Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/17/2017 5:59:42 PM



At Least 42 Dead After U.S. Airstrike Hits Mosque in Syria

March 17, 2017 at 9:25 am

(MEE) The US military has admitted that jets from its coalition launched a devastating air attack that led to the deaths of at least 42 people in a mosque in Syria’s Aleppo province.

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said missiles hit the mosque in the rebel-held village of al-Jina, south-west of Atarib in the western Aleppo countryside, on Thursday.

It said the bombs fells when the mosque was full of worshippers at evening prayers, between 7 pm and 7.30pm local time, and that Russia or Syria was originally suspected.

Video footage showed White Helmets rescue workers picking through rubble from the part-demolished mosque.


The US initially said the strike targeted al-Qaeda fighters in nearby Idlib province, “a significant safe haven for al-Qaeda in recent years”.

However, following inquiries by Airwars and media groups, a spokesman for the US military said its attack had hit al-Jina in Aleppo.

Major Josh Jacques told Airwars that its target in al-Jina was “assessed to be a meeting place for al-Qaeda, and we took the strike – it happened to be across the street from where there is a mosque”.

He said the mosque was not the target, and that it was not hit directly.

Video footage taken by reporter and MEE contributor Bilal Abdul Kareem showed that the northern side of the mosque was targeted by the latest round of US airstrikes.

Inherent Resolve, the US-led operation in Syria, did not respond to Middle East Eye’s requests for confirmation before publication.

However John Thomas, a colonel at US Centcom command in the Middle East, told the AFP news agency: “We did not target a mosque, but the building that we did target – which was where the meeting took place – is about 50 feet from a mosque.”

He said the mosque was “still standing”.

“We are going to look into any allegations of civilian casualties in relation to this strike,” Thomas added, when asked about the reports. “We take that very seriously.”

Turkish deputy prime minister Numan Kurtulmus on Friday condemned the attack as a “war crime” and a “crime against humanity”.

“Bombing civilians, people in the mosque and a house of worship is unacceptable,” he told reporters in the northwestern province of Canakkale.

Fragments of weapons were found around the attack area, showing English lettering which the investigative group Bellingcat identified as corresponding with script found on missiles used by US forces.

The above left photograph was given to Dutch journalist Sakir Khader by activists in Syria. The location and authenticity of the photo could not be independently verified.

Bellingcat used video footage and satellite imagery to confirm the location of the mosque.

First daylight video confirms again: northern side of mosque collapsed; CENTCOM says it was not directly targeted.https://twitter.com/BilalKareem/status/842649912819040259

Perhaps the small building north [green] of the partly collapsed mosque is also a mosque? The one CENTCOM is referring to?pic.twitter.com/ouzshzLutW

View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter

The US has been at the center of several recent reports of the use of overwhelming force against militants in Syria and Iraq.

Earlier this month, Airwars estimated that hundreds of civilians had been killed in western Mosul during the campaign against IS in Iraq.

Civilians in western Mosul told Middle East Eye that dozens of missiles had fallen in civilian areas to target sometimes solitary Islamic State fighters, leading to “countless deaths”.

In December, the US coalition admitted it had killed dozens of civilians in July air attacks in Syria’s Manbij, where its local allies were fighting the Islamic State.

The deadliest strike occurred on July 18th, when an aircraft attacked a group of IS fighters, killing about 100 of them.

But “up to 24 civilians who had been interspersed with combatants were inadvertently killed in a known IS staging area where no civilians had been seen in the 24 hours prior to the attack,” the coalition said.

By MEE Staff / Republished with permission / Middle East Eye / Report a typo



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/17/2017 11:50:10 PM

How The Financial System Is Being Used To Disempower Us
Posted on


By Luke Miller Truth Theory

A way in which we can conceptualise the banking system is by imagining 100 people all being given $100 and as a result of this they are expected to pay back $110 at the end of the month. The only way in which you can earn extra money is by earning it from someone else in this group of 100. So there is $10000 in circulation, but $11000 needs to be paid back. In the best of situations this would mean 10 people would end up with nothing and go bankrupt, and the other 90 would be able to continue the cycle. But in our current system it does not work in this way as there is such inequality. It is more like 10 people have $5000 each and the 90 get $55.55 each, but still need the $110 at the end of the month. So as a result they have to borrow the extra $54.45 from one of the 10 with $5000 to keep on going, but for this to happen they will need to pay more interest and the never ending cycle continues.


