Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/12/2015 10:08:49 AM

Israel demolishes EU-funded shelters in Jerusalem

AFP

The EU-funded structures demolished were small metal constructions put up on the outskirts of Arab neighbourhood Issawiya, pictured on November 30, 2010 (AFP Photo/Ahmad Gharabli)


Jerusalem (AFP) - Israeli authorities on Tuesday demolished an EU-funded shelter in Arab east Jerusalem, the European Union said, denouncing the move.

"We condemn today's demolition of temporary shelters funded by the European Union... as part of its response to the needs of the affected communities," an EU statement said.

EU funds have helped to pay for some 200 temporary buildings used as shelters in villages inhabited by Bedouin communities in the West Bank, just outside Arab east Jerusalem.

Israel occupied east Jerusalem in 1967 and later annexed it, in a move never recognised by the international community.

The structures demolished on Tuesday were small metal constructions put up on the outskirts of Arab neighbourhood Issawiya, an AFP correspondent said.

The area was empty of residents following the demolition by bulldozer.

A spokeswoman for the Jerusalem municipality said the process was initiated by the Israel Nature and Parks Authority.

A spokeswoman for the authority told AFP the structures were in a national park within the jurisdiction of the Jerusalem municipality, which had been informed of the violation and demolished the structures.

A spokesman for Regavim, a rightwing lobby group, said the move was unusual.

"This doesn't happen every day, and it certainly doesn't happen to EU buildings," the spokesman told AFP.

Israeli authorities regularly demolish structures inhabited by the Bedouin in the West Bank, and have tried to move communities into housing planned by the state.

Activists say Israel is deliberately displacing the Bedouin in order to build settlements in the area of the West Bank just outside east Jerusalem.

That effective annexation of a corridor running through the middle of the West Bank would make the creation of a contiguous Palestinian state impossible.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/12/2015 10:15:53 AM

Kerry: Even a Republican president won’t undo Iran nuclear deal

The Republican Senate letter is “absolutely incorrect” on the law, the secretary of state told a Senate panel Wednesday


Olivier Knox
Yahoo News

US Secretary of State John Kerry testifies before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in Washington, DC, March 11, 2015 (AFP Photo/Jim Watson)


Secretary of State John Kerry bluntly told Republicans on Wednesday that they are kidding themselves if they think a GOP president could stroll into the White House in January 2017, pick up a pen, and nullify a nuclear agreement with Iran.

“It’s not going to happen,” Kerry told lawmakers during a frequently contentious Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing focused on the war against the so-called Islamic State.
The top U.S. diplomat’s dismissive comments came as the United States, with its partners Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China, faces an end-of-March deadline for reaching a framework deal aimed at ensuring that Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon. Tehran admits to extensive nuclear facilities, but claims that it will use nuclear power only for civilian purposes, like generating electricity. Washington and its allies doubt this, noting that the Islamic Republic of Iran has tried to keep large parts of its atomic infrastructure secret.
Kerry acknowledged that a future president could “come in with a different attitude” about the pending deal, but implied that the international consensus would make rolling it back prohibitively difficult.
“I’d like to see the next president, if all of those countries have said, ‘This is good and it’s working,’ turn around and just nullify it on behalf of the United States,” he told the committee.
The issue was raised in an open letter drafted by Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., and signed by 46 fellow Senate Republicans, warning Iran’s leaders that a deal with Obama may not survive past his presidency unless Congress approves the deal. Lawmakers, or Obama’s successor, could modify the arrangement after he leaves office, the letter cautioned. Many Republicans considered likely to run for the White House in 2016 have either signed on to or expressed support in principle for Cotton’s effort.
Obama and congressional Democrats, as well as some well-known Republican foreign policy hands, have denounced the message as undermining the president’s constitutional authority to conduct foreign policy. Republicans in turn have pointed to past instances of Democrats undertaking foreign policy overtures that undermined the executive branch.
“My reaction to the letter was utter disbelief,” Kerry told the committee on Wednesday, adding that if he had been asked to sign on to a similar letter when he was in the Senate, “I guarantee you no matter what the issue and no matter who was president, I would have certainly rejected it.”
Kerry said claims that Congress must approve the agreement are “absolutely incorrect,” and that the letter’s assertion that lawmakers could alter the deal is also mistaken.
“It’s incorrect when it says that Congress could actually modify the terms of the agreement at any time. That’s flat wrong,” he said. “They don’t have the right to modify an agreement reached executive to executive between the leaders of countries.”
In fact, Congress could try to undermine any such agreement by cutting off necessary funding, or passing legislation that conflicts with the agreement. But to do so, it would need a veto-proof majority — and be willing to roll back an agreement that is expected to include intrusive monitoring and inspections of Iran’s suspect nuclear program.
Kerry tried to cool some of the rhetoric in the debate surrounding the letter. The New York Daily News on Tuesday branded the 47 signatories “traitors.”
“No one is questioning anybody’s right to dissent. Any senator can go to the floor any day and raise any of the questions that were raised” in the letter, he said.
But “this risks undermining the confidence” that foreign governments have in the United States and existing agreements, Kerry said.
And telling the world that the only binding deal is one negotiated with Congress, he added, is “both untrue and profoundly a bad suggestion to make.”


