shoppers bargaining with vendors for fresh fruits and vegetables, bread and live chickens.

Young women in brightly colored headscarves and clothing walk freely through the streets, while young men are enlisted to work with their fathers on farms or in shops.

The serenity belies mounting tensions across this region as the Islamic State group continues to make gains against an embattled Iraqi military — despite the air campaign launched by the U.S. and several allies. Iraqi troops and militants regularly exchange mortar fire just west of Abu Ghraib, as the militant group works its way around Iraq's western Anbar province, looking to seize what is left of it, hardening its grip on the Iraqi-Syrian border.

"We are very scared," said Oum Mohammed, a local farmer who didn't provide her full name in keeping with tradition. "We keep receiving information that (IS) are close, that they entered the city, but then I go out into the street and see that everything is still ok for now. May Allah protect us."

The U.S. said Sunday that it expanded airstrikes in Sunni-dominated Anbar, targeting a berm near the Fallujah Dam which, in May, had been used by Islamic State militants to flood neighborhoods east of Fallujah — including Abu Ghraib — and in turn, slow any military offensive. At least 12,000 families in the Abu Ghraib area lost crops and livestock and were displaced from their homes by those floods, and at least 11,000 were left in desperate need of food, clean water and other assistance, according to the UN.

The destruction lent to the tribes' case to keep the militants out at any cost. "All of the tribes are so closely knit and would not tolerate the fall of their city to any outside force," said Sheikh Hamza Mohammed Ali, another elder in al-Zoba tribe. "We look after ourselves and our own affairs and we don't need others to rule the place for us."

But Abu Ghraib has grown heavily militarized in recent weeks, with tanks and checkpoints abundant across the city. At some checkpoints, The Associated Press saw heavily-armed volunteers in black ski masks standing alongside the military, quizzing locals and checking vehicles.

A report released last week by Amnesty International said Iraq's Shiite militias have abducted and killed scores of Sunni civilians with the tacit support of the government in retaliation for Islamic State group attacks. The report said tens of thousands of militiamen wear military uniforms but operate outside any legal framework and without any official oversight.

Abu Ghraib residents were frightened to discuss the issue in detail. Oum Mohammed said her 22-year old son Omar has been detained, allegedly by the Iraqi military, and she insisted he had no connection to the Sunni militant group.

"The military harasses us all, but there is nothing we can do so we are forced to keep quiet," she said reluctantly. Ibrahim denied reports of sweeping abductions, saying the military is in Abu Ghraib at the invitation of the tribes and that they collaborate on all security matters.

Donatella Rovera, senior crisis response advisor at Amnesty International, said "often it may not be clear until a bit later if the person was taken by militias or by security forces — or who is holding them," saying that there have been reports of such cases in Abu Ghraib. Such practices can risk fanning resentment toward the central government.

"Families are often too scared to make noise about such cases and there are hardly any lawyers willing to work on such cases, so detainees can be temporarily disappeared for quite a long time," she added.

At the height of Iraq's sectarian conflict, Sunni tribal members formed the first Awakening groups, ad hoc armed forces that allied with the U.S. military to rid their communities of al-Qaida in Iraq -- the precursor of the Islamic State group.

A similar community-driven national guard is now envisioned by Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi, with the support of the U.S.-led coalition. On a recent visit to Baghdad, John Allen, the U.S. special envoy for the global coalition to counter the Islamic State group, said that the effort will not succeed without the participation of Iraq's Sunni tribes.

"There will be a full blown conversation about this to engage the tribes where possible to operate in conjunction with Iraqi security forces," he said on Oct. 3. "As this concept of the national guard continues to flesh out... the national guard will benefit from recruitment out of the tribes."

But many Sunni tribes have not been won over. In Anbar, some 5,000 tribesmen are currently on board with government efforts to take part in the fight against the Islamic State group, which includes arrangements for arms and financial compensation. But with tribes often numbering 30,000 to 40,000 people, the effort has a long way to go.

Abu Ghraib's tribes, the al-Zoba sheikhs say, know it's up to them to keep their homes safe. Our tribes "don't accept their country to be harmed or violated," said Ali. "They will never allow anybody to harm our country's independence or sovereignty."



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!