The central reserve banks create money which are not backed by anything tangible, meaning there is no gold or asset supporting it, it is generated from nothing. They then put interest on that money, loan it to the banks and add their fees. The banks then loan it to the people and add interest. The money can never be paid back, as there is not enough money in circulation to pay back the debt. It is like one giant ponzi scheme that will eventually collapse.

This has ramifications on an individual level, but it is so much more far reaching than that. Because the debt keeps growing, the only way to keep feeding the system is through aggressive growth of industry. This comes at the expense of the environment, human rights and anything that can damage profits.

Our government is supported and influenced by this system and as a result the majority of the problems we face can be linked back to the financial sector. Halliburton a company that have armed multiple sides of global conflicts for nearly 100 years made $39.5 billion from the Iraq War (a bill picked up in part by taxpayers), they also had Dick Cheney as their CEO before he became vice president, Dick Cheney was very vocal on why we should go to war in Iraq. Does anyone see the conflict of interest here?

Education is provided to keep this system flowing and science for the most part is funded by organisations that have agendas. We literally have a system that is created to serve a very small group who want to disempower us, so they can continue with their abuse. The groups that are creating this mess are by definition parasites.

IMAGE CREDIT: ricardoreitmeyer / 123RF Stock Photo

Category:

TruthTheory


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/18/2017 9:40:54 AM

What is left of Mosul: 'We don't belong here anymore'

Updated 1125 GMT (1925 HKT) March 17, 2017


What has become of Baghdadi's state? 02:31
Mosul, Iraq (CNN) Sufian stood in the gateway of the bullet-pocked villa, sheltering from the rain. Around him were other men and teenage boys waiting to be cleared by Iraqi intelligence officers who were on the lookout for ISIS sympathizers and suspects.Sufian was in his late teens, perhaps early twenties.
When I shook his hand, it was warm and soft. The skin under his scruffy, juvenile beard had the same pallor of many people fleeing Mosul, who had spent weeks huddled indoors, often in dark basements, as the battle raged outside.
I greeted him in Arabic. He responded in English.
    "Hello, how are you?" he said, smiling nervously, eying the intelligence officers nearby.
    "You speak English?" I asked.
    "I am capable of expressing myself adequately," he said.
    Attack helicopters clattered overhead, occasionally firing missiles and heavy machine guns into the old city. Gunfire, mortar and artillery fire boomed a few blocks away.
    We were trying to convince the Iraqi soldiers to let us go forward, so I left Sufian and went back to the group of intelligence officers nearby.
    Our producer, Kareem Khadder, was trying to charm them. They were a tough crowd, suspicious by profession. Kareem handed out another round of cigarettes, making jokes in the hopes they would warm to us.
    I knew this would take a while, so I walked down the muddy road with camerawoman Mary Rogers to have a look around Tayaran, the battered neighborhood just north of Mosul's equally battered airport.


    Smoke rises over west Mosul's old city. Iraqi forces are fighting street-by-street, house-by-house. The Iraqi government doesn't publish casualty figures but the CNN crew saw many ambulances rushing toward the battle zone.

    I turned around and saw Sufian again, struggling to push his mother in a wheelchair through the muck.
    "A real disaster," Sufian told me, breathless. "We lost everything: our hearts, our beliefs, our belongings. We don't belong here any more. We want peace."
    "Will you come back?" I asked.
    "No, I can't," he said. "No more. I can't. I'm so scared. They will kill us."
    I stopped to let them go, saying in Arabic "khair, in sha Allah," which roughly translates as "God willing, all will be well."
    "We have Jesus," responded Sufian. "We are going to Jesus."
    "What did Sufian say?" interjected his grandfather in Arabic, hobbling on a cane over to me.
    I didn't respond. I couldn't fathom why someone with the very Sunni Muslim name of Sufian would say that.
    Is this what he meant when he had said we lost our beliefs?