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/12/2015 10:25:05 AM

Iraqi forces, militias sweep into Islamic State-held Tikrit

Associated Press

Associated Press Videos
Raw: Iraqi Troops Enter IS-held Tikrit

Watch video

BAGHDAD (AP) — Iraqi soldiers and allied Shiite militiamen swept into the Islamic State-held city of Tikrit on Wednesday, launching a two-front offensive to squeeze extremists out of Saddam Hussein's hometown in a major test of the troops' resolve.

Explosions and heavy gunfire echoed through Tikrit, a key way station for Iraqi forces trying to expel the militants who hold roughly a third of the country and neighboring Syria. The offensive also will serve as a major crucible for Iraqi forces, which collapsed under the extremists' initial offensive last year and now face street-by-street fighting in one of the Islamic State group's biggest strongholds.

Allied Iraqi forces first entered the city through its northern Qadisiyya neighborhood, according to video obtained by The Associated Press. Overhead, an attack helicopter fired missiles as soldiers and militiamen laid down heavy machine gunfire in the neighborhood's dusty streets as downtown Tikrit loomed in the distance, black smoke rising overhead.

Officials quickly established a supply line through the neighborhood to reinforce troops, Salahuddin police Brig. Kheyon Rasheed told the state-run Iraqiyya television. Authorities offered no immediate casualty figures, though Iran's state-run Press TV satellite channel reported that a mortar attack wounded one of its cameramen there.

A local official in Iraq's Salahuddin province confirmed that Iraqi troops entered Qadisiyya and raised the Iraqi flag over Tikrit's general hospital. He spoke on condition of anonymity as he was not authorized to brief journalists.

Later Wednesday, allied forces also swept into Tikrit from the south in a pincer movement to squeeze out militants, though some suggested many already fled in the face of the advance, codenamed "At your service, prophet of Allah."

"The terrorists are seizing the cars of civilians trying to leave the city and they are trying to make a getaway," Rasheed said.

Tikrit, the capital of Salahuddin province, sits on the Tigris River about 130 kilometers (80 miles) north of Baghdad. Several of Saddam's palaces remain there, as do remnants of his now-outlawed Baathist party. Many believe party members assisted the Islamic State group in its offensive last summer.

After the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, insurgent Baathists in Tikrit launched attacks on American forces. The same could happen to incoming Iraqi forces, who already faced sniper fire and heavily mined roads.

Taking Tikrit would open a supply line for a future operation to besiege Mosul, Iraq's second-largest city that remains under Islamic State control. U.S. military officials have that said a mission to retake Mosul likely will begin in April or May and involve up to 25,000 Iraqi troops. But the Americans have cautioned the offensive could be delayed.

Iranian military advisers have been helping guide Iraqi forces in their advance on Tikrit. Speaking Wednesday on Capitol Hill, U.S. Gen. Martin Dempsey described the militias as "Iranian trained and somewhat Iranian equipped."

Among those directing operations is Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, commander of the powerful Revolutionary Guard's Quds Force. Frontline images have emerged of the general in recent days, showing him smiling in plainclothes without a bulletproof vest.

The overt Iranian role and the prominence of Shiite militias in the campaign have raised fears of possible sectarian cleansing should Tikrit, an overwhelmingly Sunni city, fall to the government troops.

"Iranians will try to calm the fears of the Sunnis instead of persecuting them because the Iranian officials know that it is in their best interest to keep the Iraq united," said Hadi Jalo, a Baghdad-based political analyst. "For the Iranians, it is easier to dominate one country instead of three separate states."

