Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Promote
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/22/2015 12:45:45 AM

Why Are We Still Vaccinating? 25 Questions From A Former Pro-Vaccine Advocate

http://livelovefruit.com/still-vaccinating-25-questions-former-pro-vaccine-advocate/

by Brian Rogers – May 15, 2015

vaccinationBSIP/UIG via Getty Images image: http://livelovefruit.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/vaccination.jpg

I used to be pro vaccine. I know the feeling of thinking others were just plain crazy and wrong for not vaccinating their children and themselves. ‘Irresponsible!’ I said when pointing my finger. I’d use the same old arguments about polio and small pox and how vaccines saved us from all those horrible diseases and just swallowing and regurgitating the propaganda I was brought up with. It was only recently, in 2009 that I started questioning my long held beliefs and began digging in to the history, efficacy and safety of vaccines. I was appalled at what I found and the recklessness of those government health agencies entrusted with our health and our children’s safety, and angry with myself that I had put my family’s health at risk by blind faith in others when I was ultimately responsible for the medical decisions of my family.

When I began to put this article together I specifically chose not to include research from or links to websites that are considered untrustworthy by most pro-vaxxers, sites such as Natural News, Mercola, etc. even though I personally trust those sites and much more than I would WebMd and for good reason [a]. Instead I chose to employ basic logic and also incorporate independent and .gov scientific studies-mostly peer review, journals, news from mainstream sources (that pro-vaxxers love and totally trust) and articles that link to other .gov scientific studies, as well as government statistical resources. So, I started writing down questions and then looking for answers. I’ll admit, some of these questions have already been asked by others, but I just expanded upon it to form a helpful list.

I hope the following information helps you in your lifelong journey in search of health, vitality and truth in your own lives and your children’s lives.

1. Why are newborn babies vaccinated on their first day of life against a disease that is primarily transmitted sexually and by needles in drug users?

(Pregnant women are already tested for STD’s prior to birth so there’s no reason to give it to an infant). Interesting to note, of the few vaccines that still are given to infants and STILL has thimerasol in it is Hep B and DipTet (and Flu shot recommended to pregnant women). So, the claim that it has been removed from all vaccines is a lie and misdirection. If they give it to all newborns then ALL the newborns are getting that thimerasol (mercury derivative). “It was removed from many child vaccines in 2002 but remains in some vaccines (e.g., hepatitis B virus and)” Page 21.

2. Why are babies given vaccines to produce antibodies when they do not produce antibodies until after the age of 3 to 6 months?

They get the required antibodies from breastfeeding.

3. Why does the government tell parents to delay breast feeding and get more vaccines when breast feeding babies produce higher levels of antibodies?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20442687

http://naturalsociety.com/scientists-say-delay-breastfeeding-to-improve-vaccine-potency/

4. Why aren’t vaccine manufacturers held responsible when their product injures your child? Why would these companies need to be protected from the effects of such wonderful products?

(Look into Vaccine Injury Compensation Program .gov and VAERS)

The Supreme Court ruling exempting the vaccine manufacturers from all liability is done under the explicit understanding that they fall under the category “unavoidably unsafe products.”

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf

http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/index.html

https://vaers.hhs.gov/index

5. Why have no double blind, placebo, randomized controlled trials been done on any vaccines?

This is standard with any other drug.

6. Why are we following the US vaccination schedule? We are the most vaccinated population on the planet with the highest rates of infant deaths/SIDS in the western world?http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/09/29/our-infant-mortality-rate-is-a-national-embarrassment/

http://sm.stanford.edu/archive/stanmed/2013fall/article2.html

7. Why are disease outbreaks occurring in populations with 90%+ vaccination rates? What about that ‘Herd Immunity’ guys?

http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/139/1/77.short

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8483623

http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/6/5/00-0512_article

8. Why are children vaccinated against these diseases still catching and spreading them?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24076325

http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/studies-show-measles-vaccine-spreads-virus/(see Johns Hopkins paper)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15954490

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8483623

9. Why are we frightened of non-fatal illnesses that train a child’s immune system how to behave?

10. Why are vaccine manufacturers allowed to reduce antigens and insert cheap and toxic additives that aggravate the injection site?