    People fleeing west Mosul.

    In the meantime, Kareem's charm bore fruit. The intelligence officers were laughing, asking us to pose for group pictures. They were ready to take us deeper into the city. This would be our second try that day.
    Earlier, we had driven with members of the Rapid Response Unit of the Iraqi Federal Police to a park next to the Mosul museum. But as we were driving up, our car shook with a massive blast. The shock wave rattled the shutters on the shops lining the road.
    When we exited our car, we saw a cloud of black smoke rising about 150 meters (492 feet) away.
    One by one, ambulances were going forward. The soldiers were on edge. A pickup truck rushed by in the opposite direction, several wounded soldiers in the back.
    We later learned an armored ISIS suicide earthmover had exploded, killing and wounding many of the soldiers.


    With the little they could carry west Mosul residents are streaming out of the city. "It's a catastrophe," one young man told the CNN crew.

    Our escort, a man named Captain Firas, decided we had seen enough. He barked for us and the other journalists to get back in our cars. Protests fell on deaf ears.
    We drove back to the ruins of Mosul airport, losing Captain Firas along the way.
    There we saw hundreds of Mosul residents walking out of the city. Leading the group was Saleh Jassim, a man in his early thirties, a white calf draped over his shoulders, other cows following him.


    Saleh Jassim, seen above, braved ISIS snipers and mortar fire to get his family and his herd, his only livelihood, out of harms way in western Mosul.

    While others appeared exhausted and disoriented, Saleh was smiling broadly, waving, giving a V-for-victory sign with his fingers.
    "Thank God for your safety," I told him in Arabic. In response, he kissed my cheeks.
    Saleh and his family had walked for two hours from their home in the Bab Al-Baidh district of Mosul's old city.
    "The shelling was violent," he told me. "I haven't slept in two days."
    The cows, he added, belonged to a neighbor.


    Families fleeing the fighting in western mosul carrying the few belongings and their herds as it is their only livelihood. Many residents of Mosul flee the violence under mortar and sniper fire.

    While Mary and I were talking to Saleh, Kareem had stopped a Federal Police pick up truck and convinced the men inside to take us back into the city. That's where we met Sufian.
    If this story is starting to sound disjointed, that's how our days in Mosul usually are. Plan A quickly becomes Plan B, then Plan C, until we get half-way through the alphabet.
    After speaking with Sufian and his family, we followed our new-found friends, the intelligence officers, deeper into the city by car where they promised to take us to their commander. He wasn't there. As we waited, seven soldiers came down the street. There were pulling two men with their shirts pulled over their faces.
    "They're da'eshis," a soldier next to us said. ISIS.
    "How do you know they're ISIS suspects?" I asked one of the intelligence officers.
    "They're not suspects. They are ISIS," he shot back.
    "How do you know?"
    "We have informers," he said.
    "I hope you let them have it," shouted a soldier by the side of the road.
    As the group ran past, I saw red marks, and two black boot marks on one of the captive's exposed back. They had already "let them have it." Or to be more precise, had started to let them have it.


    Rasoul, a year and a month old, hid out with his family and other relatives -- 23 people in all -- for 12 days in their basement, while the battle raged around them in the Jawsaq neighborhood of west Mosul. As they were in the basement, the house caught on fire after being hit by mortar rounds, says his grandmother, Khadija.