The U.S. says its allied coalition carrying out airstrikes targeting the extremists has not been involved in the ongoing Tikrit offensive. Iraq's Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has appealed for more aid for his country's beleaguered ground forces, though the U.S. spent billions of dollars training and equipping Iraq's army during its eight-year occupation.

A senior U.S. military official told the AP that as of June 2014, the Iraqi military stood at 125,000 men at best, down from 205,000 in January 2014. Iraqi officials now say that at least 30,000 men — including the military, militias, Sunni tribes and police — are fighting to capturing Tikrit. Dempsey said Wednesday that at least 20,000 militiamen are taking part.

Most battlefield successes in Iraq have been coordinated efforts, with Iraqi and Kurdish forces and Shiite militias fighting on the ground and the U.S.-led coalition providing air power.

The siege on the village of Amirli just north of Baghdad, when many feared the capital itself might fall, was broken last year with the help of U.S.-led airstrikes and a fighting force of mainly Shiite militias. Shiite militiamen backed by a coalition air campaign also retook the town of Jurf al-Sukhr, on Baghdad's outskirts, in October.

The Islamic State group kept up its attacks elsewhere in Iraq. In Ramadi, the provincial capital of Iraq's embattled Anbar province, at least 13 suicide car bombs exploded almost simultaneously, killing two soldiers and wounding eight, said Sabah Karhout, head of the Anbar provincial council. The Islamic State group said in an online statement that it used foreign fighters from Australia, Belgium, Syria and Uzbekistan fighters in the attack.

A car bomb also exploded in a Shiite neighborhood of northern Baghdad, killing seven people and wounding 18, authorities said. No one immediately claimed responsibility for that attack.

___

Associated Press writers Vivian Salama in Baghdad and Deb Riechmann in Washington contributed to this report.





Authorities tell Iraq's state-run media that terrorists are seizing civilian cars trying to leave the city of Tikrit.
Explosions and heavy gunfire



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/12/2015 10:38:57 AM

Sexual Predators Hidden in Federal Witness Protection Program, Report Finds

ABC News

Sexual Predators Hidden in Federal Witness Protection Program, Report Finds (ABC News)

The U.S. government’s Witness Protection Program provides new identities and new communities for federal witnesses who may be at risk.

But what if some of those protected witnesses are also sexual predators? And are their new communities informed?

The short answer: not usually. There are now at least four sex offenders in the program who have received a new name and a new home, “but the Department of Justice did not use adequate safeguards to protect and notify the public and law enforcement about the risk posed,” according to a new DOJ Inspector General report released today.

The Department of Justice Inspector General today released a scathing, and heavily redacted report, criticizing the Federal Witness Protection program for “not taking sufficient steps to mitigate threats posed” by sex offenders in the program, as well as sex offenders recently released from the program. Some of them even committed their crimes while in the program.

Myths About Sex Offenders

Start Snitching: Inside the Witness Protection Program

The crimes of some of those protected by the program include rape and sexual assault of children.

“We believe that the DOJ generally did not use adequate safeguards to protect and notify the public and law enforcement about the risk posed by sex offender participants in the Program.” the report states.

When the IG audit of Witness Protection began in July 2013, the report found, the Department of Justice didn’t even know how many sex offenders were in Witness Protection. Last year, DOJ identified 58 sex offenders who were in the program at some point.

Ten of those offenders were convicted of sexual offenses before they entered the program. Ten committed their crimes while in the program, and 38 were convicted of sex offenses when they were no longer in the program.

Since the audit began, the IG says, the Justice Department has taken steps to improve oversight of sex offenders in the program and those who’ve been released.

This is the IG’s second report in two years criticizing the Witness Protection Program. In 2013, the IG found “inadequate monitoring of known or suspected terrorists” who were in Witness Protection, and “a failure to share essential information about WITSEC Program participants with the Terrorist Screening Center and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.”

The DOJ won’t say how many people are in its program currently for security reasons, but since its inception in the early-1970s, there have been 8,648 witnesses under protection, mostly by the U.S. Marshals Service.