11. Why do we need multi-dose vaccines if the number ONE priority of vaccine manufacturers is your child’s safety?

12. Why will no physician sign a written guarantee for a child’s safety prior to vaccinating them with products they insist you take and that they say are completely safe?

13. Why is there no outrage about the 3.1 billion dollars paid out in vaccine injury/death claims and yet they claim there is no correlation and they are perfectly safe?

http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreport.pdf

14. Why don’t people recognize from history that the most widespread and lethal diseases in the last 200 years were reduced due to cleaner drinking water, improved sanitation, nutrition, less overcrowded areas and better living conditions?

Vaccines were introduced at points in time where every single disease was already declining, most almost completely gone. To give vaccines credit for global reductions in disease is like giving a band-aid credit for healing a wound that was already closing. Dr. Hans Rosling shows exactly how the health condition of nearly all countries of the world have improved with wealth, even 200 years ago, at the times where there no vaccines.

http://youtu.be/jbkSRLYSojo

https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/graphs/ (blog yes, but the links are amazing and historical data.)

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/hs/pubhealth/rosner/g8965/client_edit/readings/week_2/mckinlay.pdf

By the late 1950s, even before the introduction of measles vaccine, measles-related deaths and case fatality rates in the United States had decreased markedly, presumably as a result of improvement in health care and nutrition (Oxford Journal of Infectious Diseases).

image: http://livelovefruit.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/historical_vaccine_graphs.png

historical_vaccine_graphs

Image Source

15. Why do people keep parroting what they hear about ‘Herd Immunity?’

Herd immunity is a hilarious concept that assumes that 1) Vaccinated people are immune to the diseases for which they’ve been vaccinated, 2) Can not carry the diseases for which they are vaccinated/immune, 3) Because most of the people are vaccinated, other people around them can’t catch the disease. My favourite analogy for herd immunity is that if 95% of people in a building are wearing hard hats when the ceiling falls in, the 5% are protected. (credit Dr. Robert Murdoch)

16. Why are almost all pro-vaxxer adults we talk to not up to date on their adult vaccinations/boosters?

17. Why do pro-vaxxers ignore .gov scientific studies?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23902317

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8483623

18. Why didn’t our government health agencies ever safety test thimerasol (a mercury derivative and adjuvant) since Lilly developed it in the 1920’s?

They used it in vaccines from 1930 to 2004! It still is in some vaccines such as the flu vaccine and others. Here is a 2 minute clip, from Congressional Hearings. The EPA themselves acknowledge the toxic effects of mercury:

http://www.epa.gov/hg/effects.htm

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/29/us/a-capitol-hill-mystery-who-aided-drug-maker.html

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21350943

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20803069

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21549155

19. Why is it that only 40% of health professionals receive the flu shot each year? They must not believe in it.

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/ColdandFluNews/story?id=6418974&page=1

20. Why? Instead of a mandatory vaccine law, why don’t they have a mandatory law passed to protect us from Iatrogenic Death? (Death by Doctor, 3rd leading cause of death!)

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2000/07/30/doctors-death-part-one.aspx

http://www.worldlawdirect.com/article/749/medical-malpractice-basic-information.html

21. Why doesn’t the pro vaccination public admit that the vaccinated spread disease and stop blaming us?

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102473744

http://www.nc.cdc.gov/eid/article/6/5/00-0512_article

image: http://livelovefruit.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Vaccination2.jpg

Image Source: Varivax Instrucctions

Vaccination2

22. Why do people still trust their government health agencies when they say vaccines are perfectly safe?

With all the big pharma fraud cases, Merck, Glaxo Smith Kline, etc. and all the class action suits that come out several times a year for death/injury you see on tv commercials every week, combine that with the VICP and VAERS .gov statistics, and Iatrogenic Death statistics, why do people still trust their government health agencies when they say vaccines are perfectly safe? Having said that, why is government trusted at all since Democide statistics (death by government) show that nearly 300 million in this last century were killed by the state. Those are non-combatants.