    The commander we had come to meet never showed up. Instead, we followed another group of federal policemen into a half-finished building where they said we could see Al-Hadba, the leaning minaret of Mosul next to the Great Mosque of al-Nuri.
    It was there that Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi made his first and only confirmed public appearance on July 4, 2014, days after the announcement of the establishment of his so-called caliphate.
    From the third floor of the building, we had a panoramic view of the old city.
    "Be careful," a policeman warned us. "There are snipers."
    Al-Hadba was just about two kilometers, just over a mile away. To its left, a large column of black smoke rose to the heavens. More gunfire, more blasts.
    On the broad boulevard below, a family of eight -- two boys, four men and two women -- scurried by. One of the women, in a green headscarf, clutched a stick with a piece of white cloth to signal they were not combatants.
    "Come," offered one of the soldiers, "I'll show you a dead da'eshi."
    We followed him down the stairs, though a courtyard, over an earth rampart to the side of a street.
    "We have to run across this street, one by one," he said. "There's a sniper."
    Once we gathered on the other side of the street, we heard the whoosh of an incoming mortar round.
    Everyone hit the dirt.
    It landed with a crash somewhere nearby.
    "Quickly, we need to go," said the soldier. "There might be another mortar."
    Before us was a charred, mangled Federal Police Humvee. Next to it, the burned, twisted wreckage of a car. Probably a car bomb. To its right lay a corpse in combat fatigues and boots, leg splayed. By the stench, it had been there for days.
    A black rooster strutted by the body, crowing triumphantly.
    All around, there is destruction.
    Masonry, glass shards, twisted metal, scraps of clothing, and bullet casings litter the ground.
    Machine gun fire rattles down the street.
    Another boom.
    This is what is left of the great city of Mosul.

    (CNN)

    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +1
    Luis Miguel Goitizolo

    1162
    61587 Posts
    61587
    Invite Me as a Friend
    Top 25 Poster
    Person Of The Week
    RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
    3/18/2017 10:15:19 AM

    U.S. Ambassador Haley Blasts UN Report, Demanding Immediate Withdrawal Of Statement On Israel

    Posted by | Mar 16, 2017 |

    Nikki Haley Livid At UN

    U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley (Pictured Above) Has Slammed The United Nations For Their Anti-Israel Stance

    The United Nations has come under fire for their recent anti-Israeli stance. It started when former President Barack Obama was still the Commander-in-Chief, and it has only escalated since then. Considering that the United States and Israel are allies, this stance isn’t sitting well with the American people.

    It all started with the United Nation’s order against Israel from settling on its own property. Once that order came out, several Republican lawmakers were calling for funding to be cut off from the U.N. Unfortunately, this type of anti-Israeli stance has only continued since then.

    Now, a new United Nations report came out that accused Israel of being “guilty of the crime of apartheid.” It should be noted that the report was co-authored by anti-Israel scholar Richard Falk. Nevertheless, the Trump administration was livid. They demanded that the U.N. “withdraw” the study.

    Nikki Haley, the United States ambassador to the U.N., slammed the report. She categorized it as “anti-Israel propaganda” in a statement that was made late Wednesday night. Unfortunately, this is how the U.N. has been treating Israel for too long now.

    Haley said, “The United States stands with our ally Israel and will continue to oppose biased and anti-Israel actions across the UN system and around the world.”

    Don’t be so quick with your celebrations.

    The United States And Israel Are Long-Time Allies

    The report itself was appointed by the U.N Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia. Apartheid was originally associated with South Africa. However the report said Israel’s policies are consistent with the definition of it. Apartheid is described as “an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination” by one racial group over another.

    The report said, “Aware of the seriousness of this allegation, the authors of the report conclude that available evidence establishes beyond a reasonable doubt that Israel is guilty of policies and practices that constitute the crime of apartheid as legally defined in instruments of international law.”

    The commission appointed by the U.N. is supposed to promote economic development in the Arab region. However, they employed an extremely controversial person to co-author the report in Falk. According to Fox News sources, the report was sent out while he was speaking at a ceremony in Beirut.

    A little history on Falk shows that he has not been kind to either Israel or the United States. In fact, he is known for being harsh and eccentric critiques of both countries. These come out specifically when talking about Islamist terrorism.

    Soon after the 2013 Boston Marathon Bombings, Falk made a disturbing remark. “The American global domination project is bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world.” Wow, how surprising that someone who makes these types of remarks would be against Israel and the United States.

    This is also a person who has repeatedly questioned “the official version of 9/11.” Back in 2013, he was on a radio show talking about “gaps” in the standard 9/11 narrative. This was the person they chose to author a report? No wonder it’s incredibly biased!

