Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
11/12/2016 12:02:31 AM

Millions sign petition urging Electoral College to elect Hillary Clinton

Yahoo News

President-elect Donald Trump, flanked by his wife, Melania, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky., gives a thumbs-up on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 10, 2016, after their meeting. (Photo: Molly Riley/AP)

The election of Donald Trump as president is a bitter pill to swallow for millions of Americans — and some are backing a quixotic campaign to reverse that outcome.

As of Friday afternoon, more than 2.4 million people had signed a petition to the U.S. Electoral College, urging its members to ignore their states’ votes and cast their ballots for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

“Mr. Trump is unfit to serve. His scapegoating of so many Americans, and his impulsivity, bullying, lying, admitted history of sexual assault, and utter lack of experience make him a danger to the Republic,” wrote Elijah Berg, who launched the petition on Change.org.

Berg, of North Carolina, argued that the Electoral College can award the White House to either candidate and should use its own “most undemocratic” institution to ensure a “democratic result.”

Berg continued: “24 states bind electors. If electors vote against their party, they usually pay a fine. And people get mad. But they can vote however they want and there is no legal means to stop them in most states.”


Protesters against President-elect Donald Trump march peacefully through Oakland, Calif., on Nov. 9, 2016. (Photo: Noah Berger/Reuters)


Another petition on Faithlessnow.com similarly calls for more than 160 Republican electors to set aside their votes in states that don’t have laws binding them to do so: Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and West Virginia. The petition has assembled a list of the relevant electors.

Clinton is the first presidential candidate since 2000 to win the popular vote while losing the White House. In that year, Al Gore lost the Electoral College to George W. Bush. While Americans were still waiting to see whether Gore or Bush had won Florida’s 25 electoral votes, Clinton, the first lady at the time, called for the college to be disbanded so that no one would ever have to doubt again whether his or her vote counted.

“We are a very different country than we were 200 years ago,” she said then. “I believe strongly that in a democracy, we should respect the will of the people and to me, that means it’s time to do away with the Electoral College and move to the popular election of our president.”

And in a deep twist of irony, Trump has also called for the Electoral College to be abandoned. On the eve of the 2012 election, between President Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney, Trump called the Electoral College “a disaster for a democracy.”


After that election, in a tweet he has since deleted, Trump said, “The phoney [sic] electoral college made a laughing stock out of our nation. The loser one! [sic]” Trump tweeted this at a time when he thought Romney would win the popular vote, which ultimately was not the case.

The last time Gallup checked to see whether Americans would vote for a law to abolish the Electoral College was in 2013 — and 63 percent said they would.

So what is the Electoral College, exactly? American citizens did not in fact elect a president on Nov. 8; they chose electors. On Dec. 19, the 538 electors of the Electoral College will cast their ballots for a candidate and ultimately decide the next resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

The authors of the Constitution established this system for two reasons.

First, the founding fathers intended the Electoral College to serve as a buffer between the electorate and the presidency. They feared that a tyrant or someone incompetent would be able to manipulate the population and that better-informed, judicious electors could prevent this from happening. In other words, the Electoral College is supposed to act as a check on the citizenry, should it be hoodwinked by a demagogue.


“Scene at the Signing of the Constitution of the United States,” with George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, at the Constitutional Convention of 1787; oil painting on canvas by Howard Chandler Christy, 1940. The painting is 20 by 30 feet and hangs in the United States Capitol building. (Photo: GraphicaArtis/Getty Images)
Founding father Alexander Hamilton articulated this view in the Federalist Papers: “A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations. It was also peculiarly desirable to afford as little opportunity as possible to tumult and disorder.”

The Electoral College was also created as a result of compromises with smaller states, to ensure that they would not be overlooked. Each state has the same number of electoral votes as it has congressional representatives. Voters in smaller states thus have more influence than those in larger states, because every state, no matter how small, has two U.S. senators.

But some historians point to slavery as another driving factor in the formation of the Electoral College. Southerners were worried that direct democracy — one person, one vote (in actuality, one white, male landowner, one vote) — would give Northern states greater sway in political affairs. But if the South had been allowed to include its slave population in determining the numbers of representatives and electors, it would have greater political power. This resulted in the infamous Three-Fifths Compromise, in which slaves were counted as three-fifths of a person.

The writer Joyce Carol Oates and others have argued that this system will always benefit rural, more conservative voices at the expense of urban, more liberal ones.


The Change.org petition is part of a growing trend of petitions prompted by Trump’s election. Many are directed explicitly at the president-elect and urge him to rethink his policy positions or behavior on the campaign trail. A voter in Virginia is calling for Trump to meet with SpaceX CEO Elon Musk to learn about the reality of climate change. A Californian mother of two children with chronic illnesses is urging Trump to protect the commitment enshrined in the Obamacare legislation that forbids discrimination based on pre-existing conditions. Another woman in California is asking for Trump to condemn hate crimes that his supporters commit in his name.

But these petitions for Trump to re-examine specific policies or actions have not yet resonated with the public as strongly as the petition to the Electoral College calling upon its members to stop Trump from entering the Oval Office. Many supporters have been promoting the Change.org petition on social media.












(Yahoo News)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
11/12/2016 10:16:22 AM

After The (S)Election

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
11/12/2016 10:37:56 AM

Trump Is President: Now What?

By Brandon Turbeville

On November 9, Americans woke up to the announcement that they have narrowly avoided the apparent worst-case scenario, i.e. a Hillary Clinton presidency. Most researchers and activists of good will were happy if not outright ecstatic that the wicked witch of the West was finally gone, hopefully for good. Others simply acknowledged that a change in power would take place in January, 2017 but argue that there will be no discernible difference between a Trump administration and the Obama administration just as the Bush-Obama years were those of a seamless transition.

But while we may take some temporary relief in knowing that we avoiding the absolute worst-case scenario, it is time to ask, “what now?” We are faced with Donald Trump as President in 2017. So what do we do? Join the Trump team and become a cult follower? Support him until he does something terrible or commits a series of terrible decisions? Start attacking him immediately?

Certainly, complacency should not be an option. Simply sitting back because the outcome was “not as bad as it could have been” is entirely useless and counterproductive.

First, it is imperative that activists and people of good will must recognize that a Trump victory is not necessarily a victory for the American people. A Hillary defeat, although positive, does not equal a win for America, at least not in those simplistic terms.

Now is a time for organization and action.

Activists, activist organizations, and all people of good will must immediately begin to prepare themselves for a new phase in a battle that they have been (or at least should have been) fighting all along. They must begin to put aside petty differences with one another and begin looking at areas of common concern. They must continue their individual battles but must form alliances with one another in order to fight in a united front under a common umbrella. Whether the cause is related to guns, the drug war, war, GMOs, or some other issue, these individuals and organizations must come to understand the concept of enlightened mutual self interest.

Many of these groups currently do not work together over petty squabbles or simple laziness. We need individuals who are willing to establish connections with these groups and act as a uniting factor between them. This, of course, includes individual activists as well as groups. Essentially, we need someone who will be the unifying factor by establishing contacts, finding policies that unify these groups, and helping unite them (acting as the central figure) in current fights for (or against) legislation and for strategically offensive legislative action. These individuals will need to be active and willing to engage in dialogue with widely varying groups, remaining respectful of their perspectives and personal agreements/disagreements with some of their policies. Eventually, these coalitions can be brought together across the barriers of their issues for demands of interest to all.

As for the demands, any movement that seeks to bring about positive change must have a list of requirements in the form of demands or else the movement itself is dead from the start. A list of demands and a set of steady principles are absolutely necessary to the success and the continued life of any movement. For those struggling with the idea of what demands should be central to any resistance movement going forward, please see my article, “A Real New Deal For America – 43 Points.

Where Trump and his administration are willing to forward any points of our agenda, we should be there to push him along. Where he is willing to forward the agenda of the Anglo-American system, we must be willing to fight him tooth and nail.

We must also remember that the magnitude of what we face as a people is much bigger than a President, as should be clear to anyone who is even slightly informed should be aware. Regardless, it is time that the American people become active and engaged and that activists no longer sit idly by, navel gazing and castrated by egos and selfish interests, but that they immediately begin to join forces and fight for the change they want to see.

This article may be freely shared in part or in full with author attribution and source link.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
11/12/2016 11:01:37 AM
The alt-right supported Trump. Now its members want him to satisfy their demands.




A supporter waits for the beginning of a Trump campaign event on Nov. 3 in Berwyn, Pa. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)


Mike Adams, a conservative Texas blogger, greeted President-elect Donald Trump’s victory with this post: “The evil, demonic, mass murdering Hillary Clinton has been defeated. This is VICTORY for all Americans, even the uninformed, ignorant morons who voted for Hillary.”

But a few hours later, as the news sank in, Adams posted againwith a more hopeful tone: “Today I declare ‘LOVE WINS’ because it is love for America that inspired us to collectively achieve this great victory.” He said he was going to send Trump a video with his suggestions about how to reform health care.

Adams and thousands of others on the furious far-right of American political discourse, who have railed for years against the “criminal” and “treasonous” excesses of the federal government under President Obama, woke up Wednesday to find themselves in the odd position of being, essentially, insiders.

Members of the so-called “alt-right,” who reject establishment conservatism and spread their far-right ideology online, wereeagerly courted by candidate Trump. Now this vocal constituency feels emboldened by its new ally in the White House, presenting Trump with a major challenge to satisfy its pent-up demands while trying to unite a deeply divided nation.

Adams, who blogs about health, wellness and politics on a Facebook page that has 2 million “likes,” said he sees the Trump election as a long-awaited chance to be heard by the White House. In addition to sending Trump his health-care ideas, he is urging him to fight abortion and nominate Supreme Court justices who will protect his right to own a gun.

The alternative right has come under fire from Hillary Clinton and establishment Republicans, but it has been seeping into American politics for years as a far-right option for conservatives. Here's what you need to know about the alt-right movement. (Jenny Starrs/The Washington Post)

“My message is going to be: Let’s move forward, let’s contribute,” Adams said in an interview. “It’s like JFK: Ask what you can do for your country. We’re at that kind of moment. Myself, and I hope many others, are going to do our best to try to contribute to solutions.”

Trump’s election has sent hopes flying among a broad array of Americans angry at the federal government for what they see asunconstitutional overreach into their lives. They often describe themselves as part of the patriot or liberty movements, and many belong to well-armed militia groups such as the Oath Keepers or the 3 Percenters, whose membership has soared into the hundreds of thousands since Obama took office in 2008.

Many people in those movements backed Trump’s candidacy with full-throated gusto on the Internet and social media. However, others have been skeptical of his conservative credentials, and some are now vowing to pressure him to make good on his campaign rhetoric on issues such as abortion, immigration and putting “America first.”

“It is now up to us to keep the heat on Congress and Trump, to fulfill the promises that were made by Mr. Trump,” said Shorty Dawkins, writing on the Oath Keepers website. “We have won a battle, but not the war against globalism. We cannot rest.”

KrisAnne Hall, a radio host who tours the nation preaching against federal overreach of the Constitution, said she wanted voters to “make a list of things they wanted changed that motivated them to vote and hang that list on their refrigerator.”

“Then I want them to review that list in two years and again in four years and see if those things actually changed for the better,” she said. “Perhaps then we can see where the changes need to be made and who has or doesn’t have the power to make those changes.”

Trump’s victory has also energized white supremacists, who believe that Trump, with his calls to deport immigrants and ban Muslims, could bring their racist and anti-Semitic views into the mainstream in a way no politician has for decades.

“The people in our movement are really excited with the possibility of a Donald Trump presidency, what it can do for us,” said William Daniel Johnson of the American Freedom Party, a prominent white nationalist in Los Angeles who has called for a whites-only United States and the deportation of other races and ethnicities.

“In the past, presidents have reached out to all peoples, except those whites who are proud of their heritage and want to preserve Western civilization,” Johnson said. “Our hope is that his large tent will include us who have really been despised for generations.”

During the campaign, Trump retweeted messages from white nationalist groups and often seemed reluctant to distance himselffrom those groups. He was endorsed by former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke.

After the election, the Loyal White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, based in North Carolina, posted a large photo of Trump on its website with the message “TRUMP=TRUMP’S RACE UNITED MY PEOPLE.” The group says it has scheduled a “victory parade” on Dec. 3 in North Carolina. The group did not return a telephone message seeking comment and more details.

Two months after Trump announced his candidacy last year, a South Florida tattoo artist named Lonny Morgan latched on to Trump’s crusade against “political correctness” and started a website called “Outlaw Morgan,” devoted to promoting Trump and trashing Clinton and Obama. The Democrat-turned-Republican, who now earns his living selling T-shirts and other merchandise on his Facebook site, has more than 260,000 “likes.”

“I couldn’t take it anymore; I got to a point where I was tired of oversensitive people claiming that everything is bigotry and everything is racist,” said Morgan, 41, who doesn’t count himself among the white supremacists.

Morgan said many Trump supporters were “pretty much talking 1776-style revolution” if Clinton had won. But with Trump in the White House, they now see a chance for their beliefs and ideas to be taken seriously at the highest levels of government.

For example, Morgan said he hoped Trump would select Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), who led a congressional inquiry into Clinton’s role in the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, to replace Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch.

He said he and others who felt completely alienated by the government view Trump’s victory as a “torch of hope for people to carry.”

“You can feel the hope in your chest. You wake up this morning and you’re like, ‘Hell yeah,’” he said. “I woke up today and the tension in my shoulders was lifted. I feel calm. I have a Harley-Davidson that I love to ride. I bought a ’91 Jeep Cherokee that I’m going to put a lift kit on and take out in the woods. I feel like I can finally get back to my life.”

Morgan said he planned to keep his website going to support Trump and to make sure that he keeps his campaign promises.

“It’s up to us to monitor everything and make sure he stays true to his word,” Morgan said. “The American people are going to hold him accountable.”

Since the election, Johnson, the white supremacist, who has said U.S. citizenship should be limited to white people with “no ascertainable trace of Negro blood,” has been emailing and calling Trump campaign officials, and people at the conservative Heritage Foundation, to promote himself and allies for positions in the Trump administration. He said they could be a “conscience” pressuring Trump “to live up to some of his pro-white, pro-nationalist, pro-populist political campaign promises.”

Johnson said he has promoted himself for undersecretary of agriculture for food, nutrition and consumer services, the position that oversees the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — the federal food stamp program. He said he wants to “get rid of this entitlement mentality that we have in this country. It needs to be adjusted and reduced.”

He said he has asked his British friend Nigel Farage, of the far-right, anti-immigrant United Kingdom Independence Party, which was a key driver of this year’s Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, to recommend him to Trump officials. Farage appeared with Trump at a few rallies over the summer.

Johnson was briefly included on the Trump campaign’s list of delegates to the Republican National Convention in July. But after media reports, campaign officials removed him, saying he had been inadvertently included through a “database error.”

He’s had no better luck this time. Despite his hopeful pleadings to be part of the Trump administration, he said so far he’s had no response from anyone in the Trump camp.

Jared Taylor, a prominent white nationalist known for his opposition to multiculturalism, said he does not believe Trump is a white supremacist.

“Donald Trump has stumbled onto certain policies that are congruent with a racialist view of the world, but he’s got completely different motives,” Taylor said.

But he said there is hope that Trump’s thinking may evolve, opening the door to contact with Taylor. If so, he said, he will certainly take advantage of the opportunity to influence the new administration.

“The possibility of that happening is greater than ever before,” he said. “Here is a guy who has broken the mold for how we talk about race. The fact that he was nominated at all was a huge step forward.

Taylor said that if he is contacted by members of the Trump administration, he’s unlikely to publicize it any time soon.

“As an earthly assistant of the devil, boldly writing about my plans to meet the Trump entourage — how could that possibly do to the president-elect any good?” he said.

(The Washington Post)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
11/12/2016 11:20:37 AM
How Trump’s victory is causing Europe to rethink its security



Members of the Kosovo Security Force take part in a field exercise in the village of Nashec near the town of Prizren on Oct. 27. (Armend Nimani/AFP/Getty Images)


The surprise triumph of Donald Trump is raising fears of a historic recalibration between the United States and its allies in Europe, threatening to upend the allegiances that became the cornerstone of post-World War II peace.

Few countries are more in the crosshairs than Germany, Western Europe’s most populous nation and the pacifist home to 47,000 U.S. troops. For decades, American power has been a security blanket here. Even as thousands of U.S. troops were redeployed elsewhere, Chancellor Angela Merkel and President Obama forged a bond that became important in tackling various issues, including the Ukraine crisis and the fight against global warming.

Enter President-elect Trump, who threatened on the campaign trail to back away from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and force U.S. allies to shoulder more of the burden of their defense. Amid concern of a future bromance between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, the victory has put Europe on notice — and bracing for transatlantic divisions potentially greater than the “freedom fries” era of President George W. Bush.

A big question now is whether Trump’s America could awaken the sleeping giant of German might. This nation, weighed down by the horrific violence of Adolf Hitler, has shied away from military strength since the end of World War II. But leading voices here are now calling for a fresh debate on beefing up capabilities and equipment. They join a chorus from Belgium to Finland, where the clamor is growing for a more independent security strategy with the dawn of Trump.

Many far-right parties in Europe are celebrating the presidential victory of Donald J. Trump. (Jason Aldag, Ishaan Tharoor/The Washington Post)

“Europe will have to be prepared to take better precautions itself,” German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen told public television.