University of Hawaii Study: https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM

23. Why do they put aborted fetal cells in Vaccines? Also DNA from monkeys, chickens, human tumour cells?image: http://livelovefruit.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Vaccination3.jpg

Vaccination3

Sources: 1st box, page 4; 2nd box, page 7, section 13.1; 3rd box, page 7; 4th box, page 3; 5th box, page 18

24. Why is Aluminum being used as an adjuvant in vaccines when there are many .gov studies against it’s use as Toxic?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4202242/ (Go to Section 1.2. The Toxic Effects of Aluminum as a Vaccine Adjuvant. One of many aluminum studies)

25. Why do people think the government can’t get away with secret human testing of disease, drugs, and chemicals on us when they have done it and apologized for it numerous times?

When they put toxic ingredients in vaccines, food, drugs, water and our sky that have no long term safety studies by any government health agency, that is tantamount to human experimentation. It’s a crime under the Geneva Convention, Nuremberg Code and our own constitution, and against medical informed consent laws.

Al Gore admits government experimentation

Bill Clinton apology for secret human experimentation

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/41811750/ns/health-health_care/t/ugly-past-us-human-experiments-uncovered/#.VQDefeEYGgg

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_depopu28.htm

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12656420 (government study admitting experimentation of large populaces with aerosol vaccines)



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/22/2015 10:48:52 AM

Nearly 19% of Female College Freshmen will be Victims of Rape or Attempted Rape


The results of a study from a university in the Northeast are pretty shocking. (Photo: Getty Images)

Just last week, NFL first draft pick and current Florida State University (FSU) quarterback Jameis Winston filed a lawsuit — claiming damages upward of $75,000 — against the young woman who had filed a Title IX suit against FSU and sued Winston for sexual assault.

“Mr. Winston brings this action against Ms. Kinsman out of necessity, not malice or ill will,” the court filing said.

And while Erica Kinsman not only filed suits against FSU and Winston, she also went public with her story in the documentary film The Hunting Ground, which premiered at the Sundance Film Festival this year. While Winston says otherwise, Kinsman tells a troubling story of assault — and the way in which the university sought to sweep her allegations under the carpet — in the film. (The DNA from Kinsman’s rape kit matched a sample taken from Winston.)

The prevalence of these stories of campus assault have been dominating the news of late, indicating an epidemic of rape and sexual assault at American colleges.

In a study released today, the Journal of Adolescent Healthfinds that 18.6 percent of college women are the victims of rape or attempted rape by the end of their freshman year.

Related: What’s Really Behind College Rape Culture?

By the beginning of their sophomore year, that number will have risen to 26 percent for incapacitated rape — or rape involving drugs or alcohol — and 22 percent for forcible rape. The study surveyed 483 college women attending a Northeastern university. The women were surveyed when they first arrived on campus, after the fall semester, after the spring semester, and then again at the conclusion of the summer following their freshman year.

Professor Kate Carey of Brown University’s School of Public Health, the study’s lead author, told Yahoo Health that unfortunately, the findings of her research “are not surprising.”

“Data like these highlight the need to develop programs to proactively prevent sexual assault, for clear and responsive policies for handling such violence when it occurs, and for programs that provide support for victims,” Carey added when asked what changes she would like to see on campuses as a result of her research.

Related: Should Sororities Host Their Own Parties To Prevent Rape?

Carey’s research found that this disturbing trend does not exist in a vacuum; these patterns of behavior begin before students first enter college. Eighteen percent of the same group of students surveyed were reported to have been the victims of attempted and/or incapacitated rape, 15 percent reported forced rape, and overall 28 percent reported rape or attempted rape before they entered college. Furthermore, students who were the victims of incapacitated rape before they entered college were six times more likely to be forcibly raped during their freshman year compared with women who had not experienced incapacitated rape before college.

Carey also points to research done by others that has found that aggression, adoption of traditional masculine gender roles, low empathy, acceptance of rape myths, acceptability of using force in a relationship, and endorsing stereotypes regarding women who drink are all associated with sexual assault. “Thus, certain individuals may be prone to engaging in sexual aggression, then alcohol and peer expectation may provide the supportive environment” for rape on campuses, she said.

In an accompanying editorial in the Journal of Adolescent Health by Heather McCauley, of the Department of Pediatrics of the University of Pittsburgh, and Adam Casler, director of community living at Siena College, write that Carey’s research indicates the need for “a trauma-informed approach to preventing and working with survivors of campus sexual assault.

Related: Why Women Are Giving Up The Pill

Trauma-informed prevention promotes empowerment and recognizes that sexual assault may affect everything about survivors moving forward, including peer relationships, academic progress, likelihood of engaging in subsequent risky alcohol use, and poor mental health.