    “Questioning that deeply the official version of 9/11 does touch the third rail of American political sensitivities, and there is an attempt to discredit and destroy anyone that makes such a bold statement,” Falk said.

    Although there are some theories on why the U.N chose to get Falk to co-author the report. It could be seen as a slap in the face to the Trump administration. They have expressed concerns about the anti-Israel bias in the U.N., which the U.N isn’t taking too kindly. This theory gains traction as Falk has been an outspoken critic of Trump.

    Trump stands with Israel

    Falk Has Been An Outspoken Critic Of President Trump, Leading To The Theory That The U.N. Chose Him To Write This Report

    In fact, Falk said that Trump’s inauguration led him to “muse about what it might mean to live in a pre-fascist state.”

    Naturally, a spokeswoman for the U.N said that the report doesn’t reflect Falk’s views. “It was published by the Economic Commission for Western Asia, a regional U.N. economic commission, without prior consultation with U.N. headquarters.”

    Still, the Israeli ambassador to the U.N. also slammed the report, calling it “biased and deceitful.”

    Ambassador Danny Danon didn’t hold back either. “The attempt to smear and falsely label the only true democracy in the Middle East by creating a false analogy is despicable and constitutes a blatant lie. It comes as no surprise that an organization headed by an individual who has called for boycotts against Israel, and compared our democracy to the most terrible regimes of the twentieth century, would publish such a report.”

    This has also made tensions worse between the U.N. and the Trump administration. Haley herself slammed Falk while telling the secretary-general to go further.

    “That it was drafted by Richard Falk, a man who has repeatedly made biased and deeply offensive comments about Israel and espoused ridiculous conspiracy theories, including about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, is equally unsurprising,” she said. “The United Nations Secretariat was right to distance itself from this report, but it must go further and withdraw the report altogether.”

    Ambassador Haley will see that Iran is held responsible for violating its resolution.

    Ambassador Haley Wasn’t Thrilled With What Falk Stated In The Report

    The report points to what it says is specific engineering of demographics made by policies designed to keep Israel as a Jewish state. It said there was a “policy of domination” in “inferior services, restrictive zoning laws and limited budget allocations made to Palestinian communities … and in the mostly segregated landscape in which Jewish and Palestinian citizens of Israel live.”

    The report also called on member states to act against the nation. “This report accordingly recommends that the international community act immediately, without waiting for a more formal pronouncement regarding the culpability of the State of Israel, its Government and its officials for the commission of the crime of apartheid.”

    This is not going to sit well with the Trump administration. They have already been eyeing 50 percent cuts in funding for U.N. programs. The administration also confirmed that it is reviewing U.S. membership on the Human Rights Council. This is because they have concerns the body unfairly targets Israel, while they overlook crimes done by Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad.

    When Haley was confirmed in January, she specifically pointed out the U.N.’s anti-Israel bias as something that the Trump administration would put a lot of focus on. “Nowhere has the U.N.’s failure been more consistent and more outrageous than in its bias against our close ally Israel.” Haley told the Senators.

    The United Nations has a history of saying things that they shouldn’t say. Back in January, they released a report saying that refugees do not pose a security threat to Americans. Despite the fact that there have been several high-profile terrorist attacks that have come from refugees, the U.N. wanted to release this report.

    Muslim refugees

    According To The U.N., Refugees Do Not Provide A Security Risk To Americans

    The former administration always spoke highly about the United Nations. That was because Obama wanted the United States to actually give sovereignty to the United Nations. It was a globalist’s dream situation. Thankfully, it never came true.

    Share this article to show that Nikki Haley and the Trump administration are not happy with the United Nations. Once again, they have shown that they are going to be anti-Israel. Now they are saying that Israel is guilty of apartheid. If they keep this up, then the United States will not stay there much longer.



    (conservativedailypost.com)


    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +1
    Luis Miguel Goitizolo

    1162
    61587 Posts
    61587
    Invite Me as a Friend
    Top 25 Poster
    Person Of The Week
    RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
    3/18/2017 10:36:46 AM

    Passing The Baton: Trump Takes Over In The Race For Raqqa

    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +1