Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/8/2016 11:06:27 AM

Iran Mass Execution Allegations: Khamenei, Rafsanjani Accused

By Fayçal Benhassain | September 7, 2016 | 12:26 AM EDT

Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, with former President Hashemi Rafsanjani and then senior nuclear negotiator (now president) Hassan Rouhani, in Tehran in March 2006. (AP Photo, File)

Paris (CNSNews.com) – Iran’s supreme leader and a prominent former president – who is sometimes described as a “moderate’ in the Iranian context – are the latest senior Iranians to be accused of involvement in themass executions of imprisoned dissidents almost three decades ago.

The National Council of Resistance of Iran/People’s Mujahedeen Organization of Iran (NCRI/MEK), an exiled opposition group, held a press conference in Paris Tuesday to make public the names of prominent Iranians allegedly involved in the killings.

It said supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and former President Hashemi Rafsanjani were directly linked to the executions.

The unpunished killings returned to the public eye last month when the son of a senior ayatollah, who dies in 2009, released an audio recording of a meeting between his father and members of one of the “death commissions” that oversaw the executions.

In the recording released by Ahmad Montazeri, Grand Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri expressed his strong opposition to the executions, carried out in the late 1980s during the tenure of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

“Killing is the wrong way to resist against ideas,” Montazeri said in the 1988 clip. “It is in my opinion the greatest crime committed during the Islamic Revolution for which history will condemn us.”

Montazeri had been nominated as Khomeini’s successor until falling out with the clerical regime over his criticisms. After Khomeini’s death the supreme leader post went to Khamenei, a former president, who holds it to this day.

During Tuesday’s press conference Mohammad Mohaddessin, chairman of the NCRI’s foreign affairs committee, said the executions of political prisoners occurred mostly in the weeks after a fatwa (religious edict) was issued by Khomeini in 1988.

“A death commission was created in Tehran and in 10 other Iranian provinces to conduct the fatwa,” he said. “Until now only the names of the members of the death commission in Tehran had been exposed, since Khomeini himself appointed them.”

“Now we have more names of members involved in the massacre and we are making them public.”

Mohaddessin said they included Khamenei – president and a key regime decision-maker at the time – as well as Rafsanjani, who at the time was parliamentary speaker, but went on to serve two terms as president, from 1989-1997. (Since then, Rafsanjani has headed two of the regime’s most important institutions – the Assembly of Experts, a body of top religious scholars which nominates the supreme leader, and the Expediency Council, a body that advises the supreme leader. He still holds the latter post.)

Another prominent Iranian implicated in the executions was Ali Fallahian, who at the time was a deputy intelligence minister, then went on to become intelligence minister during the Rafsanjani presidency and later also served on the Assembly of Experts.

(Fallahian is one of half a dozen senior Iranians wanted by Argentina in connection with the 1994 bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires that cost 85 lives and wounded 300 more.)

President Hasan Rouhani’s minister of justice, Mostafa Pourmohammadi, was also implicated in the “death commissions,” according to information released earlier and corroborated by the Montazeri audio recording.

Most of those killed in the campaign were reported to have been imprisoned supporters of the NCRI/MEK.

Among the victims, said Mohaddessin, 62 pregnant women and 789 minors, as young as 14-15 years at the time of their arrest, were massacred and secretly buried in mass graves.

Mohaddessin expressed the NCRI/MEK’s hope that the next U.S. president would have a different policy towards Tehran in the light of the revelations about the 1980s executions.

“We really hope that the U.S. attitude will change and that next administration will be more determined against Rouhani’s regime,” he said. “President Obama conducted a politic of moderation toward Iran but it did not work out.”

“This regime is more brutal than the former ones,” Mohaddessin charged. “Just have a look at its involvement in the Middle East. Look at what is happening in Iraq, Syria and other countries in the region where Tehran is deeply involved.”

William Bourdon, the NCRI’s French lawyer, voiced the hope that the publication of the new information would draw the attention of the international community.

“It is time that the United Nations, for instance starts, looking at the 1988 massacre by the Iranian regime,” he said. “And the truth about these crimes is now known worldwide.”

“We are now calling upon the international community in order to take actions against the Tehran regime,” Bourdon said. He argued that there was enough proof of the involvement of Iran’s highest authorities to lead other countries act as well.

Khomeini’s 1988 fatwa targeted members of the MEK, whom he described as “treacherous monafeqin [hypocrites] who do not believe in Islam.”

Ahmad Montazeri has been interrogated and reportedly charged with national security offenses after publishing the explosive audio file last month on a website run by supporters of his late father.

(Patrick Goodenough contributed to this story.)


(cnsnews.com)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/8/2016 11:21:36 AM

Drone Speedboats To Be Tested In Massive Military Drill “Unmanned Warrior 2016”

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/8/2016 3:11:23 PM
Trump’s history of corruption is mind-boggling. So why is Clinton supposedly the corrupt one?


In the heat of a presidential campaign, you’d think that a story about one party’s nominee giving a large contribution to a state attorney general who promptly shut down an inquiry into that nominee’s scam “university” would be enormous news. But we continue to hear almost nothing about what happened between Donald Trump and Florida attorney general Pam Bondi.

I raised this issue last week, but it’s worth an update as well as some contextualization. The story re-emerged last week when The Post’s David A. Fahrenthold reported that Trump paid a penalty to the IRS after his foundation made an illegal contribution to Bondi’s PAC. While the Trump organization characterizes that as a bureaucratic oversight, the basic facts are that Bondi’s office had received multiple complaints from Floridians who said they were cheated by Trump University; while they were looking into it and considering whether to join a lawsuit over Trump University filed by the attorney general of New York State, Bondi called Trump and asked him for a $25,000 donation; shortly after getting the check, Bondi’s office dropped the inquiry.

Marco Rubio accused Donald Trump of starting a "fake university" at the Feb. 25 GOP debate in Houston. Here's what you need to know about Trump University.(Peter Stevenson/The Washington Post)

At this point we should note that everything here may be completely innocent. Perhaps Bondi didn’t realize her office was looking into Trump University. Perhaps the fact that Trump’s foundation made the contribution (which, to repeat, is illegal) was just a mix-up. Perhaps when Trump reimbursed the foundation from his personal account, he didn’t realize that’s not how the law works (the foundation would have to get its money back from Bondi’s PAC; he could then make a personal donation if he wanted). Perhaps Bondi’s decision not to pursue the case against Trump was perfectly reasonable.

For instance, there was only one mention of this story on any of the five Sunday shows, when John Dickerson asked Chris Christie about it on “Face the Nation (Christie took great umbrage: “I can’t believe, John, that anyone would insult Pam Bondi that way”). And the comparison with stories about Hillary Clinton’s emails or the Clinton Foundation is extremely instructive. Whenever we get some new development in any of those Clinton stories, you see blanket coverage — every cable network, every network news program, every newspaper investigates it at length. And even when the new information serves to exonerate Clinton rather than implicate her in wrongdoing, the coverage still emphasizes that the whole thing just “raises questions” about her integrity.

The big difference is that there are an enormous number of reporters who get assigned to write stories about those issues regarding Clinton. The story of something like the Clinton Foundation gets stretched out over months and months with repeated tellings, always with the insistence that questions are being raised and the implication that shady things are going on, even if there isn’t any evidence at a particular moment to support that idea.

When it comes to Trump, on the other hand, we’ve seen a very different pattern. Here’s what happens: A story about some kind of corrupt dealing emerges, usually from the dogged efforts of one or a few journalists; it gets discussed for a couple of days; and then it disappears. Someone might mention it now and again, but the news organizations don’t assign a squad of reporters to look into every aspect of it, so no new facts are brought to light and no new stories get written.

The end result of this process is that because of all that repeated examination of Clinton’s affairs, people become convinced that she must be corrupt to the core. It’s not that there isn’t plenty of negative coverage of Trump, because of course there is, but it’s focused mostly on the crazy things he says on any given day.

But the truth is that you’d have to work incredibly hard to find a politician who has the kind of history of corruption, double-dealing, and fraud that Donald Trump has. The number of stories which could potentially deserve hundreds and hundreds of articles is absolutely staggering. Here’s a partial list:

  • Trump’s casino bankruptcies, which left investors holding the bag while he skedaddled with their money
  • Trump’s habit of refusing to pay contractors who had done work for him, many of whom are struggling small businesses
  • Trump University, which includes not only the people who got scammed and the Florida investigation, but also a similar story from Texas where the investigation into Trump U was quashed.
  • The Trump Institute, another get-rich-quick scheme in which Trump allowed a couple of grifters to use his name to bilk people out of their money
  • The Trump Network, a multi-level marketing venture (a.k.a. pyramid scheme) that involved customers mailing in a urine sample which would be analyzed to produce for them a specially formulated package of multivitamins
  • Trump Model Management, which reportedly had foreign models lie to customs officials and work in the U.S. illegally, and kept them in squalid conditions while they earned almost nothing for the work they did
  • Trump’s employment of foreign guest workers at his resorts, which involves a claim that he can’t find Americans to do the work
  • Trump’s use of hundreds of undocumented workers from Poland in the 1980s, who were paid a pittance for their illegal work
  • Trump’s history of being charged with housing discrimination
  • Trump’s connections to mafia figures involved in New York construction
  • The time Trump paid the Federal Trade Commission $750,000 over charges that he violated anti-trust laws when trying to take over a rival casino company
  • The fact that Trump is now being advised by Roger Ailes, who was forced out as Fox News chief when dozens of women came forward to charge him with sexual harassment. According to the allegations, Ailes’s behavior was positively monstrous; as just one indicator, his abusive and predatory actions toward women were so well-known and so loathsome that in 1968 the morally upstanding folks in the Nixon administration refused to allow him to work there despite his key role in getting Nixon elected.

And that last one is happening right now. To repeat, the point is not that these stories have never been covered, because they have. The point is that they get covered briefly, then everyone in the media moves on. If any of these kinds of stories involved Clinton, news organizations would rush to assign multiple reporters to them, those reporters would start asking questions, and we’d learn more about all of them.

That’s important, because we may have reached a point where the frames around the candidates are locked in: Trump is supposedly the crazy/bigoted one, and Clinton is supposedly the corrupt one. Once we decide that those are the appropriate lenses through which the two candidates are to be viewed, it shapes the decisions the media make every day about which stories are important to pursue.

And it means that to a great extent, for all the controversy he has caused and all the unflattering stories in the press about him, Trump is still being let off the hook.


(The Washington Post)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/8/2016 4:58:42 PM

Obama Visits Laos, Refuses To Apologize For US Dropping Two Million Tons Of Bombs

By Kurt Nimmo

Obama visited Laos after rubbing elbows with world leaders at the G20 in China.

“Given our history here, I believe that the United States has a moral obligation to help Laos heal,”he said.

Between 1964 and 1973 the Pentagon dropped over two million tons of ordnance on Laos during 580,000 bombing missions making Laos the most heavily bombed country per capita in history. The massive bombing raids—equal to a planeload of bombs every 8 minutes, 24-hours a day, for 9 years—were launched because the US was unable to defeat the Pathet Lao on the ground. The Pathet Lao went to war after they were excluded from the government and jailed by CIA-installed strongman Phoumi Nosavan.

“Laos was an American plantation, a CIA playground,” writes William Blum.

“Between 1957 and 1965, Laotian governments came and went at a frantic pace, with the CIA sponsoring at least one coup a year. The problem was a leftist group called the Pathet Lao which kept getting enough votes to be included in coalition governments,” notes Mark Zepezauer.

During the Vietnam War, the US claimed Laos was invaded by the communists. “The people of the United States were led to believe that Laos physically had been invaded by foreign Communist troops from across its northern border. Our Secretary of State called the situation grave; our ambassador to the U.N. called for world action; our press carried scare headlines; our senior naval officer implied armed intervention and was seconded by ranking Congressmen … The entire affair was a fraud. No military invasion of Laos had taken place,” write William Lederer and Eugene Burdick in A Nation of Sheep.

Nixon and Henry Kissinger were involved in the bombing of Lao’s Plain of Jars along with civilian targets in North Vietnam, including Haiphong harbor, dikes, cities, and the Bach Mai Hospital. Nixon’s illegal and secret bombing of Cambodia—exceeding the number of bombs dropped on Japan in World War II—resulted in the murder of 500,000 civilians and the rise of the Khmer Rouge, a brutal guerrilla group responsible for killing around three millions Cambodians. (For more on this war crime, see David Model’s President Richard Nixon, Henry Kissinger, and the Bombing of Cambodia.)

“Within days of Richard Nixon’s inauguration in January 1969, national security adviser Kissinger asked the Pentagon to lay out his bombing options in Indochina. The previous president, Lyndon Baines Johnson, had suspended his own bombing campaign against North Vietnam in hopes of negotiating a broader ceasefire. Kissinger and Nixon were eager to re-launch it, a tough task given domestic political support for the bombing halt,” writes Greg Grandin.

Hillary Clinton has courted the arch war criminal Kissinger and it now appears he will endorse her presidential campaign.

Although Obama said “I believe that the United States has a moral obligation to help Laos heal,” he didn’t offer an apology for the bombings.

But then America, as the “exceptional nation,” never apologizes for its war crimes.

Kurt Nimmo is the editor of Another Day in the Empire, where this article first appeared. He is the former lead editor and writer of Infowars.com.


(activistpost.com)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/8/2016 5:26:29 PM
Britain and France to construct ‘Great Wall of Calais’ to keep migrants from port

British authorities confirmed Tuesday that construction will begin this month on a concrete wall in Calais intended to keep migrants and refugees from the city’s port, where they frequently attempt to stow away on U.K.-bound trucks and ferries.

“This measure is intended to further protect the Rocade from migrant attempts to disrupt, delay and even attack vehicles approaching the port,” the British Home Office said in an emailed statement. The Rocade is an access road leading into the port.

On Monday, French truck drivers and local residents protestedagainst the large migrant camp outside the city, blocking traffic and insisting that migrants and refugees have increasingly resorted to violence to gain passage to Britain, 20 miles across the English Channel.

Tuesday’s update from U.K. Immigration Minister Robert Goodwill on what local residents immediately began calling on social media the “Great Wall of Calais” came days after the French government pledged, again, to close the “Jungle” encampment outside Calais. Goodwill declined to comment further.

French port workers, drivers and farmers protest against the rising flow of migrants in the port city of Calais. (Reuters)

In the camp, 7,000 to 9,000 refugees and migrants — mostly from Afghanistan and Sudan — live in squalid conditions and legal limbo. Nearly equidistant from London and Paris, the Jungle has become an arresting symbol of Europe’s migrant crisis, no longer confined to the continent’s periphery.

The wall, a crucial part of a $22.65 million Franco-British security package agreed to in early March, is slated to be about 13 feet high and made of smooth concrete, a material that is difficult to scale.

Almost instantly, a pro-immigrant segment of the British government voiced concerns, saying the Calais wall could send the same message of exclusion commonly associated with the controversial proposal by Republican U.S. presidential nominee Donald Trump to build a wall between the United States and Mexico.

Alf Dubs, a member of the House of Lords and the lead sponsor of a recent amendment to welcome into Britain more unaccompanied migrant children, called the idea “stupid.” Dubs was once a child refugee in Britain, brought there as part of the famous Kindertransports that saved the lives of nearly 10,000 Jewish children in World War II.

“It sends an appalling message after the disaster of the Brexit vote,” he said, referring to the United Kingdom’s vote to leave the European Union. “It sends an appalling message of us being a small, nasty, inward-looking country.”

Meanwhile, the city of Paris announced Tuesday the details of its plan to become the first densely populated European city to create a space within city limits to welcome and house migrants. Anne Hidalgo, the city’s Socialist mayor, told reporters that a new facility would open in mid-October in the French capital, initially for 400 and with room to expand to 600.

“We must invent new devices to overcome the current situation, which is a situation of saturation,” Hidalgo said.

(The Washington Post)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!