(NaturalNews) It is hardly a secret that deception is the lifeblood that runs D.C. But the massive onslaught of pro-vaccine propaganda coming from our nation’s leaders today has spiraled completely out of control, with top health officials and politicians now blatantly lying under oath about the “safety and effectiveness” of vaccines.

During a recent congressional hearing, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Director Dr. Anne Schuchat, M.D., told Congress that there is absolutely no scientific evidence that vaccines cause autism, mental disorders, allergies or autoimmune disease.

Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Big Pharma hack who recently proposed eliminating all criminal penalties for drug companies that injure or kill people with their deadly products, asked Dr. Schuchat a series of softball questions about vaccines, upon which she denied that vaccines are in any way dangerous.

The hearing was apparently held to put “vaccine conspiracy theorists in their place,” to quote the drug industry-sponsored news company MSNBC. But what it actually did was prove, yet again, that those entrusted with protecting public health are actively lying to the American public in order to push the vaccine agenda.

The science is clear: vaccines can cause autism and other permanent harm

A 30-minute segment that recently aired on InfoWars Nightly News presented a plethora of scientific evidence exposing Dr. Schuchat as a liar, including multiple cases where families of autism victims were awarded judgments for vaccine injury. Nightly News director Rob Dew also proffered numerous studies linking vaccines like MMR to autism.

Many of these are referenced in an extensive scientific essay penned by retired neurosurgeon Dr. Russell L. Blaylock, M.D., entitled “Vaccines, Neurodevelopment and Autism Spectrum Disorders.” Published in 2008, Dr. Blaylock’s paper clearly demonstrates that vaccines have, in fact, been linked to autoimmunity, immune suppression, brain damage, and the larger grouping of behavioral and neurological conditions known as autism.

Several years after writing this paper, Dr. Blaylock published an even more extensive one that included details about the “excitotoxic” effects of vaccines in the journal Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine.

Establishment

As you may recall, the first ever court award admitting that vaccines cause autism occurred in 2010 when the family of Hannah Poling received more than $1.5 million for lost earnings, pain and suffering, and life care. The so-called “vaccine court” agreed that Hannah developed autism as a result of receiving vaccinations against nine disease, including the MMR vaccine, all at once.

UK authorities also agreed during the same year that a child who suffered brain damage did so as a result of MMR, resulting in the child’s family receiving a nominal cash sum to put towards his lifetime of treatment.

Even the manufacturer-issued package insert for MMR admits that the vaccine can cause a host of diseases, including many of the conditions associated with autism spectrum disorder. A full list of these is available on the vaccine insert here:
Merck.com.[PDF]

Dew’s must-see Nightly News report goes much deeper into all of this, exposing the establishment as a lying propaganda machine. There’s even a concise but thorough rundown of the kangaroo “vaccine court” and how it protects drug and vaccine companies from liability while simultaneously admitting that vaccines cause permanent harm, and in some cases death.

This segment begins around 12:10 in the following video:
YouTube.com.

“When we produce study after study [exposing vaccines as dangerous], they [the establishment hacks]always proclaim them to be insufficient evidence or unacceptable studies,” wrote Dr. Blaylock. “More often than not, they just completely ignore the evidence. This is despite the fact that we produce dozens or even hundreds of studies that not only demonstrate the link clinically and scientifically, but also clearly show the mechanism by which the damage is being done –even on a molecular level.”

“These include cell culture studies, mixed cell cultures, organotypic tissue studies, in vivo animal studies using multiple species and even human studies. To the defenders of vaccine safety-our evidence is never sufficient and, if we face reality –never will be.”

Sources:

• http://www.naturalnews.com
• http://youtube.com
• http://www.wddty.com
• http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
• http://www.cbsnews.com
• http://www.cdc.gov
• http://www.naturalnews.com
• https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com
• http://www.merck.com[PDF]

Source: Natural News

Photo credit: Anne Schuchat is a medical doctor who serves as the director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). She is an Assistant Surgeon General holding the ranks of rear admiral in the United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. Having worked with the CDC on immunization, respiratory, and other infectious diseases since 1988, she served as the Interim Deputy Director for Science and Public Health at the CDC from February 2009 to June 2009. She has also held other posts in the CDC. (Wikipedia)

RIYADH (Reuters) - A remark by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry that President Bashar al-Assad should be included in negotiations on a Syrian political transition provoked alarm and dismay on Monday among commentators close to Gulf Arab governments opposed to his rule.

Saudi Arabia, the top oil exporter and main Arab ally of the United States, has long feared that the administration of President Barack Obama lacks the resolve to tackle Assad and that it is instead focusing on a nuclear deal with the Syrian leader's main supporter Iran.

Although there was no immediate official comment from Riyadh, Saudi analysts with connections to the ruling family and conservative Sunni Muslim clerics quickly voiced concern about Kerry's remarks.

"Bashar has no legitimacy after killing his people and driving 11 million out of their houses. How can you sit down and talk to him and keep him in power? It's a big joke for us," said Abdulaziz al-Sager, head of the Gulf Research Center based in Jeddah and Geneva.

"We have to negotiate in the end," Kerry said. "We've always been willing to negotiate in the context of the Geneva I process," he added, referring to a 2012 conference which called for a negotiated transition to end the conflict.

One major U.S. ally appeared to differ. France said it was sticking to its opposition to talks with Assad, saying these had to include Syrian opposition members and elements of the exiting regime - but not Assad - to pave the way to a unity government.

Other Gulf countries, which like Saudi Arabia have backed Syrian rebels against Assad, worried about Kerry's remarks.

"The fact that Assad is still in the picture is something we have lived with and accepted as an interim arrangement. If Mr. Kerry was talking about this same interim arrangement - one year or two years until negotiations reach some fruit - we understand," said Sami al-Faraj, a Kuwaiti adviser to the Gulf Cooperation Council that comprises Gulf Arab states.

"But if he means that even after negotiations Assad would stay on, that is unacceptable."

The Saudis have in the past said a political transition in Syria cannot begin unless Assad leaves power, and Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal has accused him of committing genocide against Syrians.

Riyadh's concerns have been heightened by negotiations between Iran and world powers aimed at finding a deal over its nuclear program, which have reached a critical stage.

Nasser al-Omar, a hardline conservative Sunni Muslim cleric with over 1.6 million Twitter followers, tweeted on Monday that Kerry's comments were evidence of a deal between Tehran and Washington to make Iran "America's policeman in the region".

(Reporting By Angus McDowall and Noah Browning, Editing by William Maclean and Mark Heinrich)

Related Video

Syria's Assad says wants actions, not words from Kerry (video)

By Thomas Grove

MOSCOW (Reuters) - More than 45,000 Russian troops as well as war planes and submarines started military exercises across much of the country on Monday in one of the Kremlin's biggest shows of force since its ties with the West plunged to Cold War-lows.

President Vladimir Putin called the Navy's Northern Fleet to full combat readiness in exercises in Russia's Arctic North apparently aimed at dwarfing military drills in neighboring Norway, a NATO member.

"New challenges and threats to military security require the armed forces to further boost their military capabilities. Special attention must be paid to newly created strategic formations in the north," Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu said, quoted by RIA news agency.

Shoigu said the order came from Putin, who has promised to spend more than 21 trillion rubles ($340 billion) by the end of the decade to overhaul Russia's fighting forces.

Putin made his first public appearance since March 5 on Monday, an absence from view that had fueled feverish speculation over his health as well as his grip on power. He was meeting Kyrgyz President Almazbek Atambayev at the Constantine Palace outside Russia's second city of St. Petersburg.

Norway is currently holding its "Joint Viking" drills involving 5,000 troops in Finnmark county, which borders Russia in the resource-rich Arctic circle where both countries are vying for influence.

Russia's drills would include nearly 40,000 servicemen, 41 warships and 15 submarines, RIA reported.

Tensions between Russia and Europe worsened last year, leading eight northern European nations to promise to boost cooperation to counter an increase in Moscow's military activity.

NATO made new allegations last week that Russia was arming separatists in east Ukraine, where more than 6,000 people have been killed in nearly a year of fighting.

The West and Kiev accuse Russia of supplying arms and soldiers to support the pro-Russian separatists. Moscow denies the claims.

NATO says it counted more than 100 intercepts of Russian planes into members' airspace last year, three times more than in 2013. The intercepts have forced civilian planes to change their courses and Britain scrambled Typhoon interceptor planes after two long-range bombers flew over the English Channel.

Norway said its military drills had been planned before the Ukraine crisis.

"However, the current security situation in Europe shows that the exercise is more relevant than ever," Lieutenant General Haga Lunde said in a statement.

The Russian exercises are due to last for much of the week during which Russia will celebrate its annexation of the Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea, carried out with the help of special forces.

Other drills involved 5,000 troops in Russia's eastern military district, while another exercise included another 500 troops from Russia's troubled North Caucasus region of Chechnya, the site of two separatist wars, wires reported.

The exercises were meant to focus on fighting Islamist insurgents, whose movement to create a Muslim state has spread across the predominantly Muslim North Caucasus, fueled by religion and anger at local abuse of power.

(Reporting by Thomas Grove, Editing by Elizabeth Piper and Angus MacSwan)

by Jim Fetzer

How many lies of enormous magnitude are the American people expected to accept from their government and the mass media, when it fuctions on its behalf? William Colby, former Director of the CIA, observed that “The agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media”, which Carl Bernstein had previously confirmed in his article, “The CIA and the Media” (Rolling Stone, 20 October 1977), in which agency officials boasted that their greatest successes had been with CBS, with Time Inc. and with The New York Times:

Among the executives who lent their cooperation to the Agency were William Paley of the Columbia Broadcasting System, Henry Luce of Time Inc., Arthur Hays Sulzberger of the New York Times, Barry Bingham Sr. of the Louisville Courier-Journal and James Copley of the Copley News Service. Other organizations which cooperated with the CIA include the American Broadcasting Company, the National Broadcasting Company, the Associated Press, United Press International, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps-Howard, Newsweek magazine, the Mutual Broadcasting System, The Miami Herald, and the old Saturday Evening Post and New York Herald-Tribune. By far the most valuable of these associations, according to CIA officials, have been with The New York Times, CBS, and Time Inc.

Judging from its recent coverage of the Boston bombing trial, which The New York Timespretends is a legitimate judicial procedure based upon authentic evidence, nothing seems to have changed. The evidence in this case for concluding that this was a drill using amputee actors and special effects filming is overwhelming, where neither Tamerlan nor Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were responsible for the explosions or events thereafter. The Timesinsults our intelligence. How, for example, could Dzhokhar have run over his brotherafter Tamerlan had been arrested by the police?

The faulty analogy

Consider, for another, Katharine Q. Seelye, “Defense in Marathon Bombing has Echo of Clarence Darrow” (The New York Times, 13 March 2015), in which she invokes an absurd comparison of Judy Clarke’s by admission in her opening statement that “He did it!” to Darrow’s defense of Leopold and Loeb, where Darrpw spent 12 hours of emotion-laden appeals to convince the jury to spare their lives and sentence them to life in prison rather than to impose the death penalty. Seelye, alas, overlooks the obvious: Leopold and Loeb were guilty, while her client, Dzhokhar Tsarnaov, is innocent.

Not only that, but she pled her client, “Not guilty!”, while Darrow had pled his “Guilty!” But these differences have not inhibited this reporter from committing a faulty analogy, which occurs when their differences are greater than their similarities, there are few but crucial differences or the argument is taken to be certain rather than probable. Could Seelye possibly be unaware that Judy Clarke had pled Dzhokhar “Not guilty”, which was reported by Richard A. Oppel, Jr., “Jurors Hear Harrowing Account of Boston Marathon Bombers’ Hostage” (The New York Times, 12 March 2015):

So while it may have made sense for Clarence Darrow to have pled Leopold and Loeb, who had committed the crime of which they were accused, “Guilty”, and then to have made an impassioned appeal to the jury to spare their lives, it makes no sense for Judy Clarke to have pled Dzhokhar, who has not committed the crime of which he stands accused, “Not guilty”, but then proceed to declare, “He did it!”, in her opening statement. As I have previously observed, that simplified the prosecution’s task, because no juror will now believe that he did not commit the crime, thanks to her.

How much proof is enough?

As I have explained in recent articles, including “The Boston Show Trial: The ‘bloody confession’ of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev” (12 March 2015), “Boston Show Trial: Attorney declares patsy “Guilty!” (8 March 2015), and (most thematically!) “Media complicity and indispensable to ‘false flag’ success” (14 January 2015), the proofs that Dzhokhar did not do it are so blatant and numerous that they should be intelligible even to reporters for The New York Times. That The Times should be ignoring the evidence and promoting a fantasy defies belief–unless, of course, it remains under the control of the CIA. Here are a dozen proofs that make the case:

Exhibit 1:

We have a video with a sound track that shows the police using bullhorns to announce,“This is a drill! This is a drill!” Listen to it for yourself. If the Boston police knew it was a drill, how could the Boston Police Commissioner claim they were guilty and even had additional explosives they were planning to use? Why is he lying to Chris Wallace on Fox News?

Exhibit 2:

We also have tweets from The Boston Globe that a “controlled explosion” is going to be set off during the marathon “for the benefit of bomb squad activities” and another stating that one would be set off in front of the library in one minute. When The Globe knows it was a drill, why has The Globe, one of our nation’s premier papers, not spoken out about it?

Exhibit 3A:

The alternative media had already zeroed in on the perps the very day of the event itself, who were Craft International personnel wearing khaki trousers, black jackets and black baseball caps with a skull insignia, where the motto of Craft is, “Violence does solve problems!” When amateurs using computers can solve the problem, why can’t professionals?

Exhibit 3B:

We have photos of two Craft personnel, one of whom is wearing a black backpack with a white square on it, where the backpack that blows up is black with a white square on it (which is circled in yellow) and of the two of them running away from the location as the bomb it contains explodes. This is about as obvious as it could possibly be. Now you see it, now you don’t.

Exhibit 3C:

Here is a photo of Dzhokhar with his backpack. One of those that blew up was black with a white square; the other was tan or light brown. Notice that Dzhokhar’s backpack is grey or silver. It is neither black with a white square nor tan or light brown. So why would anyone, much less the authorities, regard him as a suspect? His doesn’t even have a right backpack.

Exhibit 4:

Here is the scene immediately after one of the explosions. Notice the presence of the smoke. But there is no blood, which Lorraine Day, M.D., Chief of Orthopedic Surgery at San Francisco General Hospital (with 25 years of experience) has observed would be impossible if this had been a real event: there would instantaneously have been blood everywhere!

Exhibit 5:

Same scene, but different point. According to reports from the AP, such as “The Huffington Post” (23 April 2013), three persons (including one child) were killed and 260 injured. It has become part of the official narrative about the Boston event. But the images from the scene suggest a number closer to 20. Where are the other 240 victims?

Exhibit 6:

When the blood finally shows up, it is fake blood–special effects “Hollywood” blood–which is not even the right color. And when the scene clears, the tubes from which it came can be seen. If this had been a bona fide bombing, it would not have been necessary to fake it. They faked it because it was only a staged bombing, which produced no blood, not a real one.

Exhibit 7:

A perfect example of the use of actors turns out to be Nicole Brannock Gross, who, although feigning to have had both legs broken in two places and had her Achilles tendon severed, sits calmly displaying no agony or pain, in striking contrast with professional athletes, who are used to enduring pain, who grimace and contort from injuries far milder than what she claims.

Exhibit 8A:

Hollywood producer/director Nathan Folks has identified one of the key players (in the cowboy hat running along side Jeff Bauman) as an actor he had cast in one of his films and the type of filming as “hyper-realistic”, which is used to create scenes that are as realistic as possible, for purposes such as introducing inexperienced troops to what they will encounter in combat.

Exhibit 8B:

Another orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Stan Monteith, pondering how this man lost his legs below the knees on the scene but turns up 19 days later with amputations above the knee, where it takes three months to recover from the surgery and another three to learn to cope without your legs, was forced to conclude that this young man must have been an actor.