Furthermore, the authors write:

“It also guides us to approach all students as though they have experienced abuse, regardless of whether they have or not, so that we begin each interaction with students prepared to support them where they are. A trauma-informed approach does not necessarily seek disclosure, rather it shifts our frame of reference so that we are mindful of the myriad of experiences that may influence our students. It also equips us with language to normalize conversations about violence, an important step in shifting the culture on campuses from one plagued by silence to one that challenges the misconception that sexual assault is normal or acceptable. … Comprehensive prevention efforts must include training to promote positive bystander intervention and incorporate violence prevention messages into health and wellness education to engage the college community on an ongoing and sustained basis about this important issue.”

“Parents, educators, coaches, and other influential adults all have a role to play in educating boys and girls about health relationships and mutual respect,” Carey tells Yahoo Health, speaking on how sexual assault can be addressed proactively before the men perpetrating these rapes enter college. “Sex health education should go beyond the plumbing and address healthy relationships. Role modeling by adult males is needed. Calling out misogynous language and exploitive marketing is needed.”

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/22/2015 10:58:31 AM

Ireland looks set to back gay marriage in landmark referendum

Reuters


Associated Press Videos
Ireland to Vote on Gay Marriage

Watch video

By Padraic Halpin and Conor Humphries

DUBLIN (Reuters) - Ireland votes on Friday on whether to allow gay marriage in a referendum that could make the once deeply Catholic country the first in the world to adopt the policy by popular vote.

The reform is backed by all political parties, championed by big employers and endorsed by celebrities, all hoping it will mark a transformation in the last country in Western Europe to decriminalize homosexuality just over two decades ago.

Opponents, including noticeably low-key church leaders, have raised concerns over parenthood and surrogacy rights for gay couples. But polls indicate that the referendum will be passed by a margin of as much as two-to-one.

"My message to people is that if you believe in equality, do not be complacent, do not leave it to others," said Prime Minister Enda Kenny, a practicing Catholic who has spoken of his personal journey to become a leading advocate for gay marriage.

"Say yes, yes to inclusion, yes to rights, yes to love, yes to equality. Take away those burdens for people and let them be who they are."

A number of U.S. states recognize gay unions as do Brazil, France, New Zealand, Britain and other countries, but none have extended civil marriage to same-sex couples by way of a national referendum. Recent votes in Slovenia and Croatia were rejected.

Pollsters say a ratification may hinge on whether younger voters, tens of thousands of whom have registered to vote in recent months, actually turn up to cast their ballot.

Results, which will be declared on Saturday, will also be closely watched for an urban/rural split. When voters legalized divorce by a razor thin majority in 1995, only five of the 30 constituencies outside Dublin backed the proposal.

Shorn of much of its influence after a series of sex abuse scandals, the Catholic Church has mainly limited its campaigning to sermons to its remaining flock but nevertheless made a last minute appeal to voters.

"I think the days when Bishops tell people how to vote is long since gone but we have constantly said this is not a simple thing," Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin told national broadcaster RTE in a rare interview.

"Marriage isn't just about two people falling in love, marriage and family and children are all linked together and you can't tear them apart."

(Editing by Andrew Heavens)




The once deeply Catholic country could become the first in the world to adopt the policy by popular vote.
Expected to pass easily


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/22/2015 11:10:49 AM

Environmentalists seize on latest Santa Barbara oil spill

Associated Press

Associated Press Videos
Calif. Oil Spill Spreads to 9 Miles of Beaches

Watch video

GOLETA, Calif. (AP) — The latest oil spill on the Santa Barbara coast is just a drop in the bucket compared with the area's catastrophic blowout in 1969, but it has become a new rallying point for environmentalists in their battle against drilling and fossil fuels.

No one expects damage on the order of the '69 disaster, which helped give rise to the modern environmental movement and led to passage of some of the nation's most important environmental laws.

Nevertheless, the new spill from a ruptured underground pipe is being held up as another reason to oppose such things as fracking, the Keystone XL pipeline that would run from Canada to Texas, the moving of crude by train, and drilling in far-flung places.