See the full report on the Witness Protection Program’s monitoring of sex offenders.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
3/12/2015 11:04:35 AM

2 officers shot at protest outside Ferguson police station

Associated Press

Police mobilize in the parking lot of the Ferguson Police Station after two police officers were shot while standing guard in front of the Ferguson Police Station on Thursday, March 12, 2015. (AP Photo/St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Laurie Skrivan)


FERGUSON, Mo. (AP) — Two officers were shot in front of the Ferguson Police Department early Thursday, authorities said, as demonstrators gathered after the resignation of the city's police chief in the wake of a scathing Justice Department report alleging bias in the police department and court.

A 32-year-old officer from nearby Webster Groves was shot in the face and a 41-year-old officer from St. Louis County was shot in the shoulder, St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar said at a news conference. Both were taken to a hospital, where Belmar said they were conscious. He said he did not have further details about their conditions but described their injuries as "serious."


DETAILS: At least 2 police officers shot during protest in - local media on.rt.com/lxkx62 http://


"I don't know who did the shooting, to be honest with you," Belmar said, adding that he could not provide a description of the suspect or gun.

He said his "assumption" was that, based on where the officers were standing and the trajectory of the bullets, "these shots were directed exactly at my officers."

The shots were fired shortly after midnight as protesters were gathered following the resignation of embattled Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson on Wednesday. Before the shooting, some at the protest were chanting to show they weren't satisfied with the resignations of Jackson and City Manager John Shaw earlier in the week, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported. Authorities from multiple agencies had gathered outside of the department.

The protest was a familiar scene in Ferguson, which saw similar and much larger demonstrations after the shooting death of black 18-year-old Michael Brown last summer by city police officer Darren Wilson. When Wilson, who is white, was cleared in November by a state grand jury, the decision set off further protests, looting and fires. But Wednesday was the first time an officer at a protest had been shot.

Marciay Pitchford, 20, was among the protesters outside the police department. She told The Associated Press the protest had been mostly peaceful until she heard the shots ring out.


Photo: Moment after shots fired at police in Missouri, USA telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews http://www.


/northamerica/usa/11466197/Two-police-officers-shot-in-Ferguson-amid-fresh-race-protests.html


"I saw the officer go down and the other police officers drew their guns while other officers dragged the injured officer away," Pitchford said. "All of a sudden everybody started running or dropping to the ground."

Belmar said the shots were fired from across the street from the police department.

After the shooting, officers with guns and in riot gear circled the station, and more than a dozen squad cars blocked the street.

Jackson was the sixth employee to resign or be fired after a Justice Department report last week cleared Wilson of civil rights charges in the shooting. Wilson has since resigned. A separate Justice Department report released the same day found a profit-driven court system and widespread racial bias in the city police department.

Mayor James Knowles III announced Wednesday that the city had reached a mutual separation agreement with Jackson that will pay Jackson one year of his nearly $96,000 annual salary and health coverage. Jackson's resignation becomes effective March 19, at which point Lt. Col. Al Eickhoff will become acting chief while the city searches for a replacement.

Jackson had previously resisted calls by protesters and some of Missouri's top elected leaders to step down over his handling of Brown's shooting and the weeks of protests that followed. He was widely criticized from the outset, both for an aggressive police response to protesters and for his agency's erratic and infrequent releases of key information.

He took nearly a week to publicly identify Wilson as the shooter and then further heightened tension in the community by releasing Wilson's name at the same time as store security video that police said showed Brown stealing a box of cigars and shoving a clerk only a short time before his death.

During a 12-minute news conference, Knowles said Jackson resigned after "a lot of soul-searching" about how the community could heal from the racial unrest stemming from the fatal shooting last summer.

"The chief is the kind of honorable man you don't have to go to," Knowles said. "He comes to you when he knows that this is something we have to seriously discuss."

The acting head of the Justice Department's civil rights division released a statement saying the U.S. government remains committed to reaching a "court-enforceable agreement" to address Ferguson's "unconstitutional practices," regardless of who's in charge of the city.

Jackson oversaw the Ferguson force for nearly five years before the shooting that stirred months of unrest across the St. Louis region and drew global attention to the predominantly black city of 21,000.

In addition to Jackson, Ferguson's court clerk was fired last week and two police officers resigned. The judge who oversaw the court system also resigned, and the City Council on Tuesday agreed to a separation agreement with Shaw, the city manager.

Related Video:

Police Officers Shot Outside Ferguson, Missouri Police Department (video)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1