Exhibit 8C:

It might sound far-fetched to think that they would use actors for an event like this, but that is what staging one entails. We even have the “Actor Waver Form” for actors who are recruited by DHS to participate, where the objective appears to be to keep Americans in a state of fear, because 680 studies have shown that domestic terrorism is virtually non-existent.

Exhibit 9A:

On Thursday following the Monday event, the FBI sent out a stooge to tell the public, “Don’t look at that man behind the curtain”. He told us, ignore all the photos on the internet and focus only on these two. He sought the public’s assistance in their identification, but it would turn out that they had had the Tsarnaev brothers under surveillance for at least 5 years.

Exhibit 9B:

They appear to have been selected as patsies because of their country of origin, but they were actually ordinary young men, where Tamerlan had a wife and a child and was considering moving to New York, while Dzhokhar was a college student who participated in wrestling and was popular with his fellow students on campus, where he went after the bombing,

Exhibit 9C:

Perhaps the most bizarre of all, Tamerlan was arrested, stripped naked and placed into a police car, which was widely broadcast at the time. I could identify him, but his mother and his aunt confirmed his identity. According to the absurd official narrative, moreover,Tamerlan was killed by Dzhokhar, who drove over him repeatedly in an SUV–after his police apprehension!

Exhibit 10:

In an appalling act of treachery, the FBI sent a five-man team to interrogate a friend of the two Tsarnaev brothers, Ibragim Todashev, 27, who was concerned that they were coming to kill him. Apparently, after lengthy but unsuccessful attempts to persuade him to turn against his friends, all left the room but one, who shot him multiple times, claiming he had violently attacked him.

Exhibit 11:

According to the Boston police, the FBI, The Boston Globe, Fox News and every other major media outlet, the Tsanaev brothers were responsible for “the Boston bombing”, even though we know it was a drill, that no one died and that it was done by Craft International personnel. Even the Boston Police Commissioner and The New York Times support the fabrication, in spite of the evidence against it.

Exhibit 12:

The latest absurdity is the “bloody confession” of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, recovered from the inside of a boat, which is nevertheless written in perfectly straight lines, which are evenly spaced–an achievement that not even Leonardo da Vinci could have accomplished. This is a photoshopped creation by projecting a 2-dimensional image to appear to be a 3-dimensional one.

The abuse of power and authority

Not all of these exhibits are of equal weight, where, for example, Exhibit 5 could be contested on the ground that the scene shown is only one, where there may have been more casualties at the other site. But the overwhelming majority are beyond dispute: the police calling out, “This is a drill! This is a drill!”; The Boston Globe tweets; the missing blood; the Hollywood blood; the obvious use of actors; the reports of experts (such as Lorraine Day, M.D., Dr. Stan Monteith, and Nathan Folks).

In spite of my best efforts to get to the bottom, every time I look at his case, I discover something worse: Dzhokhar is alleged to have killed his brother by driving over him with an SUV after he had been taken into custody! The FBI has done its part, because it not only contributed a stooge to mislead the public but earned its stripes by murdering one of their friends, who, it seems, was not going to play along with the charade. The media covers it with no reservations.

I served my nation with pride as a commissioned officer in the Marine Corps. I have done my best to uphold the honor and the integrity of the United States. But I have learned the bitter lesson that we are not a nation of laws but of liars. We are being deceived on every count–about Boston, about Sandy Hook, about Ukraine, about Iran, about ISIS and more–to advance a political agenda run by elites including the Khazarian Mafia, through a covert government, where the CIA serves as their instrument, which even Bill Clinton, as President, admitted he did not control.

Americans are the least informed and most gullible population on Earth. We confuse authority with truth, when the truth should be our authority. Even our newspaper of record,The New York Times, entrusted to chronicle the official history of the United States, plays the public for fools. Unless we know the truth, we cannot act in our own best interests, because we don’t know what those actions would be. Addressing these issues, I find myself in a state of nausea. This is not a nation that deserves respect. It is a sham, a fraud and a disgrace to all who perceive the truth.

• About Author
• Latest Posts

Jim Fetzer

A former Marine Corps officer, Jim Fetzer has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.

McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone.

The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).

Powered by Starbox