"What we see from this event is that the industry still poses enormous risks to an area we cannot afford to lose," said Joel Reynolds of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The timing of the leak — days after a federal agency approved Shell's plan for drilling in the Arctic, and while the Obama administration considers opening the Atlantic to exploration — could work to the advantage of environmental groups.

Closer to home, it could galvanize opposition to plans for new drilling in the Santa Barbara Channel, where Union Oil's platform blew out 46 years ago, spewing an estimated 3 million gallons of crude along 30 miles of coast. Some 9,000 birds died.

Tuesday's spill involved an estimated 105,000 gallons of crude; about 21,000 is believed to have made it to the sea and split into slicks that stretched 9 miles along the same stretch of coast fouled in 1969. A 23-mile by 7-mile area was closed to fishing.

As of Thursday, more than 9,000 gallons had been raked, skimmed and vacuumed up, officials said.

The thick, powerful-smelling crude coated rocks and sand, but only six oil-coated pelicans and one juvenile sea lion had been rescued.

There was no estimate on the cost of the cleanup.

The 24-inch pipe, built in 1987, had no previous problems and was thoroughly inspected in 2012, according to its operator, Plains All American Pipeline. The pipe underwent similar tests about two weeks ago, though the results had not been analyzed yet.

Company officials said it can take weeks or months after excavation and inspection of the broken pipeline to determine the cause of the spill.

The 1969 spill was a watershed event in the area and also for the nation.

Artist Bud Bottoms remembers yelling, "We've got to get oil out!" thus coining what became a rallying cry and the name of the organization he founded, Get Oil Out, or GOO.

"We made so much noise about the oil spill in our pristine Santa Barbara coast that it was called the 'environmental shot heard 'round the world,'" Bottoms said.

The stench was terrible, and he remembers people crying at the sight of the beaches. Inmates were brought in to help spread bales of straw to sop up the mess.

His group helped gather 200,000 signatures to get the oil rigs removed from the coast. That never happened, but over the next few years significant legislation was passed to protect endangered species and the air and water. The first Earth Day was celebrated in 1970.

Sean Anderson, environmental professor at California State University, Channel Islands, said he doesn't think this week's spill will have any effect on policies or regulations, mostly because there are so many already in place.

"The 1969 spill created a panoply of federal, state and county level regulations and laws," he said. "From that watershed event, a huge array of policy and procedural tools emerged."

Tupper Hull, a spokesman with Western States Petroleum Association, said the industry expects a certain amount of blowback but not necessarily new regulation.

"It's no secret that there are groups that have an agenda to curtail energy production in California," Hull said. "They will no doubt reference this tragedy in their advocacy. We will respond with a measured, thoughtful response that will make full use of facts."

Plains All American and its subsidiaries operate more than 6,000 miles of hazardous liquid pipelines in at least 20 states, according to company reports. Those companies handle more than 4 million barrels of crude and other liquid fuels daily.

Since 2006, the companies have reported 199 accidents and been subject to 22 enforcement actions by federal regulators. The accidents resulted in a combined 725,500 gallons of hazardous liquids spilled and damage topping $25 million.

Corrosion was determined to be the cause in more than 80 of those accidents. Failures in materials, welds and other equipment were cited more than 70 times.

Enforcement cases against the companies resulted in the collection of $154,000 in penalties, according to a federal database.

Patrick Hodgins, senior director of safety for Plains All American, said the company has spent more than $1.3 billion since 2007 on maintenance, repair and enhancement of its equipment.

"Safety is not just a priority; it's actually a core value at Plains," he said.

One local group that arose out of the 1969 disaster was the local Environmental Defense Center, which is now trying to block certain drilling projects.

"It doesn't matter how many laws you have on the books or how many regulations you have and it doesn't matter what advancements are made in technology," said Linda Krop, the group's chief counsel. "Oil development is risky business and will result in oil spills."

___

Associated Press writers John Antczak in Los Angeles and Matthew Brown in Billings, Montana, contributed to this story.GOLETA, Calif. (AP) — The latest oil spill on the Santa Barbara coast is just a drop in the bucket compared with the area's catastrophic blowout in 1969, but it has become a new rallying point for environmentalists in their battle against drilling and fossil fuels.

No one expects damage on the order of the '69 disaster, which helped give rise to the modern environmental movement and led to passage of some of the nation's most important environmental laws.