Trump could pull back from his most radical pledges, and massive obstacles remain before Germany could reemerge as a “normal nation” matching its economic strength with muscle. Public opposition to military power is part of the DNA here. The military is also an atrophied limb, with a 2014 parliamentary report detailing a shocking state of disrepair. Only one of Germany’s four submarines was operational. Only 70 of its 180 GTK Boxer armored vehicles were fit for deployment. Seven of the German navy’s fleet of 43 helicopters were flight-worthy.

Yet a provocative Trump presidency could prove a tipping point for change, including accelerated talks to create a European army anchored by Germany and France.

In a sense, that new era of European security is already unfolding. Berlin is sending 650 soldiers to Mali next month in an experimental operation to relieve French forces fighting militants affiliated with the Islamic State. Next year, German troops will also stage a deeply symbolic deployment to Lithuania — a nation once brutally occupied by the Nazis — as part of NATO’s mission to counter an increasingly belligerent Russia.

“If Russia reaches a great power understanding with Trump, Germany would need to reconsider its defense,” said Christian Mölling, senior transatlantic fellow at the German Marshall Fund in Berlin. “But defending against whom? Also the U.S.? You open a Pandora’s box.”

German Chancellor Angela Merkel congratulated President-elect Donald Trump on his victory and offered to work closely with him on the basis of "democratic values" including respecting people's dignity regardless of their origin or religion. (Reuters)

As with many Americans, the unknowns of Trump frighten Europe. His foreign-policy plan has been only loosely sketched out. To minimize surprises, envoys from major U.S. allies typically meet campaign advisers to Democrats and Republicans ahead of the election. But countries such as Germany have not been able to secure advance meetings with the Trump campaign, officials say. Trump has also never met key European leaders, including Merkel.

The nascent push for more independence stems also from the fact that many Europeans saw Trump’s election in deeply personal terms — deflating their view of the United States as a serious nation and a bastion of tolerance. Many feel not just shocked but betrayed. Even senior voices in a nation more familiar with the risks of demagoguery than any other are asking whether it may really be wise for Germany to hitch its wagon to Trump.

“Trump is the trailblazer of a new authoritarian and international chauvinist movement,” Sigmar Gabriel, Germany’s deputy chancellor, told German media after the U.S. presidential election. He added: “They want a rollback to the bad old times in which women belonged by the stove or in bed, gays in jail, and unions at best at the side table. He who doesn’t keep his mouth shut gets publicly bashed.”

In the aftermath of Trump’s victory and the vote by Britain to leave the European Union, many across the continent see an old world order crumbling. Europe’s greatest ally could emerge as its chief adversary on climate change, the peace accord with Iran and free trade. German officials, for instance, are already calculating that Trump’s victory means a massive transatlantic free-trade deal — years in the making — is effectively dead. And Berlin will be hard-pressed to maintain European unity on sanctions against Russia if the United States backs away from its own.

Concern is also rising of a possible frost between Trump and Merkel, whom he repeatedly jabbed at on the stump. Many European leaders sent him innoxious congratulations Wednesday. But Merkel dispatched a cautionary note, offering cooperation with the caveat that it be based on “democracy, freedom, as well as respect for the rule of law and the dignity of each and every person, regardless of their origin, skin color, creed, gender, sexual orientation, or political views.”

In fact, some see Merkel — particularly if she runs and wins reelection next year — as potentially filling the gap on the world stage left by Obama’s exit. In a full-circle transition for Germany, she could emerge as the leading champion, and defender, of liberal Western values.

“All eyes will be on Berlin,” said Josef Janning, head of the Berlin office of the European Council on Foreign Relations. “Merkel appears to be the only pillar still standing.”

The Germans have for years been under pressure from the United States to increase military spending and contribute more to operations in international conflicts. Even if Hillary Clinton had won, Germans say they expected that pressure to increase. Although German defense spending has recently grown, it is still only 1.2 percent of gross domestic product, compared with NATO’s benchmark of 2 percent.

Conventional wisdom holds that Germany’s neighbors, particularly France, would fear a stronger military here. But new calculations with Trump as the leader of the “free world” may change that, experts say.

Germans “avoid military conflict, whereas we rather tend to seek it,” said François Heisbourg, a former member of a French presidential commission on defense. “When the Germans display greater willingness to act like a normal power, that actually makes the French quite happy, because they’re acting like a normal country.”

Stephanie Kirchner in Berlin, Michael Birnbaum in Brussels and James McAuley in Paris contributed to this report.

(The Washington Post)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1