Nevertheless, the new spill from a ruptured underground pipe is being held up as another reason to oppose such things as fracking, the Keystone XL pipeline that would run from Canada to Texas, the moving of crude by train, and drilling in far-flung places.

"What we see from this event is that the industry still poses enormous risks to an area we cannot afford to lose," said Joel Reynolds of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The timing of the leak — days after a federal agency approved Shell's plan for drilling in the Arctic, and while the Obama administration considers opening the Atlantic to exploration — could work to the advantage of environmental groups.

Closer to home, it could galvanize opposition to plans for new drilling in the Santa Barbara Channel, where Union Oil's platform blew out 46 years ago, spewing an estimated 3 million gallons of crude along 30 miles of coast. Some 9,000 birds died.

Tuesday's spill involved an estimated 105,000 gallons of crude; about 21,000 is believed to have made it to the sea and split into slicks that stretched 9 miles along the same stretch of coast fouled in 1969. A 23-mile by 7-mile area was closed to fishing.

As of Thursday, more than 9,000 gallons had been raked, skimmed and vacuumed up, officials said.

The thick, powerful-smelling crude coated rocks and sand, but only six oil-coated pelicans and one juvenile sea lion had been rescued.

There was no estimate on the cost of the cleanup.

The 24-inch pipe, built in 1987, had no previous problems and was thoroughly inspected in 2012, according to its operator, Plains All American Pipeline. The pipe underwent similar tests about two weeks ago, though the results had not been analyzed yet.

Company officials said it can take weeks or months after excavation and inspection of the broken pipeline to determine the cause of the spill.

The 1969 spill was a watershed event in the area and also for the nation.

Artist Bud Bottoms remembers yelling, "We've got to get oil out!" thus coining what became a rallying cry and the name of the organization he founded, Get Oil Out, or GOO.

"We made so much noise about the oil spill in our pristine Santa Barbara coast that it was called the 'environmental shot heard 'round the world,'" Bottoms said.

The stench was terrible, and he remembers people crying at the sight of the beaches. Inmates were brought in to help spread bales of straw to sop up the mess.

His group helped gather 200,000 signatures to get the oil rigs removed from the coast. That never happened, but over the next few years significant legislation was passed to protect endangered species and the air and water. The first Earth Day was celebrated in 1970.

Sean Anderson, environmental professor at California State University, Channel Islands, said he doesn't think this week's spill will have any effect on policies or regulations, mostly because there are so many already in place.

"The 1969 spill created a panoply of federal, state and county level regulations and laws," he said. "From that watershed event, a huge array of policy and procedural tools emerged."

Tupper Hull, a spokesman with Western States Petroleum Association, said the industry expects a certain amount of blowback but not necessarily new regulation.

"It's no secret that there are groups that have an agenda to curtail energy production in California," Hull said. "They will no doubt reference this tragedy in their advocacy. We will respond with a measured, thoughtful response that will make full use of facts."

Plains All American and its subsidiaries operate more than 6,000 miles of hazardous liquid pipelines in at least 20 states, according to company reports. Those companies handle more than 4 million barrels of crude and other liquid fuels daily.

Since 2006, the companies have reported 199 accidents and been subject to 22 enforcement actions by federal regulators. The accidents resulted in a combined 725,500 gallons of hazardous liquids spilled and damage topping $25 million.

Corrosion was determined to be the cause in more than 80 of those accidents. Failures in materials, welds and other equipment were cited more than 70 times.

Enforcement cases against the companies resulted in the collection of $154,000 in penalties, according to a federal database.

Patrick Hodgins, senior director of safety for Plains All American, said the company has spent more than $1.3 billion since 2007 on maintenance, repair and enhancement of its equipment.

"Safety is not just a priority; it's actually a core value at Plains," he said.

One local group that arose out of the 1969 disaster was the local Environmental Defense Center, which is now trying to block certain drilling projects.

"It doesn't matter how many laws you have on the books or how many regulations you have and it doesn't matter what advancements are made in technology," said Linda Krop, the group's chief counsel. "Oil development is risky business and will result in oil spills."

___

Associated Press writers John Antczak in Los Angeles and Matthew Brown in Billings, Montana, contributed to this story.




More than 8,300 gallons of oil have been raked, skimmed, and vacuumed from California's central coast.
Environmentalists rally


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/22/2015 1:19:27 PM

Hundreds protest Wash. police wounding of 2 unarmed suspects

Associated Press

Olympia Police Chief Ronnie Roberts, center, stands with prosecutor Jon Tunheim, right, and Thurston County Sheriff's Office Chief Deputy Brad Watkins, left, as they wait to talk to reporters, Thursday, May 21, 2015, in Olympia, Wash. Two stepbrothers suspected of trying to steal beer from the store were shot early Thursday in Olympia by a police officer who confronted them nearby and reported he was being assaulted with a skateboard. The stepbrothers are expected to survive. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)

View Gallery

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — Hundreds marched peacefully in Washington state's capital city to protest a police shooting that wounded two unarmed stepbrothers suspected of trying to steal beer from a grocery store.

The officer reported he was being assaulted with a skateboard early Thursday before the shooting that left a 21-year-old man in critical condition and a 24-year-old man in stable condition. Both were expected to survive.

The stepbrothers are black, and the officer is white, but Olympia Police Chief Ronnie Roberts said, "There's no indication to me that race was a factor in this case at all."

Protesters who turned out Thursday evening held signs that read "Race is a Factor" and "We Are Grieving."

The two men were identified as Andre Thompson, 24, and Bryson Chaplin, 21, both of Olympia.

"It was terrible," the young men's mother, Crystal Chaplin, told KIRO-TV. "It's heartbreaking to see two of my babies in the hospital over something stupid."

The shooting is being investigated by a team of detectives from several agencies. Brad Watkins, chief deputy of the Thurston County Sheriff's Department, said two skateboards were recovered from the shooting scene and an investigation will likely take three to six weeks. The young men had no guns, investigators said.

The crowd of demonstrators rallied first at a park, then marched about a mile to a building that houses the Olympia police headquarters and City Hall. Protesters chanted "Black Lives Matter," ''No Justice, No Peace" and the names of the young men who were shot.

Olympia police tweeted their thanks to marchers "for keeping the event nonviolent."

"We are committed to helping our community work through this difficult circumstance and help us understand this tragic event," the police chief told a news conference Thursday afternoon.

Officer Ryan Donald was among those who responded around 1 a.m. Thursday to a call from a Safeway store, Roberts said. Employees said two men tried to steal beer and then threw the alcohol at workers who confronted the pair.

Officers split up to search for the men. Donald encountered two men with skateboards who fit witnesses' descriptions, and moments later, he radioed in that shots had been fired, the police chief said.

In radio calls released by police, Donald calls dispatchers once he spots the men, and again to report that he fired shots.

"I believe one of them is hit, both of them are running," Donald said.

He tells dispatchers that one of the men "assaulted me with his skateboard."

"I tried to grab his friend," Donald said. "They're very aggressive, just so you know."

He says he has one man, then both, at gunpoint and asks for help.

Seconds later, he shouts, "Shots fired! One down," and asks for more backup units. He then says the second man has been shot.

The police chief said Donald wasn't injured but an officer "has the right to defend himself" if a suspect wields an object that could be used as a deadly weapon.

Donald, 35, who is on administrative leave pending the investigation, has been with the department for just over three years. No residents have filed complaints against him, and he was recently recognized by the agency for being proactive on investigations, Roberts said. He worked previously as an Army police officer, the chief said.

The shooting follows a string of high-profile killings of unarmed black men by police, including Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, and Eric Garner in New York City, which set off weeks of protests and a national "Black Lives Matter" movement that has gained momentum across the country.

Olympia Mayor Stephen H. Buxbaum called for calm in the community.

"It deeply saddens me that we have two young people in the hospital as a result of an altercation with an officer of the law," he said. "Let's come together to support their needs, the officer's needs, the needs of the families and our community's needs. Let's not be reactive."

Merritt Long, a retired chairman of the state's liquor control board, was one of several residents to attend the news conference Thursday.

"Does the punishment fit the crime?" he asked afterward. "Given the seeming epidemic of this happening not only here but in our country, it makes you pause and wonder what's going on."




Police shoot unarmed men accused of beer theft


A Washington state officer shot and wounded two stepbrothers suspected of trying to steal beer from a grocery store.
Hundreds protest

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!